Hi,
I have problem with X100P clone card.I can not force it to work
under Asterisk 1.4.27.1 and DAHDI Version: 2.2.0.2.
I looked over and over on configuration and could not see any mistakes.
Here are relevant configuration files.
/etc/dahdi/system.conf
> fxsks=1
> echocanceller=mg2,1
> loadzone
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 05:27:50PM -0400, John Novack wrote:
>
>
> Henry Cobb wrote:
> >On 6/5/07, Jared Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>Most of the clone cards don't support far-end disconnect supervision,
> >>so you'll have problems where Asterisk can't tell that the other party
> >>has hu
On 6/6/07, John Novack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Henry Cobb wrote:
> Why would anybody plug a telephone line into an X100P clone?
???
What else would one plug into it?
We just use them as clock cards for MeetMe and trunking.
-HJC
___
--Bandwidth and
Henry Cobb wrote:
On 6/5/07, Jared Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Most of the clone cards don't support far-end disconnect supervision,
so you'll have problems where Asterisk can't tell that the other party
has hung up the phone. You'd be better off to buy a modern Asterisk
telephony card.
On 6/5/07, Jared Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Most of the clone cards don't support far-end disconnect supervision,
so you'll have problems where Asterisk can't tell that the other party
has hung up the phone. You'd be better off to buy a modern Asterisk
telephony card.
Why would anybody p
On 6/5/07, Ronaldo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm planning to buy a X100P clone and would like some feedback about
this card.
Most of the clone cards don't support far-end disconnect supervision,
so you'll have problems where Asterisk can't tell that the other party
has hung up the phone. You'
I've been using one for several years now. It works ok but not
spectacular.
You can almost forget ever sending or receiving faxes thru it tho. They
only work about 5% of the time.
Henry Cobb wrote:
On 6/5/07, Ronaldo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I'm planning to buy a X100P clone and
On 6/5/07, Ronaldo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I'm planning to buy a X100P clone and would like some feedback about
this card.
Does anyone already used this card? Does anyone recommend it ? or not?
I'd appreciate any comments.
If you have a new 3.3v only motherboard then make very sure
Hi all,
I'm planning to buy a X100P clone and would like some feedback about
this card.
Does anyone already used this card? Does anyone recommend it ? or not?
I'd appreciate any comments.
Thanks.
Ronaldo.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Ea
Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone dial problems.
Well, my PSTN card has:
signalling-fxs_ks
and that works for me.
Klaverstyn, David C wrote:
> Thanks for your help.
>
>
>
> This is my file.
>
>
&g
on-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone dial problems.
Klaverstyn, David C wrote:
> I have since added fxs_ks=1
This is meaningless. Follow the example that I posted.
and channel => 1
>
> This has not fixed the problem. I d
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 06:53:19PM +1100, Klaverstyn, David C wrote:
> I have since added fxs_ks=1 and channel => 1
>
> This has not fixed the problem. I do notice a warning on the reload of
> asterisk.
>
> WARNING[4296]: chan_zap.c:10874 setup_zap: Ignoring signalling
Right. reload of chan_zap
hen
Sent: Monday, 11 December 2006 4:47 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone dial problems.
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 04:18:20PM +1100, Klaverstyn, David C wrote:
> I'm not sure if I have a configuration problem or not. I am unable to
> dial out.
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 04:18:20PM +1100, Klaverstyn, David C wrote:
> I'm not sure if I have a configuration problem or not. I am unable to
> dial out. When I try to dial in I can hear the phone ring on the
> dialling phone but Asterisk does not register anything.
>
>
>
>
>
> In zaptel.con
I'm not sure if I have a configuration problem or not. I am unable to
dial out. When I try to dial in I can hear the phone ring on the
dialling phone but Asterisk does not register anything.
In zaptel.conf I have
loadzone = au
defaultzone=au
fxsks=1
In zapata.conf
language=au
Did anyone success to install X100P Clone card on Asterisk to work with Japan stanadards for Analog line over ISDN TA. I can't make call when the call is ringing is OK and in the moment when the call is pick up the line is droped. I have hang ups all the time. I can't make call. Did anyone else hav
> > One last thing:
> >
> > Playback sounds now like MickeyMouse, much to slow
>
> One sanity check: try zttest . See that it gives values ov 100% or very
> close to that.
--- Results after 141 passes ---
Best: 99.499512 -- Worst: 83.691406 -- Average: 95.715467
_
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 02:21:01PM +0200, Frank Darner wrote:
>
>
> > > What is the output from 'cat /proc/zaptel/*'
> >
> > After delete of all Asterisk files and complete new install I got
> > something:
> >
> > # modprobe zaptel && modprobe wcfxo
> >
> > linux:/proc/zaptel # cat /proc/zaptel/*
--
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Frank Darner
Envoyé : dimanche 23 juillet 2006 23:41
À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone not working
Am Sunday 23 July 2006 20:58 schrieb Walter Willis:
> look ud
Am Sunday 23 July 2006 20:58 schrieb Walter Willis:
> look udev rules???
the problem was related that ztcfg did not find zaptel.com
-c /etc/asterisk/zaptel.conf has solved this issue
#ztcfg --help -c -- Use instead
of /etc/zaptel.conf
my failure, I should read man page more carefully
n
look udev rules???On 7/23/06, Frank Darner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tom Lynn:> perhaps not what you're looking for, but reading thru your config, it looks> like you've mis-spelled 'echo cancel' as 'echo cancle'you are right, typothank you___
--Bandwidth
Tom Lynn:
> perhaps not what you're looking for, but reading thru your config, it looks
> like you've mis-spelled 'echo cancel' as 'echo cancle'
you are right, typo
thank you
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users m
perhaps not what you're looking for, but reading thru your config, it looks like you've mis-spelled 'echo cancel' as 'echo cancle'On 7/23/06, Frank Darner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What is the output from 'cat /proc/zaptel/*'>> After delete of all Asterisk files and complete new install I got
> > What is the output from 'cat /proc/zaptel/*'
>
> After delete of all Asterisk files and complete new install I got
> something:
>
> # modprobe zaptel && modprobe wcfxo
>
> linux:/proc/zaptel # cat /proc/zaptel/*
> Span 1: WCFXO/0 "Generic Clone Board 1" RED
>
>1 WCFXO/0/0
>
> but
Am Sunday 23 July 2006 06:39 schrieb Tzafrir Cohen:
> On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 09:02:48PM +0200, Frank Darner wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have problem to set up an X100P clone card.
> > Installation of zaptel was successful.
> > Also modprobe of zaptel, ztdummy and wcfxo without problems.
> >
> > kerne
> configs look fine to me
> it has to be a module problem im guessing
may be, but I dont know whats wrong
Zaptel (1.2.6.) installation was without errors and I did not get an error
when loading the modules
>
> try rmmod for zaptel and wctfxo or w/e then modprobing again(must be root)
>
> if th
Tzafrir Cohen:
> On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 09:02:48PM +0200, Frank Darner wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have problem to set up an X100P clone card.
> > Installation of zaptel was successful.
> > Also modprobe of zaptel, ztdummy and wcfxo without problems.
> >
> > kernel: wcfxo: module not supported by Nov
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 09:02:48PM +0200, Frank Darner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have problem to set up an X100P clone card.
> Installation of zaptel was successful.
> Also modprobe of zaptel, ztdummy and wcfxo without problems.
>
> kernel: wcfxo: module not supported by Novell, setting U taint flag.
>
here is some more information
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/X100P+clone
From: Frank Darner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
Discussion
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clo
that wcfxo is the correct module for that device??
hoping to help
`KruZ~
From: Frank Darner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
Discussion
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone not w
Hi,
i tried w/o ztdummy but nothing changed.
any ideas?
zaptel.conf
--
fxsks=1
loadzone=us
defaultzone=us
zapata.conf
[channels]
language=en
context=incoming
signalling=fxs_ks
usecallerid=yes
echocancle=yes
transfer=yes
echocanclewhenbridged=yes
channel => 1
dmesg | grep x100p
also
im almost positive(correct me if im wrong anyone) you do NOT
need ztdummy
i repeat, do NOT need ztdummy with x100p
then rmmod zaptel && rmmod wctdm && modprobe zaptel && modprobe wctdm
or wctfxo or w/e
let me know how this works out
(post the section for your x100p from
Hi,
I have problem to set up an X100P clone card.
Installation of zaptel was successful.
Also modprobe of zaptel, ztdummy and wcfxo without problems.
kernel: wcfxo: module not supported by Novell, setting U taint flag.
kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt :05:04.0[A] -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 193
Hello All,
I have this strange problem,
I can dial out with my sip phone and it seems to work relatively well, but
when I call in, the line just rings and rings, I get no indication in
asterisk that it's detecting an incoming call.
The strange thing is that in ztmonitor 1 -vv the rx volume goes f
s helps,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christoph
Rothe
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 01:24
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Clone any hints for recognizing RINGing ?
On Mon,
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
> It has absolutely nothing to do with what "economically suits them best" --
> it
> has everything to do with the fact that when you buy a clone X100P you DO NOT
> KNOW what you're getting. The chipset may be the same but as you can clearly
> see
> I think it comes down to tolerances. Some days I am far less tolerant than
> others when it comes to people who just don't want to put forward any effort.
>
> Today was particularly bad and if I was a smarter person, would probably
> refrain from reading the list at all. I don't always sel
> Most of those people who tend to scold every newbie are probably
> "elitist pretenders". If they were truly elite, they would be too busy
> to read and reply to such posts. Of course some of us are just
> impatient, regardless of our skill level.
Very well said!
Now back to helping those th
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
I can't tell if you're on "my side" of this debate or not, because you sure
sound like it. :-)
I'm on "my side" and always on the side of the serious and earnest end
user. I live in a sparsely populated rural area. Most of the locals
can't afford to pay for computer
On March 5, 2005 04:49 pm, Paul Fielding wrote:
> Geepers man. Looking at the last couple of times you tried to 'educate'
> someone, I don't see anything in their messages that sound like "I need X
> done **RIGHT NOW**!! I DEMAND HELP!!". Uneducated and demanding are not
> necessarily the same t
On March 5, 2005 04:57 pm, Paul wrote:
> FWIW - some of us have paying customers and helping them takes absolute
> over helping newbies who won't try to help themselves first. Some of
> them actually are capable of reading and studying the information
> already out there, but they are also selfish
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On March 5, 2005 02:46 pm, Paul wrote:
Maybe one of the free web-based forum packages will eventually offer an
"elitist" or "impatient" mode. Before you can post, you do the required
reading and pass online exams. The idea is to weed out people who think
README is just an
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Kohlsmith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I think where the problem comes in is that people take this forum to be
asterisk-biz half the time. "I need X done **RIGHT NOW**!! I DEMAND
HELP!!"
-- take it to -biz, there are dozens if not hundreds of consultants who
Well, considering I'm on topic, I shouldn't get flamed to badly for this. I
have a bunch of these working well in my home experiments:
http://www.laptops4me.com/product_info.php/products_id/1444
And yes that price is correct and they do arrive. :)
Not everyone can justify buying the "supported"
On March 5, 2005 02:46 pm, Paul wrote:
> Maybe one of the free web-based forum packages will eventually offer an
> "elitist" or "impatient" mode. Before you can post, you do the required
> reading and pass online exams. The idea is to weed out people who think
> README is just another geek buzzword
On March 5, 2005 02:30 pm, Mike Dent wrote:
> There is a difference when you are that childs father or mother but
> you are neither?
You have a point, but... (read on)
> Do you stop people in the street when you see them doing things wrong
> and try and tell them "you shouldn't be doing it like t
Mike Dent wrote:
And if nobody's going to educate the newbies, then how will they ever learn?
Do you believe in letting your children do whatever they want, too? There
are 'defacto' rules for any system. No, I don't have my shiny ListCop
There is a difference when you are that childs father
On Sat, 2005-03-05 at 19:30 +, Mike Dent wrote:
> >
> > And if nobody's going to educate the newbies, then how will they ever learn?
> > Do you believe in letting your children do whatever they want, too? There
> > are 'defacto' rules for any system. No, I don't have my shiny ListCop
>
> Th
>
> And if nobody's going to educate the newbies, then how will they ever learn?
> Do you believe in letting your children do whatever they want, too? There
> are 'defacto' rules for any system. No, I don't have my shiny ListCop
There is a difference when you are that childs father or mother bu
- Original Message -
There is a LOT of traffic on this list about products that are not
supplied by Digium. Do you want to exclude those also?
The Sangoma guys typically handle support for their own product, even on
this
list. Atacomm's card hasn't hit the market yet. The Sipura people
On March 5, 2005 12:02 pm, John Novack wrote:
> Since Digium no longer suppliers this card, they were denied NOTHING!
They offer comparable hardware. TDM410P is $113.
> There is a LOT of traffic on this list about products that are not
> supplied by Digium. Do you want to exclude those also?
Th
On March 5, 2005 11:57 am, Dave Cotton wrote:
> Just a question, where's the Dev Lite Kit on Digium's site?
I meant "Dev Kit" and you're right, it's an FXO and FXS on the carrier card.
US$195.
> The PCI Dev kit would give him an FXO and an FXS which may be more than
> some people want, perhaps
On March 5, 2005 11:01 am, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
> specifically these types of problems. Maybe someone else on this list is
> more forgiving than I am but I really hope not.
I apologize for this remark. I still do feel, though, that if you're this new
to asterisk that you should have purchase
On March 5, 2005 12:22 pm, Rich Adamson wrote:
> There seems to be about a half dozen "self-appointed" list cops, and
> none of them speak for Mark, digium or asterisk. Several of those are
> lurking on this list only to find fresh meat to sell their services to.
> It's obvious who they are.
I hav
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On March 5, 2005 08:14 am, Androtech wrote:
I bought one "Trust 56k V92 PCI Internal Modem MD-1100" which has the 1057
Motorola Chip, and I installed it on my linux box.
When I try to load the module wcfxo, I cannot load it (zaptel is already
loaded):
Not to
Rich Adamson wrote:
There seems to be about a half dozen "self-appointed" list cops, and none of
them speak for Mark, digium or asterisk. Several of those are lurking on this list only
to find fresh meat to sell their services to.
It's obvious who they are.
Indeed.
Much easier to config the
> Ummm... This isn't a Digium Run list. This is a Digium sponsored list. My
> understanding (someone please correct me if I'm wrong) is that this list *is
> not* a Digium support list. This list is a forum for Asterisk discussion by
> users. As such, I would suggest that all topics of discus
gards,
Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Kohlsmith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 9:01 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Clone, Which one?
On March 5, 2005 08:14 am, Androtech wrote:
I bought one "Trust 56k V92 PCI Internal Modem MD-1100&q
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On March 5, 2005 08:14 am, Androtech wrote:
I bought one "Trust 56k V92 PCI Internal Modem MD-1100" which has the 1057 Motorola Chip, and I installed it on my linux box.
When I try to load the module wcfxo, I cannot load it (zaptel is
On Sat, 2005-03-05 at 11:01 -0500, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
> On March 5, 2005 08:14 am, Androtech wrote:
> > I bought one "Trust 56k V92 PCI Internal Modem MD-1100" which has the 1057
> > Motorola Chip, and I installed it on my linux box.
>
> > When I try to load the module wcfxo, I cannot load it
On March 5, 2005 08:14 am, Androtech wrote:
> I bought one "Trust 56k V92 PCI Internal Modem MD-1100" which has the 1057
> Motorola Chip, and I installed it on my linux box.
> When I try to load the module wcfxo, I cannot load it (zaptel is already
> loaded):
Not to rub salt in the wound, but do
Hi All,
Googling X100P Clone I found several information
about these cards and seems that some winmodem has the same chip used from the
original X100P.
Here below a list winmodem which should work as
X100P clone:
1057 Motorola5608 SM56 PCI Fax Voice
ModemE159 Tiger Jet Network Inc0001 Ti
Ten dollars! Someone please figure this out, I've got a modem here I'd
like to try out!
On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 18:30:24 -0500, Glenn Powers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Razvan Turtureanu wrote:
>
> > I'm new to asterisk and fror a cupple of days I heave been googleing
> > the net for digium "clone
Razvan Turtureanu wrote:
I'm new to asterisk and fror a cupple of days I heave been googleing
the net for digium "clones", because it's very hard for me to get a
digium card (X100P).
Does anyone Know another substitute for X100P (I know that intel based
modem with chip 537/MD3200 is working but
I found At www.ebay.com 7 $US
Max Rivera
- Original Message -
From: "Razvan Turtureanu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 11:40 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Clone
> I'm new to asterisk and fror a cupple of days I heave been
I got mine from http://www.digitnetworks.com
On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 15:40:50 +0200, Razvan Turtureanu
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm new to asterisk and fror a cupple of days I heave been googleing the
> net for digium "clones", because it's very hard for me to get a digium
> card (X100P).
> Does
I'm new to asterisk and fror a cupple of days I heave been googleing the
net for digium "clones", because it's very hard for me to get a digium
card (X100P).
Does anyone Know another substitute for X100P (I know that intel based
modem with chip 537/MD3200 is working but I did not find any of tho
Hello!
I'm trying to install Zaptel module so I can run a X100P clone (Intel 537,
MD 3200) as an FXO interface.
The problem is that after compilling and installing (successfull, aparently)
I can't load the module.
I tried (almost) every tip I was able to find on Google, Voip-Info and this
mailin
68 matches
Mail list logo
