So long as it'll work on a 256MB RiscPC with Adjust, I'm happy ;)
I.
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Lee
Sent: 16 November 2018 18:47
To: arcem-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Sourceforge Ditching CVS Write Access.
On Fri, 16 Nov 2018, Steffen Huber wrote:
>
Wow, this email's a reply from a while back. I don't think I ever saw the
original, sorry.
I'd vote for git, especially if that's coming to RISC OS (26bit?)
Ian
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Lee
Sent: 16 November 2018 00:39
To: arcem-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Source
...@tarnyko.net]
Sent: 13 December 2016 17:25
To: Ian Jeffray
Cc: arcem-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Win32 improvements (mouse, fullscreen...)
Thanks Ian, this is really appreciated !
I plan to fix more bugs and eventually implement sound, but before that,
some feedbac
Nice work, I'll try it later!
Ian
On 13/12/2016 14:26, Tarnyko wrote:
> Hi ArcEm devs,
>
> I just posted a patch improving the Windows frontend (most notably improving
> the mouse, adding floppy insertion/ejection, fullscreen, paste...).
>
> This is here, with screenshots and a "demo" binary :
>
On 17/12/2012 18:52, Michael Drake wrote:
> In article ,
> Jeffrey Lee wrote:
>
>> Now done - for RISC OS and Windows, at least.
>
> Excellent! Thanks Jeffrey.
Good stuff. Personal matters have got the better of me
this last few months so I've had no time to finish the
'proper' OSX port, bu
On 09/09/2012 15:22, Michael Drake wrote:
>
> Had a go at a web site redesign:
>
> http://www.smoothartist.com/temp/arcem/site/
>
> Just the front page done. What do people think?
>
>
> I used that new logo I made, and I used the blue, rather than cyan
> version, as it looked too unappealing
On 30/07/2012 23:33, Jeffrey Lee wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2012, Ian Jeffray wrote:
>
>> Might be interesting to check if there's any noticeable (timeable)
>> performance difference between the gcc and vs2010 builds... I'd rather
>> hope the latter would be ahead.
The arcem manual on the website is definitely out of date, and
has some errors. Since Jeffrey enabled HostFS for Win32 today,
I noticed the manual refers to the support module as
'arcemsupport,ffa' when it's actually just 'support,ffa'
Several chunks are also marked 'CVS' which needs fixing.
No
On 30/07/2012 23:33, Jeffrey Lee wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2012, Ian Jeffray wrote:
>
>> Might be interesting to check if there's any noticeable (timeable)
>> performance difference between the gcc and vs2010 builds... I'd rather
>> hope the latter would be ahead.
On 30/07/2012 22:41, Jeffrey Lee wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2012, Ian Jeffray wrote:
>
>> I've also started to get the Win32 build to actually build again,
>> using VS2010 (mostly just a little breakage in the fastmap stuff
>> to solve in a clean way).
>
> FWI
On 29/07/2012 20:34, Andrew Flegg wrote:
> On 29 July 2012 20:31, Jeffrey Lee wrote:
>> On Sun, 29 Jul 2012, Andrew Flegg wrote:
>>
>>> Ah, it seems that SDD_Name(RowFunc) dispatches to an explicit set of
>>> functions which only support 1X and 2X. Hmm.
>>
>> Yes, I guess I forgot about that!
>
>
On 25/07/2012 17:28, Michael Drake wrote:
> The existing content, apart from manual.html, is pretty much up-to-date
> now.
Smashing stuff.
> I was considering a redesign of the web site next, but I had an idea
for a
> new ArcEm logo:
>
> http://www.smoothartist.com/temp/arcem/
>
> T
On 25/07/2012 11:48, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Jeffrey Lee wrote:
>> In lieu of a safe place to get free ROMs, you could add a link to
>> ROL's shop, where they're selling a CD containing Arc ROM images:
>>
>> http://www.e-junkie.com/43789
>
> Thanks, I didn't know of
> http://www.e-junkie.co
On 24/07/2012 08:36, Ian Jeffray wrote:
> On 23/07/2012 23:27, Jeffrey Lee wrote:
>> Since people keep (quite rightly) asking me where the latest version of
>> ArcEm for RISC OS is, unless anyone objects in the next five mins or so
>> I'll upload an alpha version of
On 24/07/2012 10:47, Michael Drake wrote:
>cvs -d:pserver:t...@arcem.cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/arcem login
As stated on the CVS help page on SF, use ssh for developer access;
export CVS_RSH=ssh
cvs -z3 -d:ext:developern...@arcem.cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/arcem co
-P .
https://source
On 23/07/2012 23:27, Jeffrey Lee wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2012, Ian Jeffray wrote:
>
>> On 17/07/2012 22:22, Jeffrey Lee wrote:
>>> Michael being the website maintainer sounds good to me. At one point I was
>>> planning on updating it a bit myself with a new RISC OS
gt;> non-decorated types/methods.
>>
>> Attached is the output of "cvs diff -u" for the "hostfs.h" file which
>> is what I had to patch in order to get it to build. (also inline)
>
> Thanks Doug. I noticed Ian Jeffray checked-in something based on your
> patc
On 18/07/2012 13:46, Michael Drake wrote:
> In article <50055fbc.2040...@jeffray.co.uk>,
> Ian Jeffray wrote:
>
>> I vote in favour :-) The web pages are all in CVS, but a complete
>> revamp may well be in order really.
>
> Great! I'll have to remem
On 17/07/2012 22:22, Jeffrey Lee wrote:
> Michael being the website maintainer sounds good to me. At one point I was
> planning on updating it a bit myself with a new RISC OS build, but I guess
> I never put in the effort to track down someone who could explain it all
> or give me the right permiss
Michael,
> I'd like to offer to be ArcEm web site maintainer.
>
> I could keep it up-to-date with news and update it for new releases.
I've tried to do a little of that (most recently just dumping
the GP2X references that was all silly anyway).
> Are there any plans to have a new ArcEm release
Hi Jerome, all,
This is also exactly what I've been doing - re-started the project in XCode4.
Back in the UK this week so will check it and see if I can help try and
progress things :)
Ian
On 27 May 2012, at 11:58, Jerome Vernet wrote:
> Le 27/05/12 11:52, Michael Dales a écrit :
>> Hey the
On 12/05/2012 19:16, Jeffrey Lee wrote:
> Now that that's out of the way, what are everyone's thoughts on putting
> together a new release? I believe the OS X build still needs fixing, and
> gp2x may be broken
The OSX build is still on my list. Honestly. The GP2X build was never
really very goo
On 27/10/2011 22:17, Jeffrey Lee wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2011, Jeffrey Lee wrote:
>
>> My CVS access seems to be working, so when I get a chance I'll check in my
>> changes. Since I've got lots of backups I could even have a go at breaking
>> it up into several changes if you want. That should make
On 31/07/2010 20:17, Chris Young wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 17:03:04 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time), Jeffrey Lee wrote:
>
>> This week I decided to take a quick break from my OMAP work and instead
>> had a play around with optimising ArcEm to run faster on ARM hardware
>> (although I suspect most of t
Peter,
> I still don't know if we should be linking to your page or not.
> I have to assume the port has been lost (i.e, my overall fear
> here) and that the link should be removed. This alone would
> justify my concern.
The code is checked in to SF like all the other ports. Why you
should even
Peter,
You said:
> If I
> was so obviously cast in the mold for which are you
> insisting for me, then I would have just moved it, no
> questions asked.
Should you do so, and I'm fairly sure you will, I will simply
open up a new SF project to put the source back in the public
domain where it bel
Peter,
> Please don't top-post.
Understand common business practice and avoid the pettyness.
>> I do not think it is acceptable for you to close down an opensource
>> project and take it on to your private subversion server.
>
> riscos.info is not "private", any more than any other well-known
>
Peter,
I do not think it is acceptable for you to close down an opensource
project and take it on to your private subversion server. As a
contributor, supporter and user of this project, I do not support
this move.
Ultimately I can see you do whatever you wish to any project anyway.
Ian.
Pet
Peter Howkins wrote:
Does anyone have any problems working like this?
Cool
http://www.home.marutan.net/arcempage/screenshots.html
( featuring stolen photos and screenshot from the Mac OS X and GP2x pages
:) oh and much smaller thumbnails :) )
It's "Gamepark Holdings" not "Gamepak" ... and
Ralph Corderoy wrote:
OK, I may have found the problem.
I was able to subscribe now. Thanks for sorting that :-D
I.
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mo
Ian Jeffray wrote:
Ian Jeffray wrote:
Nor does it on the gp2x. I think you may have broken something
fundamental here. :-(
D'oh. Doesn't compile for Windows any more either! Some missing
includes or something. Looking at that, too...
Actually, it appears to be simply
Ian Jeffray wrote:
Nor does it on the gp2x. I think you may have broken something
fundamental here. :-(
D'oh. Doesn't compile for Windows any more either! Some missing
includes or something. Looking at that, too...
I.
--
Ian Jeffray wrote:
The code you removed was *NOT* common as I had tweaked around
with it heavily to try and get at least some semblence of
performance out of the gp2x port.
I've made the PollHost return a flag to say if the queue should
be run, however...
The RISC OS port also appeas
Matthew Howkins wrote:
I have just committed to CVS a patch to refactor some of the display code in
ArcEm:
5. Move static variables enodes and xpollenode, and #define POLLGAP from each
*/DispKbd.c to DispKbdShared.c
Uh...
7. Common code moved from DisplayKbd_PollHost() to DisplayKbd_Poll()
Matthew Howkins wrote:
I have just committed to CVS a patch to refactor some of the display code in
ArcEm:
Good job.
Could I request that Michael Dales and Ian Jeffray check that the MacOS, RISC
OS, and GP2x ports are still working, and that I haven't broken them.
Shall do so soon.
Rob Kendrick wrote:
What's the point in having a mailing list for discussing ArcEm if people
aren't going to use it?
We are using it though. Just not for every last spam of technical
blah and ideas that goes on.
Case in point was two developers wanting a discussion about something.
If they m
Rob Kendrick wrote:
On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 11:17 +, Peter Howkins wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 10:18:59AM +, Daniel Clarke wrote:
In conclusion, if anybody wishes to pick up the pieces and have a go
using any of the code I have written, or alternatively using it as a
base for somet
Ralph Corderoy wrote:
There's an arcem-cvs list
...which won't send me an email to join.
I've tried to join twice now. No email. :-(
I.
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends appli
Michael Dales wrote:
So chatting to Peter it appears that half the list has been left out
on some private discussion as to how and why things are done in
ArcEm. So...
Woah, woah. Calm. I *think* I "started this" by trying to be
good person and actually contribute my work back to the GPL
comm
Ralph Corderoy wrote:
Hi Michael,
Perhaps then it's time to fork some stuff then.
Can we avoid top-posting on this list please.
Can we avoid CCing everyone on everything if we're also
using the list? :-)
Perhaps there even needs to be some kind of fork - a pure version of
ArcEm and a R
40 matches
Mail list logo
