Hi!
The problem with this is that there are so many different metadix
formats that it will be impossible to come up with one that covers them
all. For example if I remember correctly how the alt works is
different in es-pt and in oc-es. I think it was decided that it was
desirable to have them
El dt 21 de 12 de 2010 a les 10:42 +, en/na Francis Tyers va
escriure:
Hi!
...
Btw, thinking about metadix I have some probably unpopular ideas,
that would preclude any standardisation. I think that maybe we should not
have one format, but rather many _codified_ formats depending on the
2010/12/21 Mikel Forcada m...@dlsi.ua.es
Hi Apertiumers,
Before any more patches to the dictionary format are made, a general
agreement should be reached. Remember that we have different dialects of
metadix and an unification would be desirable before fiddling anymore
with dictionary
2010/12/21 Francis Tyers fty...@prompsit.com
El dt 21 de 12 de 2010 a les 10:42 +, en/na Francis Tyers va
escriure:
Hi!
...
Btw, thinking about metadix I have some probably unpopular ideas,
that would preclude any standardisation. I think that maybe we should not
have one format,
2010/12/21 Jacob Nordfalk jacob.nordf...@gmail.com
2010/12/21 Francis Tyers fty...@prompsit.com
El dt 21 de 12 de 2010 a les 10:42 +, en/na Francis Tyers va
escriure:
Hi!
...
Btw, thinking about metadix I have some probably unpopular ideas,
that would preclude any
Francis Tyers fty...@prompsit.com writes:
Hi!
The problem with this is that there are so many different metadix
formats that it will be impossible to come up with one that covers them
all. For example if I remember correctly how the alt works is
different in es-pt and in oc-es. I think it
El dt 21 de 12 de 2010 a les 13:04 +0100, en/na Kevin Brubeck Unhammer
va escriure:
Francis Tyers fty...@prompsit.com writes:
Hi!
The problem with this is that there are so many different metadix
formats that it will be impossible to come up with one that covers them
all. For example
On 21 Dec 2010, at 10:42, Francis Tyers fty...@prompsit.com wrote:
Hi!
The problem with this is that there are so many different metadix
formats that it will be impossible to come up with one that covers
them
all. For example if I remember correctly how the alt works is
different in
Hi all,
a couple of comments:
(1) I am not advocating the use of XSLT. In fact, I think it is not a
good idea to bundle code (even if it is XSLT) with a language pair. I
would rather have a compiler that understands directly the higher level
descriptions collectively called metadixes; it
