---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4588/#review15152
---
Ship it!
Other than having this get documented in the CHANGES
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4587/#review15151
---
branches/13/configs/samples/pjsip.conf.sample
Matt Jordan has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Testsuite: Caller callee initiated local attended transfers
to application.
..
Patch Set 2: Code-Review+1
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/34
To
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4391/#review15168
---
/trunk/main/cli.c
Matt Jordan has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: res_phoneprov_pjsip: Disconnect HTTP before stopping Asterisk.
..
Patch Set 3: Code-Review+1
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/35
To unsubscribe,
Joshua Colp has uploaded a new change for review.
https://gerrit.asterisk.org/37
Change subject: pjsip: Add test for OPTIONS requests received in-dialog.
..
pjsip: Add test for OPTIONS requests received in-dialog.
This test
Matt Jordan has uploaded a new change for review.
https://gerrit.asterisk.org/36
Change subject: rest_api/applications/stasisstatus: Make run-test executable
..
rest_api/applications/stasisstatus: Make run-test executable
If
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4604/#review15153
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Mark Michelson
On April 9, 2015, 2:57
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4608/
---
(Updated April 9, 2015, 1:57 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk Developers
On April 3, 2015, 5:37 a.m., Corey Farrell wrote:
/trunk/main/manager.c, line 4873
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4391/diff/3/?file=72904#file72904line4873
If we successfully ran the command, it seems unsafe to claim failure.
We have to assume the the caller doesn't actually
On March 31, 2015, 7:14 p.m., Mark Michelson wrote:
I don't understand the purpose of this warning. I tried searching for
details about this warning flag on the internet and came up empty, so I
can't find any documentation that explains what type of error this check is
supposed to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4604/#review15146
---
branches/13/main/loader.c
John Bigelow has uploaded a new patch set (#2).
Change subject: Testsuite: Caller callee initiated local attended transfers
to application.
..
Testsuite: Caller callee initiated local attended transfers to application.
This
On April 3, 2015, 6:37 a.m., Corey Farrell wrote:
/trunk/main/manager.c, line 4873
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4391/diff/3/?file=72904#file72904line4873
If we successfully ran the command, it seems unsafe to claim failure.
We have to assume the the caller doesn't actually
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4499/
---
(Updated April 9, 2015, 10:44 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4596/
---
(Updated April 9, 2015, 11:52 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
Matt Jordan has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: res_phoneprov_pjsip: Disconnect HTTP before stopping Asterisk.
..
Patch Set 2:
(1 comment)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4606/#review15160
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Joshua Colp
On April 9, 2015, 5:05
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4609/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Bugs: ASTERISK-24841
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4608/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers and Corey Farrell.
Bugs:
Mark Michelson has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: rest_api/applications/stasisstatus: Make run-test executable
..
Patch Set 1: Code-Review+2 Verified+1
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/36
To
Ashley Sanders has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: rest_api/applications/stasisstatus: Make run-test executable
..
Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/36
To unsubscribe,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4605/
---
(Updated April 9, 2015, 11:50 a.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4608/#review15167
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Corey Farrell
On April 9, 2015, 3:57
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4607/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Repository: Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4606/
---
(Updated April 9, 2015, 12:05 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4603/#review15162
---
This review can be summed up in 2 words: NAPTR ARGH
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4606/#review15159
---
branches/13/CHANGES
Mark Michelson has submitted this change and it was merged.
Change subject: rest_api/applications/stasisstatus: Make run-test executable
..
rest_api/applications/stasisstatus: Make run-test executable
If it isn't executable,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4608/#review15164
---
I think I still prefer ao2_callback over ao2_iterator for
Matt Jordan has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Testsuite: Caller callee initiated local attended transfers
to application.
..
Patch Set 1:
(7 comments)
https://gerrit.asterisk.org/#/c/34/1//COMMIT_MSG
Matt Jordan has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: pjsip: Add basic resolver tests covering A/, SRV, and NAPTR.
..
Patch Set 1:
(1 comment)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4604/#review15154
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Corey Farrell
On April 9, 2015, 10:57
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4588/
---
(Updated April 9, 2015, 2:21 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4585/#review15149
---
I've also sent an email to Teluu for their thoughts on this.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4597/#review15148
---
Ship it!
Ran the command, format looks good - all the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4533/
---
(Updated April 9, 2015, 7:47 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
Hello Anonymous Coward #119,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gerrit.asterisk.org/35
to look at the new patch set (#3).
Change subject: res_phoneprov_pjsip: Disconnect HTTP before stopping Asterisk.
On March 28, 2015, 3:59 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote:
/branches/13/channels/chan_iax2.c, lines 7674-7676
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4547/diff/1/?file=73110#file73110line7674
I really dislike this warning.
In C, it has always been perfectly valid to initialize all
Hi,
I submitted that change, as we have need for not the 'no' and the 'never'
cases on different devices/trunks etc, and before the patch they were
almost the same.
I completely agree with the above suggestion from Kevin. I always set
progressinband manually for all of my device definitions, so
On March 29, 2015, 5:01 a.m., Diederik de Groot wrote:
/branches/13/configure.ac, line 389
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4543/diff/6/?file=73280#file73280line389
move the raii compiler checks to their own m4 file and called the
checking function a little earlier in the
On March 23, 2015, 8:01 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote:
Thanks for the patch! I've clicked the Ship It button, although the same
statement about requiring tests for things going into Asterisk 13 that I
made on the DTMF review applies here as well.
In this particular case, a test for this
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4604/
---
(Updated April 9, 2015, 8:57 a.m.)
Review request for Asterisk Developers
On April 9, 2015, 1:49 p.m., Corey Farrell wrote:
branches/13/res/res_pjsip_phoneprov_provider.c, lines 358-363
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4608/diff/1/?file=73836#file73836line358
To record our brief discussion about this change:
coreyfarrell gtjoseph: so one thing I
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4596/#review15144
---
Can you update the description with the current analysis of
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4601/
---
(Updated April 9, 2015, 10:54 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4590/#review15143
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Joshua Colp
On April 8, 2015, 6:21
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4476/
---
(Updated April 9, 2015, 1:02 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4483/
---
(Updated April 9, 2015, 7:27 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4605/#review15161
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Mark Michelson
On April 9, 2015, 4:50
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4606/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Bugs: ASTERISK-24835
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4598/
---
(Updated April 9, 2015, 10:50 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4607/#review15165
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Joshua Colp
On April 9, 2015, 5:04
On March 23, 2015, 3:01 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote:
Thanks for the patch! I've clicked the Ship It button, although the same
statement about requiring tests for things going into Asterisk 13 that I
made on the DTMF review applies here as well.
In this particular case, a test for this
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4536/#review15145
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Matt Jordan
On April 7, 2015, 3:38
55 matches
Mail list logo