Depends on what the router is. If you get a 2800 series router (we
use 2801s and 2811s for T1s in production with no major issues). You
need the T1/E1 module, DSPs, and an IOS that supports voice.
For a 2800 series you would need something like:
- VWIC2-MFT-T1/E1 ( or VWIC2-2MFT-T1/E1 if you
Thanks for the info. I didn't have any model in mind, just wondering
what was required.
Thanks again, much appreciated.
Julian
2009/10/14 Jonathan Thurman jthurma...@gmail.com:
Depends on what the router is. If you get a 2800 series router (we
use 2801s and 2811s for T1s in production with
List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco router
Thanks for the info. I didn't have any model in mind, just wondering
what was required.
Thanks again, much appreciated.
Julian
2009/10/14 Jonathan Thurman jthurma...@gmail.com:
Depends on what the router is. If you get
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Julian Lyndon-Smith aster...@dotr.com wrote:
Thanks for the info. I didn't have any model in mind, just wondering
what was required.
If you haven't purchased anything yet, or don't have anything, it
might serve you better to look at other products. While the
some howto configuration for asterisk controlling ci$co router (pri/qsig
ports especially) using mgcp interests me too... ;-)
Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444 wrote
I am using a Cisco to connect Asterisk via PRI to our Nortel TX-1. The Cisco is
a voice bundle of 2,811 + E1 + PDLM card. Note
anyone know if they have a solution in Cisco for:
1- Connect old PABX (with BRI or PRI) to a cisco router
2- Connect this cisco router in SIP to a Asterisk Server
I am search if cisco can this and what is the modele for this
I am using a Cisco to connect Asterisk via PRI to our
Thank you so much. After fighting with a large/extensive QOS policy from Cisco's SDM tool, I used your sample and tweaked it for my needs and everything started working fine.Bruce
On 8/23/06, Rich Adamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce Reeves wrote: I'm needing some pointers from anyone who has
The majority of the sample qos policies seem to be based on either five
or seven qos queues, and most folks don't need all of that. What I've
shown as a sample only has three queues; one for voip, one for my
outbound web traffic, and the default queue that everything else falls
into.
You can
On 8/23/06, Bruce Reeves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm needing some pointers from anyone who has been able to get Cisco routers
to recognize the iax protocol and perform QOS on it. Or if there is a better
way to get my iax traffic prioritized by the router.
Can't you just setup a policy class
Bruce,
this might be able to help give you some hints or a place to start:
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/QoS+Cisco
Hope that helps
\R
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or
Bruce Reeves wrote:
I'm needing some pointers from anyone who has been able to get Cisco
routers
to recognize the iax protocol and perform QOS on it. Or if there is a
better
way to get my iax traffic prioritized by the router.
I just spent some time doing this myself. If your routers
Bruce Reeves wrote:
I'm needing some pointers from anyone who has been able to get Cisco
routers to recognize the iax protocol and perform QOS on it. Or if there
is a better way to get my iax traffic prioritized by the router.
You can either match on udp/4569, or, match on TOS header bits.
Additionally, just to satisfy myself that I wasn't going mad I changed
the port from 5060 to 5070 and now things are working, so something is
definitely playing up on port 5060.
James
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
On Jun 11, 2006, at 8:15 AM, James Harper wrote:
Additionally, just to satisfy myself that I wasn't going mad I changed
the port from 5060 to 5070 and now things are working, so something is
definitely playing up on port 5060.
If you are behind a NAT perhaps two SIP devices are both trying to
James Harper wrote:
Additionally, just to satisfy myself that I wasn't going mad I changed
the port from 5060 to 5070 and now things are working, so something is
definitely playing up on port 5060.
James
You probably have are behind NAT and your NAT device has a SIP ALG.
Changing the
On Jun 11, 2006, at 8:15 AM, James Harper wrote:
Additionally, just to satisfy myself that I wasn't going mad I
changed
the port from 5060 to 5070 and now things are working, so something
is
definitely playing up on port 5060.
If you are behind a NAT perhaps two SIP devices are both
Does anyone know how to use the cisco router with an fxo wic with
Asterisk? I don't have enough space on this device to support an IOS
that supports sip or h323. Currently the only one signaling in there
says Cisco. I assume this is the skinny protocol.
www.kingston.com has inexpensive DRAM and
Does anyone know how to use the cisco router with an fxo wic with
Asterisk? I don't have enough space on this device to support an IOS
that supports sip or h323. Currently the only one signaling in there
says Cisco. I assume this is the skinny protocol.
This is Cisco's pre-SIP
Hello,
On an AS5350 this works so I expect this to work too your 3620
Regards,
Niels
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon
Lawrence
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 2:03 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 08:02, Jon Lawrence wrote:
Hi all,
Just checking that what I want to do is possible.
I've got a cisco 3620 in my lab (IP plus ios). I'm thinking of moving my
current pots lines to isdn BRI at home. What I'm thinking of is putting a
wic-1b(s/t) into the 3620 and using
Won't work. The WIC-1B is a data only. You need an NM-1V (or NM-2V)
and a VIC-2BRI to terminate voice and pass it via IP.
Peder
Jon Lawrence wrote:
Hi all,
Just checking that what I want to do is possible.
I've got a cisco 3620 in my lab (IP plus ios). I'm thinking of moving my
current pots
On Tuesday 26 October 2004 14:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Won't work. The WIC-1B is a data only. You need an NM-1V (or NM-2V)
and a VIC-2BRI to terminate voice and pass it via IP.
Should have known Cisco would want more money from me to get this working :)
It'll probably be cheaper to get a
22 matches
Mail list logo
