[Apertium-stuff] Oriya verb morphology [Was: One doubt on apertium]

2012-07-08 Thread Mikel Forcada
Dear Sandhya [or Itisree], sorry for the delay. If you are developing something with Apertium, it would be a good idea to subscribe to the apertium-stuff list at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff and send your messages to that list. I will try my best, but we have a

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Online language pair packages

2012-07-08 Thread Arink Verma
Hi Mikel! I have tired your jnlp, its looks so gr8. But for android, what I think, weh dont need standalone the language pair jar which you have upload to https://apertium.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/apertium/branches/gsoc2012/artetxem/packages/jars/ should not contain whole compiled code of

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Online language pair packages

2012-07-08 Thread Mikel Artetxe
But for android, what I think, weh dont need standalone the language pair jar which you have upload to https://apertium.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/apertium/branches/gsoc2012/artetxem/packages/jars/ should not contain whole compiled code of lttoolbox. It should have Translator class for

[Apertium-stuff] Apertium on Android

2012-07-08 Thread Arink Verma
Hi Everyone! I am Arink, doing working on Apertium on Mobile:Gsoc12 Recently I have finished my work according to timeline [timeline]http://www.arinkverma.in/2012/06/current-status-of-apertium-on-mobile.html#more, hence app is good for testing and review on device. I have tested it on my

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Online language pair packages

2012-07-08 Thread Jacob Nordfalk
2012/7/8 Mikel Artetxe artet...@gmail.com Yes, you are right. Some stuff in the Jars is not really needed for Android. Note that, before, the script was creating specific packages for Android with only the necessary stuff there. But Jacob suggested me that having single universal packages

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Definite determiner in apertium-es-ca

2012-07-08 Thread Bernard Chardonneau
Hey everybody. After 10 days mostly in the nature without a computer and just before 8 other weeks without a permanent internet connexion (widely chosen), I want to give my opinion as a new pair developer about the discussion about what should countain dictionaries. 1) For monodices, I perfectly

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Online language pair packages

2012-07-08 Thread Mikel Artetxe
'As usual' I wanted to add several language pairs into the same JAR file. That would be cool. But it isnt possible, as transfer_classes and classes.dex doesent have language pair specific file names. Yes, that's true. I think that the biggest problem here is classes.dex, which cannot have a

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Online language pair packages

2012-07-08 Thread Per Tunedal
Hi, I've put my answers bellow. On Fri, Jul 6, 2012, at 21:49, Mikel Artetxe wrote: I have been really troubled by the broken Apertium-viewer (special characters like å ä ö é è ê didn't work). I even considered to correct the program myself, but found that my knowledge in Python

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Online language pair packages

2012-07-08 Thread Jimmy O'Regan
On 5 July 2012 21:15, Per Tunedal per.tune...@operamail.com wrote: Hi, as an OmegaT user I cannot but agree. In vain I have tried to install Apertium Server to call it from OmegaT. An easy way to use translations from Apertium in OmegaT would be welcome. OmegaT's support for Apertium is

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Online language pair packages

2012-07-08 Thread Jacob Nordfalk
2012/7/8 Per Tunedal per.tune...@operamail.com Well, I mixed it up even more: I actually thought of Apertium-tolk. I want a simple interface without all the information in Apertium-viewer. Hey, to me it smells very much like the 'very simple example client application for the desktop' that