El 09/08/10 05:30, michel freiha escribió:
Hello Miguel molina,
I did what you asked, but still the voice is too bad
Regards
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Miguel Molina
mailto:mmol...@millenium.com.co>> wrote:
El 05/08/10 14:50, Tim Nelson escribió:
- "michel freiha"
Hello Miguel molina,
I did what you asked, but still the voice is too bad
Regards
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Miguel Molina wrote:
> El 05/08/10 14:50, Tim Nelson escribió:
>
> - "michel freiha" wrote:
> >
> > Dear Sir,
> >
> > I tried to convert ilbc to ulaw and get the same result
Steve-
> On 08/07/2010 03:15 AM, Jeff Brower wrote:
>> Steve-
>>
>>> El 05/08/10 14:50, Tim Nelson escribió:
- "michel freiha"wrote:
> Dear Sir,
>
> I tried to convert ilbc to ulaw and get the same result...Bad Voice
Quality
> Regard
On 08/07/2010 03:15 AM, Jeff Brower wrote:
> Steve-
>
>> El 05/08/10 14:50, Tim Nelson escribió:
>>> - "michel freiha"wrote:
Dear Sir,
I tried to convert ilbc to ulaw and get the same result...Bad Voice
>>> Quality
Regards
>>>
Steve-
> El 05/08/10 14:50, Tim Nelson escribió:
>> - "michel freiha" wrote:
>>> Dear Sir,
>>>
>>> I tried to convert ilbc to ulaw and get the same result...Bad Voice
>> Quality
>>> Regards
>>>
>> Again, iLBC is poor quality to begin with. You can't take
On 08/06/2010 04:43 PM, Jeff Brower wrote:
> Steve-
>
>>On 08/06/2010 05:40 AM, Jeff Brower wrote:
>>> Miguel-
>>>
El 05/08/10 14:50, Tim Nelson escribió:
> - "michel freiha" wrote:
>> Dear Sir,
>>
>> I tried to convert ilbc to ulaw and get the same result...Bad Vo
On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 07:40:44 -0500, Michael Graves wrote:
>On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 03:43:33 -0500 (CDT), Jeff Brower wrote:
>
>
>
>>> MELPe is patent encumbered,
>>
>>Not if used for govt/defense purposes. For commercial-only purposes, TI will
>>waive royalty fees if their chip is used
>>in the produ
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 03:43:33 -0500 (CDT), Jeff Brower wrote:
>> MELPe is patent encumbered,
>
>Not if used for govt/defense purposes. For commercial-only purposes, TI will
>waive royalty fees if their chip is used
>in the product. It would have been nice if Digium had considered the many
>adv
Steve-
> On 08/06/2010 05:40 AM, Jeff Brower wrote:
>> Miguel-
>>
>>> El 05/08/10 14:50, Tim Nelson escribió:
- "michel freiha" wrote:
> Dear Sir,
>
> I tried to convert ilbc to ulaw and get the same result...Bad Voice
Quality
> Regards
>
Again, iLBC is p
On 08/06/2010 05:40 AM, Jeff Brower wrote:
> Miguel-
>
>> El 05/08/10 14:50, Tim Nelson escribió:
>>> - "michel freiha" wrote:
Dear Sir,
I tried to convert ilbc to ulaw and get the same result...Bad Voice
>>> Quality
Regards
>>> Again, iLBC is poor quality to begin
>> This just made me remember some comment on the iax.conf sample file...
>>
>> disallow=lpc10; Icky sound quality... Mr. Roboto.
>>
> LPC10 is a very old codec, from early 1980s. LPC10 doesn't do a good job
> with pitch detection so it tends to have a
> 'robotic' sound. With
Miguel-
> El 05/08/10 14:50, Tim Nelson escribió:
>> - "michel freiha" wrote:
>> >
>> > Dear Sir,
>> >
>> > I tried to convert ilbc to ulaw and get the same result...Bad Voice
>> Quality
>> >
>> > Regards
>> >
>>
>> Again, iLBC is poor quality to begin with. You can't take a poor audio
>> sa
El 05/08/10 14:50, Tim Nelson escribió:
- "michel freiha" wrote:
>
> Dear Sir,
>
> I tried to convert ilbc to ulaw and get the same result...Bad Voice
Quality
>
> Regards
>
Again, iLBC is poor quality to begin with. You can't take a poor audio
sample and make it better by converting it t
Michel-
> I tried to convert ilbc to ulaw and get the same
> result...Bad Voice Quality
I think you have to be more specific when you say "bad voice quality". Like
what? Worse than a cellphone call? Gaps
of audio missing? Robotic or "cyborg" sound? Static? A background tone or
buzzing?
i
- "michel freiha" wrote:
>
> Dear Sir,
>
> I tried to convert ilbc to ulaw and get the same result...Bad Voice Quality
>
> Regards
>
Again, iLBC is poor quality to begin with. You can't take a poor audio sample
and make it better by converting it to a codec with better 'resolution'.
Dear Sir,
I tried to convert ilbc to ulaw and get the same result...Bad Voice Quality
Regards
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Tim Nelson wrote:
> - "michel freiha" wrote:
> >
> > Dear All,
> >
> > i would like to ask please if someone tried to make a codec conversion
> from ilbc to g729,
- "michel freiha" wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> i would like to ask please if someone tried to make a codec conversion from
> ilbc to g729, because i did that but the voice quality was too bad and a lot
> of disconnection..
>
> Can i get your feedback regarding this issue please?
>
> rega
Dear All,
i would like to ask please if someone tried to make a codec conversion from
ilbc to g729, because i did that but the voice quality was too bad and a lot
of disconnection..
Can i get your feedback regarding this issue please?
regards
--
_
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010, Steve Edwards wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Feb 2010, wassim darwich wrote:
>
>> Thanks for?your reply,ill give?you my situation, iam using my asterisk box
>> as a switch ,so my client is sending me ulaw and my voip provider?only
>> accept g723 ,So what i have to do is to receive?g711
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010, wassim darwich wrote:
Thanks for?your reply,ill give?you my situation, iam using my asterisk
box as a switch ,so my client is sending me ulaw and my voip
provider?only accept g723 ,So what i have to do is to receive?g711?codec
and convert them to g723 at?asterisk ,i tried t
Hi:
Thanks for your reply,ill give you my situation, iam using my asterisk box as a
switch ,so my client is sending me ulaw and my voip provider only accept g723
,So what i have to do is to receive g711 codec and convert them to g723
at asterisk ,i tried this before but i saw the cpu usage is ov
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 18:23 -0400, Wasif wrote:
> What is the best utility to convert GSM files into G729 files for batch
> processing.
I don't think sox supports G729. However, you can actually use Asterisk
to do this for you if you use the trunk, or upcoming 1.4 release. In
the trunk, there is
Hello,
What is the best utility to convert GSM files into G729 files for batch
processing.
Thanks
WAzb
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.dig
for sip calls, asterisk is able to convert a incoming g729 cal to a outgoing G.711 call.
For oh323, I am unable to get asterisk to convert a incoming g729 call to a outgoing G711 call .
my question is : For h323, how to configure asterisk to convert a incoming h323/g729 calls to a outgo
Hi!
There's any way to set up a call using
G726 (sip peer) receive it on Asterisk convert it to G711Mu to send it
to PSTN broadband termination?
I've put the following in
sip.conf:
disalow=all
allow=gsm
allow=g726 (my TAs use G726
32K)
best regards,
Helder
___
Helder Rogério [MICROREDE] wrote:
Hi!
Is there any way to receive in * server a call from a Terminal adapter in
G.723/G.729 and then convert it to G.711?
I'm wondering this because I can only place all thru Broadvoice in G.711 but
most of customers have ADSL connection with 128k upstream, so the
t;
>
> - Joshua Colp.
>
>
>
> _
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Helder
> Rogério [MICROREDE]
> Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 12:34 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: [Asteri
.
Brian Fertig
Network Engineer
Planet Telecom, Inc.
Tampa, FL Office
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Helder Rogério
[MICROREDE]
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005
11:34 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users
.
- Joshua Colp.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Helder Rogério
[MICROREDE]
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005
12:34 PM
To: Asterisk
Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Codec
conversion
Hi!
Is there any way
Hi!
Is there any way to receive in * server a call from
a Terminal adapter in G.723/G.729 and then convert it to G.711?
I'm wondering this because I can only place all
thru Broadvoice in G.711 but most of customers have ADSL connection with 128k
upstream, so the result is that they can he
Doesn't g729 require a license?
Lyle
- Original Message -
From: "Sean Cook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 8:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users]
I think that all you have to do is where you define the codecs for the
extention/protocol and asterisk will take care of the rest...
[sip2101] [sip2102]
allow=g711allow=g729
Asterisk will make the conversion
Hello,
Is there an utility for asterisk for codec
conversion? I tried google but i haven' got anything.
I am trying to initiate a call with G711 codec to
asterisk and i would like asterisk to call a gateway with an g729 codec,
therefore making a codec conversion from g711 to g729. I know ch
33 matches
Mail list logo