On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 11:19 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com
wrote:
Atheros PCIe wireless cards handled by ath5k, don't work well with PCIe
ASPM L0s enabled.
[...]
Acked-by: Luis R. Rodriguez lrodrig...@atheros.com
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 07:21:28AM -0700, Roman Yepishev wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 11:19 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com
wrote:
Atheros PCIe wireless cards handled by ath5k, don't work well with PCIe
ASPM L0s
From: Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com
Atheros PCIe wireless cards handled by ath5k do require L0s disabled.
For distributions shipping with CONFIG_PCIEASPM (this will be enabled
by default in the future in 2.6.36) this will also mean both L1 and L0s
will be disabled when a pre 1.1 PCIe
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 07:51 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 07:21:28AM -0700, Roman Yepishev wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 11:19 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com
wrote:
Atheros PCIe wireless
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 11:27 -0400, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
From: Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com
Atheros PCIe wireless cards handled by ath5k do require L0s disabled.
For distributions shipping with CONFIG_PCIEASPM (this will be enabled
by default in the future in 2.6.36) this will
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 07:51 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 07:21:28AM -0700, Roman Yepishev wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 11:19 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:33
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 11:30 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 07:51 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 07:21:28AM -0700, Roman Yepishev wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at
Atheros PCIe wireless cards handled by ath5k, don't work well with PCIe
ASPM L0s enabled.
For example, Acer Aspire One (AOA150, Atheros Communications Inc. AR5001
Wireless Network Adapter [168c:001c] (rev 01)) doesn't work well with ASPM
enabled. With ASPM ath5k will eventually stall on heavy
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com wrote:
Atheros PCIe wireless cards handled by ath5k, don't work well with PCIe
ASPM L0s enabled.
For example, Acer Aspire One (AOA150, Atheros Communications Inc. AR5001
Wireless Network Adapter [168c:001c] (rev 01))
Hi,
Just want to summarize and finally put that problem to rest.
Was the patch that removes sets on CONFIG_PCIEASPM? accepted?
Is it possible to check that all ath5k pcie devices that must not use
L0s actually have the 'PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_RBER' disabled (this bit causes
pcie device be marked as
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Just want to summarize and finally put that problem to rest.
Was the patch that removes sets on CONFIG_PCIEASPM? accepted?
Is it possible to check that all ath5k pcie devices that must not use
L0s actually
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 07:34:04PM +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
Just want to summarize and finally put that problem to rest.
Was the patch that removes sets on CONFIG_PCIEASPM? accepted?
Is it possible to check that all ath5k pcie devices that must not use
L0s actually have the
Hi All,
Let's hear it for chips without available specs!
Does anyone remember the days when paper specs arrived in plain
envelopes with no return address when you asked the manufacturer for some
real support?
And lets hope they are REAL low in price!
wiz
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010,
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 11:20 +0300, Jussi Kivilinna wrote:
Quoting Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com:
On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 13:09 +0300, Jussi Kivilinna wrote:
Atheros card on Acer Aspire One (AOA150, Atheros Communications Inc. AR5001
Wireless Network Adapter [168c:001c] (rev 01))
Quoting Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com:
(ok, I might switch back ath5k to work on this, but opening AAO is
pain.. on the other hand, I'm just user in this case and pretty
unwilling to work with dual-license)
What do you mean?
Patch I made uses GPL code from e1000e, but since ath5k is
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 13:49 +0300, Jussi Kivilinna wrote:
Quoting Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com:
(ok, I might switch back ath5k to work on this, but opening AAO is
pain.. on the other hand, I'm just user in this case and pretty
unwilling to work with dual-license)
What do you
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com wrote:
Patch I made uses GPL code from e1000e, but since ath5k is
dual-licensed so patch can't be accepted. So if I got it right, patch
has to be remade from scratch by someone who really knows about pci
registers etc. I
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 09:59 -0400, Bob Copeland wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com
wrote:
Patch I made uses GPL code from e1000e, but since ath5k is
dual-licensed so patch can't be accepted. So if I got it right, patch
has to be remade from
On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 13:09 +0300, Jussi Kivilinna wrote:
Atheros card on Acer Aspire One (AOA150, Atheros Communications Inc. AR5001
Wireless Network Adapter [168c:001c] (rev 01)) doesn't work well with ASPM
enabled. With ASPM ath5k will eventually stall on heavy traffic with often
Note: this e-mail thread is on a public mailing list.
Adding a few folks just for their information or in case they have
anything to add and It is also good to remind ourselves about best
practices for this stuff.
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Bruno Randolf b...@einfach.org wrote:
On
On Saturday 29 May 2010 05:27:56 Pavel Roskin wrote:
If we need to add GPL code to ath5k, it could go to a separate file.
But if that separation becomes inconvenient, we could drop BSD
compatibility from ath5k. I don't see any benefit from dual licensing,
unless some existing ath5k
Atheros card on Acer Aspire One (AOA150, Atheros Communications Inc. AR5001
Wireless Network Adapter [168c:001c] (rev 01)) doesn't work well with ASPM
enabled. With ASPM ath5k will eventually stall on heavy traffic with often
'unsupported jumbo' warnings appearing. Disabling ASPM L0s/L1 in ath5k
On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 13:09 +0300, Jussi Kivilinna wrote:
+static void __ath5k_disable_aspm(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 state);
+static void ath5k_disable_aspm(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 state);
Forward declarations should not be needed unless the functions are
called before
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 3:09 AM, Jussi Kivilinna
jussi.kivili...@mbnet.fi wrote:
Atheros card on Acer Aspire One (AOA150, Atheros Communications Inc. AR5001
Wireless Network Adapter [168c:001c] (rev 01)) doesn't work well with ASPM
enabled. With ASPM ath5k will eventually stall on heavy traffic
Quoting Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@gmail.com:
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 3:09 AM, Jussi Kivilinna
jussi.kivili...@mbnet.fi wrote:
Atheros card on Acer Aspire One (AOA150, Atheros Communications Inc. AR5001
Wireless Network Adapter [168c:001c] (rev 01)) doesn't work well with ASPM
enabled. With
Quoting Pavel Roskin pro...@gnu.org:
On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 13:09 +0300, Jussi Kivilinna wrote:
+static void __ath5k_disable_aspm(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 state);
+static void ath5k_disable_aspm(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 state);
Forward declarations should not be needed
On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 21:25 +0300, Jussi Kivilinna wrote:
I used code from e1000e which does this same way, which now suddenly
reminds me of that ath5k is dual lisenced, right? Can I even reuse
code from GPL driver in ath5k?
That's another reason why we don't want this code to be all over
27 matches
Mail list logo
