Re: [arin-ppml] Clarification regarding Section 5 of NRPM

David - Excellent point - thanks for catching that and giving the appropriate clarity! /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers On Aug 19, 2024, at 7:19 AM, David Farmer wrote: John, He also asks about transfers of ASNs. Section 8 covers resource

Re: [arin-ppml] Clarification regarding Section 5 of NRPM

. I.e., the policy for AS number issuance in the ARIN region is quite straightforward at present. If you are researching past policies, earlier versions of the NRPM may be found here - https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/nrpm/changelog/ Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO Am

Re: [arin-ppml] AC structure (was AC candidates)

bove I must disagree with your assessment – the ARIN policy development process is accessible to all, but indeed it does appear that some elements of it are different than what you might be accustomed to. Thanks, /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry

Re: [arin-ppml] AC structure (was AC candidates)

dy in those processes (and in fact, it recognizes that some policies will explicitly have another body - the Address Council) so long as it does not adversely impact the open/transoparent/accessible nature of the process. Thanks, /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Int

Re: [arin-ppml] AC structure (was AC candidates)

On Aug 14, 2024, at 11:57 AM, Fernando Frediani wrote: Thanks for the comments John. On 13/08/2024 13:11, John Curran wrote: Other regions, chairs are elected by community and should they commit any mistakes or abuses the RIR Board still have the power to not ractify an approved proposal

Re: [arin-ppml] AC structure (was AC candidates)

atters of fairness, consensus, etc. all to the detriment of the community. Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers ___ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public

Re: [arin-ppml] AC candidates

rt in the field, the death by committee effect is > evident in a way that wasn't true of the old IRPEP proposals. Yes, as noted above. Thanks, /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers ___ ARIN-PPML You are rece

Re: [arin-ppml] AC candidates

policy text that are not obvious in advance. Thanks, /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers ___ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML

Re: [arin-ppml] AC candidates

ct and continue their original proposal to the next meeting. All of this was replaced with a streamlined petition process that allows the same thing in cases where there is even nominal community support for that course of action. Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO American Regist

Re: [arin-ppml] AC candidates

On Aug 9, 2024, at 6:48 PM, William Herrin wrote: On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 3:24 PM John Curran wrote: On Aug 9, 2024, at 6:17 PM, William Herrin wrote: No. No no. That's what the AC did BEFORE the board created the PDP. Now they're charged with writing the policies. You are correc

Re: [arin-ppml] AC candidates

On Aug 9, 2024, at 6:17 PM, William Herrin wrote: On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 1:39 PM John Curran wrote: I will note that the member-elected ARIN AC works predominately to administer the policy development process, and to do so in a highly uniform and consistent manner. No. No no. That's wha

Re: [arin-ppml] AC candidates

njoy deep consideration during the upcoming update of ICP-2, and it’s likely premature to anticipate the outcome of such discussions in advance. Thanks, /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers ___ ARIN-PPML You are

Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2024-8: Restrict the Largest Initial IPv6 Allocation to /20

and this includes sampling customer tickets to validate that NRPM requirements and internal procedures are consistently followed - the audit reports are available here - https://www.arin.net/about/corporate/rsd_audits/ ) Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet

Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2024-8: Restrict the Largest Initial IPv6 Allocation to /20

culminate in approval. (Fraudulent requests are a different matter, and one would have to be fairly brave to engage in subterfuge in order to obtain an oversize block given the risks of reclamation by ARIN should it be determined later that the block was fraudulently obtained.) Thanks, /John John

Re: [arin-ppml] Revised - Draft Policy ARIN-2022-12: Direct Assignment Language Update

Bill - Agreed that the language is oriented to those with existing ARIN context (although this may be somewhat inevitable given that we’re clarifying the deprecation of ARIN-specific jargon…) Do you have any suggestions for improving the policy text? Thanks, /John John Curran President

Re: [arin-ppml] Revised - Draft Policy ARIN-2024-1: Definition of Organization ID/Org ID

.) Best wishes, /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers On Feb 8, 2024, at 2:52 AM, Owen DeLong via ARIN-PPML wrote: Since one technically needs to create an ORG-ID in order to request resources (if you don’t already have an ORG-ID), ORG-IDs are technically

Re: [arin-ppml] Sections 6.5.1.a and 6.5.1.b - More section 6 Potential simplifications from the NRPM Working Group

On Dec 14, 2023, at 7:49 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: On Dec 14, 2023, at 14:45, John Curran wrote: …. I am fairly clear what constitutes an ISP and/or a provider of connectivity services, but what services constitute network services? Does that include an IR that provides VPN/tunnel services

Re: [arin-ppml] Sections 6.5.1.a and 6.5.1.b - More section 6 Potential simplifications from the NRPM Working Group

iting “Address Management Services” without connectivity. Policy proposals are relatively easy to submit if you wish to make NRPM clearer in any manner. Thanks (and Happy Holidays!) /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers

Re: [arin-ppml] Sections 6.5.1.a and 6.5.1.b - More section 6 Potential simplifications from the NRPM Working Group

need for the community be quite explicit in its desired policy outcomes. Thanks, /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers ___ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy

[arin-ppml] [MORE] Re: Sections 6.5.1.a and 6.5.1.b - More section 6 Potential simplifications from the NRPM Working Group

On Dec 13, 2023, at 5:52 PM, John Curran wrote: On Dec 13, 2023, at 5:09 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: My point was that ARIN doesn’t apply those greater constraints and said assumption is actually problematic in that it may dissuade or confuse legitimate applicants. Incorrect - As I indicated

Re: [arin-ppml] Sections 6.5.1.a and 6.5.1.b - More section 6 Potential simplifications from the NRPM Working Group

language cleanup. Thanks! (And Happy Holidays!) /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers ___ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). U

Re: [arin-ppml] Sections 6.5.1.a and 6.5.1.b - More section 6 Potential simplifications from the NRPM Working Group

On Dec 13, 2023, at 1:40 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: On Dec 13, 2023, at 09:09, John Curran wrote: ... I note that that you make a strong presumption about "what ARIN is actually concerned about”, and while registration aspects may frequently be the main focus, it is not necessarily alway

Re: [arin-ppml] Sections 6.5.1.a and 6.5.1.b - More section 6 Potential simplifications from the NRPM Working Group

eing described and more > relatable to the policy intent. As noted, such a change may be more _or less_ descriptive to actual policy intent of particular sections of NRPM , but the community certainly has the ability to consider such cases and clarify as needed. Thanks (and Happy Holidays

Re: [arin-ppml] Making the Sausage (was: re: AC Candidate [...etc...] )

nsidered nearly the equivalent to “being nominated” if you choose to treat it in that manner. FYI, /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers ___ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscri

Re: [arin-ppml] AC Candidates

, suggestions for the improvements to the ARIN election process should be directed to the ARIN ACSP <https://www.arin.net/participate/community/acsp/> Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers ___ ARIN-PPML Y

Re: [arin-ppml] Should we disallow an AC member from submitting a policy proposal?

w know if the same is the case for your proposed hobbling of the ARIN AC members, but provide it as related background. Thanks, /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers ___ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message beca

[arin-ppml] Regarding ARIN's PDP (was: Re: AC Candidates)

> On Oct 27, 2023, at 4:10 PM, John Curran wrote: > >> Does the current process actually achieve that lofty goal? > > Yes. By the way, if you actually wish proof of that, feel free to review the record of the policies recommended to the Board of Trustees for adoption… All

Re: [arin-ppml] AC Candidates (Chris Tacit)

he current process actually achieve that lofty goal? Yes. Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers ___ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (

Re: [arin-ppml] AC candidates

policy proposals or draft policies Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers ___ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).

Re: [arin-ppml] Revised - Draft Policy ARIN-2022-12: Direct Assignment Language Update

On Oct 3, 2023, at 1:05 AM, John Santos wrote: On 10/2/2023 5:42 PM, John Curran wrote: Alas, your proposed analogy fails when there is no vehicle, but only the registry entry itself – i.e. Internet number resources are unique identifiers within the Internet Numbers Registry System, and this

Re: [arin-ppml] Revised - Draft Policy ARIN-2022-12: Direct Assignment Language Update

ers. You may operate in a manner without such subdelegations (as is the case for most organizations operating as an "end-users”) – in which case such requirements don’t come into play. Thanks, /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers ___

Re: [arin-ppml] Revised - Draft Policy ARIN-2022-12: Direct Assignment Language Update

nction for some of entries is meaningful – it presently is not from a policy or operations perspective, so it is a very reasonable question for the community to consider. Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers __

Re: [arin-ppml] Revised - Draft Policy ARIN-2022-12: Direct Assignment Language Update

usion, then the same confusion (or more) would quite likely result from changing both to new terminology altogether. Thanks, /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers On Oct 2, 2023, at 12:58 PM, Owen DeLong via ARIN-PPML wrote: John, At least in my case, thi

Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN Trusted Facilitator Program and Certification Requirements (Re: Tenfold fee increases?)

for transfers, it’s simple enough to achieve if there’s community consensus for such - summit a policy proposal if you wish this considered by the community. Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers > On Jun 4, 2023, at 3:47 PM, Michel Py >

Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN Trusted Facilitator Program and Certification Requirements (Re: Tenfold fee increases?)

Mike - It’s still a simple service for the community, but now hopefully one with a lower probability that those selecting a facilitator from the list will end up dissatisfied. Thanks, /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers On Jun 4, 2023, at 1:35 PM, Mike

Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN Trusted Facilitator Program and Certification Requirements (Re: Tenfold fee increases?)

endangering the integrity of the program. Thanks, /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers On Jun 4, 2023, at 12:36 PM, Mike Burns wrote: One more thing John…. You keep referring to his as the “Trusted” Facilitator program, not Qualified. Why does ARIN feel to

[arin-ppml] ARIN Trusted Facilitator Program and Certification Requirements (Re: Tenfold fee increases?)

e been operational for some time, we will review the level of participation received, the associated costs, and determine if any adjustments are warranted to provide for more equitable cost recovery. Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet N

Re: [arin-ppml] Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2022-11: Clean-up of NRPM – Introduction of Section 2.17

rking, and the point of section 2 is rather to provide technical definitions for a technical audience. Thanks, /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers ___ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are sub

Re: [arin-ppml] Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2022-11: Clean-up of NRPM – Introduction of Section 2.17

for such a perspective. Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers ___ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe

Re: [arin-ppml] Are we an ISP or an End-User? Can our designation change at a later time?

licy developed by this community - to the extent that there are different policies for different operational usages, ARIN implements accordingly. Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers ___ ARIN-PPML You are rece

Re: [arin-ppml] Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2021-8: Deprecation of the ‘Autonomous System Originations’ Field

On 1 Nov 2022, at 11:10 PM, Owen DeLong mailto:o...@delong.com>> wrote: On Nov 1, 2022, at 19:49, John Curran mailto:jcur...@arin.net>> wrote: You had the option to consolidate to a single billing relationship for all of the resources, but choose not to do so. I had one ORG-ID

Re: [arin-ppml] Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2021-8: Deprecation of the ‘Autonomous System Originations’ Field

On 1 Nov 2022, at 9:21 PM, Owen DeLong mailto:o...@delong.com>> wrote: On Nov 1, 2022, at 12:14, John Curran mailto:jcur...@arin.net>> wrote: ... Owen - That was your choice: you could have consolidated into a single billing relationship if you wished or opted (as you did)

Re: [arin-ppml] Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2021-8: Deprecation of the ‘Autonomous System Originations’ Field

On 1 Nov 2022, at 3:03 PM, Owen DeLong mailto:o...@delong.com>> wrote: On Nov 1, 2022, at 05:07, John Curran mailto:jcur...@arin.net>> wrote: The “double-charging” that you allege was imposed by the ARIN Board of Trustees was actually self-imposed by you; i.e., you chose to maint

Re: [arin-ppml] Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2021-8: Deprecation of the ‘Autonomous System Originations’ Field

ion. Please refrain from such misrepresentation if you wish to continue participation on ARIN’s mailing lists, as the ARIN Mailing List AUP <https://www.arin.net/participate/community/mailing_lists/aup/> specifically prohibits the posting of false or fictitious statements. Thanks!

Re: [arin-ppml] Election candidate qualification guidance letters

.arin.net/vault/participate/elections/board_nomcom_guidance2022.pdf The Advisory Council Guidance to the 2022 Nomination Committee is available here - https://www.arin.net/vault/participate/elections/ac_nomcom_guidance2022.pdf Best wishes, /John John Curran President and CEO A

[arin-ppml] Fwd: [arin-announce] Submit Your Questions for Candidates in the 2022 ARIN Elections

Folks - If you have a particular questions for this year’s ARIN Board or ARIN AC candidates, now is your opportunity to submit them for consideration to be used in the upcoming candidate forums. Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers Begin

Re: [arin-ppml] Revised - Draft Policy ARIN-2022-2: Remove Barrier to BGP Uptake in ASN Policy

process - <https://www.arin.net/participate/community/acsp/> Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers On 18 Sep 2022, at 9:13 PM, William Herrin mailto:b...@herrin.us>> wrote: On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 8:59 AM Gary Buhrmaster mailto:

Re: [arin-ppml] Availability of the Legacy Fee Cap for New LRSA Entrants Ending as of 31 December 2023

the more advanced services that were developed since, and paid for the ARIN community. Best wishes, /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers > On 13 Sep 2022, at 5:05 PM, John Santos wrote: > > $250/year for maintaining the registration of a singl

[arin-ppml] Availability of the Legacy Fee Cap for New LRSA Entrants Ending as of 31 December 2023

December 2023 in order to secure the most favorable fees for their ARIN Services as well as being able to access ARIN’s more advanced services such as the Internet Routing Registry (IRR) and Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) services. FYI, /John John Curran President and CEO American

[arin-ppml] Fwd: [arin-announce] New ARIN Registration Services Agreement

Updated RSA agreement available. FYI, /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers Begin forwarded message: From: ARIN mailto:i...@arin.net>> Subject: [arin-announce] New ARIN Registration Services Agreement Date: 12 September 2022 at 12:56:02 PM EDT To:

[arin-ppml] IMPORTANT - Deadline Approaching — Make Sure Your Organization is Eligible to Vote in ARIN’s Upcoming Election!

mber status, assign a voting contact, and participate in this year’s election. See the message below for further information. FYI, /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers Begin forwarded message: From: ARIN mailto:i...@arin.net>> Subject: [arin-announce

Re: [arin-ppml] Deceased Companies?

> On 9 Aug 2022, at 5:09 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > > In message <69ed05b4-afc0-48ea-b466-417b2dab4...@arin.net>, > John Curran wrote: > >> From where I am sitting, and based on my substantial knowledge of ARIN's >> past actions, >> you

Re: [arin-ppml] Deceased Companies?

On 9 Aug 2022, at 5:10 AM, Ronald F. Guilmette mailto:r...@tristatelogic.com>> wrote: In message <7eacaf7e-1f93-42fe-828a-5f9ca9a59...@arin.net<mailto:7eacaf7e-1f93-42fe-828a-5f9ca9a59...@arin.net>>, John Curran mailto:jcur...@arin.net>> wrote: If you find a W

Re: [arin-ppml] Deceased Companies

ms. Thanks, /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers ___ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your m

Re: [arin-ppml] Deceased Companies?

situations and correct where possible – considering that (as you did above) we have limited resources that must be prioritized across many activities. Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers __

Re: [arin-ppml] Deceased Companies

e was returned, held for a period, and then issued by the policies in place at that time. Thanks, /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers ___ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN actions regarding address blocks with no valid POCs (was: Re: Deceased Companies?)

ll always remain in good standing (and most fervently wish that to be the case since having to deal with reclamation might indeed be a tad challenging…) FYI, /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers ___ ARIN-PPM

Re: [arin-ppml] Deceased Companies?

ptable and should be rectified forthwith. This is not intentional (nor different than the practices of most organizations) but rather the desire to minimize confusion and potential for parties using the wrong version when dealing with ARIN. However, it should be relatively easy to provide a su

Re: [arin-ppml] Deceased Companies?

past that are applicable to the entire registry including legacy resource holders – this includes addition of the abuse contact, number resource resource review section, POC validation, etc.) ... In fairness, I must apologize to John Curran, to the entire ARIN staff, and to everyone here if my ques

[arin-ppml] ARIN actions regarding address blocks with no valid POCs (was: Re: Deceased Companies?)

On 4 Aug 2022, at 5:01 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt mailto:t...@ipinc.net>> wrote: On 7/26/2022 12:50 PM, John Curran wrote: if such a case were brought to our attention and the resources were not being used, we’d revoke. If they were in use, we’d try to reach the party using them first (as the

Re: [arin-ppml] Deceased Companies?

o be a very common occurrence with truly defunct entities. Thanks, /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers ___ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List

Re: [arin-ppml] Deceased Companies?

ge the outcome but does provide another lead to pursue and potentially evidence of actual customers that might be impacted. Thanks, /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers ___ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message

Re: [arin-ppml] Deceased Companies?

> On 26 Jul 2022, at 3:05 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette > wrote: > > In message <050367fd-7090-4f98-9c34-2904f1129...@arin.net>, > John Curran wrote: > >>> Section 8.2. of the NRPM covers "Mergers, Acquisitions, and >>> Reorganizations". The p

Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN Guidelines, regarding use in ARIN region, curious question

substantial connection with the ARIN region” If you are seeing circumstances where this is likely is not the case, please report it - https://www.arin.net/reference/tools/fraud_report/ Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers __

Re: [arin-ppml] Deceased Companies?

developed and adopted by this community will most certainly continue to apply to your legacy resources…) Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers ___ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message be

Re: [arin-ppml] Deceased Companies?

per the community-developed policy for all registry entries, legacy included – as announced by NSF at ARIN’s formation. Thanks, /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers ___ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this messag

Re: [arin-ppml] Deceased Companies?

> On 25 Jul 2022, at 5:42 PM, William Herrin wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 2:28 PM John Curran wrote: >> "Creation of ARIN will give the users of IP numbers (mostly Internet service >> providers, corporations and other large institutions) a voice in the >

Re: [arin-ppml] Deceased Companies?

> On 25 Jul 2022, at 5:50 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette > wrote: > > In message <91f20ecc-6de8-4de7-822c-b3436465e...@arin.net>, > John Curran wrote: > >>> So I ask again, where is the justification, either in legal principals or >>> in the >&g

Re: [arin-ppml] Deceased Companies?

icipate & gain a voice in policy development for management of the registry (as opposed to having it set by some US government contractor or bureaucrat.) i.e. it’s a lot less murky than you suggest. Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO American Reg

Re: [arin-ppml] Deceased Companies?

gistry services without contract or fee, but we have yet to see any party present an obligation enforceable against ARIN for how we operate the registry. (ARIN has quite a few obligations to its members and contracted customers, and they govern how the registry is administered.) Thanks! /John John

Re: [arin-ppml] Deceased Companies?

ed via an open and transparent process. 5. To the extent that you want to chat about any of the above, feel free to reach out to me at any time: my mobile number is +1 617 512 8095. (It might be possible to walk through some of this orally in a more efficient manner.) Thanks and best wishes, /

Re: [arin-ppml] Deceased Companies?

plete otherwise. Thanks, /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers On 25 Jul 2022, at 4:02 PM, Paul E McNary via ARIN-PPML mailto:arin-ppml@arin.net>> wrote: John you have repeatably told me I would risk revocation if I obtained a legacy IP block and tri

Re: [arin-ppml] Deceased Companies?

process for the community to set number resource policy and then operating the registry according to that policy. Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers ___ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because

Re: [arin-ppml] Deceased Companies?

>> asking whether ARIN can start rejecting his RSA fee payments?) > > Yes, you may so presume. I look forward to you proposing policy to that effect. The postulated case would be an Org recovery, as per NRPM 8.2. If you wish to add more exacting criteria to that secti

Re: [arin-ppml] Deceased Companies?

policy application – see "Registration Services Audit Reports” – https://www.arin.net/about/corporate/rsd_audits/ Thanks, /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers On 25 Jul 2022, at 3:22 PM, Paul E McNary via ARIN-PPML mailto:arin-ppml@arin.net>> w

Re: [arin-ppml] Deceased Companies?

r given ARIN’s track record of success in court. My advice remains to comply with ARIN policy, as ARIN has never been ordered to update the registry contrary to our policies. Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers __

Re: [arin-ppml] Deceased Companies?

tly exist, nor contention without due cause for those who are enjoying their issued number resources. Thanks, /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers ___ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed

Re: [arin-ppml] Deceased Companies?

> On 25 Jul 2022, at 2:48 PM, William Herrin wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 11:35 AM John Curran wrote: >>> On 25 Jul 2022, at 2:09 PM, William Herrin wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 8:02 AM Fernando Frediani >>> wrote: >>>> Question

Re: [arin-ppml] Deceased Companies?

involving revocation of legacy resources had resources that creatively hijacked in one form or another, and the “registrant” that had operational control disappears rather contest the revocation – thus leaving ARIN free to see if we can find the bona fide registrant or legal successor…) Thank

Re: [arin-ppml] Deceased Companies?

Paul - Legacy resources holders receive basic registry services without contract or payment to ARIN; the associated address blocks are in the ARIN registry and remain subject to ARIN’s policies. Thanks, /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers On 25 Jul 2022

Re: [arin-ppml] Deceased Companies?

rejecting his RSA fee payments…) Thanks, /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers > On 25 Jul 2022, at 12:32 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette > wrote: > > In message , > Chris Woodfield wrote: > >> I'd expect that in the case of an assignee sub

Re: [arin-ppml] Deceased Companies?

, compliance with policy, then indeed I probably said “not possible.” Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers On 25 Jul 2022, at 12:22 PM, Paul E McNary mailto:pmcn...@cameron.net>> wrote: It was you John Curran at WISPAMERICA when it was at Louisv

Re: [arin-ppml] Deceased Companies?

rees on that or if a given legacy resource holder wishes to return it directly to IANA would it be forbidden and directed by IANA to do to ARIN ? Legacy resource holders in the ARIN registry must return their resources to ARIN. Thanks, /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for

Re: [arin-ppml] Deceased Companies?

brought to our attention that they were issued to an organization that no longer exists due to passing of the proprietor. Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers > On 25 Jul 2022, at 11:45 AM, Paul E McNary via ARIN-PPML > wrote: > > I

Re: [arin-ppml] Deceased Companies?

On 25 Jul 2022, at 11:02 AM, Fernando Frediani mailto:fhfredi...@gmail.com>> wrote: Em 25/07/2022 11:34, John Curran escreveu: I have seen administratively and voluntarily dissolved corporations come back to life, so ARIN must consider this. Exactly… It turns out that dissolved

Re: [arin-ppml] Deceased Companies?

at there’s often a lack of readily verifiable documentation (unlike a registered legal entity) and the same ease with which we accept representations of a purported genuine resource holder aids those who frequently attempt to hijack your number resources. Thanks, /John John Curran President

Re: [arin-ppml] Deceased Companies?

Adam - Contact the Registration Services Helpdesk… we deal with situations like this fairly often and can often find a way to either get the registration updated (so that the holder can use or monetize the resources) or have them relinquished back to the registry. Thanks! /John John

Re: [arin-ppml] Deceased Companies?

e of old sole proprietorships where the registrant dies, the fate of > addresses is unclear. Correct - we’re looking to see what can be done when cases are reported to us, but it is a fairly manual and labor intensive process. Thanks! /John John Curran Pre

Re: [arin-ppml] Thanks! - and a couple of reminders... (was: Re: CEO that takes the time to answer all questions)

discussed on a more general purpose "arin-discuss” mailing list. In the meantime, the charter of the ARIN-PPML mailing list remains as-is, and please adhere to it in your postings Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers On 24 Jul 2022, at 3:

Re: [arin-ppml] Thanks! - and a couple of reminders... (was: Re: CEO that takes the time to answer all questions)

John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers On 19 Jul 2022, at 2:40 PM, Noah mailto:n...@neo.co.tz>> wrote: Hi John On Tue, 19 Jul 2022, 20:57 John Curran, mailto:jcur...@arin.net>> wrote: 3) If you think that it might be nice to have a more open forum f

Re: [arin-ppml] Thanks! - and a couple of reminders... (was: Re: CEO that takes the time to answer all questions)

han just topics that are “policy related ideas and issues”), I would suggest that you support that position in the open consultation I referenced previously. Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers ___ ARIN-PPM

[arin-ppml] Thanks! - and a couple of reminders... (was: Re: CEO that takes the time to answer all questions)

://www.arin.net/announcements/20220621-consultopen/ Again, thanks for your kind words and support! /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers On 19 Jul 2022, at 1:28 PM, Owen DeLong via ARIN-PPML mailto:arin-ppml@arin.net>> wrote: Yes… It’s been my experienc

Re: [arin-ppml] Reclamation of Number Resources

urrences was not provided. Thanks, /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers Begin forwarded message: From: John Curran mailto:jcur...@arin.net>> ... Yes, revocations can occur for violations of the ARIN’s number resource policy manual (NRPM)) for any resour

Re: [arin-ppml] Reclamation of Number Resources

or is dictated by the laws that exist in Nevis & St. Kitts. > > On what are you basing that very facinating conclusion? ARIN’s Data Privacy does not allow processing of personal data [including publication] outside of the specific lawful purposes for which it was collected. Thanks, /J

Re: [arin-ppml] Reclamation of Number Resources

umber Resource Fraud Reporting” process, please submit your suggestion here - https://www.arin.net/participate/community/acsp/process/ Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers On 18 Jul 2022, at 9:56 AM, Paul E McNary mailto:pmcn...@cameron.net>> w

Re: [arin-ppml] Privacy of ARIN registry data (was: Re: Reclamation of Number Resources)

On 18 Jul 2022, at 9:04 AM, Ronald F. Guilmette mailto:r...@tristatelogic.com>> wrote: In message <6d0e26dd-2b7d-49f3-9889-6b2d0cc41...@arin.net<mailto:6d0e26dd-2b7d-49f3-9889-6b2d0cc41...@arin.net>>, John Curran mailto:jcur...@arin.net>> wrote: If you wish the ARIN r

Re: [arin-ppml] Reclamation of Number Resources

ck in 2012. When I highlighted the the adoption of NRPM section 9 was in 2016, I did so via a link to the NRPM change log (which includes all of the versions of the Number Resource Policy Manual since inception) - https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/nrpm/changelog/#nrpm-change-log Thanks, /J

Re: [arin-ppml] Reclamation of Number Resources

> On 18 Jul 2022, at 8:42 AM, Ronald F. Guilmette > wrote: > > In message , > John Curran wrote: > >> ARIN requires that organizations are properly registered as a legal entity >> in order to sign n RSA and request resources. > > Yes, I think w

Re: [arin-ppml] Reclamation of Number Resources

On 18 Jul 2022, at 7:44 AM, Ronald F. Guilmette mailto:r...@tristatelogic.com>> wrote: In message <779ca4f6-751c-436e-a6c4-ca21c8db7...@arin.net<mailto:779ca4f6-751c-436e-a6c4-ca21c8db7...@arin.net>>, John Curran mailto:jcur...@arin.net>> wrote: Hopefully this works

[arin-ppml] Privacy of ARIN registry data (was: Re: Reclamation of Number Resources)

k would represent a fairly significant departure from what are becoming commonly accepted principles for personal data privacy and processing of personally identifiable information. Thanks, /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers ___

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >