On 1/31/19 7:10 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Hi Will,
>
>> Given RHBZ1639765, "Rock960 hangs after boot" and
>> uboot-images-armv8-2018.09-1.fc29.noarch having rock960-rk3399 files it
>> looks like there are some people that have Fedora running on the Vamrs
>> Rock960, but arm-image-installer
Hi,
Given RHBZ1639765, "Rock960 hangs after boot" and
uboot-images-armv8-2018.09-1.fc29.noarch having rock960-rk3399 files it looks
like there are some people that have Fedora running on the Vamrs Rock960, but
arm-image-installer doesn't list the board on the supported list. Does anyone
have
On 04/13/2018 02:34 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> i have a inet 3f tablet (pov protab 255xxl) and managed to get fedora 27
>> running on the board with a inet1 dtb,
>
> That means nothing to me, I'm guessing it's a cheap AllWinner based
> device, do you have any more details? Are you
On 09/14/2016 01:00 PM, Ziqian SUN(zsun) wrote:
> Sorry for reply on ancient mail.
> I see that neither HiKey nor DragonBoard is marked in the wiki[1]. So I want
> to know what's the support status of Hikey Board?
>
> And I see usually we ship ISO for aarch64, while Hikey and Dragon Board
>
On 01/07/2015 07:07 AM, Pratyush Anand wrote:
Hi Will,
On Monday 05 January 2015 09:36 PM, William Cohen wrote:
Hi All,
Pratyush has been implementing uprobes support for aarch64 and has
posted a set of patches
(http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/382237) for
review
Hi All,
Pratyush has been implementing uprobes support for aarch64 and has
posted a set of patches
(http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/382237) for
review. The really new Linux kernels requires a patch to the
systemtap runtime because the f_dentry macro has been removed. With
Hello Everyone,
I was reviewing the systemtap testsuite results for ARM on Fedora 19 and I
found that one of the tests (systemtap.base/deref.stp) failing on ARM for
uint16_t reads and writes. The same tests work on x86_64. There appears to be
ARM specific code in
On 09/07/2013 08:16 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 01:02:39PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
All places in general where ENXIO might be returned are related to the
function irqchip_in_kernel and the mysterious VGIC hardware (which
I guess is doing interrupt routing
On 08/25/2013 06:54 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 01:43:57PM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
W dniu 08.08.2013 15:11, Richard W.M. Jones pisze:
I can't find any documentation that says that the Chromebook
definitively cannot boot from USB 3.0 or from external HDDs.
I have moved to running the vanilla mainline linux-3.11-rcN kernel on my
Samsung Chromebook. There are some notes on the steps that I used to get it
running at:
http://people.redhat.com/wcohen/chromebook/booting-3.11kernel.txt
The config file is a bit different than the fc20 kernel
On 08/10/2013 11:23 PM, Jon wrote:
Enabling HYP seem conceptually easy.
From what I gather it involves initializing the cores one at a time,
then touching 16 registers.
(something like that)
The nv-u-boot does not seem to support saveenv, so might be worthwhile
to rebuild with better
On 02/28/2013 08:49 AM, Jon wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:31 PM, William Cohen wco...@redhat.com
mailto:wco...@redhat.com wrote:
On 02/27/2013 01:52 PM, Jon wrote:
I would advise you build your own kernel.
The upstream chromeos-3.4 contains many fixes
On 02/27/2013 11:51 AM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
Is it advisable to build my own kernel for the Chromebook? I glanced
through the IRC chat from last week and saw a note about kernels.
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 02/27/2013 01:52 PM, Jon wrote:
I would advise you build your own kernel.
The upstream chromeos-3.4 contains many fixes, including the audio fix so you
do not risk melting the speakers.
I would also advise you enable audit_syscall.
Enabling the PERF stuff is also a good idea.
Jon,
On 01/21/2013 01:41 PM, Jon wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 2:10 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com
mailto:pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought you were going to have a hack fest on it @ FUDCon, did that
not happen?
We did have some hacking going on, Will Cohen and I
On 11/15/2012 09:49 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Paul Whalen pwha...@redhat.com wrote:
Good day all,
Many lucky Fedora users have already received their shiny new Chromebooks
and have begun
tinkering, with some reports of Fedora 18 up and running.
Around
I have a trimslice that I am using to make sure that various performance tools
such as papi, perf, oprofile, and systemtap work on. There are a couple of
bugzilla entries that have patches, but the patches are not in the RPMs:
Bug 741325 - ARM fc14 kernels does not provide hardware perf
On 04/24/2012 07:39 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 04/23/2012 09:31 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 04/23/2012 06:36 PM, Thomas Meyer wrote:
I'm running the Ubuntun 2.6.38 Tegra2 kernel (because of their fbdev
On 03/02/2012 06:31 AM, Robert Richter wrote:
On 23.02.12 17:25:11, Robert Richter wrote:
On 23.02.12 10:12:35, Will Deacon wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 04:08:23AM +, William Cohen wrote:
I was looking to see why the arm kernel builds for fedora 17 were failing
with:
arch/arm
On 02/23/2012 05:12 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
Hi Will,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 04:08:23AM +, William Cohen wrote:
I was looking to see why the arm kernel builds for fedora 17 were failing
with:
arch/arm/oprofile/../../../drivers/oprofile/oprofile_perf.c:28:28: error:
variably modified
I was looking to see why the arm kernel builds for fedora 17 were failing with:
arch/arm/oprofile/../../../drivers/oprofile/oprofile_perf.c:28:28: error:
variably modified 'perf_events' at file scope
The error points to the following line in oprofile_perf.c:
static struct perf_event
Has any luck in using the device trees (dtb files) on arm machines? Things do
not seem to be working with the tegra-trimslice.dtb and
CONFIG_ARM_APPENDED_DTB=y for me.
I have been looking at Red hat Bug 741325 (ARM fc14 kernels does not provide
hardware perf counter support). I suspect the
On 10/13/2011 06:42 PM, William Cohen wrote:
Hi all,
I was revisiting a bug on ARM where systemtap cannot probe kernel modules
(http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13022). The linker is setting
the sh_addr field for some of the sections. The values for the sh_addr
fields look
Hi all,
I was revisiting a bug on ARM where systemtap cannot probe kernel modules
(http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13022). The linker is setting
the sh_addr field for some of the sections. The values for the sh_addr fields
look rather odd. I saw this both with fedora ARM fc13
On 09/07/2011 05:10 AM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
I just thought of another reason to not use prelink - incremental
backups. Prelinking will change the binaries every time it is run thus
triggering an unnecessarily large backup. Couple that with the fact that
it will nullify the advantage
On 09/07/2011 01:48 AM, Martin Dengler wrote:
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 07:54:17PM +0100, Gordan Bobic wrote:
On 09/06/2011 06:53 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 07:22:37PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 19:15:45 +0200, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Personally, I would
Would it be possible to get the new prelink rpm pulled into arm builds?
The prelink arm support (rhbz#733089) is available in:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=260584
-Will
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 08/06/2011 03:09 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
Could you or some other proven packager have a look at Bug 728730? The
attached (and tested) patch makes it possible to use kernel parameter
console=ttymxc,115200 on Freescale i.MX based (EfikaMX like Genesi
Smarttopp/Smartbook). It would really be
On 08/08/2011 09:52 AM, Dan Horák wrote:
William Cohen píše v Po 08. 08. 2011 v 09:41 -0400:
On 08/06/2011 03:09 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
Could you or some other proven packager have a look at Bug 728730?
The
attached (and tested) patch makes it possible to use kernel
parameter
console
On 07/14/2011 10:20 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Thursday, July 14, 2011 09:15:19 AM William Cohen wrote:
Hi all,
I have an Efika MX smartbook running the Fedora 13 images on
http://ausil.us/smartbook/. I would like to build kernels using a cross
compiler as described on
http
30 matches
Mail list logo
