ip the zipped file, 2) It generate a folder call FastExport
3) Run: FastDotNet.exe
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Guillaume Rheault
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 12:21 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Delta Data Migrat
___
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [arslist@ARSLIST.ORG]
> on behalf of Roger Justice [rjust2...@aol.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 4:41 PM
> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> Subject: Re: Delta Data Migration tool (was Long running ITSM 7.6 upgrade)
>
&g
: FastDotNet.exe
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Guillaume Rheault
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 12:21 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Delta Data Migration tool (was Long running ITSM 7.6 upgrade)
**
100K records per hour is
ystem discussion list(ARSList) [arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] on
behalf of Roger Justice [rjust2...@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 4:41 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Delta Data Migration tool (was Long running ITSM 7.6 upgrade)
** Remember I am doing API to API and insuring data integrity incl
stice [rjust2...@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 4:09 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Delta Data Migration tool (was Long running ITSM 7.6 upgrade)
** When I used it I did not make any new indexes and I was able to move, on a
good network, over 100K records per hour.
-Ori
G] on
behalf of Roger Justice [rjust2...@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 4:09 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Delta Data Migration tool (was Long running ITSM 7.6 upgrade)
** When I used it I did not make any new indexes and I was able to move, on a
good network, over 100K records per
When I used it I did not make any new indexes and I was able to move, on a good
network, over 100K records per hour.
-Original Message-
From: Guillaume Rheault
To: arslist
Sent: Mon, Jan 31, 2011 3:57 pm
Subject: Delta Data Migration tool (was Long running ITSM 7.6 upgrade
?
Guillaume
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] on
behalf of Easter, David [david_eas...@bmc.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2011 11:50 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Long running ITSM 7.6 upgrade
Two recent
;
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Patrick Zandi
> Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2011 05:27 AM
> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> Subject: Re: Long running ITSM 7.6 upgrade
>
>
>
> **
>
> 7.6.04 might (don
Behalf Of Patrick Zandi
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2011 05:27 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Long running ITSM 7.6 upgrade
**
7.6.04 might (don't know yet) be a faster method.
But UT is Not supported
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 29, 2011, at 8:14 AM, "Gard, Richard J&qu
We can't afford down time of more than 4-5 hours on a Friday
> night. The switch is more of a DNS repoint and test.
>
>
> From: sphilben [mailto:sphil...@mac.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 02:40 PM
> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> Subject: Long running ITSM 7.6 up
2:40 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Long running ITSM 7.6 upgrade
All:
We are in the process of working out our upgrade path from ARS 7.1/ITSM 7.0.03
to ARS 7.6/ITSM 7.6. The upgrade of ARS is pretty straightforward and
relatively quick.
The ITSM pieces, on the other hand, take forever. The up
**
All:
We are in the process of working out our upgrade path from ARS 7.1/ITSM 7.0.03 to ARS 7.6/ITSM 7.6. The upgrade of ARS is pretty straightforward and relatively quick.
The ITSM pieces, on the other hand, take forever. The upgrade path looks like this:
SRM 2.2 p4CMDB 7.5 p5SRM 7.6 p1CMD
13 matches
Mail list logo