he mailing list moves.
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
e\archiva-repository-layer\src\test
\repositories\metadata-repository\or g\apache\archiva\metadata\tests
\snap_shots_a\1.0-alpha-11-SNAPSHOT\.svn\tmp\text-base
\snap_shots_a-1.0-alpha-11-20070302 ..212723-3.war.svn-base': The
system cannot find the path specified.
--
Brett Porter
grade archiva's too? Or is it a work in progress?
^_^
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
the directory listings prettier, but I still need
to
be able to click around a _single_ repository with the
/repository/repo-id/ path.
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
Apache
Archiva project, its source, and its goals.
I would like to nominate him as an Apache Archiva committer.
I'll leave this discussion open for a week, then call a vote if
everyone agrees.
- Joakim
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
=
--- archiva/trunk/archiva-modules/archiva-web/archiva-webdav/pom.xml
(original)
+++ archiva/trunk/archiva-modules/archiva-web/archiva-webdav/pom.xml
Mon Apr 14 06:03:47 2008
@@ -45,6 +45,12 @@
org.codehaus.plexus
plexus-spring
+
+
+ org.codehaus.plexus
+ plexus-container-default
+
+
org.springframework
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
On 12/04/2008, at 12:36 PM, Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
Brett Porter wrote:
Looks good to me. I say roll it into trunk.
A couple of uncertainties:
- isn't doFinal required?
doFinal ?
sorry, got confused with JCE :) it's digest() in MessageDigest, which
is there.
- I think
nsider this a call for discussion. ;-)
- Joakim
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
3 version
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
is it served as the flat file?
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
are
triggered after a repository scan, which can be scheduled or
explicitly
executed.
I could get the servlet context when the scan is explicitly
executed, but I
don't think i can get it when it's executed by the task executor.
-Deng
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:06 PM, Brett Port
Results:
+1, binding: Myself, Deng, Nicolas, Fabrice
+1, non-binding: James, Dan
+0: Wendy
I'll proceed with the release and announcement.
Cheers,
Brett
On 04/04/2008, at 4:23 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
Hi
The Archiva 1.0.2 release candidate has been staged.
This release includes 41
at OpenSymphony. (Not sure
if they've switched to an XWork release yet.) Everything looked okay
to me but it kept failing complaining about missing artifacts.
--
Wendy
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 9:00 AM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 07/04/2008, at 4:17 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote
On 07/04/2008, at 4:17 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Archiva 1.0.2 release candidate has been staged.
...
[ ] +1 Release it!
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Don't release it, because...
+0 - I've only had time to
e organized too.
I'm getting the test failure in the sources distribution again
(archiva-repository-layer) though but this is not a blocker for the
release.
Thanks,
Deng
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 1:23 AM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
The Archiva 1.0.2 release candid
ryone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback.
[ ] +1 Release it!
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Don't release it, because...
The vote will be open for 72 hours.
Thanks,
Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
* * ?] for database update is invalid.
Defaulting to hourly.
What's strange is that the web page shows three *'s when I submit
it, not two.
--
Wendy
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
today for
1.1 :-)
Thanks,
Deng
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
mments and suggestions are entertained.
This could probably take up a good half of the time if we have a few
people in there - I think this is the best bit :)
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
if artifact not
present (default)
Please tell me now if these aren't descriptive enough, firstly :)
For the one that propagates at the end, I'll look into a way to list
all the errors that occurred in the response.
WDYT?
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTE
t :-)
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1563
-Deng
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Joakim Erdfelt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
so ... what's needed to move the archiva mailing lists?
- Joakim
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
emory to take another instance, we'd
need to find out.
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
On 30/03/2008, at 2:22 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
The only one I'm not sure about is the cli module - it's at the top
level since it seems separate enough and for distribution, but it
contains code so it
;s excluded from the reference. It also results in
more content in the root POM that could be pushed down to the modules
POM. What do others think?
- Brett
On 29/03/2008, at 2:19 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
Ok, I've done this - will now work on cleaning up the reporting.
I als
Ok, I've done this - will now work on cleaning up the reporting.
I also changed the group ID to org.apache.archiva. I have not done
this on the branch for 1.0.x however.
- Brett
On 28/03/2008, at 7:36 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
Since we're moving tomorrow anyway, I'd like to
On 29/03/2008, at 1:30 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
/archiva
/archiva-docs
/archiva-jetty
/archiva-modules
.. current structure under here
This means we can retain the one release, one build - but all the
came up when I ran
it. I'm
getting a jasper compiler exception when I tried to access the
application,
so I added the dependency back and everything worked fine again :-)
Thanks,
Deng
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 2:43 AM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
That's weird -
r -modules. This allows us to put all the Java code
reporting in there, and not pollute the -docs and the distro with it.
I think more changes can be made to the structure of -modules, but
that can be done at a later time.
Any objections?
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs
+ jasper-compiler-jdt
+ 5.5.15
+ runtime
+
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
more info
is provided)
Any last minute objections, wishes for inclusion, comments?
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
n-plugin:1.0-
alpha-15:runtime (selected for runtime)
org.codehaus.mojo.appassembler:appassembler-maven-plugin:maven-
plugin:1.0-20080307.021018-2:runtime (selected for runtime)
org.codehaus.mojo:dependency-maven-plugin:maven-plugin:1.0:runtime
(selected for runtime)
org.codehaus.mojo:jpox-maven-p
unk/pom.xml (original)
+++ maven/archiva/trunk/pom.xml Sun Mar 23 22:02:11 2008
@@ -175,7 +175,9 @@
archiva-scheduled
archiva-web
archiva-cli
+
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
1-SNAPSHOT.
This makes sense - I'd move it up to the top level already since it
doesn't have any correlation to trunk.
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
s and
Annotations to get the jdo mapping pieces and xml bindings for the
database backup/restore functions too.
wdyt?
- Joakim
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
n the PlexusLifecycleBeanPostProcessor class in
order to execute the configure in the right. But as a non Spring
expert, I haven't found yet :-).
I couldn't figure that out either, which is why I put configurable in
the other location :)
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
ool-2-thread-1] INFO
org.codehaus.plexus.taskqueue.execution.TaskExecutor:repository-
scanning
- Finished repository task:
--
Wendy
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
r Software Engineer
ICAT Managers LLC <http://www.icat.com/>
W: +1 (303) 447-1155 x2431
M: +1 (720) 346-3868
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
On 21/03/2008, at 12:57 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 5:25 AM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Any objections to me locking in the morning (Australian time) of Sat
Mar 29th to do the SVN move?
Sounds fine.
I wanted to give it a bit of time so 1.0.2 can
- wdyt?
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ARCHIVA/Index
I just did this by hand, so I apologise for losing history but it was
never going to be feasible to import :(
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
I thought this might be of interest to some people here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ARCHIVA/Setting+up+Archiva+in+Eclipse+with+Q4E
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
Hi all,
The board approved the resolution we submitted, so Archiva is now a TLP.
I look forward to working with you all on moving forward with this!
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
in helping out/testing it?
Thanks!
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
JarInfo client can take an anonymous Jar file and perform a
series of identification checks in an attempt to identify the Jar
file based on jar file contents, and even similarity to jar files
found in the JarInfo indexes.
That's all the info I can squeeze out tonite, hopefully someone else
ating away our plexus scaffolding to spring,
wouldn't we need spring too?
No, I think we should just be using the wiring information (and
possibly annotations). The only time we should use Spring libs is when
we use one of their components, like the scheduler or the cache.
- Brett
27;ll look it up).
But I also noticed a bug in the assembly descriptor too - did anyone
noticed archiva jetty bakes a 53Mb ZIP file? :) It seems everything is
included in repo/*, when really we just want the Jetty JARs.
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
On 17/03/2008, at 8:21 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I'm expecting we will distribute based on the jetty + war runtime
instead
for 1.1.
And does that work? I see archiva-standalone/archiva-jetty, and
MRM-
On 16/03/2008, at 2:15 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Adding spring as default dependency.
Why is this needed? I would expect we only need a spring dependency in
testing (which should be spring-test), and in the webapp - we're not
using any interfaces?
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
[
.. which
makes me want to blame Redback since they have that in common.
On it's trunk? Nothing has changed so maybe it's a problem with the
mail.jar on your system?
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
.
- Brett
On 13/03/2008, at 7:52 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
No problem - I'll drop it in :)
On 13/03/2008, at 3:08 AM, nicolas de loof wrote:
Nothing left for me. My +1 to merge
Not beeing at home this week I cannot acces SVN.
Nico
2008/3/12, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
H
No problem - I'll drop it in :)
On 13/03/2008, at 3:08 AM, nicolas de loof wrote:
Nothing left for me. My +1 to merge
Not beeing at home this week I cannot acces SVN.
Nico
2008/3/12, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Nicolas,
What is left before merging the branch i
Hi Nicolas,
What is left before merging the branch in?
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
:42 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
What would it take to use Subversion as the back-end for Archiva?
I noticed we have JSPWiki incubating now, and they can do it...
http://www.jspwiki.org/wiki/SubversionProvider
--
Wendy
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
maven/test/2.0.4-SNAPSHOT/test-2.0.4-SNAPSHOT.pom Thu Mar 6
09:40:26 2008
@@ -102,7 +102,8 @@
TEST/Archiva
- ${kb.site.url}/${prj.url.relative}
+
+ http://j.random.server.com/docs/${project.groupId}/$
{project.artifactId}/${project.version}
scm:svn:${prj.svn}/${prj.svn.branch}
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
/tar.gz files.
The appassembler nicely generates the wrapper conf file and different
platforms you request. Much easier to upgrade the wrapper or
reconfigure or duplicate for Continuum, etc.
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
On 05/03/2008, at 9:20 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
Cool! I will pass this on to the board for the meeting later this
month.
I will also note that I removed Dennis at his request on the Maven PMC
list - he will remain as a committer but felt his contributions had
not yet been significant
ier ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Dennis Lundberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Jesse McConnell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Brett Porter ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Edwin Punzalan ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Carlos Sanchez ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Wendy Smoak ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
John Tolentino ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Emmanuel Venisse ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Cool. Is there anything left to do on here now, or should we look at
merging it to trunk?
On 02/03/2008, at 6:33 PM, nicolas de loof wrote:
That's what I supposed but just want to verify.
2008/3/1, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
It may not be necessary - presumably webwork
a similar interceptor.
--
Olivier
[1] http://plexus.codehaus.org/plexus-components/plexus-xwork-integration/
2008/2/29, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
the reason in plexus was because each action was allocated on every
request and not released - I just want to check whether that was the
case
leaks from the webapp
when it never released the components.
Very cool stuff :)
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
and (some)
>>>
>> lifecycle
>>
>>> interfaces. As I discover plexus features by testing on archiva,
I'd be
>>> pleased to get more infos on plexus IoC specificities.
>>>
>>> It also provides a PlexusInSpringTestCase that is
On 29/02/2008, at 12:31 AM, Fabrice Bellingard wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I think this is a great description for the front page - want to
update the site? :)
Ok :-)
I reworked it a bit, and updated the xdoc front page
a Ching ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Nicolas de Loof ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Joakim Erdfelt ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Arnaud Heritier ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Dennis Lundberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Jesse McConnell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Brett Porter ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Edwin Punzalan ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Carlos Sanchez ([EMAIL PROTEC
27;t happen - we can look at his contributions
to Archiva and start a vote there instead.
What do you think?
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
S.txt
Any objections?
James
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
y all means let us know :)
3) May be others can chip with their thoughts on Modello. But I
think Modello could be dropped by using JPA annotations for the data
model.
Yeah, that's not really related :)
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
requirement on
RepositoryContentFactory for the Contextualizable interface, and
direct
access to the PlexusContainer.
I plan to create a PlexusContainerAdapter to expose Spring beans
Nicolas.
2008/2/25, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 25/02/2008, at 10:23 PM, nicolas de loof
ration...
No - are you reading the CacheFailureTransferTest.xml file as a plexus
descriptor?
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
Hi Joakim,
James pointed out trunk wasn't building and it seems that the upgrade
of commons-io was the cause. I can't just roll that back as there are
now other dependencies on the new API.
Can you find out what's up?
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://
de Loof ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Joakim Erdfelt ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Arnaud Heritier ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Dennis Lundberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Jesse McConnell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Brett Porter ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Edwin Punzalan ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Carlos Sanchez ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Wendy Smoak ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
EJB3 injection) but
requires
some conf ...
I've posted on spring forum :
http://forum.springframework.org/showthread.php?t=50181
2008/2/20, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
This is way cooler than what I was doing :)
Can you replace the calls to the other factories so we can se
On 21/02/2008, at 8:07 PM, Ben Lidgey wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 February 2008 07:03
To: archiva-dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: should Archiva talk about requesting to become a top
level project?
[snip]
Is there anyone lurking that
The discussions this week have been pretty healthy, releases going
smoothly, and there is user and developer interest.
Today, Continuum has graduated to be a top level project and I feel
Archiva is well on track. What do others think?
BTW, SVN lists the following committers (snipped a coupl
.. and some spring internals.
On this basis, we can migrate components in isolation, without
requirement for changes in many places because some other
component has (or
has not yet) been updated to use spring.
Nico.
2008/2/20, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 20/02/2008, at 6:33 PM, nic
On 21/02/2008, at 1:36 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ per-lookup
typo?
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
doesnt.
Any ideas?
Robert Simmons Jr
Senior Software Engineer
ICAT Managers LLC <http://www.icat.com/>
W: +1 (303) 447-1155 x2431
M: +1 (720) 346-3868
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
app (though it might still have some plexus components we'll want to
pick up).
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
On 20/02/2008, at 6:03 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hi,
Interesting, could you move this Spring/Plexus to a component in the
plexus svn @ codehaus ?
That's a possibility - though it's really just a first draft right
now :)
Cheers,
Brett
Thanks,
--
Olivier
2008/2/20, Brett Port
FailureCache" );
}
The next thing we should probably try is using something like
SpringCache as suggested to remove the plexus-cache dependency.
Have fun!
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
purely
looking to operate Archiva as a secured proxy and the administration
features of the webapp could be separately secured since there are
often less users needing to be set up for that.
- Brett
-- Robert
-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
o struts2 or staying with Webwork since it's minimal impact to the
code. The other doesn't bring any obvious benefit for all the work?
Good proposal, though - when will you be getting started?
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
* 1.0-beta-3
* 1.0-beta-4
And merge them into:
* 1.0
Any objections?
- Joakim
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
or central, and getting this in the Struts 2 build:
$mvn install -Pall
...
Couldn't find a version in [1.6] to match range [1.7,)
commons-digester:commons-digester:jar:null
If I go straight to central, no problem.
--
Wendy
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
heers,
Brett
[1] http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Archiva+Roadmap
On 11/02/2008, at 5:07 PM, Maria Odea Ching wrote:
On Feb 7, 2008 7:08 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have some additions :)
I also think we need to keep reviewing the types of problems people
have
- not sure I understand - isn't the wagon consuming from an
InputStream and pushing to an OutputStream and can trace the byte
count along the way?
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
:)
On 07/02/2008, at 12:16 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
These all sound good to me. Really enjoying the discussion :)
Some comments and additions:
On 06/02/2008, at 5:48 PM, Maria Odea Ching wrote:
From the thread so far, these are the things to choose from for the
1.1roadmap:
1. Red
rce
transport layer)
What I'm want to propose is the removal of Wagon and replacing it
with a
more flexible library (perhaps we could cook something up with
commons-vfs?)
So what do you think? Suggestions?
Thanks
James Dumay
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
These all sound good to me. Really enjoying the discussion :)
Some comments and additions:
On 06/02/2008, at 5:48 PM, Maria Odea Ching wrote:
From the thread so far, these are the things to choose from for the
1.1roadmap:
1. Reduce memory consumption
2. Preemptive artifact synchronisation
3
On 04/02/2008, at 9:52 PM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
Hi all,
There's always a very important bug in maven 1.0.1 about proxies :
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-631
Is there someone who plan to work on it ? for an archiva 1.0.2 ?
Shall I assign it to you? :D
- Brett
cheers,
--
..
Just coming back to this - it is working for me now.
(Perhaps this is because the site plugin was downgraded again, since
the docs were broken with the latest release)
On 31/12/2007, at 6:06 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
I'm having trouble running 'mvn site' from archiva/trunk. (Also from
the arc
Are these things that have disappeared, or just caught your attention
again? Probably best just to put them in JIRA for 1.1?
- Brett
On 01/02/2008, at 11:27 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On Jan 29, 2008 4:11 AM, Maria Odea Ching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Archiva 1.0.1 release candidate has be
It really depends on whether you are looking to use the 1.1.9
enhnacement features, or the 1.1.9 runtime features. I think the bug
it was addressing was in the runtime - so to upgrade would be nice but
non essential.
As for the conversion, I'm not really sure...
- Brett
On 30/01/2008, at
+1! :)
I'm running it now, ran through my standard set up and checked the
distribution.
Just some minor issues to adjust in the release process for the docs:
- site.xml version needs to be adjusted prior to release in docs
- release notes in the docs need to be updated before build
Cheers,
B
MRM-667 needs to be
applied,
as well as Nicolas' commit for MRM-670..
Thanks,
Deng
On Jan 29, 2008 9:29 AM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nicolas,
This can't be part of the 1.0.1 release - we haven't created the
branch yet, right?
I guess we can create i
agreed, though I hope it is short lived :)
On 25/01/2008, at 11:54 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
There was some discussion on IRC last night about branching Archiva
1.0 to allow trunk to move on as 1.1.
Thoughts?
--
Wendy
I'm happy with the binary itself and am using it now :)
I did notice the docs have some problems since the site plugin was
upgraded (the breadcrumb version is wrong, and the navigation is
missing, along with the same problem in the assembly).
Also, the parent POM doesn't seem to be staged a
IIRC the page is generated, but not linked. It should be linked from
the get involved page.
The only thing I deliberately left off was the left nav :)
On 08/01/2008, at 1:05 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On Jan 7, 2008 10:01 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yeah, it should be
Yeah, it should be in the empty get involved page (*sorry*)
On 08/01/2008, at 11:02 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On Jan 7, 2008 3:34 PM, Barrie Treloar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There are no details of any of the mailing lists for archiva at the
Project Information page.
See http://maven.apache.or
Hi Joakim,
I read your comment on here: http://www.plasticboy.de/?
p=24#comment-16. I was wondering what mysql issues you are referring
to - since I don't recall anyone bringing it up and couldn't find it
in JIRA?
BTW, that article is quite good - we should link it somewhere :)
Cheers,
Br
Hi Nicolas,
I saw this added dependency in one of your commits and thought it
might be best kept separated - do you think the toArtifactReference()
might be better suited to being in the LegacyPathParser?
Cheers,
Brett
1 - 100 of 311 matches
Mail list logo
