The problem with you Werner, is YOU make TOO much sense! You lay it
all out plain and simple! No double talk, double entendre's, nada!
Plain old english, the way I like it. If I could repeat my post to
you, I would. If I could apologize for the actions, taken against
you, I hope you know,
Werner, I share your dissapointment with what has not been
accomplished over the past five years. But we are where we are and
can't judge what's being done now by MM through the lens of where we
should have been had the past five years been different. That is
both unrealistic and unfair. MM
The question remains how is the budget shortfall going to be fixed -
By hitting the current residential property owners hard ?
No, they will claim hardship and the pain it will cause to city property
owners. They state will
again print money and hand it over - run the city, run the
As hard as it is to feel this way, I don't think MM can be saddled
with the sins of the past and be forced to play catchup, either by
working 5 times faster or by somehow being forced to deal with the
shortfall in taxables caused by Partners lack of progress. My
opinion is that you have to
Thank you, I do agree with what you observe, however even MM has been
dragging their feet. Perhaps due to problems with the Partners, I
don't know.
What I do know is that I attended the planning board applications for
the 5th Ave Pav. This project is a 'no-brainer' The Plan calls for the
Pavilion
Another keeper. Post on refrigerator.
In a message dated 11/6/2007 7:42:44 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But we are where we are and
can't judge what's being done now by MM through the lens of where we
should have been had the past five years been different
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, asburycouple [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
As hard as it is to feel this way, I don't think MM can be saddled
with the sins of the past and be forced to play catchup, either by
working 5 times faster or by somehow being forced to deal with the
shortfall in