Re: CSRSIIDF Question

2016-07-02 Thread Mike Shaw
Thank you Peter. Mike Shaw MVS/QuickRef Support Group Chicago-Soft, Ltd. On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Peter Relson wrote: > >Then is there a reliable method for a non APF authorized program that > does > >not execute continuously to determine whether a capacity on demand

Re: CSRSIIDF Question

2016-07-02 Thread retired mainframer
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER- > l...@listserv.uga.edu] On Behalf Of Peter Relson > Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2016 6:02 AM > To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU > Subject: Re: CSRSIIDF Question > > >Because some o

Re: CSRSIIDF Question

2016-07-02 Thread Peter Relson
>Then is there a reliable method for a non APF authorized program that does >not execute continuously to determine whether a capacity on demand upgrade >was performed since the last time that same program executed? Not that comes to mind. And, in fact, the operating system has no idea that

Re: CSRSIIDF Question

2016-07-01 Thread retired mainframer
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER- > l...@listserv.uga.edu] On Behalf Of Peter Relson > Sent: Friday, July 01, 2016 5:21 AM > To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU > Subject: CSRSIIDF Question > > >Question: is it incorr

Re: CSRSIIDF Question

2016-07-01 Thread Mike Shaw
Thank you Peter. Then is there a reliable method for a non APF authorized program that does not execute continuously to determine whether a capacity on demand upgrade was performed since the last time that same program executed? Mike Shaw MVS/QuickRef Support Group Chicago-Soft, Ltd. On Jul 1,

CSRSIIDF Question

2016-07-01 Thread Peter Relson
>Question: is it incorrect to rely on the presence of a timestamp in the >SI00LASTUPDATETIMESTAMP field ​as an indication​ >that a capacity on demand upgrade has been done? In a word, yes. There are system reasons why the STSI information might have been refreshed. I believe that that includes

Re: CSRSIIDF Question

2016-06-30 Thread retired mainframer
mailto:ASSEMBLER- > l...@listserv.uga.edu] On Behalf Of Mike Shaw > Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 9:14 AM > To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU > Subject: CSRSIIDF Question > > Anyone: > > Question about comments in the CSRSIIDF mapping DSECT used to map > informat

CSRSIIDF Question

2016-06-30 Thread Mike Shaw
Anyone: Question about comments in the CSRSIIDF mapping DSECT used to map information returned by a ​ call to the ​ CSRSI ​ service. The DSECT has this field in it: SI00LASTUPDATETIMESTAMP DS CL8 STCK With these comments for the field: ​"​ timestamp when system last re-issued STSI to