ussion list(ARSList)
>
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carey Matthew Black
> Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 12:29 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: OT: Attachement Updation - File Contents Changed
>
> Wikipedia.com also has a definition for most things.
>
e: OT: Attachement Updation - File Contents Changed
Wikipedia.com also has a definition for most things.
And that list does include fubar too. But I will not repeat the definition
in polite company. :) So reader beware if you go looking for it.
Maybe Kinetic Data can have a survey to find out if p
Wikipedia.com also has a definition for most things.
And that list does include fubar too. But I will not repeat the
definition in polite company. :) So reader beware if you go looking
for it.
Maybe Kinetic Data can have a survey to find out if people think more
of FooBar or Fubar when they think
At times, Wikipedia suffers from obfuscatory prolix where style is
concerned.
On 8/3/07, Shellman, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ** From Wikipedia
> "Foobar is a common placeholder name also referred to as metasyntactic
> variable used in computer programming or computer related documentati
Of L. J. Head
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 11:54 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: OT: Attachement Updation - File Contents Changed
**
Ah...well I'm familiar with FOO but I didn't know about FOOBAR...must be
a programmer jokesorry I didn&
mming languages.
>
> --
> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *L. J. Head
> *Sent:* Friday, August 03, 2007 11:19 AM
> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> *Subject:* Re: OT: Attachement Updation - File Contents C
2007 9:39 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: OT: Attachement Updation - File Contents Changed
**
Hugo had it correct. He is referring to FOOBAR which is a reference often
used with perl and probably most of the older programming languages.
_
From: Action Request System discussi
, August 03, 2007 11:19 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: OT: Attachement Updation - File Contents Changed
**
Entirely off of this topic...but it would be PERFORM-ACTION-FUBAR
:)
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Entirely off of this topic...but it would be PERFORM-ACTION-FUBAR
:)
_
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hugo Visser
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 2:31 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: OT: Attachement Updation - File
: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: OT: Attachement Updation - File Contents Changed
Meenakshinathan ,
Maybe.
An active link that fires on "Gain Focus" for each attachment field
could put a flag in a hidden field so that the right attachment field
could be used in the active link on
@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: OT: Attachement Updation - File Contents Changed
Meenakshinathan ,
Maybe.
An active link that fires on "Gain Focus" for each attachment field
could put a flag in a hidden field so that the right attachment field
could be used in the active link on the button
Meenakshinathan ,
Maybe.
An active link that fires on "Gain Focus" for each attachment field
could put a flag in a hidden field so that the right attachment field
could be used in the active link on the button. The flag might even be
the FieldID keyword. But I have not tested it and I do no
Thanks for all posters for giving the valuable inputs.
One more question on this.
I am trying the implementation of Dave's and Lisa' suggestion
I have created one button called "Add", after click that button i set
an run process command action PERFORM-ACTION-ADD-ATTACHMENT
As per remedy, if we p
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hugo Visser
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 4:31 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: OT: Attachement Updation - File Contents Changed
** Stephen,
That's very clever, thanks for sharing :)
Stephen,
That's very clever, thanks for sharing :) Maybe BMC should put some kind of
PERFORM-ACTION-FOOBAR to do this in a DB independent way.
Hugo
On 8/2/07, Heider, Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ** Hugo,
>
> Your post got me thinking: How can you determine if the file contents have
>
Hi Dave,
Can you please explain some more in detail when you are getting free
time, how did you implement that?. Becoz my application is accessed
via web browser. Users are adding attachments via display only form
and i am having an audit form (Regular form) to store this values. In
the properties
Hugo,
Your post got me thinking: How can you determine if the file contents
have changed? I have wanted to create something like this for a
while... so I just wrote this SQL Server 2000 function that returns the
checksum of an attachment field (actually any field of Image data type.
The current
17 matches
Mail list logo