> Hey Grayhat- been a while... Thanks for your followup.
Hi there, yes, been (and being ) busy
> I'm using our internal dns servers, without forwarders. I see DNSBL
> messages, RWL, etc as expected.
ok, one thing less to check (I hope) :)
> Could a format error in the w
:: On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:02:50 -0500
::
:: K Post wrote:
> Confirmed that it seems like only the cached entries are working.
> Every one of the 300+ senderbase matches from today, are from the
> cache. For example:
> 199.101.162.46
couple questions:
1: are there any DNS-related messages in yo
> hi all.
> is there any caveat or recommendation or special modules/packages
> requirements for upgrading from ASSP version 2.3.3(13276) to version
> 2.3.4(latest)?
> i'm running a 2 hosts production system on Linux, perl 5.14, all
> databases as tables on Mysql.
upgrade your Perl runtime and al
> So far I have identified two domains that most mail claims as the from
> address. Both publish SPF records but define ~all so I have added
> them to strictSPFRe.
Hmmm... now I'm becoming curious; you're running ASSP, so, which
filters did you enable (set aside SPF and AV scanning) ? See, it so
> We have ClamAV running on our mailserver and are currently suffering a
> significant number of Trojans getting past.
ClamAV is a more than decent mail AVscanner but you'll need to feed it
with some additional signatures, namely the ones available here
http://www.sanesecurity.co.uk/databases
> I have a cron job for this (attached). It opens a connection to both
> the SMTP and Web interface ports and makes sure it gets a connection
hmm... not bad, but before that, I think you'd better check if the ASSP
process is running, then, if it's running (and only if it's running)
you may go on
> > Subj: assp spawning spam
> > on an installation of mine
> >they managed to get hold of the boss address (of all addresses)
> >and they send spam to the outside world.
>
> "they" -- is who?
> Computer with antispam?
> Or computers of internal users?
I suspect that someone "bruteforced"
> >not exactly, ASSP will deal with the "received" headers and ...
> No. You do not understand the feature.
sure, sure, ok
--
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
"Graph Databases" is the definitive ne
> Never happened, an appliance which receive mails and forward it to
> any server (including ASSP) should add a receive header.
exactly, "should" is the point here; what if it doesn't ? And there
*are* critters which, pretending to work "in a transparent way" won't
add whatever header ...
> If
> ASSP will use the receive header with the hostname set in
> ispHostnames. This header contains the originating IP and which will
> be used for IP-based checks if set in ispip.
> This header contains also the originating HELO which will be used for
> HELO- based checks.
assuming (and it isn't a
> >you'd loose the real sender IP, that is, the one which
> >*is* sending you the message,
> Why?
Suppose someone from 31.11.43.121 tries to send to you an email
pretending to be "mail.example.com" and using "example.com" as the
sending domain (in email); ASSP sits behind the "proxy" so it only
> ASSP can use those checks, even if there is only one IP if front of
> all senders.
not exactly; you'd loose the real sender IP, that is, the one which
*is* sending you the message, this in turn will defeat SPF/DKIM and
DNSBL checks, sure, one may still play tricks and check the "received"
heade
> I am working on a setup and situation dictates that every server here
> is behind a NAT firewall. The problem now of course is, that
> connections to SMTP daemon are translated to the internal IP of the
> firewall, therefor SPF, and a whole lot other checks fail because
> ASSP sees them coming
Let me start with this email which appeared on the "SaneSecurity" ML
<===>
From: "Steve Basford"
To: sanesecurity@y
Subject: [sanesecurity] GTUBE support
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 20:15:07 +0100
Hi All,
GTUBE (the Generic Test for
> Andrea,
>
> try to fix it - add the following line to 'lib/CorrectASSPcfg.pm'
>
> $main::DoSyncBDB = 0;
>
> Thomas
Hmm... it doesn't seem the case; tried that and also tried 13081 but
made no difference; whenever I issue an "sc stop asspsmtp" keeping the
"dbgview" open, ASSP logs some messag
> Just checked it on my prod system (13081) - works perfect. No
> process, no pid file, no error or warning in assp.
>
> Active Perl 5.16.1 on W2K3Sp2
> Win32::Daemon 20110117
>
> Just checked it on Active Perl 5.12.4 (32Bit) on
> W2K8
> W2K8R2
> W2K12
>
> >time ago you released a fix for the
> >will update to 13080 in minutes
>
> wait for 13081 - in some minutes !
too late, already updated :)
See, I was on the box to update ClamAV to 0.97.7
<===>
ClamAV 0.97.7 addresses several reported potential security bugs.
Thanks to
> >Will there be new stable releases of V2 anytime soon
>
> in the next 4 weeks
>
> is this beta release intended for production use too?
>
> yes - how ever there are changes and new features which have to be
> tested
> - bugs in the stabil release are fixed in the 'beta' first
>
> Thomas
Tho
> First use a LDAP client of your choice (commandline based are the
> best - helps learning the LDAP language/syntax) and test the LDAP
> queries for domains and email addresses. The docu of your LDAP server
> will help you in first place.
As a note, having a windows box handy, the free LDAP bro
> See example, how work ISPIP :
>
> 999.99.99.9 -- my secondary MX IP
> mailserver.good.net -- my secondary MX
Correct; that's also why I play a little trick with my MX records;
nothing "magic" nor really new, mind me, the whole thing is called "MX
sandwich" or "nolisting" and is explained
> Andrea , this is not 100% correct. If assp receives a mail from an
> ISPIP and the 'ispHostNames' is defined, assp will lookup the IP that
> was connected to the ISP from the header and will process this IP
> instead of the ISPIP.
*FACEPALM*
*D'OH!!*
You're totally right, Thomas, I forgot a
> It is similar to Exchangedefender. I've got it set in ispip now. It
> seems to be working well so far. However, I don't know that it's
> caught any spam yet. I'm trying to clear out my ccspam mailbox so I
> can get a good idea of what's going on.
forgot; if your ASSP is now ONLY receiving e
> My company is moving to a 3rd party email archiving service. Our MX
> records will be changed to point to that service. They will run their
> anti-spam checks on incoming email and then pass through the emails
> that pass the checks (sounds like a store and forward type service).
Hmm... from
> ASSP version 2.2.2(13006) is hanging and showing errors in the
> connection screen. It is a total of 128 connection (32 are allowed in
> in the Setup)
Same here... and after a while it "commits suicide" and needs to be
restarted rolled back to a previous (12366) version and the
issue
> Does either 2.x or 1.9x provide for the capability to reroute mail?
> eg sento: x...@y.com deliveredto: a...@b.com
>
> If not is it possible to add?
Sincerely, I think this isn't a task for ASSP; such a thing should be
handled by whatever mailserver sits "behind" ASSP, not by ASSP itself;
all
> I have UseLocalDNS enabled, and I have five system local DNS servers
> defined. One of the five is running on the same box as ASSP, so it
> should always be available.
Five seems quite a bit, given that you wrote you're using external
resolvers; now I'm curious; do your local resolvers (inclu
> > If you run 64bit win, use 5.14 32 bit.
> aye, I already downloaded it (x32) will install it (and no, not going
> to install the x64 one, no need to waste resource w/o benefits :-D)
since we're at it; I'm planning to try installing ASSP on MariaDB (ok,
MySQL if you prefer); are there any spec
> If you run 64bit win, use 5.14 32 bit.
aye, I already downloaded it (x32) will install it (and no, not going
to install the x64 one, no need to waste resource w/o benefits :-D)
--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do w
> There are still some Perl modules missing for Perl 5.16.
> The internal auto-perl-module-upgrade procedure is still unable to
> handle Perl 5.16.
ok... better going for 5.12 or 5.14 ?
--
Everyone hates slow websites. S
I'm about to install an instance of ASSPv2 on a fresh new box (ok, VM)
so I fired up a browser and went to activestate... to find that they're
now recommending to pick Perl v-5.16 ! At this point I wonder... do I
need to pick that one (I want a *stable* setup, at least from the perl
runtime standp
> I use the latest ASSP 1.9.x version. I haven't used Griplist in
> probably two years. I stopped using it because I found that there
> were way too many false-positives causing legit emails to score
> higher and get blocked. Is that still the case or is it working any
> better now?
Not sure
> The junk emails are nothing to do with our servers.
Ah ok; so setting up the message ID checks should suffice, still, I do
believe that using the "rate limiter" may be useful to find out if
some of your folks are spitting out bunches of messages ... and to
possibly take action :)
-
> has you set 'MSGIDpreTag' and 'MSGIDSec' ?
>
> Both have to be set! The default value is NOT valid for 'MSGIDSec'!
good point; also, if the customer is also *sending* out emails through
ASSP, it may be a good idea enabling the outbound rate limiter, that is
setting appropriate values for Loc
> - The automatic corpus correction in the rebuildspamdb task was not
> working as expected in every case.
> There is one rebuild task required to enable this feature in
> future.
Now I'm curious, Thomas, I wonder how comes that nobody ever noticed
this issue before; I had this floating aroun
> >ASSP will extract the headers and body and perform
> some checks to see if it already "saw" that file
> Exactly this way it works for years now - I think we had this topic
> some months ago Andrea - how ever, good ideas comes back in mind
> every time! :):):).
LOL, probably it's a sign that
> I'll explain a bit more:
>
> - all folders are processed : "the youngest files first"
> - both error folders are fully processed up to MaxFiles
>
> As the result of processing the first two folders we get a weight
> (spam/ham). Now we know were we are: we have a current weight, a
> wanted we
> >I see, so, basically, you're saying that the weight reported in the
> "rebuild report" isn't correct ?
> No - the values were correctly shown. But ASSP has used all files (up
> to MaxFiles) even it was better to use some less ( from here or
> there) to get a better corpusnorm.
Hmm... I see n
> Andrea,
Hi there, Thomas, we are on the public list, aren't we :) ?
> your request was very logical.
Well... to tell it all, I reported about such a behavior here and
there, but then, I didn't really pay attention to it... until I was
forced to setup a script, scheduled at intervals, to "tri
I'm running the latest ASSP 2.2.2 build 12248 (Win2k8, ActivePerl,
MSSQL), but I observed the same behavior with previous versions as
well; in short, if I manually "trim" the spam/notspam folders down to
14000 files (or less, but same count for both) and start a rebuild, the
rebuild report tells m
> >Is Unicode::GCString a new dependency?
>
> Yes, if you want assp to process all words as a sequence of UAX #29
> Grapheme Clusters (Unicode 6.1.0) for Bayes and HMM.
>
> http://unicode.org/reports/tr29/
>
here's the PPM search result (just in case)
1: Unicode-LineBreak
UAX #14 Unicode
> RBLError
> AvError
> ÜRIBLError
> ??? .
yes... those as well, the idea is to add an option to ASSP so that
"checking" a box will turn the "fail" message into a "tempfail" one and
having entry fields (text) for both messages, this would allow one to
fine tune ASSP to match certain conditions
> Is the theory that a given sender will be mistakenly added to a
> DNSBL, and during that server's retry period it will be removed?
> Maybe...
I know, it doesn't happen often, but it *may* happen, believe me or
not :)
> I guess it depends on the DNSBL's being used. ASSP's defaults are
> prett
> option so that, instead of emitting a reject, ASSP could emit a
> "tempfail", that is, something like (e.g.)
>
> 442 Connection from $IP temporarily refused, host listed by $LIST
notice that the very same kind of option may be added to the AV
scanning as well; this way, in case you have a too "
I've been reading some stuff and found that there are pros and cons to
what I'm suggesting... let me go straight to the ball; at the moment,
if ASSP uses DNS blacklists (or URIBLs for that) and if an IP (or URL
or domain) is listed (or at least the list score goes "over limit") the
result is a 5xx
From: "Fritz Borgstedt"
> I propose a retention period for developer versions, after nn days it
> will warn , after nn+10 it will stop working.
uh... turn ASSP into some kind of time-bombed kids game ? Are you serious ?
-
> I left my thread status window open, as well as tailing the log in
> hopes that I would see what might be causing it. I missed it
> happening twice, but the third time I caught it. Here's what I saw
> while it was happening:
> 5 562 s SenderBaseOK (stuck)
> 6 658 s SenderBaseOK (stuck)
Noti
> Thomas,
>
> could you please have a look on HMM again?
> After testing with different options, I found that HMM does not work
> if HMMusesBDB is enabled.
>
> Rebuildspamdb reports HMM will be generated but when finished, the
> database is reported as empty. I have a RAM disk for tmpDB but
Apparently it fixed some issues; I had problems rebuilding the spamDB
(Thomas knows that) and suddenly, w/o doing anything else, after
updating ASSP to the 12123 the rebuild worked and I got back the
"usual" (not so usual for the last *several* months) report so...
Whatever you did, Thomas, WELL
> Just using M$ 2003 Server DNS. All it does is provide DNS lookup for
> ASSP, nothing more (1000-2000 messages per day). It doesn't seem (to
> me) that that many lookups per day would be more than it could handle.
Well... it should deal with those just fine as long as the box has
enough bandw
> What would cause an SPF lookup to timeout? For example:
> Apr-10-12 17:53:25 id-33409-03026 178.20.64.93
> to: some...@mydomain.com SPF: timed out after 21 secs.;
>
> The above sender is not actually from valid Microsoft.com servers.
Hm... probably slow resolvers, by the way, it could be u
Sounds like I probably spotted a bug sitting inside ASSP
from some versions (including the latest 12080) here's what
I noticed; if, for whatever reason ASSP crashes and gets
restarted, upon startup it applies a lock to the "whitelist"
database table (yes, I'm using a DB:) and never releases it,
so
> ...
> Mar-20-2012 19:09:31 [Worker_1] Error: MainThread stuck for 64
> seconds after: MainLoop get the best worker = 1 (0 sockets) - last
> debug step was: servicecheck!
> ...
same here, workers seem to get "stuck" after a while; had to rollback
ASSP to "12058" to fix the issue otherwise, a
to anyone interested
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.virus.clamav.announce/148
--
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
_
> - stop assp
> - remove the 'tmpDB' folder
> - remove all griplist files in the assp-base folder
> - start assp
>
> If assp crashes - some times the griplist files (e.g. BDB) are
> destroyed . ASSP will redownload the griplist after the startup.
Thomas... given my own "been there done that", I
> How is this configured, Thomas? I don't see an option to restrict
> email interface addresses by network or authentication.
"only local or authenticated users contribute to the whitelist"
--
Virtualization & Cloud Man
>
> · SMTP Listen Port (listenPort)
> (External IP and Internal IP)
>
> · SMTP Destination (smtpDestination)
> (Internal Mail Server)
>
> IN: Internet --> ASSP (IP External) --> ASSP (IP Internal) -->
> Internal Mail Server Out: Internal Mail Server --> ASSP (IP Internal)
> --> A
> Matti... given that I'm facing the very same kind of issues; could you
> please
> (please !!! :D) detail the steps you took to solve this ?
Different experience here; the rebuild "randomly" crashes if the corpus
(spam/notspam folders) contains more than 14000 files and/or contains
files w/o sub
> After disabling Bayes & HMM checks, I was able to do a complete
> rebuild during the uptime.
> So I truncated spamDB., made anaother rebuild and switched on HMM.
> ASSP is fine for hours. Now I enabled Baysian and it seems as assp is
> still stable.
>
> So I hope this issues is solve
> Error: rebuildspamdb failed - Database delete all statement failed:
> Can't Execute Command 'delete from spamdb' INFO: RebuildSpamdb removed
> from queue Info: RebuildSpamdb Scheduler stopped
> Info: starting RebuildSpamdb Scheduler with '15 1 * * *'
>
> I'll now try wiping (truncate) the spam
> Thanks, Thomas, running the rebuild right now (from console, so in
> case of errors I'll see them all); at the moment the process is
> sweeping the "./notspam" folder; will report back in a while
went on to
2012-03-08 00:20:26 Generating weighted Bayesian tuplets
2012-03-08 00:21:18 start popu
> fixed in assp 2.1.2 build 12068:
>
> - assp dies in the rebuild task
> - assp stucks in the rebuild task
> - Bayesian values are calculated too high
> - reference error in Win32::Unicode::File.pm line 408
Thanks, Thomas, running the rebuild right now (from console, so in case
of errors I'll see
> Mär-07-12 12:42:11 Generating weighted Bayesian tuplets
Same here, the rebuild stops exactly there, no error message, nothing
at all, it just "dies"; this doesn't happen if I totally empty the
spamdb (and the various temp files) but I don't think this is a solution
-
> I am trying to give users the option to
> send a mail message to assp and then the assp
> can answer back to them with a list of blocked
> messages.
Have a look at the "block reporting" section in ASSP GUI, there's the
place to start when configuring the feature you're seeking for; ensure
to co
> > May I humbly suggest to replace that "delete from spamdb" with a
> > (faster) "truncate table spamdb" ?
> Don't empty _all_ records in spamdb table <= see rebuild spamdb
> algoritm
I know, but that was the ONLY way to allow the rebuild to complete :P
otherwise it either crashed or timed-ou
> and, by the way, crashing the perl process
retried and it worked... until it reached the point in which it imports
the spamdb data into the DB, at that point the rebuild bombed again
(but this time assp kept running) with the following
<>
2012
> fixed in assp 2.1.2 build 12067:
Running it right now, tried a rebuild and it bombed after a while
emitting the following message on the console
Free to wrong pool 3e3c68 not 32313032 at sub main::mlog line 30.
and, by the way, crashing the perl process
---
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Locality-sensitive_hashing
> corpus, now, the above may represent a solution, in such a case, the
> rebuild may just "skip" messages if they're repeated too often, so
> allowing to keep the corpus balanced
> also say that the email was recognized as "spam" (or h
I was reading a document describing the so called "Locality Sensitive
Hashing"
http://www.stanford.edu/class/cs345a/slides/05-LSH.pdf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Locality-sensitive_hashing
and, while going through it, I started thinking at the ASSP spam and
notspam corpus; as it was discussed
Hi there; just stumbled upon what I see as a bug and a source of
issues; here's what I noticed
Sometimes, under certain conditions ASSP emits both a reject message
(message score over limit), that is a "550 ..." *followed* by another
SMTP tempfail "451 retry later" which comes from the graylistin
> Quickly assembled a script to scan the spam/notspam folders and
> remove files older than 15 days or greater than 1 bytes or either
> above the 14000 files limit, reran the rebuild and it's going on now, so,
> apparenly you were exactly "on the ball" :) what puzzles me is the fact
> that the
> Andrea,
Hi there, Thomas !!
> check the errors/notspam folder for too large files - remove them.
> I never got any issue in the rebuild task.
> My largest file is 5.7 MB.
Quickly assembled a script to scan the spam/notspam folders and
remove files older than 15 days or greater than 1 byte
Sounds like ASSP is constantly *crashing* during the rebuild, it
processes the errors folder, the spam one and, once it starts
processing the notspam folder, it suddenly *crashes* w/o any kind of
notice or error (also tried that running ASSP from cmdline); I also
tried trimming the spam/notspam fo
> - could be useful having from contact which are local in
> "green" (i.e.) color remote senders in "black" color (i.e.)
> - an icon near each Helo value to add the helo value in Suspicious
> HELO
> - an icon near each ip address value to add the ip address in
> denySMTPConnectionsFromAlways
Uh...
> >> Try UseTrapToCollect :
> > DANG !!! Yes, I think that's it; sorry Victor probably I had a
> > senior moment :(
> No problem ;-)
> I'm sow this option today. First time ;-)
Since we're at it; to have it working you need to properly set things
up, here's what you'll need
* create a "spambu
> Perhaps I misunderstood your question or I took it out of context.
No, I think you got it right
> If you have "DoPenaltyMakeTraps" set to "use for spamaddresses", then
> in any corporate situation where an employee no longer exists with a
> valid email address
the address should be added to
> > I wouldn't say that they only receive junk. In a business
> > environment previous employees' addresses could eventually make it
> > on that list
>
> No, that list isn't there for such a purpose; there's another one
> which deals with the above
that is "RejectTheseLocalAddresses"; the spamt
> Try UseTrapToCollect :
DANG !!! Yes, I think that's it; sorry Victor probably I had a senior
moment :(
--
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft
> I wouldn't say that they only receive junk. In a business environment
> previous employees' addresses could eventually make it on that list
No, that list isn't there for such a purpose; there's another one which
deals with the above
-
I was rereading the description related to "DoPenaltyMakeTraps" and
"spamtrapaddresses" now, I wonder why ASSP only uses the "traps" to
score IPs instead of also using them to improve the bayes/hmm corpus; I
mean, given that those addresses *are* traps so they don't belong to
any "human" and, by d
I was looking at the "browse all articles" here
http://www.asspsmtp.org/mw/index.php?title=Special:AllPages
and found this
http://www.asspsmtp.org/mw/index.php?title=Car_insurance
now, maybe I'm just dumb; could someone please explain
me what's the relation between ASSP and car insurance :) ?
> Early Perl versions has used ISO-8859-1 to store internal data - for
> example as a result of a decode(...,...).
[...]
> the resulting string has a mixed enconding. Even if a string is
> internaly stored in ISO-8859-1 - if we check the UTF-8 flag of the
Hmmm... maybe I'm missing some details
> But if it would work - the behavior of assp on 5.10 and 5.12/5.14
> would be different.
totally correct (as a note, I'll probably be able to move from
5.10 to 5.14 in a while, pending some "migration" ;-D)
> I'll find another workaround for the ISO.8859-1/UTF8 internal
> encoding problem of
> >(think to "runas" to get an example)
>
> This seems not to be possible if the Perl session is started - if
> assp is running as service . (???)
Well... I referred to "runas" just as an example, there *are* ways to
achieve such a result (although I've to admit I never tried that using
Perl
> On nix we can start as root - chmod - and can switch to another
> account/group.
in windows the approach is opposite; you start as "user", raise your
privileges by calling the appropriate functions (think to "runas" to
get an example), do whatever you need and then go down to "user" when
done .
> 'setFilePermOnStart' and 'checkFilePermOnStart' are no longer
> available for windows systems.
> Perls chmod has no effect on NTFS volumes - so both options are
> useless on windows systems.
Well... there is a way to achieve the same kind of result, that is
http://search.cpan.org/~teverett/Wi
> This test could be stopped - the version does not start on Perl 5.10
> - 'unsupported feature'.
>
> So we have to wait until 5.10 is obsolet.
You're right, and it seems to be confirmed by this
http://docs.activestate.com/activeperl/5.14/lib/feature.html
scrolling down to the "unicode_strings"
> What I mean - the implementation of this step in any available
> Web-Server (100 and more version) is not really possible. The session
> key must be build by the Web-Server
> and as long as I know they are not valid after a server restart (in
> most cases).
Thomas... let the webserver (whatev
> Not at all.
Ok...
> This is a small business that manufactures batteries and deals with
> many international companies. Often those companies are on the end of
> dodgy IP blocks in China, Russia or South America.
>
> The emails are time sensitive because suppliers change stock levels
> and pr
> A customer wants the block reports to run hourly due to the time
> sensitive nature of some of the emails.
Oh... you're referring to THAT kind of customer; I see, those which
feel lost if they don't receive their daily shot of junk email and
which don't even understand how the email works nor
> Personally, since there will never be duplicate attachments, keeping
> them forever (or at least for many years) shouldn't be a real
> problem, and that is what I would do. The simplest way for those who
well... that fits your reality, but when it comes to a program (ASSP)
used in a number of d
> Charles - this could be done with the ASSP_AFC plugin in V2. Without
> the plugin a mail with a bad attachment is blocked - the plugin will
> replace the bad attachments with a text part.
> Including a download-link to a replaced bad attachment seems not to
> be wise.
>
> Or do you mean a featur
> This is strange - I could understand that, if all (~ 1000) config
> settings are set to default because the config file could not be
> opened - but 291 - I've no clue.
Thomas... just shooting in the dark here, since I wasn't able to
reproduce the behaviour (yes, tried it :D) ... I wonder if, fo
> Is it under "Block Reporting" ?
> I tried a couple of things there but nothing happened.
Yes, you'll need to use the blockreport option; basically your user
will need to send an email to the "assp blockreport" email address,
this way ASSP will generate a report containing the blocked emails for
when, while looking at my issue of "Linux Journal" I found that they
quickly reviewed an application I had been already using for some time;
it wasn't fancy, just a simple cmdline app, yet it worked very well ...
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7450#mpart3
:-)
>
> Warning: Spamdb contains 151091 records (allocating at least 35.9MB)
> - it is highly recommended to use a database for 'spamdb'
>
> and same for whitelistdb. I'd also like to experiment with the Hidden
> Makrov Model functionality, which requires a database.
>
> I currently use MySQL for my
> What exactly causes this?
here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sender_Policy_Framework#Error_handling
--
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft
> - The 'EarlyTalker' check is now skipped for all IP's
> - connected to the 'relayPort'
> - include in 'acceptAllMail'
> - include in 'whiteListedIPs'
> - include in 'ispip'
> - include in 'noPB'
> - include in 'noDelay'
> - include in 'noBlockingIPs'
> - include in 'noProcessing
> Does anyone know of a reliable outsourced antispam service that uses
> ASSP2 as the tool of choice?
Sorry, no idea, maybe Thomas will have some pointers
> I have a client that simply does not want to do it inhouse (no matter
> how easy I tell them it will be), but really like the
> features
> all I see is "There are no active SMTP ses"
hmmm... I see, so are you suggesting to change that to "There is no
active SMTP sex" :) ?
--
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online
>
> Not that I know the answer, but I note that 12017 is now available.
Same problem with 12017; setting the value in correctASSPcfg.pm doesn't
work, setting it directly inside the ASSP code works
--
Keep Your Developer
101 - 200 of 1015 matches
Mail list logo
