In article
,
Chris Young wrote:
> Also I need something closer to a size of 60x60 pixels :)
Added a 60x60 version:
http://www.smoothartist.com/temp/arcem/
--
Michael Drake http://www.smoothartist.com/
-
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Ian Jeffray wrote:
> Actually, I'm not sure how much I do trust these results after all.
> Are you getting consistent output for the memory tests?
>
> Doing some testing on arcem on OSX just now (2.8GHz, OSX 8, XCode 4.4)
> my Main memory write varies anywhere from 372 to 481
On 30/07/2012 23:33, Jeffrey Lee wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2012, Ian Jeffray wrote:
>
>> Might be interesting to check if there's any noticeable (timeable)
>> performance difference between the gcc and vs2010 builds... I'd rather
>> hope the latter would be ahead.
>
> I'm not entirely sure if !SICK c
On 30/07/2012 23:33, Jeffrey Lee wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2012, Ian Jeffray wrote:
>
>> Might be interesting to check if there's any noticeable (timeable)
>> performance difference between the gcc and vs2010 builds... I'd rather
>> hope the latter would be ahead.
>
> I'm not entirely sure if !SICK c
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012, Ian Jeffray wrote:
Might be interesting to check if there's any noticeable (timeable)
performance difference between the gcc and vs2010 builds... I'd rather
hope the latter would be ahead.
I'm not entirely sure if !SICK can be trusted (the CPU speed it reports
seems to k
On 30/07/2012 22:41, Jeffrey Lee wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2012, Ian Jeffray wrote:
>
>> I've also started to get the Win32 build to actually build again,
>> using VS2010 (mostly just a little breakage in the fastmap stuff
>> to solve in a clean way).
>
> FWIW, the Win32 build (now that you've fixed
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012, Ian Jeffray wrote:
> I've also started to get the Win32 build to actually build again,
> using VS2010 (mostly just a little breakage in the fastmap stuff
> to solve in a clean way).
FWIW, the Win32 build (now that you've fixed all the C99-ness) builds OK
with the Express ed
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012, Chris Young wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 22:13:08 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time), Jeffrey Lee wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 24 Jul 2012, Jeffrey Lee wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 24 Jul 2012, Michael Drake wrote:
>>>
On manual.html -- http://arcem.sourceforge.net/manual.html [...]
Th
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 22:13:08 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time), Jeffrey Lee wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jul 2012, Jeffrey Lee wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 24 Jul 2012, Michael Drake wrote:
> >
> >> On manual.html -- http://arcem.sourceforge.net/manual.html [...]
> >>
> >> This page has a change log up to version 1.00,
On Tue, 24 Jul 2012, Jeffrey Lee wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jul 2012, Michael Drake wrote:
>
>> On manual.html -- http://arcem.sourceforge.net/manual.html [...]
>>
>> This page has a change log up to version 1.00, which will need updated
>> for 1.50.
>
> Indeed - I'll try knocking up a changelog summar
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 17:40:12 +0100, Ian Jeffray wrote:
> I quite like the existing logo... and certainly it needs to be the
> correct Archimedes cyan blue if you do change it -- it's iconic...
> stands out as the main logo colour on an old machine, viz:
> http://www.old-computers.com/museum/photos
On 25/07/2012 17:28, Michael Drake wrote:
> The existing content, apart from manual.html, is pretty much up-to-date
> now.
Smashing stuff.
> I was considering a redesign of the web site next, but I had an idea
for a
> new ArcEm logo:
>
> http://www.smoothartist.com/temp/arcem/
>
> T
In article ,
Jeffrey Lee wrote:
[...]
Thanks for all that. I've committed most of those updates.
The existing content, apart from manual.html, is pretty much up-to-date
now.
I was considering a redesign of the web site next, but I had an idea for a
new ArcEm logo:
http://www.smoothar
On 25/07/2012 11:48, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Jeffrey Lee wrote:
>> In lieu of a safe place to get free ROMs, you could add a link to
>> ROL's shop, where they're selling a CD containing Arc ROM images:
>>
>> http://www.e-junkie.com/43789
>
> Thanks, I didn't know of
> http://www.e-junkie.co
Hi,
Jeffrey Lee wrote:
> In lieu of a safe place to get free ROMs, you could add a link to
> ROL's shop, where they're selling a CD containing Arc ROM images:
>
> http://www.e-junkie.com/43789
Thanks, I didn't know of
http://www.e-junkie.com/43789/product/457238.php#RISC+OS+Classic+ROMs+Collecti
On Tue, 24 Jul 2012, Michael Drake wrote:
> On index.html -- http://arcem.sourceforge.net/
>
> I think it's just the Features section which is out of date.
>
> It has "Features of version 1.00", and "Additional features of the CVS
> version". I'm not sure if the CVS section has been kept updat
In article
,
Chris Young wrote:
> I've uploaded them to the Files page too under the 1.50-alpha moniker
> (even though they probably purport to be something like "arcem-fast
> 1.10+CVS" in the archives themselves)
OK, I've updated the website news to mention the various ports:
http://arcem
On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 12:47:12 +0100, Michael Drake wrote:
> On index.html -- http://arcem.sourceforge.net/
>
> I think it's just the Features section which is out of date.
>
> It has "Features of version 1.00", and "Additional features of the CVS
> version". I'm not sure if the CVS section
Hi Michael,
> In the support files section, perhaps a RISC OS 3.11 download can be
> included now, if it can be built from the ROOL source?
Wouldn't have thought it could be. I agree it would be really nice to
have 3.10 or 3.11 ROM images available for download. Who holds the
copyright? RO
In article <500e7172.3060...@jeffray.co.uk>,
Ian Jeffray wrote:
> As stated on the CVS help page on SF, use ssh for developer access;
> export CVS_RSH=ssh
> cvs -z3 -d:ext:developern...@arcem.cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/arcem co
> -P .
Thanks, that worked.
I've been having a look at the e
Hi Ian,
> On 23/07/2012 23:27, Jeffrey Lee wrote:
> > I'll upload an alpha version of a 1.50 release for RISC OS.
>
> I'd stick some builds up there too, but I believed only the admin of
> the project could do that. That's what the documentation seems to
> say. How did you upload files to the p
On 24/07/2012 08:36, Ian Jeffray wrote:
> On 23/07/2012 23:27, Jeffrey Lee wrote:
>> Since people keep (quite rightly) asking me where the latest version of
>> ArcEm for RISC OS is, unless anyone objects in the next five mins or so
>> I'll upload an alpha version of a 1.50 release for RISC OS. Then
On 24/07/2012 10:47, Michael Drake wrote:
>cvs -d:pserver:t...@arcem.cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/arcem login
As stated on the CVS help page on SF, use ssh for developer access;
export CVS_RSH=ssh
cvs -z3 -d:ext:developern...@arcem.cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/arcem co
-P .
https://source
In article ,
Jeffrey Lee wrote:
> Since people keep (quite rightly) asking me where the latest version of
> ArcEm for RISC OS is, unless anyone objects in the next five mins or so
> I'll upload an alpha version of a 1.50 release for RISC OS.
Ooh, that's great. Is there a change log anywher
On 23/07/2012 23:27, Jeffrey Lee wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2012, Ian Jeffray wrote:
>
>> On 17/07/2012 22:22, Jeffrey Lee wrote:
>>> Michael being the website maintainer sounds good to me. At one point I was
>>> planning on updating it a bit myself with a new RISC OS build, but I guess
>>> I never pu
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012, Ian Jeffray wrote:
> On 17/07/2012 22:22, Jeffrey Lee wrote:
>> Michael being the website maintainer sounds good to me. At one point I was
>> planning on updating it a bit myself with a new RISC OS build, but I guess
>> I never put in the effort to track down someone who could
Hi Michael,
> I'd like to offer to be ArcEm web site maintainer.
A volunteer! Capital! I wouldn't want to see something like
http://www.redsquirrel.fsnet.co.uk/redsquirrel.html though, as amusing
as it may be on first visit. :-) Something that lets newcomers get up
and running quickly, includ
On 18/07/2012 13:46, Michael Drake wrote:
> In article <50055fbc.2040...@jeffray.co.uk>,
> Ian Jeffray wrote:
>
>> I vote in favour :-) The web pages are all in CVS, but a complete
>> revamp may well be in order really.
>
> Great! I'll have to remember how to use CVS. :)
Or not. I've nev
In article <500680ac.7010...@jeffray.co.uk>,
Ian Jeffray wrote:
> An admin (Ralph/Chocky) needs to add Michael to the developers list.
My sourceforge username is 'tlsa'.
--
Michael Drake http://www.smoothartist.com/
-
In article ,
Jeffrey Lee wrote:
> Agreed. Since these last few years have seen a focus on improving the
> emulator core, it would make sense if the next release (2022?) made sure
> all the frontends/ports are up to scratch.
I've been using ArcEm quite a bit lately with ADFFS, which works re
In article <50055fbc.2040...@jeffray.co.uk>,
Ian Jeffray wrote:
> I vote in favour :-) The web pages are all in CVS, but a complete
> revamp may well be in order really.
Great! I'll have to remember how to use CVS. :)
--
Michael Drake http://www.smoothartist
On 17/07/2012 22:22, Jeffrey Lee wrote:
> Michael being the website maintainer sounds good to me. At one point I was
> planning on updating it a bit myself with a new RISC OS build, but I guess
> I never put in the effort to track down someone who could explain it all
> or give me the right permiss
Michael being the website maintainer sounds good to me. At one point I was
planning on updating it a bit myself with a new RISC OS build, but I guess
I never put in the effort to track down someone who could explain it all
or give me the right permissions.
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012, Ian Jeffray wrote
Michael,
> I'd like to offer to be ArcEm web site maintainer.
>
> I could keep it up-to-date with news and update it for new releases.
I've tried to do a little of that (most recently just dumping
the GP2X references that was all silly anyway).
> Are there any plans to have a new ArcEm release
34 matches
Mail list logo
