I don't have any experience with this product, but I will say that by doing
your syncing via DB replication, I think you're on the right track. It's
the fastest way I know of to do what you're doing.
Rick
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Zoltán Nemes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
** Dear Listers!
The issue with DB Sync is that logically youwould need a server-group to do
this.
In the past DSO has never been an issue of performance in my experiance.
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 8:48 AM, Rick Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
** I don't have any experience with this product, but I will say that
In many environments, DSO will work just fine. Where the network
performance is less than optimal, I wouldn't probably choose it as my first
option. I have seen it at times not handle hiccups very well (though that
was a couple of versions ago), and if that is still a possibility, given his
I used Shareplex a couple companies ago. I think they're still using it. We
were replicating between 2 production server and 2 reporting servers. It worked
great and I'd definitely use it again if I was on Oracle and had money to burn.
We also tried to switch out Shareplex with DSO to try and
Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Cook
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 9:49 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: synchronization of servers
** I don't have any experience with this product, but I will say that by
doing your syncing via DB replication, I
.
--
*From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Rick Cook
*Sent:* Wednesday, May 14, 2008 9:49 AM
*To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
*Subject:* Re: synchronization of servers
** I don't have any experience with this product
6 matches
Mail list logo
