I did ath_info in one of my cards and i get
MAC Revision: 2414 (0x79)
Device type: 1
2GHz PHY Revision: 2413 (0x56)
/== EEPROM Information =\
| EEPROM Version: 5.3 | EEPROM Size: 16 kbit |
| EEMAP: 2 | Reg. Domain: 0x37 |
|= Capabiliti
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 10:55 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> Most of the cards I've used or tested are for the US actually.
Oddly enough, at least one of the ar9170 you sent me claims to be for
CO...
johannes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 00:33 +0200, Tobias Doerffel wrote:
> > Could you try to work against v11
> > of my rfkill patch, or better even against the cfg80211 rfkill instead?
> I didn't look at both of them yet. However I think we first should try to get
> current rfkill support into mainline as fas
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 26. Mai 2009 01:32:46 schrieb Johannes Berg:
> On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 01:24 +0200, Tobias Doerffel wrote:
> > + err = rfkill_register(sc->rf_kill.rfkill);
> > + if (err) {
> > + sc->rf_kill.rfkill = NULL;
> > + return -1;
> > + }
>
> Mi
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 05:47:34AM -0700, Bob Copeland wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 05:29:38PM +0800, forr...@hifulltech wrote:
> > Dear Bob,
> >
> > Another patch of ath5k FYI.
>
> Hi Forrest,
>
> Please include the patch in the email body instead of as an attachment,
> it makes it easier
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> An example of specialized cards here
> could be the Public Safety SKU. Whoever sells these cards can
> customize the database for their customers as they see fit. This would
> allow the cards to use new regulatory rules without modifying
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez
wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 05:26:51AM -0700, Bob Copeland wrote:
>> Anyway, I don't care too strongly about it, but it seems Atheros use
>> world roaming so much that the eeprom value is often meaningless.
>
> Most of the cards I've used o
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 05:26:51AM -0700, Bob Copeland wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 08:30:01PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > Since we do allow users to override the regulatory domain this would
> > mean trusting blindly what the user says and for ath5k/ath9k/ar9170
> > that would mean dis
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 05:29:38PM +0800, forr...@hifulltech wrote:
> Dear Bob,
>
> Another patch of ath5k FYI.
Hi Forrest,
Please include the patch in the email body instead of as an attachment,
it makes it easier to reply to. See Documentation/SubmittingPatches.
> diff -Naur linux-2.6.30-rc
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 08:30:01PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> Since we do allow users to override the regulatory domain this would
> mean trusting blindly what the user says and for ath5k/ath9k/ar9170
> that would mean disregarding completely what has been programmed into
> the EEPROM.
Well
10 matches
Mail list logo
