To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Snom 360 lights not working on
subscription
Hey Mike,
We started deploying exclusively Polycom and Linksys. The Polycom's
support presence, they call it 'Buddy List'. I am not sure about the
Linksys
In order to get subscriptions working and the Snom 360 lights turns
on, I have set everything just like all the pages in the net explain.
So, I get subsciption working. I can list subscription on the
asterisk and if I use the SIP trace function built in at the SNOM nad
see NOTIFY
-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Snom 360 lights not working on subscription
Hey Mike,
We started deploying exclusively Polycom and Linksys. The Polycom's
support presence, they call it 'Buddy List'. I am not sure about the
Linksys phones, I don't think they do although I did see support
What we found is that even if you get the lights working, they go off
after a few days.
Paul Hales
AsteriskIT
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 09:49 -0300, Carlos Maimone wrote:
Dear friends,
I am working around with a Snom 360 and Asterisk 1.4 + FreePBX
In order to get subscriptions working and
I used to deploy these phones, it was these types of issues that
forced me to drop it. It took way too long to troubleshoot the
problems and there was a general lack of documentation. This was 2
years ago, things might have changed. If I remember correctly, it was
this issue you are having that
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Omar A.
Sabek
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 9:27 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Snom 360 lights not working on
subscription
I used to deploy these phones, it was these types of issues
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Omar A.
Sabek
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 9:27 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Snom 360 lights not working on
subscription
I used to deploy these phones
Hi,
Is this a real question? I'm asking because it seems to be a
babelfish translation of a post in a german forum
http://www.ip-phone-forum.de/archive/index.php/t-99696.html
from over a year ago. (is their date wrong?)
Dovid B wrote:
Does someone know coincidentally the cause for the error
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SNOM 360 Rejecting Calls
Hi,
Is this a real question? I'm asking because it seems to be a
babelfish translation of a post in a german forum
http://www.ip-phone-forum.de/archive/index.php/t-99696.html
from over a year ago. (is their date wrong?)
Dovid B wrote:
Does
Hi Erik,
have tried to switch of RTP Encryption on the snom (in the account/identity
connected to Asterisk).
Cheers
Tim
On 4/26/07, Erik Wartusch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I`ve a strange problem since an upgrade from Asterisk 1.2 to 1.4.1.
If a SNOM 360 calls (internal) another phone
Is there a reboot for the phone neccessary? If no then it didn`t work. I
tested to call a Linksys phone with deactivated RTP encryption, no audio
transmission.
Erik
Am Donnerstag, 26. April 2007 10:28 schrieb Tim Koehler:
Hi Erik,
have tried to switch of RTP Encryption on the snom (in the
Him Tim,
Tim Koehler wrote:
have tried to switch of RTP Encryption on the snom (in the account/identity
connected to Asterisk).
Nice to know you're on the list. :)
Grüße,
Philipp
--
amooma GmbH - Bachstr. 126 - 56566 Neuwied - http://www.amooma.de
Let's use IT to solve problems and
Hi UxBoD,
just create a voicemail for your extension and Asterisk will do the rest!!!
Giorgio Incantalupo
--[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
Hi,
I have got my new phone working with Asterisk, and must say it is very
very good combination. Now I have WMI working, but what I would like to
be able to do is
exten = 123,1,Dial(SIP/123|20)
exten = 123,n,Voicemail(u123)
would be a start, you can have all kinds of fun...
On 3/30/07, --[ UxBoD ]-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have got my new phone working with Asterisk, and must say it is very
very good combination. Now I have WMI working, but
Hmmm, okay. But surely it will just try and ring the extension? Or do
you mean setup a seperate extension ie.
exten = 1001,1,Dial(sip/1001,20)
exten = 1001,2,VoiceMail([EMAIL PROTECTED],u)
exten = 1001,3,Hangup()
exten = 1001,101,VoiceMail([EMAIL PROTECTED],u)
exten = 1001,102,Hangup()
exten =
The snom360 DND button forces the phone to give a 480 do not disturb
response.
Bails
--[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
Hmmm, okay. But surely it will just try and ring the extension? Or do
you mean setup a seperate extension ie.
exten = 1001,1,Dial(sip/1001,20)
exten = 1001,2,VoiceMail([EMAIL
Ahhh, awesome. Thank you :)
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:47:30 +0100
bails [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The snom360 DND button forces the phone to give a 480 do not disturb
response.
Bails
--[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
Hmmm, okay. But surely it will just try and ring the extension? Or
do you mean setup
bails wrote:
The snom360 DND button forces the phone to give a 480 do not disturb
response.
Bails
--[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
Hmmm, okay. But surely it will just try and ring the extension? Or do
you mean setup a seperate extension ie.
exten = 1001,1,Dial(sip/1001,20)
exten =
Thankyou David,
It works for Linksys,but not for snom 360.
Do I need to change someting using web UI ?
--- Klaverstyn, David C
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is my code (that I copied form somewhere) for
paging a group of
phones. By dialling 99 it will page phones 2101,
2102 and 2105.
This is my code (that I copied form somewhere) for paging a group of
phones. By dialling 99 it will page phones 2101, 2102 and 2105.
Just include the context ext-paging in your dial plan and modify the
extension numbers and all should be good.
This works on Linksys Phones but should also
My company has had a few screens go out on us, but all of those were
completely blank. I'm not sure if we just got a bad batch or what, but
the Snom phones are usually a solid piece of hardware. I'd try to RMA it.
Nick Hoffman wrote:
Hi guys. I just bought and configured a Snom 360 and have
I had a problem with snom where the screen went completly blank. Snom told
me there was an issue where that the cable going from the phone board to the
screen would fall out. I opend the phone and sliped it back in.
- Original Message -
From: Nick Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
- Original Message -
From: Nick Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: asterisk-users Mailing List asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 10:53 AM
Subject: [asterisk-users] Snom 360 flickering screen
Hi guys. I just bought and configured a Snom 360 and have noticed
Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
So, you're suggesting that the FXO channel driver generates outbound
DTMF under the command of (eventually) the phone set? That would be
nice.
Yes, that _would_ be nice. Are you suggesting that that's not what's
happening? I'm not sure I gather your meaning, or I
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 08:50:51AM -0800, Mojo with Horan Company, LLC wrote:
Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
So, you're suggesting that the FXO channel driver generates outbound
DTMF under the command of (eventually) the phone set? That would be
nice.
Yes, that _would_ be nice. Are you
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 08:35:26AM -0800, Mojo with Horan Company, LLC wrote:
I'm pretty sure that when you AREN'T sending the DTMF inband, asterisk
detects it, and if the keys pressed don't lead to any recording/transfer
features, then it re-creates DTMF on the bridged channel. I mean to
I cannot find this option in the snom firmware, the only thing I found is
DTMF via SIP INFO:
This sounds nice but I guess it will break stuff if you need DTMF tones to
get through the menu of a remote PBX.
Ideally * would need to interpret the SIP INFO message from the Snom as
start
Another way would be to set the dtmf option to speed dial and then add a
speed dial number 1: *1
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
Remco Barendse wrote:
I cannot find this option in the snom firmware, the only thing I found is
DTMF via SIP INFO:
This sounds nice but I guess it will break stuff if you need DTMF tones to
get through the menu of a remote PBX.
I'm pretty sure that when you AREN'T sending the DTMF inband,
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Joel Hill wrote:
No worries. Good question, I wasn't sure so I just tested it and it seems that
the answer is yes it does send the tones to the other side.
Can I ask why this would matter, I think there could be legal implications of
recording a call and not notifying the
That varies from location to location, really. In Georgia, for instance, only
ONE party need know the recording is taking place (calling or receiving)
without a warrant. In some countries, neither party need know, etc, etc.
N.
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:25:28 +1000, Joel Hill wrote
No worries.
There was a patch to get this working, looks like it has been abandoned, though. Should give you a starting point to get it working, or perhaps a bounty would get someone interested in getting it usable and committed.
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=4845
On 10/4/06, Joel Hill [EMAIL
Hi Joel,
thanks for the answer :-).
Yes this is one (the easiest) way how it can be done (on phone side),
but I am still
looking for asterisk side solution ...
i.e. it should understand info message sent by phone and do some
prescribed action.
Haven't u any clue ?
noro
2006/10/5, Joel Hill
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 07:17:47AM -0400, sip wrote:
That varies from location to location, really. In Georgia, for instance, only
ONE party need know the recording is taking place (calling or receiving)
without a warrant. In some countries, neither party need know, etc, etc.
This page:
Hi Joe,
this is the link I was looking for - I ggled a lot, but didn't find it.
Thanke you !
noro
2006/10/5, Joe Pukepail [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There was a patch to get this working, looks like it has been abandoned,
though. Should give you a starting point to get it working, or
We use SIP Polycom 501s, and their dtmfmode=rfc2833. The remote party
can NOT hear the tones when you start recording. I suspect that if
dtmfmode=inband, they WOULD be able to. Could be wrong here, that's
just my current rudimentary understanding of the situation :)
Moj
Remco Barendse
Hi Noro,
Depending on what firmware you have this is the way to go.
Go to the Functions keys page, then look for the Record button, Change
the type to DTMF and in number put in *1 which is the default Asterisk
recording function.
Hope this helps
Cheers,
Joel
Asterisk IT
Thanks for this, I was looking for this too.
Will the DTMF tone be audible to the other side? (In other words will they
know something is happening)
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Joel Hill wrote:
Hi Noro,
Depending on what firmware you have this is the way to go.
Go to the Functions keys page, then
No worries. Good question, I wasn't sure so I just tested it and it
seems that the answer is yes it does send the tones to the other side.
Can I ask why this would matter, I think there could be legal
implications of recording a call and not notifying the other party.
That's why you always get
2) One digium quadri primary ISDN interface (TE410P)
3) Two Rhino Channel Banks
4) 25 Analogue Phones on every channel bank
How I can configure function keys on my SNOM 360 for monitoring analogue
phone status?
I haven't used the Rhino Channel banks yet, so I'm guessing to some
degree
- Original Message -
From: Steve Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 6:01 AM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SNOM 360
On 7/31/06, Koopmann, Jan-Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
- Original Message -
From: Steve Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 5:57 AM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SNOM 360
On 7/28/06, Dovid Bender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also
On 8/4/06, Dovid Bender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The snom does seem to manage its two local ports properly though but
this cannot be hard. Worst case is that the snom needs about 128Kb/s -
Not hard on a 100Mb/s full duplex connection :)
Dovid - Have you identified where the bottleneck is
On 8/4/06, Dovid Bender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Qos field is part of the 802.11q header, so is only available if
a VLAN has been configured.
VLAN 0 is a perfectly valid VLAN, and will cause an 802.11q packet
header to be added to all the phone traffic. This will then only work
if the
Dovid Bender wrote:
- Original Message - From: Steve Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 6:01 AM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SNOM 360
On 7/31/06, Koopmann, Jan-Peter
On Friday, July 28, 2006 3:08 PM Dovid Bender wrote:
I am trying to have thier PC run thru the port on the phone and the
phone give prioroty to itself and the rest to the PC. When my client
does a big download the phone call gets real bad. The docs from SNOM
on TOS (or DIFFSERV) is poor and I
On 7/28/06, Dovid Bender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also SNOM says by Vlan to set the vlan and then the value for the qos. When
you set Vlan to 0 it is supposed to be no Vlan. However once I set it the
vlan on the SNOM to 0 and I reboot the phone is no long accessable from the
network and I have
On 7/31/06, Koopmann, Jan-Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2006 3:08 PM Dovid Bender wrote:
I am trying to have thier PC run thru the port on the phone and the
phone give prioroty to itself and the rest to the PC. When my client
does a big download the phone call gets real
On Freitag, 28. Juli 2006 12:37 Dovid Bender wrote:
Does anyone know how to set up QoS on the SNOM 360 ? Thanks.
What _EXACTLY_ are you trying to accomplish? There is no simply QoS switch on a
Snom 360 that will manage things for you. AFAIK all you can do is tell the
phone (or * or whatever)
On 7/28/06, Koopmann, Jan-Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Freitag, 28. Juli 2006 12:37 Dovid Bender wrote:
Does anyone know how to set up QoS on the SNOM 360 ? Thanks.
What _EXACTLY_ are you trying to accomplish? There is no simply QoS switch on a
Snom 360 that will manage things for you.
or docs on how they did this ?
Doid
- Original Message -
From: Koopmann, Jan-Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 3:17 AM
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] SNOM 360
On Freitag, 28
-
From: Koopmann, Jan-Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 3:17 AM
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] SNOM 360
On Freitag, 28. Juli 2006 12:37 Dovid Bender wrote:
Does anyone know how to set
switch. I like m0n0wall for routers and cisco for switches.
--
Message: 9
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 09:08:17 -0400
From: Dovid Bender [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SNOM 360
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk
Welcome to VoIP... Your operator needs to take care about
QoS when you are doing a download. Alternatively, there are some more-or-less
tricky and buggy tricks to stop downloads when you are talking; this needs to be
done on your IAD.
See for example http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-QoS.
CS
Just installed!
Use 6.1.1 (beta) because 6.1 has a few of registration problems.
Bye
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Koopmann, Jan-Peter
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 9:24 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
I have had the same problem too, I solved resetting the phone to
factory defaults
Edward de Zeeuw wrote:
I'll take a look first thing tomorrow and let you know what I find. Thanks!
Edward
Colin Anderson wrote:
In the Snom web management page under Advanced make sure Challenge response
Koopmann, Jan-Peter wrote:
Hi,
Has anybody experience with Snom360 and Firmware 6.X with Asterisk 1.2.X? I
am currently using Firmware 5.5 without serious problems but wanted to make
sure 6.X will work as well (including subscription etc.)
Use the very latest - 6.2.1. It seems quite good.
I'll take a look first thing tomorrow and let you know what I find. Thanks!
Edward
Colin Anderson wrote:
In the Snom web management page under Advanced make sure Challenge response
on phone is turned to OFF. This is a stupid feature to have on by default
from the factory.
-Original
In the Snom web management page under Advanced make sure Challenge response
on phone is turned to OFF. This is a stupid feature to have on by default
from the factory.
-Original Message-
From: Edward de Zeeuw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 11:54 AM
To:
turn challenge_response off
On 6/21/06, Edward de Zeeuw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have multiple (20+) Snom 360 phones communicating with asterisk
1.2.7.1. Almost regularly (daily) and in some cases ongoing 9every 10
minutes the phones ask for password and id the account they are seeking
the
Mimmus wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying my new Snom 360 phone (6.2 firmware) and I'm seeing that it
doesn't register with the Asterisk 1.2.9.1 server after a reboot. I need to
click Re-register in the web interface.
I think that was fixed in 6.2.1. See
http://www.snom.com/wiki/index.php/Beta_Firmware
: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Snom 360 Firmware 6.0 - Microbrowser
Hello,
snom 360s can handle xml messages via SIP-Notify.
Descriptions how to implement this on:
http://snom.com/minibrowser/doc/xmlapplsnom360.pdf
http://snom.com/minibrowser/notify.txt
Common infos you can find out on: http://snom.com/wiki
Hello,
snom 360s can handle xml messages via SIP-Notify.
Descriptions how to implement this on:
http://snom.com/minibrowser/doc/xmlapplsnom360.pdf
http://snom.com/minibrowser/notify.txt
Common infos you can find out on: http://snom.com/wiki/index.php/Xmlobjects
Hope this will help...
cheers,
,
Frederic
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Hirosh Dabui
Verzonden: dinsdag 18 april 2006 17:02
Aan: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Onderwerp: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Snom 360 Firmware 6.0 - Microbrowser
Hello,
snom 360s can
TWV wrote:
By now, every Snom fan should have installed the 6.0 (beta) firmware :-)
See http://www.snom.com/wiki/index.php/Beta_Firmware
I had to revert back to 5.5, because 6.0 kept garbling my LCD screen
(the screen would become unreadable). You might want to wait for 6.0.1 :-)
- Mike
bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Dr. Michael J.
Chudobiak
Verzonden: maandag 17 april 2006 18:45
Aan: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Onderwerp: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Snom 360 Firmware 6.0 - Microbrowser
TWV wrote:
By now, every Snom fan should
Onderwerp: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Snom 360 Firmware 6.0 - Microbrowser
TWV wrote:
By now, every Snom fan should have installed the 6.0 (beta) firmware :-)
See http://www.snom.com/wiki/index.php/Beta_Firmware
I had to revert back to 5.5, because 6.0 kept garbling my LCD screen
(the screen would
I may need a consultant that can help with some problems.
We had 2 smaller satellite offices on the same asterisk systems with no
trouble. We've just upgraded the main office and hit troubles. There's
no going back because we've entirely outgrown our old system.
Any * consultants around
I have a bad feeling that getting a phone with 160 lights is not going to
happen anytime soon.
From memory, the snom360 is limited to way less than that.
Paul Hales
Technical Manager
AsteriskIT
- Original Message -
From: Stuart Elvish - Dallas Delta Corporation Pty Ltd
[EMAIL
AsteriskIT
- Original Message -
From: Stuart Elvish - Dallas Delta Corporation Pty Ltd
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 11:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Snom 360 - Multiple Server BLF
Manager
AsteriskIT
- Original Message -
From: Stuart Elvish - Dallas Delta Corporation Pty Ltd
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 11:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Snom 360 - Multiple
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, Brian Kennedy wrote:
Anyone have a Snom they're happy with? How did you manage that? :)
I would be happier if snom fixed the US indications and the giant 3000
point font they use for everything.
-Dan
___
--Bandwidth and
Anyone have a Snom they're happy with? How did you manage that? :)
I have a system of:
Asterisk 1.2.3
2 Wildcard TDM400P Rev I and E/F
1 Snom 360 + sidecar
~15 Sipura/Linsys SPA-841
~15 Grandstream 101
Everything (currently) is on the same network, not a router to be seen
Guido Hecken wrote:
Anyone have a Snom they're happy with? How did you manage that? :)
I have a system of:
Asterisk 1.2.3
2 Wildcard TDM400P Rev I and E/F
1 Snom 360 + sidecar
~15 Sipura/Linsys SPA-841
~15 Grandstream 101
Everything (currently) is on the same network, not a
On 3/23/06, Jared Davison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was having trouble getting hints to work with my GXP-2000 (with the beta
firmware). I am running Asterisk 1.2.5. I had hyphens in the SIP channel
names and it wasn't working. I have changed them to underscores and it has
worked in 1.2.5. So
On 3/6/06, Colin Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was always puzzled by posts to the list about people having problems
getting hints to work on a Snom, since I always seem to have no problem
making it work. That is, until today when I tried to get a sidecar to work.
All I could do was get a
On Wednesday 22 March 2006 05:26, Steve Davies wrote:
Another hint for getting hints working, although this only relates
to older 1.0.x versions of Asterisk (It is already fixed in 1.2.x) is
that status changes are not notified for channels where there is a
hyphen '-' in the channel name, so
On 3/22/06, Andrew Kohlsmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 22 March 2006 05:26, Steve Davies wrote:
Another hint for getting hints working, although this only relates
to older 1.0.x versions of Asterisk (It is already fixed in 1.2.x) is
that status changes are not notified for
Jared
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Davies
Sent: Thursday, 23 March 2006 12:01 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Snom 360 Hinting tricks
On 3/22/06, Andrew Kohlsmith
After rebooting, I can make one outgoing call successfully. Subsequent
calls don't work - the 360 just seems to do nothing after pressing the
OK button (but I can cancel the call, the phone isn't frozen). The
Asterisk console shows the first call going through, but nothing
appears for the
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak wrote:
I updated the firmware in my Snom 360 from 4.3 to version 5.3.6 (and then
back to 5.2), but I'm having a weird problem now:
After rebooting, I can make one outgoing call successfully. Subsequent calls
don't work - the 360 just seems to do
Snom's US tones have always been Terrible.. I have contacted them
several times, they recommeded I use another countrys tones u, I
don't think so, I don't think customers will like that too much. Plus
the call waiting tone is terrible, its loud, cuts out the call, and the
outside party can
Christian Stredicke writes:
Generally I think if people have a problem today they should move to
4.5. This version seems to be pretty stable, we did not get any
crash-complains or major problem reports from this version.
For those who want to move on (feature-wise), it is time to jump on
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 03:58:07PM -0800, Steven Ringwald wrote:
Thank you so much for your help, Christian! Your suggestion worked
perfectly, and the phones came back up without a problem.
What part of his suggestion? Upgrading the firmware to 4.5 via the tftp
server?
Please elaborate for
On Friday 23 December 2005 00:39, Steven Ringwald wrote:
On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 23:34 +0100, Christian Stredicke wrote:
Try loading
http://phone-ip-address/line_sip.htm?settings=saveuser_dp_str1= (if
that was in the line 1) while the phone boots up (keep your finger on
the reload button).
-
Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SNOM 360 locked up SOLVED
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 03:58:07PM -0800, Steven Ringwald wrote:
Thank you so much for your help, Christian! Your suggestion worked
perfectly, and the phones came back up without a problem.
What part
Try loading
http://phone-ip-address/line_sip.htm?settings=saveuser_dp_str1= (if
that was in the line 1) while the phone boots up (keep your finger on
the reload button). If that does not work, you need to do a tftp update.
Also consider moving to version 4.5
On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 23:34 +0100, Christian Stredicke wrote:
Try loading
http://phone-ip-address/line_sip.htm?settings=saveuser_dp_str1= (if
that was in the line 1) while the phone boots up (keep your finger on
the reload button). If that does not work, you need to do a tftp update.
Thank you so much for your help, Christian! Your suggestion worked perfectly, and the phones came back up without a problem.
Froehe Weihnachten!
Steve
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To
I'm not too pleased with the phones, I have about 40 of them, some of the
displays tend to die and the dial pad feels to 'mushy' IMHO, just like the
keys on a good old ZX80 computer
Also I'm having some issues with sound quality on some phones, but I still
need to switch some phones to see if
Cleaner looking, 12 line apperances, affordable sidecar, runs on
linux, developing XML services, very programable, buttons are firm in
a good way, simple layout for users
installing 30 right now...
On 11/12/05, Remco Barende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not too pleased with the phones, I have
09:50:01 +0100 (CET)
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Snom 360 Opinions
I'm not too pleased with the phones, I have about 40 of them, some of the
displays tend to die and the dial pad feels to 'mushy
@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Snom 360 Opinions
I'm not too pleased with the phones, I have about 40 of them, some of the displays tend to die and the dial pad feels to 'mushy' IMHO, just like the keys on a good old ZX80 computer
Also I'm having some issues with sound quality on some
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi List
I’m getting this notification from my one and only SNOM 360 every time a
number button is pushed.
I know that it’s only a notification, but it really irritates me. Is it
anything I can/should do anything about ??
Not really. We do not support
Well, The Polycom Cisco are high-end. I have
used others like a pingtel, sipura 841, etc. Nothing has the 'feel' of the
cisco, and nothing has the functionality of the polycom (like call drop from
conferences). Next I will try the aastra wireless combo phone for the
office. Looks nice what
My experience with auto-rebooting schemes is that reliability doesn't
improve.
I also reported the non-registration of the Snom phones as a bug. On a few
occasions I found that the phone lost registration, and rebooting or power
cycling the phone didn't help (athorization failed at the *
We schedule a reboot each night at 11/12 so it clears any errors,or
hanging channels,in case for save keeping
Im just not sure then with the 360 that it would keep the panel lights
working.
Got those problems your talking about,lost with the 220's
On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 09:39 +0200, Remco Barende
On Friday 02 September 2005 10:05, altus wrote:
We schedule a reboot each night at 11/12 so it clears any errors,or
hanging channels,in case for save keeping
Im just not sure then with the 360 that it would keep the panel lights
working.
That depends on the behavior of * when restarting. If *
Did you tried to turn off te option Filter Packets from Registrar on the
Advanced page?
That is the only case, when a snom sends a 403 (= Forbidden).
Regards
Nils Ohlmeier
On Friday 02 September 2005 09:11, altus wrote:
Good day all
I have asterisk on a box with one network card
I have a 2
Sorry, but we are unable to reproduce your problem description here locally
(without an *). If you are able to reproduce it, we guess it must be related
to the *. In this case it could help if you send us SIP-traces of that
scenario, so that we can look into this problem.
Regards
Nils
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
