[anti-abuse-wg] To whom do I report China Unicom malfeasance?

Received in reply to attempted criminal breakin: -- hqs-ipab...@chinaunicom.cn (hqs-ipab...@chinaunicom.cn) Remote Server returned '554 5.2.2 mailbox full' Original message: ----- From: Jeffrey Race

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] abuse of the internet by multinationals and nation states

On Sat, 5 May 2018 13:30:29 +0200 (GMT+02:00), Tobi wrote: >Why should I as user not have the right to protect/hide MY personal data in >whois? Because you are using a public resource. Traceability and accountability are essential to the functioning of the public resource

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Why SPAM exists in 2017

See As accurate today as when written. On Sat, 11 Feb 2017 10:11:40 +0200, ox wrote: >Hello Everyone, > >Famously, during 2004, Bill Gates promised the world that Spam would no >longer exist by 2006. > >More than a decade later, spam even penetr

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Language on List

or violate the rules, you define yourself as refined or coarse. Coarse people have fewer life opportunities because they are viewed as inconsiderate of refined persons (who mostly control the worlds institutions). This is basic sociology. I hope it is helpful to my fellow list members. Jeffrey Race

[anti-abuse-wg] Norms of discourse on this newsgroup [was: RBL Discussion Update]

violate the norms of discourse. If you can limit your future contributions to the subject and the expectations of this group I am sure our colleagues will be happy to have you with us. If not then you may be more comfortable raising your ideas in different fora with different expectations and

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Language on List

on of certain cultures. It's unknown in much of the world. It's repugnant to refined sensibilities. Behaving this way doesn't betoken one's "modernity" -- it betoken's one's personal coarseness. Jeffrey Race

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01

e spammers organize their business model in this way expecting most people to have your attitude. This is clearly explained in <http://www.jeffreyrace.com/nugget/spam_05.pdf> Kind regards, Dr. Jeffrey Race, President Cambridge Electronics Laboratories 20 Chester Street, Somerville MA 02144-300

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)

You have misunderstood the English words. I said that the mechanism by which the internet operates was slackly designed and is slackly operated so has become a cesspool of criminality. Jeffrey Race On Fri, 6 Nov 2015 17:14:22 +, Sascha Luck [ml] wrote: >On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 11

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)

On Fri, 6 Nov 2015 15:22:30 +, Sascha Luck [ml] wrote: >>though this makes inevitable the criminal nature of the >>mechanism they are charged with managing. > >The internet resource management mechanism as managed by RIRs and >LIRS is "of a criminal nature", do I understand you correctly? Th

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)

discussion below ("We can't consider that because it would be a lot of work and some people would become upset") would be out of bounds. The matter of the "defining discussion goal" will have to be taken up in order to make progress on this list's putative purpose of "

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)

th the periodic messages I receive in a standard format from NetSol regarding maintenance of my website >Also bear in mind a single data validation is quite pointless. Periodic automated revalidations :) Jeffrey Race

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)

quired at sending end, only at the receiving end to return the token (manually, ensuring that someone is actually managing the public resource in his care). Jeffrey Race

[anti-abuse-wg] Also seeking input [branching from 'WHOIS (AS204224)']

analysis the elaboration in the spoken version will help a lot. My thanks in advance to any of you who find this of interest and might be able to help make the final result something unusual. Jeffrey Race, President Cambridge Electronics Laboratories Co-organizer, "Buddhism Rejoins the Great Co

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Verifiability (was: WHOIS (AS204224))

d not be an anti-spam measure, but it would greatly simplify the next steps in anti-spam processes if the registrar community ever becomes serious about halting spam (itself again easy to do but that is the subject of another message). Kind regards to all Jeffrey Race

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Verifiability (was: WHOIS (AS204224))

On Tue, 03 Nov 2015 02:31:26 +, Aftab Siddiqui wrote: >Yes it is easy.. but not scalable, exception rate would be >very high.. multiply that with 7000+ (members) It's not a problem for the registrar!!No human effort is required at all so the registrar incurs no costs except setting the

[anti-abuse-wg] Verifiability (was: WHOIS (AS204224))

to the terms of registration. If sufficient tokens to not appear, suspension occurs automatically, just as if you don't pay your credit card bill or pay your phone bill. This is easy stuff. Jeffrey Race On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 23:50:25 +0100, Sander Steffann wrote: >Hi Roland, >