: [Assp-test] test for personal whitelist wanted
I've longed for this for ages, but always thought Thomas was too busy
to implement it :) however, I think it should work alongside GH's idea
of a blacklist.
However, what will happen with multiple recepients? Eg. 1 person marks
an address
But, if adding this feature has a major impact on performance,
There is no major impact on performance!
Thomas
Von:Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com
An: assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 03.05.2010 17:00
Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] test for personal whitelist wanted
-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 03.05.2010 16:02
Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] test for personal whitelist wanted
There is a major change in the code that uses a personal Whitelist,
which works as follows:
Thomas... it's fine, but adds a lot of overhead imHo; it would
suffice knowing
someone doesn't want to receive some messages (s)he may just add
a given sender to his/her personal BL (which will probably be
smaller)
But this (personal blacklist) is provided by every mail client - or
not?
That's different; if you do it at client level then you'll have to
accept the
: 04.05.2010 12:19
Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] test for personal whitelist wanted
someone doesn't want to receive some messages (s)he may just add
a given sender to his/her personal BL (which will probably be
smaller)
But this (personal blacklist) is provided by every mail client
So, the 99 users who believe that the message is black should each add
a rule (in the case of outlook/exchange) or add to personal BL because
of 1 minority guy who believes it should be white? (And in the case of
multiple recepients, this 1 guy wouldn't get it anyway)
Sorry, but it reminds
I've uploaded a 2.0.2_1.1.02_p-white.pl to the 'test' folder on SF-CVS.
There is a major change in the code that uses a personal Whitelist, which
works as follows:
- if a Whitelist addition is done - also a personal entry is written in to
the Whitelist
There is a major change in the code that uses a personal Whitelist,
which works as follows:
Thomas... it's fine, but adds a lot of overhead imHo; it would
suffice knowing who added a given entry to the whitelits so that, in
case a client box gets crazy (for whatever reason) it will be easy
;)
It kinda drives me nuts.
**
Thomas
Von:GrayHat gray...@gmx.net
An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 03.05.2010 16:02
Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] test for personal whitelist wanted
There is a major change in the code
development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 03.05.2010 16:02
Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] test for personal whitelist wanted
There is a major change in the code that uses a personal Whitelist,
which works as follows:
Thomas... it's fine, but adds a lot of overhead imHo
On 2010-05-03 10:43 AM, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
The reason for the whitelist was, that everyone who receives a block
report, is able to whitelist addresses - and maybe there is someone who
don't want these addresses whitelisted. Public blacklisting is not so
common (I think).
+1
But, if
I've run into this too when running an ISP. In my case I only blacklisted
domains that were know to be sending viruses, thinking that was helpful. The
next day several real estate agents called and wanting their (infected) daily
astrology report emails! So that was a case of a global blacklist
I've longed for this for ages, but always thought Thomas was too busy
to implement it :) however, I think it should work alongside GH's idea
of a blacklist.
However, what will happen with multiple recepients? Eg. 1 person marks
an address as whitelisted, everyone else consideres the address
13 matches
Mail list logo
