Re: [Apertium-stuff] A question about Apertium Kazakh and Tatar packages

2021-09-05 Thread Kevin Brubeck Unhammer
Jonathan Washington čálii: > As to Andrey's question concerning kaz-rus not working because of a > missing .t4x file, that sounds like a legit packaging error, which I'm > not sure how to fix (I really should learn...) That was fixed in

Re: [Apertium-stuff] A question about Apertium Kazakh and Tatar packages

2021-09-04 Thread Jonathan Washington
As to Andrey's question concerning kaz-rus not working because of a missing .t4x file, that sounds like a legit packaging error, which I'm not sure how to fix (I really should learn...) In the meantime, Andrey, you should be able to just clone the pair and compile from source (`apertium-get

Re: [Apertium-stuff] A question about Apertium Kazakh and Tatar packages

2021-09-02 Thread Tino Didriksen
On Thu, 2 Sept 2021 at 09:53, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer wrote: > However – there are people who want to use debug modes but would rather > not want to compile a pair and manually > `git pull && make && make test || revert-to-last-working-revision`. > > Would it make sense to install debug-modes to

Re: [Apertium-stuff] A question about Apertium Kazakh and Tatar packages

2021-09-02 Thread Kevin Brubeck Unhammer
Tino Didriksen čálii: > The monolingual packages install many more modes, because they are used for > further development. So you can get morph from those. But biltrans is not > normal to want if you aren't a developer, and thus building from source. The reasoning is that - people who want to

Re: [Apertium-stuff] A question about Apertium Kazakh and Tatar packages

2021-09-01 Thread Tino Didriksen
G'day, and CC'ing the apertium-stuff mailing list, Firstly, I recommend getting in the Apertium IRC channel for live support and developer feedback. We're on irc.oftc.net #apertium ( https://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/Contact#IRC ). As to your question, then those are debug modes. If you look in