--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, bluebishop82 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Why end with saying that I miss many points? That's a personal
attack that doesn't have anything to do with what we are talking
about. I won't do that to you.
Calling the following comment a personal attack is a
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, bluebishop82
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Official stats that are outdated are as useless as unofficial
stats. You were here in 2000 - those states are off, particularly
property values and income levels. You also can't use bad stats
and
the excuse that its
In a message dated 5/11/2005 9:15:37 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Has Jim
K left the message boards?
Not to worry Oakd.I am here. I have just needed a little
bit of time to recover from an exciting, but nonetheless, grueling campaign
run. I need a few more days
JJ
Clearly there was a poor turnout and I have no explanation for that.
I assume many have been displaced and replaced with people with dual
residences, like me. Although I registered here and voted I am told
it was voided. I assume some of the dual resident replacements
didn;t register here.
Nice post - very interesting stats. I'm not willing to make the
leap that redevelopment caused there to be less voters available.
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, jerseyjohn99
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More telling than the mandate (and I'll admit it definitely was)
is
how it was
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, dfsavgny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think I can stand 4 more years of the
council standing by while Asbury Partners does what it wants. I
really wish concerned citizens could have a serious heart to heart
talk with the new council absent rethoric and
At 12:02 AM + 5/12/05, jerseyjohn99 wrote:
...The winners campaign was based upon
the premise that Asbury's gotten back to a level footing with the
rest of the county state, ...
Nice try John. No candidate -- winner or not -- that I heard in any pubic forum
said anything like that at all.
Let's see, according to the most recent statistics 67.1% of
HOUSEHOLDS in AP had income under $35,000 80.5% of the total
population rented their living unit.
Using the 28/36 ratio, a person who makes $35,000 with no debt can
qualify for a mortgage up to $81,000. Realtor.com gives me 5 vacant
If by most recent statistics you mean the 2000 census, you are
using some awfully out of date stats.
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, jerseyjohn99
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's see, according to the most recent statistics 67.1% of
HOUSEHOLDS in AP had income under $35,000 80.5% of the
Official stats that are outdated are as useless as unofficial
stats. You were here in 2000 - those states are off, particularly
property values and income levels. You also can't use bad stats and
the excuse that its ok because you don't have access to the right
ones.
--- In
Can you use bad stats to justify Abbott district membership or
Extraordinary Aid from the state for the 4th year in a row?
What are the real stats and what would the city's demographics look
like using these real stats compared to the other 30 Abbott districts?
--- In
Good point, JJ. But do we have to use bad stats just because they
do?
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, jerseyjohn99
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you use bad stats to justify Abbott district membership or
Extraordinary Aid from the state for the 4th year in a row?
What are the real
There is a newspaper guy in Asbury, that use to be in Long Branch.
He is also Gay. It was his coming out that caused him to depart from
Long Branch, not totally however because he has a patronage benefits
position at the sewer authority in his old home town, as a payback
for all the political
.
-Original Message-
From: bluebishop82 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, 12 May 2005 02:07:34 -
Subject: [AsburyPark] Re: The Case of the Missing Voters
Good point, JJ. But do we have to use bad stats just because they
do?
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com
14 matches
Mail list logo
