--- Ole J. Rogeberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A problem with Fred's solution is that the most obnoxious spammers would
probably set their field to the non-spam when they sent out spam,
But if it were illegal, with stiff fines, for a spam message to have the
field set as non-spam, that would
But they would only have their life span shortened considerably if they
emigrated earlier rather than later in life.
The 70 year old from the Congo will have his life expectancy increased much
less by coming to the US than would say an infant (who would enjoy a
lifetime of preventative care).
While we're at it, why don't we make it illegal for people to kill each
other. If it were illegal, with stiff fines, we'd surely get rid of
murder. Same for drug use.
I find it highly implausible that a regulatory structure like that
proposed below would make a whit of difference other than
Incidentally, Pobox rated Jason debacker's response 6/10 on the spam
scale, possibly because of the large number of words that often appear
in spam: `email addresses', `customers', `spam', `retailers',
`cheapest'
I took a look at the Pobox mail service and it seems very good for
helping to
At some point there must be a cross-over point. If I live in Third
Worldzania for 60 years, exposed to Typhus, Typhoid, Dengue Fever, malaria,
Plague, TB, and have been mal-nourished, THEN I move to the US I doubt my
life expectancy, AS COMPARED TO AMERICANS, will be all that great, whereas
if
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I took a look at the Pobox mail service and it seems very good for
helping to prevent spam.
Most spam filters knock out messages sent to undisclosed recipients or
to lists of people, which also knock out listserv messages. Blocking
individual
Walt,
I visited some weapons plants in the 1970'. Since then I've had foot problems
and lately haven't felt as alert as I did in those days.. Can I get in on the
compensation?
Rodney Weiher
Warnick, Walter wrote:
Even with data, the analysis will be confounded by immigrants'
You can find lots of data on life-expectancy and health broken down by
age, race, hispanic origin and much else at tbe National Center for
Health Statistics
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about.htm
after a quick search, however, I couldn't find anything on country of
birth, let alone age of
I sent this yesterday, but it never seems to have hit the list.
Subject: Re: Spam: Legal, economic or technical problem?
available. Any thoughts on whether spam can be reduced via
some sort of economic or technical mechanism?
There are already a lot of ways to do this.
Most email programs
--- Eric Crampton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While we're at it, why don't we make it illegal for people to kill each
other. If it were illegal, with stiff fines, we'd surely get rid of
murder.
Do you deny that we have less murder with laws penalizing it than if we had
no such laws?
If so, do
AOL is the most popular ISP (I think) and Hotmail must be up there in
popularity for email accounts- and this is the case even though those
two are notorious for giving out their banks of email addresses to
spammers. In addition, selling these names is good because it makes the
service
At some point there must be a cross-over point. If I live in Third
Worldzania for 60 years, exposed to Typhus, Typhoid, Dengue Fever,
malaria,
Plague, TB, and have been mal-nourished, THEN I move to the US I doubt my
life expectancy, AS COMPARED TO AMERICANS, will be all that great,
12 matches
Mail list logo
