James M Snell wrote:
If you want to use the text/vnd.IPTC.NewsML media type to
identify the type of XML, then you'd have to escape the markup and treat
it like text.
s/escape/Base64/
s/like text/as binary/
- Sam Ruby
Sam Ruby wrote:
James M Snell wrote:
If you want to use the text/vnd.IPTC.NewsML media type to
identify the type of XML, then you'd have to escape the markup and treat
it like text.
s/escape/Base64/
s/like text/as binary/
Are you sure? From RFC 4287, section 4.1.3.3:
5. If the value of
Ahhh... a slight ambiguity presents itself. The treatment of text/
types in RFC 4287 is a bit underspecified. I've always worked off the
assumption that text/* types do not require base64 encoding (that's what
Abdera expects).
- James
James Holderness wrote:
Sam Ruby wrote:
James M Snell
James M Snell wrote:
Ahhh... a slight ambiguity presents itself. The treatment of text/
types in RFC 4287 is a bit underspecified. I've always worked off the
assumption that text/* types do not require base64 encoding (that's what
Abdera expects).
On second read, JamesH is right (as were
On 1/4/07, James M Snell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If the NewsML folks
want to be able to use a proper
mediatype to identify their stuff AND treat it as XML,
they should come upwith an appropriate media type
registration (e.g.application/newsml+xml, etc).
Did the +xml convention ever get
* Bob Wyman wrote:
Did the +xml convention ever get formalized in some RFC? I know we all
*think* that tacking +xml onto the end of something means that it is some
use of XML, however, if I remember correctly, this little bit of syntax has
never actually been formalized... Or have I missed
On 1/5/07, Bob Wyman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/4/07, James M Snell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the NewsML folks want to be able to use a proper
mediatype to identify their stuff AND treat it as XML,
they should come upwith an appropriate media type
registration
On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 05:22:30 +0100, Tim Bray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Cowan wrote:
Am I right in thinking that content which is in fact in XML but
is labeled with a media type that is neither generic XML nor
ends in +xml cannot be included inline in an Atom entry?
The NewsML community
On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 05:56:29 +0100, James M Snell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If the NewsML folks want to be able to use a proper media type to
identify
their stuff AND treat it as XML, they should come up with an appropriate
media type registration (e.g. application/newsml+xml, etc).
- Or
Begin forwarded message:
From: John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: January 4, 2007 8:08:06 AM PST (CA)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Atom format interpretation question
Am I right in thinking that content which is in fact in XML but
is labeled with a media type that is neither generic XML nor
If it's well-formed XML then I'd think dropping it into atom:content
using type=application/xml would be acceptable. You'd just end up
losing that bit of semantic metadata that tells you exactly what kind of
XML it is. If you want to use the text/vnd.IPTC.NewsML media type to
identify the type
11 matches
Mail list logo
