Re: Active Directory and People Records

Hi, the 8.x versions come with pre-defined LDAP and LDAPS Atrium Integration Jobs that can fulfil this purpose. They use the DMT Staging forms to perform validation against the data. You could investigate the use of these over a customisation. I have used these at a customer and you can add

Re: Active Directory and People Records

Thank you – sounds like what I was looking for. Sandra Hennigan Remedy Developer From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Carl Wilson Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 9:54 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Active Directory and People

Re: Active Directory and People Records

Sandra, I don't recall ever hearing about a 'SHR:People' form, but I can confirm for you that CTM:People is the 'People' form, so if your intent is to sync to People, yes, that's the form you are looking for. -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailt

Re: Active Directory and People Records

A staging is the way to go IMHO. Andy Team Capstone NITTSS - Remedy Administration National Archives & Records Administration (NARA) Archives II Office: 301-837-0481 NITTSS Help Desk - 301-837-2020 On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Hennigan, Sandra wrote: > ** > > All, > > ** ** > > I am a

Re: Active Directory and People Records

I believe back in the V5 and V6 days it was SHR:People. - Original Message - From: "LJ CTR MDA Longwing/IC" To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 10:02:40 AM Subject: Re: Active Directory and People Records Sandra, I don't recall ever hearing abou

Re: Active Directory and People Records

arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Active Directory and People Records A staging is the way to go IMHO. Andy Team Capstone NITTSS - Remedy Administration National Archives & Records Administration (NARA) Archives II Office: 301-837-0481 NITTSS Help Desk - 301-837-2020 On Wed, Feb 27, 2

Re: Active Directory and People Records

bject: Re: Active Directory and People Records I believe back in the V5 and V6 days it was SHR:People. - Original Message - From: "LJ CTR MDA Longwing/IC" To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 10:02:40 AM Subject: Re: Active Directory and People Records

Re: Active Directory and People Records

4:33 -0500 To: ReplyTo: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Active Directory and People Records ** A staging is the way to go IMHO. Andy Team Capstone NITTSS - Remedy Administration National Archives & Records Administration (NARA) Archives II Office: 301-837-0481 NITTSS Help Desk - 301-837-202

Re: Active Directory and People Records

eply-To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Active Directory and People Records Backend is Oracle - is UDM still an option? Thank you, Sandra Hennigan Remedy Developer From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of SUBSCRIBE arslist Aditya Sh

Re: Active Directory and People Records

Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto: > arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of pritch > Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 8:07 AM > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > Subject: Re: Active Directory and People Records > > I believe back in the V5 and V6 days it was SHR:People. > > --

Re: Active Directory and People Records

uary 27, 2013 10:36:47 AM Subject: Re: Active Directory and People Records ** I'm still using ITSM 5.5 On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Longwing, LJ CTR MDA/IC < lj.longwing@mda.mil > wrote: Well, that certainly explains why I don't remember it :)never used IT

Re: Active Directory and People Records

Truly sorry to hear that Warren :) -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Warren R. Baltimore II Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 8:37 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Active Directory and People Records

Re: Active Directory and People Records

ebruary 27, 2013 8:41 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Active Directory and People Records I'm also still supporting an ITSM v5 install (w/ V6.3 ARS). Some clients are happy (content) with what they've got and just don't want to upgrade their systems. - Original Mess

Re: Active Directory and People Records

ary 27, 2013 10:54:03 AM Subject: Re: Active Directory and People Records I can't fathom still supporting a 6.3 instance. I would be sitting there watching all of the flying cars running around town and then driving my Model T home at the end of the day Now, granted, we haven't

Re: Active Directory and People Records

Sigh... Warren... stay there as long as you can!! From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Warren R. Baltimore II Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 9:37 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Active Directory and People Records ** I&#

Re: Active Directory and People Records

n Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto: > arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *Warren R. Baltimore II > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 27, 2013 9:37 AM > > *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > *Subject:* Re: Active Directory and People Records > > ** ** > > ** I'm sti

Re: Active Directory and People Records

3 9:37 AM > > > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > Subject: Re: Active Directory and People Records > > > > ** I'm still using ITSM 5.5 > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Longwing, LJ CTR MDA/IC > wrote: > > Well, that certainly explains why I don't

Re: Active Directory and People Records

.ORG Subject: Re: Active Directory and People Records ** Sigh... Warren... stay there as long as you can!! From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Warren R. Baltimore II Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 9:37 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG<mailto:

Re: Active Directory and People Records

** > > *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto: > arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *Sanford, Claire > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 27, 2013 11:24 AM > > *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > *Subject:* Re: Active Directory and People Records > > ** ** &g

Re: Active Directory and People Records (UNCLASSIFIED)

Usually you do not directly import AD data into remedy user or user profile form. You would create a staging form and get the AD data into this form and then do all kinds of validations and do a final push to User and or User Profile form. You can build all your logic on what permissions to be a

Re: Active Directory and People Records (UNCLASSIFIED)

I have not tried it yet but ITSM 8.0 has an AI job for loading people from LDAP. See: Configuring Data Management for LDAP or LDAPS import Jason On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:25 AM, patchsk wro