I've rarely posted in this group, but always found it useful to follow the
various discussions. Now, sadly, it's unsubscribe time for me.
These days the only way it seems to 'benefit' me is to bring in a high
volume of spam from recruiter scum. I've tried adding a few to the spam
filter but it get
No.
On 22 Jun 2016 13:04, wrote:
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Android Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to th
It depends on your budget and needs. Get the best you can, that's
appropriate for you, with the money you have. There are so many factors
that depend on your needs. Is something large, powerful and battery-hungry
going to be sufficient because it's going to spend most of the time sat on
a desk, or
Shove your spam where the sun doesn't shine.
On 24 Mar 2016 12:40, "Shaik Sadiq" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Hope you are doing well !!!
>
> I have an urgent requirement for an *PROJECT MANAGER. *Please let me know
> if you Interested and get back to me with their updated resume in .doc
> format immediately
Hi,
To communicate via your USB to serial interface, use Android drivers
supplied by the manufacturer. The main USB to serial interfaces to support
are Prolific and FTDI. If you Google those two, you can find the Android
driver library for each, which you'd include in your project.
I have an Andr
This group is for discussing Android development and helping with specific
issues. Nobody here is going to sit and write source code for you.
On 11 Mar 2016 17:50, "Sandeep Kale" wrote:
> I am creating child vaccination reminder apk on android eclipse i am stuck
> on a question how to show vacci
I think it takes a while for servers to fully update and for your app to be
visible in searches.
On 11 Mar 2016 15:09, "Stuart Humphreys" wrote:
> Hi Y'all,
>
> Just uploaded my first App to the play store, "Flagz", a flag based quiz.
>
> However, although it is showing as published and visible i
On Thursday, January 7, 2016 at 3:29:14 PM UTC-8, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
>
> I sent a message last night but I can not see it.
>
It was stuck in moderation, since the mod bit on your account was still
set. See my 2nd post in this thread for instructions.
--
Trevor Johns
Google Developer
try Genymotion (https://www.genymotion.com), which is a
third-party emulator that some developers have reported success with. It's
a paid product though, and not endorsed by Google.
--
Trevor Johns
Google Developer Programs, Android
http://developer.android.com
If HAXM doesn't work
your moderation bit has been
cleared and your future posts will show up immediately. Your past messages
have also been approved.
Alternatively, for other folks, I believe unsubscribing and immediately
re-subscribing would be another way clear your moderation bit.
--
Trevor Johns
Google Deve
asking
for an HttpParams object.
--
Trevor Johns
Google Developer Programs, Android
http://developer.android.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android
Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
rwarded this on to the team that
maintans that page, and hopefully we'll get it fixed up quickly.
(Tracking as internal issue 26105368.)
--
Trevor Johns
Google Developer Programs, Android
http://developer.andriod.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Grou
sers to jump from Google Search
results directly into your app. Slightly different experience, but there is
some overlap with the link you posted -- so depending on what you're
looking for perhaps that will be useful to you.
--
Trevor Johns
Google Developer Programs, Android
http://de
t this behavior is too easy to trigger and too hard
to get out of. We're looking into it.
--
Trevor Johns
Google Developer Programs, Android
http://developer.android.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Android Developers" group.
To
Tragically, this is actually less vague than the functional specifications
I get given at work.
On 4 Dec 2015 09:03, "All4business בניית תוכנות ואתרים" <
all4businessc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> hello
> i need android studio code example that user open new event and press how
> many tables he need and
rses were developed by engineers on Google's Developer Relations
team (my department!), so I can vouch for the quality. ;)
--
Trevor Johns
Google Developer Programs, Android
http://developer.android.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android
practice:
https://github.com/googlesamples/android-ConfirmCredential
--
Trevor Johns
Google Developer Programs, Android
http://developer.android.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android
Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this grou
d9-8027-b834f44cfd03
Basically you're going to have to troubleshoot your system from the
ground up. (Make sure temperatures are within spec, remove software that
interfaces with the BIOS, clear your BIOS settings, etc.) If all of that
fails, you likely have a bad CPU.
--
Trevor Johns
Go
What research and programming efforts have you tried so far?
On 1 Dec 2015 07:21, "Ali Ghassan" wrote:
> how i can Bluetooth multi pairing in LG G3?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Android Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group an
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/android-developers/mo_djBs5_EY
--
Trevor Johns
Google Developer Programs, Android
http://developer.android.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send e
also contact
the group owners via
email: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!contactowner/android-developers
--
Trevor Johns
Google Developer Programs, Android
http://developer.android.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers"
Does anything in this SO QA help?
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/27376465/android-studio-doesnt-start-fails-saying-components-not-installed
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Kimberly Crawley
wrote:
> I would really appreciate anyone with experience using Android Studio in
> Linux to help m
In my layman's point of view, what strikes me immediately about your site
is that after spending a few minutes looking around, I could not find any
acknowledgement whatsoever regarding the intellectual property rights of
the owners of the media or text you're placing on your website.
>From what I
Hello,
Through ACRA, I have received a small number of reports from an alpha build
of software that show that an exception is occurring during a specific call
to Canvas.restore(). The exception is java.lang.IllegalStateException:
Underflow in restore.
I am well aware that this exception shall
I would expect that your "check_for_data()" is actually performing an
InputStream.read() or .read(buffer) or .read(buffer, byteOffset,
byteCount), all of which are calls that block until data is available.
While in a call that blocks, the thread won't load the CPU.
Trev
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 1
OK, sure! I hope a single star will do.
On 4 Oct 2013 07:39, "Dharmendra Deshmukh" wrote:
> https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.parkhya.swami
>
>
> https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.parkhya.SmsrejectionNew
>
> https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.parkhya
e Developer API, which
might explain why you were still seeing non-renewing subscriptions.)
--
Trevor Johns
Google Developer Programs, Android
http://developer.android.com
On Thursday, August 9, 2012 11:38:03 PM UTC-7, fibercode wrote:
>
> Trevor,
>
> Thank you for your prompt respo
ogize the inconvenience this has caused, and our team will
be taking steps to ensure similar incidents do not occur in the future.
--
Trevor Johns
Google Developer Programs, Android
http://developer.android.com
On Thursday, August 9, 2012 12:03:23 PM UTC-7, fibercode wrote:
>
> One of
ork and ensuring that the server
application works internally, before testing against the 3G cellular
network?
Hope these tips help push you in the right direction :)
Cheers,
Trevor Sullivan
http://trevorsullivan.net
http://twitter.com/pcgeek86
On Wednesday, 1 August 2012 12:17:59 UTC-5, n
droid documentation linked by Luiz should also be of great use, once
you learn the Java language basics. Be prepared to spend a lot of time
reading and testing!
Hope this helps,
Trevor Sullivan
On Sunday, 29 July 2012 13:14:29 UTC-5, Rithanya wrote:
>
> Hey Everyone!
> I have Samsung Nexus whic
On Jul 11, 1:55 pm, bob wrote:
> Is there any way for an app to reboot an Android Ice Cream sandwich phone?
Not on user builds, no.
-- Trevor
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send ema
Looks like I spoke just a few minutes too soon. The source just went
live again 30 minutes ago.
Gitweb/Gerritt are still down, but the Git mirrors are online and
serving code again. Details here:
http://groups.google.com/group/android-building/msg/c73c14f9b0dcd15a
On Oct 19, 12:54 pm, Trevor
27;ve been doing
to get ICS shipped.
In the meantime, you can find a mirror of the source here:
https://github.com/android
--
Trevor Johns
Developer Programs Engineer, Android
http://developer.android.com
On Oct 19, 9:14 am, Jared wrote:
> This downtime is getting old. Google needs to
now if
there's anything else you need.
--
Trevor Johns
Developer Programs Engineer, Android
http://developer.android.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to android-
No. That's a policy issue for app developers. (Developers might decide that,
depending on the nature of whatever's being purchased, that they don't want
to issue refunds, even over email.)
It's something you'd have to explain in your UI.
--
Trevor Johns
Developer Progra
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Kostya Vasilyev wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> Is that somehow explained to the user during the checkout process?
>
> -- Kostya
>
Yes. See the bold text in the middle screenshot here:
http://developer.android.com/images/billing_checkout_flow.png
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Haroon Khalid
wrote:
> Can we ban indian people?
>
No.
--
Trevor Johns
Developer Programs Engineer, Android
http://developer.android.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Brill Pappin wrote:
> What about uploading as a paid app and then changing it to free?
>
> - Brill
>
>
You cannot change a paid app to free. Once a paid app, always a paid app.
--
Trevor Johns
Developer Programs Engineer, Android
http://develo
In-app purchases have no refund window.
(The developer can still manually issue a refund via their Checkout merchant
console, but the user would need to manually email you.)
--
Trevor Johns
Developer Programs Engineer, Android
http://developer.android.com
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:33 AM
Indeed. android-platform is probably a better choice for this. However, I'll
go ahead and forward this on to JBQ anyway so he can take a look at it.
(Note that the froyo-plus-aosp branch does seem to exist, so you could give
that a try and see if it suits your needs.)
--
Trevor Johns
Deve
Err, typo there: Free apps cannot request
the com.android.vending.CHECK_LICENSE permission.
(Billing works just fine with free apps.)
--
Trevor Johns
Developer Programs Engineer, Android
http://developer.android.com
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Trevor Johns wrote:
> Technically
at we just missed before publishing. I'll
submit a change to remove it to prevent confusion.)
--
Trevor Johns
Developer Programs Engineer, Android
http://developer.android.com
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 6:14 AM, MarcoAndroid wrote:
> @rojorshi: here's the link you were looking for I th
People, please don't respond to these threads. It makes cleaning up the spam
harder (because now I have to delete *your* posts too to make the original
content disappear).
Click on the "report" link or forward them to the list owners and we'll take
care of things.
--
Tr
All Nexus S devices are unlocked. You can use any GSM SIM in them (though
whether you get 3G depends on the carrier), sideload apps if you need, and
you can unlock the bootloader by running 'fastboot oem unlock'.
(Note that unlocking the bootloader will void your warranty.)
--
Tr
sing it right. ;)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=geAXiC7vqe0
--
Trevor Johns
Developer Programs Engineer, Android
http://developer.android.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to
operly, then yes.
However, if the user disabled the backup service or doesn't sign into their
phone during the setup wizard (i.e. they skip signing into their account
until later), then we can't restore.
--
Trevor Johns
Developer Programs Engineer, Android
http://developer.android.com
-
and you'll be fine.
--
Trevor Johns
Developer Programs Engineer, Android
http://developer.android.com
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 2:11 PM, tomgibara wrote:
> I've just finished reading the preliminary documentation for in-app
> billing.
>
> If I've understood correc
to do. Sorry about that.)
--
Trevor Johns
Developer Programs Engineer, Android
http://developer.android.com
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 5:53 AM, ob1 wrote:
> Hi,
> for your information, the following page has 3 reference links at the
> bottom. All return a 404 for me.
> Wor
unt with your account for this to appear.)
3. What is the refund time window? Is it 15 mins for In-App billing
> also?
>
There is no end-user refund period. If you want to issue a refund, it has to
be done manually by the application publisher through their Checkout
merchant console.
--
Tre
ed, you'll get it automatically. (Market has the ability to
auto-update itself.)
--
Trevor Johns
Developer Programs Engineer, Android
http://developer.android.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post t
that already use "pro keys". You'd just be adding a second
check with the in-app billing service for a license that's been purchased in
the past.
--
Trevor Johns
Developer Programs Engineer, Android
http://developer.android.com
--
You received this message because you are sub
ks for your understanding, and happy holidays!
--
Trevor Johns
Developer Advocate, Android
http://developer.android.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@google
because i like it), I
> need to get it through the Market.
> See:http://market.android.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=141659
Create a new GMail account for testing purposes.
--
Trevor Johns
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "An
Hi Filip,
thanks for your feedback
1) There always has been an option to not use the accelerometer to
play the game, in the latest release I have allowed the user to
disable the shake and rotate independently, and tweaked how those
modes work.
2) In the latest version I have tweaked how much you
e to obfuscate our code?
It's coming. We have two articles in the queue that will cover this topic.
As soon as they're ready, we'll publish them.
--
Trevor Johns
Google Developer Programs, Android
http://developer.android.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
FYI: We have a blog post up on this topic. It covers many of the points I
made earlier, but I figured it's worth pointing out.
http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2010/08/licensing-server-news.html
--
Trevor Johns
Google Developer Programs, Android
http://developer.android.com
or all applications -- which would be very bad.
And on top of that, you're vulnerable to somebody decompiling the APK and
removing the code that performs the RPC check.
And you've removed the ability to perform a server-side license check if you
want.
No, this is worse idea in every way.
documentation, but we should probably be more explicit about
how to use it.
--
Trevor Johns
Google Developer Programs, Android
http://developer.android.com
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Jonas Larsson wrote:
> An official response would great.
>
> As I (and many others) see it the mai
you won't
be able to renew the license. So, after the license expires (~7 days), the
application will try and contact Android Market again and the license check
will fail.
StrictPolicy is unaffected.
--
Trevor Johns
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Maps.Huge.Info (Maps API Guru) <
cor..
r this checked into our internal Git repo, so once that
change propagates to vendors this shouldn't be an issue on future devices.
For existing devices though, if you absolutely depend on the uniqueness of
ANDROID_ID, you'll unfortunately need to rely on some other identifier
(IMEI, WiFi MAC
tings as a result. Things are
beginning to slowly pick-up now though.
I have a few improvements in mind, most obviously a high-scores table.
I am also considering implementing 'user activated' power-ups, any
suggestions?
Thanks,
Trevor
--
You received this message because you are subs
ingerprint?
(Settings > About phone > Build number)
Thanks!
--
Trevor Johns
On Aug 16, 12:45 pm, String wrote:
> On Aug 16, 8:06 pm, "Maps.Huge.Info (Maps API Guru)"
>
> wrote:
> > Seems to be a problem that's mostly with the DROID2.
>
> Yeah, I st
nsole settings for the developer/testers, and purely
by purchase history for everyone else.
--
Trevor Johns
Google Developer Programs, Android
http://developer.android.com
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 4:18 AM, Mark Carter wrote:
> So to confirm. If an app is not published (nor draft) then the res
and not get charged.
FWIW, you shouldn't be getting NOT_LICENSED if you have LICENSED set --
unless you're testing too frequently, in which case you'll start getting
HTTP 503 errors (which is our rate limiting mechanism for
misbehaving applications).
--
Trevor Johns
Goog
You're probably seeing that because you're using a test response. The server
sends a policy for test responses that disables caching.
--
Trevor Johns
Google Developer Programs, Android
http://developer.android.com
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 9:32 AM, String wrote:
> My experience so fa
t for you here:
http://code.google.com/p/marketlicensing/issues/detail?id=12
For now, the recommend behavior is to just have a retry button when the
license check fails.
--
Trevor Johns
Google Developer Programs, Android
http://developer.android.com
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:55 PM, BoD wrote:
&g
seem to be documented well, so I'll make sure that gets fixed.
Cheers!
--
Trevor Johns
Google Developer Programs, Android
http://developer.android.com
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 7:30 AM, sblantipodi wrote:
> Hi, since as I told you I'm on holidays and have no access on my pc
n code for your application.)
--
Trevor Johns
Google Developer Programs, Android
http://developer.android.com
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 12:46 AM, Mark Carter wrote:
> *I* only ever get LICENSED if I have set my Dev Console to return LICENSED.
> If I set it to "Respond normally" I get NOT
if the current user has a developer
account, and will send a test response (if one is set) using the user's RSA
keypair.
--
Trevor Johns
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 12:30 AM, Kirky wrote:
> Trevor,
>
> Can you clarify what the licensing server returns if the App is not in
> the And
make sure
that all three applications are published using the same developer account.
--
Trevor Johns
Google Developer Programs, Android
http://developer.android.com
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Don wrote:
> Hi All,
> I'm having a problem with the LVL in one of my apps.
>
> Her
The reason this happens is because we store the RSA keypair used for license
checks on a per-app/per-version basis. The old version of your application
doesn't have a license key associated with it.
(We probably could make this a bit more clear.)
--
Trevor Johns
Google Developer Pro
I just checked using my Evo running Froyo, and the license check is indeed
mentioned. However, it's not considered "dangerous", so you need to click on
"Show All" to see it.
--
Trevor Johns
Google Devloper Programs, Android
http://developer.android.com
On Mon, Aug
And even if you skip the "request refund" step, we'll see a large number of
license checks for a single account in our logs.
So, not only can we disable that account, but we'll also know who was
responsible. :P
--
Trevor Johns
Google Developer Programs, Android
http://devel
for the package name.)
Also, your developer account will always return a test response or
NOT_LICSENSED (since you can't purchase your own app), so you'll need to
test with a temporary account if you want to test the behavior an end user
will see.
--
Trevor Johns
Google De
Also, can you confirm that if you use your developer account and set
the test response in the Market publisher console to NOT_LICENSED, you
get a NOT_LICENSED response in your application?
--
Trevor Johns
Google Developer Programs, Android
http://developer.android.com
On Aug 3, 7:19 pm, Trevor
cation? I
seem to be getting an error when I try to pull up the details for
com.apptude.android.apps.test.lvltest using the Android Market admin
tools. (I can definitely see an entry for it, but no details. Is it
saved as a draft right now?)
--
Trevor Johns
Google Developer Programs, Android
http://devel
sion, OS build,
etc.)
3. (Optional, but highly useful.) The source code to a simple application
which demonstrates this behavior. (A modified version of the sample app
that's published with the library would be perfect.)
--
Trevor Johns
Google Developer Programs, Android
http://developer.a
Thanks for the heads up! I've just submitted a change to fix this.
--
Trevor Johns
Google Developer Programs, Android
http://developer.android.com
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 8:21 AM, feras wrote:
> Well, its not that big deal but i found a Syntax error in the code for
> C2DM Regis
ocal cache will expire after 1 minute -- which is the
minimum cache lifetime as enforced by ServerManagedPolicy.
--
Trevor Johns
Google Developer Programs, Android
http://developer.android.com
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 3:17 PM, sblantipodi
wrote:
> How can we use ServerManagedPolicy in the emulator
).
This is documented here:
http://developer.android.com/guide/publishing/licensing.html#extras
--
Trevor Johns
Google Developer Programs, Android
http://developer.android.com
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 7:23 AM, sblantipodi
wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm using the ServerManagedPolicy imp
lication in the com.android or com.example
namespaces.
--
Trevor Johns
Google Developer Programs, Android
http://developer.android.com
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 11:52 PM, metal mikey wrote:
> If your R.java isn't being dynamically created it's likely because
> you've got an err
owing that exception to
avoid cluttering the logs. I've opened a bug here:
http://code.google.com/p/marketlicensing/issues/detail?id=9
--
Trevor Johns
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Pent wrote:
> Hate to do it but... bump since it was the weekend.
>
> Any support from Google
HECK_LICENSE permission to the Market
publisher console, *requests* for these applications currently will always
return LICENSED. However, since (again) you can't upload these APKs, this
isn't something that should happen often.
--
Trevor Johns
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 1:30 AM, ojpdev wrot
they must request the CHECK_LICENSE permission.
The user will be informed of this, just like any other permission.
So yes, it's possible to tell at purchase time that an application is using
the LVL.
--
Trevor Johns
Google Developer Programs, Android
http://developer.android.com
--
You
esters.
(Technical note: We return ERROR_NOT_MARKET_MANAGED if we don't recognize
the package name. If you really wanted, you could write a custom policy that
treated this as a LICENSED response for testing purposes.)
--
Trevor Johns
Google Developer Programs, Android
http://developer.andr
7;t highly concerned about the
security of the license check -- and a deterrent is still better than the
alternative.)
--
Trevor Johns
Google Developer Programs, Android
http://developer.android.com
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Mark Carter wrote:
> How does that trip wire work? If t
ipwire that
can optionally delete an application's data if it detects the licensing
shared preferences have been deleted -- a consequence for trying to take
advantage of the grace period as a workaround. Since that's at the top of my
list, there's a very good chance that will be in r2 of
Check the logcat output, there should be some hints in there to tell you why
the license check is failing.
--
Trevor Johns
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:27 AM, sblantipodi
wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm trying the code sample bundled with LVL library...
>
> I builted that code into my
in your
> application without modification or you can adapt it to your needs. For more
> information, see the next section.
> Alternatively, you can write a custom Obfuscator based on your own code or
> use an obfuscator program such as ProGuard for additional security.
--
Trev
int the host name to
> his server which can providing fake licensing result?
>
> Regards,
> Ken
That's why we use public-key cryptography to sign license responses. The
fake licensing server wouldn't have access to the private key. As a result,
the forged license response
a, or replaying it across
applications/devices. Developers are also free to implement their own
Obfuscator if they so choose. (The cache itself contains timestamp data, so
there's no point in replaying the cache data for the same application on the
same device.)
--
Trevor Johns
Google
Developers can chose whether to implement response caching or not.
Assuming caching is enabled, we require a network connection for the first
license check, but then the user can go offline for a period of time before
requiring another license check.
--
Trevor Johns
Google Developer Programs
(One clarification: If this is a beta app, you could also get
NOT_MARKET_MANAGED, so watch out for that.)
--
Trevor Johns
Google Developer Programs, Android
http://developer.android.com
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Trevor Johns wrote:
> Yes, in this case, I think this is the best appro
your server as well, just to make sure it's not being spoofed.
--
Trevor Johns
Google Developer Programs, Android
http://developer.android.com
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Open wrote:
> I just finished reading the docs on Google's new Android License
> Verification Library.
Yes. There's a code sample that's bundled as part of the library download.
You'll find it in $SDK_ROOT/market_licensing/sample.
--
Trevor Johns
Google Developer Programs, Android
http://developer.android.com
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 11:55 AM, sblantipodi
wrote:
> excellent,
as I understand it, so the developer doesn't really have the
> option of shooting themselves in the foot with it.
In many ways, it's more secure to have the code embedded in the application
(which is why we designed the library this way).
If the license check was performed solely by the
They could, for example, create an single APK that checks
with multiple licensing services.
--
Trevor Johns
Google Developer Programs, Android
http://developer.android.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this
rns information on whether your users are authorized to use the
app based on stored sales records."
Developer documentation is available here:
http://developer.android.com/guide/publishing/licensing.html
Happy coding!
--
Trevor Johns
Google Developer Programs, Android
http://develop
head and fixed the problems with the email alias used in the
announcement email. Our apologies for any confusion.
(Like Roman said, please do *not* contact me directly regarding this topic.)
--
Trevor Johns
Google Developer Programs, Android
http://developer.android.com
--
You received this messag
Done. For future reference, most mailing lists (including this one)
include directions for unsubscribing yourself at the bottom of the
message. Following those directions is a lot more reliable and less
time consuming than asking a moderator to do it for you.
--
Trevor Johns
On Jan 16, 3:52 pm
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
