Thanks for voting!
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Lighty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the job of installing the lights up to Asbury Partners or the
city?
In the redeveloper agreement:
3.9 The Boardwalk
In consideration for the City utilizing the August 1, 2001 date for
the value of the
One more bit of trivia --
The professional field of Industrial Psychology has it's roots in the
study of lighting and the workplace. A study of productivity,
efficiency, accident rate, morale, etc. Facinating stuff.
So let's shed some light (of the best kind) on Asbury Park.
Werner
Q1: Does putting up the same lights that have been there for 30
years satisfy the definition of new?
Q2: Do Cobra Head lighting fixtures satisfy the definition
of decorative?
Rather than bargaining concessions over the lighting, wouldn't it be
wiser to keep the Master Developer to the
Do Cobra Head lighting fixtures satisfy the definition of
decorative? ... wouldn't it be wiser to keep the Master Developer to
the standards he agreed to when he signed the document 3 years ago?
They're decorative if you're a snake.
Isn't it a duty and responsibility of elected office to
The points you make are one in the same. At issue on the larger scale
is one of interpretation. Many of the documents are so loose that
clearly the City is being taken advantage of.
That looseness can be used to the City's advantage, if they were to
wake up. This lighting issue is just the tip
a)two wooden gazebo type sun shelters north of
Convention Hall
and two south of Convention Hall each approximately 20
feet in width
c)new decorative lighting fixtures (style and type to
be agreed
upon by the City and Master Developer meeting minimum
public safety
standards)
werner - the lights
a thought -
if asbury parnters were going to install the same
lights that were on the boadwalk previoulys, why didnt
they save the old lights? to be put back later? if
they were going to spend money on new lights, they
could have got something different for the same price.
im guessing. ive
What's the Big Deal about Lights Anyway? `
because the idea sucks.
certain towns to the south of us,
have gazebos. why does asbury park
need them too? Temp lights
stuck in the sand during construction.
not that those are much better'
Great question; `cause the point here ought to be what's
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Skip Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
As to the gazebos, with the dim witted negotiations council
employed
with The Fish; this reads like a face saving measure to make it
appear
the city would get `something' in exchange for gifting the
triangle to
the gazebos are a bad idea, and i hope they never get
built. id like to see a large fountain of some sort
in one of them. (yes i know, bradley beach has one of
those too). it could be interesting though, having
fictional characters and musical intstruemtns with
feet standing under the falling
dfsavgny -
no, those are different lights then what was
previously on the boardwalk. they are new. you can
see the differences in them, when you compare them to
the 3 standing on the older boardwalk just south of
convention hall.
__
Do You
this reads like a face saving measure to make it appear the city
would get `something'
Dan, I don't believe it/I suggest this was council's intent.
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, dfsavgny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Skip Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Skip Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this reads like a face saving measure to make it appear the city
would get `something'
Dan, I don't believe it/I suggest this was council's intent.
No, I meant don't believe that those things should, pursuant to the
Thanks for reading the agreement and keeping track.
-Original Message-
From: dfsavgny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, 23 May 2005 00:50:20 -
Subject: [AsburyPark] Re: What's the Big Deal about Lights Anyway?
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Skip
14 matches
Mail list logo
