it helps me, thanks
Sent via RIPE Forum -- https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum
In message ,
=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Carlos_Fria=E7as?= wrote:
>On Mon, 11 Mar 2019, Fi Shing wrote:
>
>> Why can't it be both?
>>
>> 12.5% annual fee incurred daily, to a maximum of 7 days, with resources
>> being decommissioned if the
> abuse contact is not updated
>> within that time.
>
>This is
--- Original Message ----
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Verification of abuse contact addresses ?
From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" mailto:r...@tristatelogic.com>>
Date: Mon, March 11, 2019 12:26 pm
To: anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net <mailto:anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net>
In message
On Mon, 11 Mar 2019, Fi Shing wrote:
Why can't it be both?
12.5% annual fee incurred daily, to a maximum of 7 days, with resources being
decommissioned if the abuse contact is not updated
within that time.
This is probably something for the RIPE NCC AGM, not for the PDP...
But i seriousl
Why can't it be both?12.5% annual fee incurred daily, to a maximum of 7 days, with resources being decommissioned if the abuse contact is not updated within that time.
Original Message
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Verification of abuse contact addresses ?
From: &quo
In message <9793c47c-2c44-47e3-033a-1d60ca4d3...@time-travellers.org>,
Shane Kerr wrote:
>As far as I know there is nothing in any policy about decommissioning
>resources. (I'm not even sure what that would mean in practice...)
>
>I don't think that such a proposal would get consensus in the
etc.
Regards,
Jordi
-Mensaje original-
De: anti-abuse-wg en nombre de Michele Neylon
- Blacknight
Fecha: viernes, 8 de marzo de 2019, 22:51
Para: Shane Kerr , Fi Shing ,
"anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net"
Asunto: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Verification of abuse contact addresses ?
Ea
; On 08/03/2019 11.07, Fi Shing wrote:
> > If it takes more than a week to verify your entire database, there
is
> > the first sign that something is wrong with your system.
> >
> >
> > Original Message
> > Subject: Re: [anti-abuse
tries -
click a link, enter a CAPTCHA, or your resources are decommissioned
within 24 hours.
How much crime can be committed in the months it has taken (and
continues to take)?
Original Message ----
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Verification of abuse contact addresses ?
--- Original Message ----
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Verification of abuse contact addresses ?
From: Shane Kerr <sh...@time-travellers.org>
Date: Fri, March 08, 2019 9:40 pm
To: anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net
Fi Shing,
I'm sure verifying the delivery of 70k e-mails (or however many is in
the datab
In message
<20190308030704.af7f9f79718891d8e76b551cf73e1563.3317785c9a@email19.godaddy.com>,
"Fi Shing" wrote:
> If it takes more than a week to verify your entire database, there is
> the first sign that something is wrong with your system.
For whatever little it is worth, I would
If it takes more than a week to verify your entire database, there is
>> the first sign that something is wrong with your system.
>>
>>
>> Original Message
>> Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Verification of abuse contact
>> addresses ?
>
at it will take a while.
Cheers,
--
Shane
On 08/03/2019 11.07, Fi Shing wrote:
If it takes more than a week to verify your entire database, there is
the first sign that something is wrong with your system.
Original Message
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Verificatio
If it takes more than a week to verify your entire database, there is the first sign that something is wrong with your system.
Original Message
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Verification of abuse contact addresses ?
From: Marco Schmidt <mschm...@ripe.net>
Date: Thu, Ma
Agreed
It's good to see that there is progress on this.
Regards
Michele
--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting, Colocation & Domains
https://www.blacknight.com/
http://blacknight.blog/
Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Personal blog: https://michele.blog/
S
In message ,
Marco Schmidt wrote:
>We are planning to publish an updated timeline soon.
>
>Ultimately, our implementation will depend of the level of cooperation
>we get from LIRs and the nature of issues that need to be fixed before
>an abuse contact can be updated (for example, some organi
Hello Ronald,
We are planning to publish an updated timeline soon.
Ultimately, our implementation will depend of the level of cooperation
we get from LIRs and the nature of issues that need to be fixed before
an abuse contact can be updated (for example, some organisations may
need to reset t
In message <9c95c110-d5a3-e94a-6b3c-b02030736...@ripe.net>,
Marco Schmidt wrote:
>It is correct that the implementation phase is still ongoing. Currently
>we are validating all the abuse contact information referenced in LIR
>organisation objects. Then we will proceed with the validation of a
In message
<20190305042821.af7f9f79718891d8e76b551cf73e1563.4d026bdf0f@email19.godaddy.com>,
"Fi Shing" wrote:
> Yes, the verification mechanism they chose to implement was a flop,
> with no input required from address owners.
So, um, nobody even checked for undeliverable bounces??
-wg en nombre de Fi Shing
Fecha: martes, 5 de marzo de 2019, 12:28
Para: "Ronald F. Guilmette" ,
Asunto: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Verification of abuse contact addresses ?
Yes, the verification mechanism they chose to implement was a flop, with no
input required from address owners.
7, Ireland
+35316609040 brian.nis...@heanet.ie www.heanet.ie
Registered in Ireland, No. 275301. CRA No. 20036270
From: anti-abuse-wg On Behalf Of Fi Shing
Sent: Tuesday 5 March 2019 11:28
To: Ronald F. Guilmette ; anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Verification of abuse contact addres
Dear Ronald,
Thank you for asking about the status of the policy change 2017-02,
"Regular abuse-c Validation".
It is correct that the implementation phase is still ongoing. Currently
we are validating all the abuse contact information referenced in LIR
organisation objects. Then we will proce
e too much sense.abuse.net lists these contacts for mesh digital:ab...@meshdigital.com (for meshdigital.com)n...@meshdigital.com (for meshdigital.com)r...@netsumo.com (for meshdigital.com)
Original Message
Subject: [anti-abuse-wg] Verification of abuse contact addresses ?
From: "Ronald F
Sorry folks, when this topic was discussed, I confess that I wasn't
really paying much attention. So now I am forced to ask: Was someone
going to verify the abuse contact addresses listed in the RIPE WHOIS
data base?
If so, how is that project coming along?
I'll tell you why I ask. It's quit
24 matches
Mail list logo
