Re: [Architecture] [CDM-Framework/MDM] Compliance monitoring for devices

2015-06-24 Thread Shanmugarajah Sinnathamby
Hi Prabath, The architecture might not fit for all the platforms. It might have to be based on the platform MDM communciation. iOS MDM device communication is agentless based (communciation is directly between the OS and the backend server) , Android is based on Developer built Agent Application

Re: [Architecture] [AppM] [CDM] AppM MDM Integration

2015-04-27 Thread Shanmugarajah Sinnathamby
Hi Dilan, The device will invoke the url to download the apk file , how do we achieve the security . Is there any kind of token ? or its its a direct link . Can we have something like parameters without exposing the direct link of the file. On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Chathura Dilan

Re: [Architecture] [AppM] [CDM] AppM MDM Integration

2015-04-27 Thread Shanmugarajah Sinnathamby
links. We need to do a proper research on this with real devices, so this feature will be support from the next version of app manager if it is possible. On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Shanmugarajah Sinnathamby s...@wso2.com wrote: Hi Dilan, The device will invoke the url to download

Re: [Architecture] Additional fields found in iOS mobile device management

2015-02-16 Thread Shanmugarajah Sinnathamby
Hi, *1. In MDM context, we have 3 kinds of Token* Token, MagicToken and UnlockToken Token,MagicToken is used for push notification from MDM Server to APNS server Unlock Token is used for ClearPasscode DM-Command - to Clear the Passcode for a Device The size of this token is little bit large.

Re: [Architecture] RFC: Adding support for Context within EMM using CEP

2014-11-19 Thread Shanmugarajah Sinnathamby
Hi Srinath, Dynamic Policy is more of a context based, which is based on Location and Time (currently 2 forms). We can have the other context to the dynamic policy. Lets have a meeting to discuss this further. Can we have it early next week ? On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Srinath Perera

Re: [Architecture] SSO IDP Proxy Application + SDK

2014-03-11 Thread Shanmugarajah Sinnathamby
Hi Prabath, 1. Can't we use the implicit grant type instead of *Authorization code . * - *Authorization Code* for apps running on a web serverhttp://aaronparecki.com/articles/2012/07/29/1/oauth2-simplified#web-server-apps - *Implicit* for

Re: [Architecture] SCEP Identity Server (was: Re: Mobile Device Management Architecture)

2013-08-05 Thread Shanmugarajah Sinnathamby
. On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Prabath Siriwardena prab...@wso2.comwrote: I guess user challenge it self is not enough.. We also need to validate the SCEP request.. Thanks regards, -Prabath On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Shanmugarajah Sinnathamby s...@wso2.comwrote: Hi

Re: [Architecture] SCEP Identity Server (was: Re: Mobile Device Management Architecture)

2013-08-04 Thread Shanmugarajah Sinnathamby
Hi Prabath , Currently SCEP server is within the MDM domain itself . Where validation will be done based on the user challenge before it gets passed to it. The validation part is not done. Also there is a performance issue in the time taken enroll a device , Mayuran is working on that along with