On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, Alejandro Lieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In a 133 Mhz 80586, the following times were necesary to
> read from HD a 288.000 Bytes 5 column HTML table with undefined
> field width:
> From IBM PC-DOS 7.0:
> Lynx for 386: 10 seconds
> Arachne: 65 seconds
> From Windows 95:
On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, "Bastiaan Edelman, PA3FFZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Subject: Re: Arachne's FTP uploads
> On Wed, 09 Apr 2003 20:10:42 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
>> On Tue, 08 Apr 2003 17:23:38 +0930, Greg Mayman wrote:
>>
>>> There is a second problem with Arachne in that I cannot v
et al,
Some time ago I was moaning about having to access the Dialup Page,
then click the ".ACF" link, then click my individual .ACF icon,
before I could switch to a new .ACF...
Several helpful folks here gave me some .HTML changes to add to
my "MAIL.HTM" or "WHATEVER.HTM" pages to give me direc
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Klaus Hameyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Glenn and others:
> I have a question regarding accessing FTP URLs. When I install
> Arachne 1.66 (without any TELNET.APM), I can access URLs such
> as ftp://ftp.fu-berlin.de/unix without any problem, in spite of the
> fact that
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, "Glenn McCorkle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2003 02:51:29 -0700, G J Feig wrote:
--snip--
> Oh... I don't know fop sure.
> But you could try http://www.cisnet.com/glennmcc/downloads/ddlddu.zip ;-)
> (sorry,
On Tue, 03 Jun 2003, "Glenn McCorkle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--snip
> DDL (Device Driver Load)
>
-snip--
> DDU (Device Driver Unload)
> __
On Thu, 22 May 2003, "Samuel W. Heywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello fellow Arachnids:
> Does anyone know of any good free mailing list services?
--snip
> There used to be lots of good free mailing list services such as
> One List and E-Groups, but they were a
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, "L.D. Best" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Mouse...
hbut you didn't attribute this quote
John Donne, Meditation XVII 1572-1631
..gregy
-- This mail was sent by a user of Arachne - The Ultimate Internet Client
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, "L.D. Best" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I cannot stop war, even though I am not alone in my efforts.
> The song tells me to think back about how we fought oppression, how we
> l.d.
> Active Duty WACR 1961-1962
> Washington State NG
> Active Duty US Army 1974-1978
I apprec
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, "L.D. Best" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whether or not the story were true, I would feel far better if
> recognized "legit" sources provided the information on the purported
> crime or hoax, whichever it might be.
> Underground "news" sites most often have an agenda of the
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, G J Feig wrote:
Replying to Ron Clarke's file upload announcement;
-snip---
that I would like to have his FP_MAIL.OOK file, too..
athanks Ron...when I edited that .HTM file...I found it
where you had inserted it into the page code
.gregy
--
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, "Ron Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have uploaded the file as http://tadpole.aus.as/files/ronsmail.htm
> I have included a suggestion for a click-on anti-virus check of the
> Arachne Inbox (which I use all the time), as well as remarks inside the
> HTML code for what
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, "Ron Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have three different ISP providers also. And up to 5 or 6
> identities (email addresses/passwords) on those. I have set up all those
> identities on different .ACF files within Arachne, and switch between
> them on a single mouse-cl
On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, "Ray Andrews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-snip---
> I reject completely the notion that the first cell arose spontaneously for
> three main reasons. First, there is not the *slightest* hard evidence for
> this--it's just a creation myth told by folks who
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Michael Polak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-snip--
> But what about Arachne User Edition ? Is there anything really tested by
> many people, ready to be published on browser.arachne.cz together with
> 1.70 ? What about your 1.71 UE, 1.71 lite, etc ?
> Any pa
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, "Laurie L Proud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I run Arachne in OS/2 Warp 3 and 4. Did a 4 browser test for download
>> speeds. Arachne was only slightly slower than the fastest, Netscape
>> was slower. If you get slow download speeds, something is not set
>> right. I have d
et al,
FIRST - please do not "quote" whole messages in replies.
SECOND - please never send something like that "whatever" to
the list.
THIRD - javascript
1. Google search will turn up more info than you ever wanted to
know about javascript.
2. I have downloaded tutorials, etc, and even bought t
On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, "Sam Ewalt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bob, I couldn't agree with you more. I don't use Windows myself--
> although I may start any day now because of Javascript and secure
> transactions on the web.
> I'd prefer to just keep using DOS. If Glenn and his helpers can
> cram a
On Sun, 22 Dec 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Laurie,
> The basics of HTML are so easy to learn - give it a try.
snip lots of useful stuff--
> Have fun.
..and ..., [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Since pages on the web mostly use complicated M$ derived HTML wh
Okay, then Listers,
Do we agree that 1.71ue01 is at a point where the known and
immediate Arachne bugs are identified and corrected??
At least as far as general useage and newbie user are
concerned...??
If we do agree, then we should "freeze" 1.71ue01 for general
distribution. Continuing wor
2nd Whoa
(this is different from the 2nd Biblical Woe..)
Okay...all hotshot Listers...
Here is where we need to stop and assess and do some
documentation.
1. That printer output inconsistency is now fixed..??
Klas and Bastiaan you both agree that Glenn has made
that "Look and Feel" consiste
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, "Kali McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (actually
James) wrote:
> Hi, I am James, Kali's partner. I like OS/2. I installed Arachne under
> Warp 4, and found it to be perfectly usable and sprightly. Don't forget
> to go into the properties box, select DOS Settings, and give arach
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Roger Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I remember the ration books that limited meat, butter, shoes, tires,
> gasoline, etc., that could be purchased each week/month. (3 gallons of gas a
> week if you had an "A" sticker, 5 gallons if you had a "B" sticker, 7 gallons
> if you
On Sun, 15 Dec 2002, "Bastiaan Edelman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I will try to make a lock-up and wait for a long time just to see what
> happens. Is there any known log-file so we can see/detect what is going
> wrong at that lock-up???
Bastiaan,
I don't think there is. When we think about
On Sun, 15 Dec 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> While I was experimenting with boot GUI=0 I did find I had the
>>> famous "My computer IKN" problem with a hard lock up when I clicked the
>>> IKN, and I haven't got a CD installed.
WHOA...!!! podner..!!! hmmm...well, sheeesh..!!!...I have MISSE
On Sun, 15 Dec 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
First, Bastiaan, please accept my condolences on the death of
your mother. She is the one woman in the whole world that a man
can not replace.
...now.to your replies:
> Why not store some 'clean' version of mime.cfg with another name, incase
>
On Sat, 14 Dec 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> As I've written off-list to Michael ...
Then you will get a reply "direct from the horse's mouth...
> There are places
been on most of the continents of the worldknow these type
problems well..
--snip-
> where I'm head
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The first problem is that Arachne is a browser, not simply a viewer.
> Since it has communication capability, I can't use it in some of the most
> needy places. A lot of nations ban or limit external access to
> information, and Arachne doesn't fit i
On Sat, 14 Dec 2002, "Laurie L Proud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
snip--
> Glenn I woulden't bother. Arachne isn't rearly meant to be run on
> a windows system, and your time could be better spent. Please don't
> get up to your elbows in assembler on our account.
> Just my view g
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, "L.D. Best" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Laugh if you want, but think ... and pass the word.
-snip--
> l.d.
> P.S. This is one time I really truly wish I were wrong, but my gut
> tells me it ain't so. :~(
I ain't laughin...but then I'm "paranoid" anyway..
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, "L.D. Best" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The mention of WWWMAN is misleading; the "tests" done aren't valid. From
> the results given by some users, it is obvious the problem is *NOT* in
> Arachne, or WWWman ...
---snip---
>> It looks like WWWMAN has trou
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> To Glenn (and anybody else who might be interested),
> Finding Arachne was like finding gold. Thank you Michael for the vision
> and original creation. Thank you Glenn and others for the improvements.
hmmm...who takes a bow, here.just fooli
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Klaus Hameyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Glenn and Greggy -
> Before I say anything further, I want to thank Glenn for the
> suggestions he provided, but also indicate that I completely
> agree with Greggy regarding a structured and documented approach
> to making cha
et al,
I reported that problem with the XPDF APM, and it was giving me
"Command or filename not recognized" error, when I clicked on a
.PDF file.
I cured it..but my cure doesn't answer the question, "Why..?"
1. I went to the XPDF home page, and downloaded the latest XPDF
which is version 2.01
et al,
I now confirm that the CORE(LC).EXE (that's the LongCookieCORE) appears
to have killed the YehawMailEVILCookieMonster. That extra long
cookie seems to have been "buffer-over-running" sort of, into Arachne's
living space, so that when you tried to have Arachne do any "shell-out"
DOS-type co
hmm...well...I'm trying, L.D., et al
These below quotes indicate that the problem is when Arachne is
run, some way or another, as-part-of-or-associated-with a Win98 or
Win95 installed system.
Cristian says under DRDOS7.03-straight it's okay, but under W98 it
doesn't. We also need to note the
et al,
I fired up 1.69, running in big RAMDisk, download the .APM from
arachne.cz, APMManager installs it, says it put ikon somewhere,
gives me the F2 option, and all is well.
I just used it less than 1 month ago. Now, it doesn't work..
I tried it in 1.71ue01, and it doesn't work there, either.
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, "Laurie L Proud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Bastiaan,
> So we have established:
> a) in straight DOS "My Computer" is broken.
noit is "Your Computer" and works in MSDOS5.0, DRDOS5.0, DRDOS6.0,
MSDOS6.22, OpenDOS7.01, DRDOS7.03, and OS/2DOSv.300andearlier...
Bastiaa
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, "Glenn McCorkle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Subject: Re: Printing/export/capture in A171ue
> On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 10:22:06 -0800, Bastiaan Edelman, PA3FFZ wrote:
>>> Hello Glenn -
>> Yes, I agree with Klaus.
>> Besides it is not easy (not possible ?) to newbies to alter s
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Doak Snead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I haven't read the rest of the mails about this, but
> does he mean clicking on "my computer" on the windoze
> desktop whilst running arachne in a dos console?
> just curious.
Yes, this and a bunch of other things, I'm sure Bastiaan has
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, "Bastiaan Edelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> IMHO the "My Computer" should be fixed too... I use 3 computers, 2 with
> 1.61 and 1 with 1.71UE and they all lock-up on this.
Bastiaan,
I have stayed out of this discussion, mostly, because I cannot, ever,
get ANY of my 3 compu
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002 "Glenn McCorkle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> May I have your permission to place that entire message on
> http://www.angelfire.com/id/glenndoom/ara171ue01.htm
> for everyone to see ???
Glenn,
Wellit AIN'T a testimonial...it is a hardnosed, critical
analysis of the cu
A few days ago, Michael Polak asked if Arachne 1.71;UE01 was about
ready for general distribution.
I have been using it steadily for about a month, now, and it seems
real solid. The MyYahooMail lockup problem is not Arachne's
problem, primarily, and isn't going to be fixed quickly, IMNSHO..
The
On Sat, 7 Dec 2002, "Laurie L Proud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> JPG image or a BMP using windows central print services (if I could
> persuade www.HP.COM to give me a driver for the Deskjet 500 for W95
> rather than the mountain of Javascript I got yesterday)
and."Glenn McCorkle" <[EMAIL PR
et al,
I think it was Bastien, and NOT Christian, who has a similar
lockup problem.
.gregy
-- This mail was sent by a user of Arachne - The Ultimate Internet Client
et al,
I posted the following to AQC, and, after sleeping on it, I
thought I should post it here, also:
---post to AQC---
teleCC: glennmcc.reference your problem
accessing your YehawMail and then doing a POP3
download on one of your own mail accounts:
...
Wellit's worse
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Gregor Jones wrote:
snip---
>> Errr, no, you managed to confuse a lot of software by creating a gzipped
>> file that had the wrong file extension on it. Seems like most software
>> detected it as a gzipped file, but only some automatically gunzipped it,
>> and
On Sun, 1 Dec 2002, "Bastiaan Edelman, wrote:
--snip
> BTW: what is \\ supposed to do or show anyway?
Bastiaan,
The ..\\.. link will always return you to the "ACCESSABLE DRIVES"
page, which is the first page you see after doing F10 - then click
on "Your Computer"
...
Th
On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, "Sam Ewalt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, I was looking for someone's personal numbers--something from
> somebody's real experience. Megabytes?
> Is anybody on the list actually getting that much spam?
Sam,
I have no axact figures. My ISP just blocks, and dumps the box
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Menedetter) wrote:
> I don't see what benefit blocking legitmate yahoo/hotmail users has !!
> it's IMHO plain silly.
> It will not lower the amount of spam you get, but it will frustrate many
users.
Yes, it doesmy ISP allows me to block entire
On Sun, 10 Nov 2002, "Glenn McCorkle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Go to "Options/Internat Settings" and turn off IgnoreJS.
> This is one of the drawbacks of my experimental IgnoreJS.
> Some other pages where the JS is not correctly commented will have the
> images pointed to by the JS interpret
et al,
Anyone know why both 1.71preview and 1.71ue01 give me 4-each
equal, 1/4-screen, tiled (not cascaded) frames - from which I
can NOT click RMB to expand any one of them...and cannot see
anything except framing script inside them
...at:
http://www.onewest.net/
NOTE - 1.69 does NOT do thi
On Tue, 01 Oct 2002, "Glenn McCorkle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have a look at my schedule for next week.
> http://www.angelfire.com/id/glenndoom/schedule.htm
> (load the images to have a little laugh) ;-)
Glenn,
That last little guy on the SUNDAY list isn't moving. Does that
mean that h
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, "Glenn McCorkle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-snip--
> Bad news.
> I am not going to spend even 1 more second trying to fix it.
> Over 4 hours is more than enough time to waste on such a STUPID
> person as the one who did THIS !!!
---snip
> Yes,
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, "Ron Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What would be even more useful, for the uninitiated, is a little
> message (as part of that display of contents) to press F2 to save the
> original ZIP.
Yes, maybe...but we can ALWAYS stress to newbies that F2 is SAVE...
just like F1
Alright, already,,,
I've just had some surprises when I downloaded some .ZIPs with 1.71pre:
1. Arachne no longer attempts to "display as text" a whole 1.4xMByte
file.
2. Arachne automagically scans/catalogs/displays-contents for the
just downloaded file.
3. To save file, just press F2, th
56 matches
Mail list logo
