WG: AW: AntHill vs. CruiseControl vs. Gump

2003-01-14 Thread Jan . Materne
Nachricht- Von: Martin Gainty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet am: Freitag, 10. Januar 2003 17:41 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: AW: AntHill vs. CruiseControl vs. Gump I wished that all of the build tools would standardise on 1 format for the Configuration File We have

AW: AntHill vs. CruiseControl vs. Gump

2003-01-13 Thread Ilja Preuss
t; > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 22:11 > Subject: AW: AntHill vs. CruiseControl vs. Gump > > > After reading the chapter in Eriks and Steves book "Java Development with > Ant" > I had chosen CruiseControl. They have written their

AW: AntHill vs. CruiseControl vs. Gump

2003-01-10 Thread Ilja Preuss
> Does anyone have any recommendations for this. My initial thought was to > have a master build.xml file that calls into the component's build.xml. > But after doing to investigation I came across a couple of tools that > seem to be designed for this problem: AntHill, CruiseControl & Gump. > Does

AW: AntHill vs. CruiseControl vs. Gump

2003-01-10 Thread Ilja Preuss
> AntHill at least has a manual, CruiseControl's (lack of) > documentation is appalling. There is a Documentation Wiki for CC: http://c2.com/w4/cc/wiki.cgi?WelcomeVisitors -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

AW: AntHill vs. CruiseControl vs. Gump

2003-01-09 Thread Jan . Materne
After reading the chapter in Eriks and Steves book "Java Development with Ant" I had chosen CruiseControl. They have written their views of the pro´s and con´s to each continous-integration-tool so you could make your own decision. Jan Matèrne -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Nau, Michael