[ATrpms-users] Fedora 22 packages

For those interested in upgrading to fedora 22, I built the basic packages, and they are available here: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/myrpms-f22-x86_64/repoview/ Anything missing should be downloaded from rpmfusion, because, in this case, the package is simple enough, to even bother building

Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 346.35

If I remember well, it is a python script. It is not really difficult to rewrite ... The problem is that I am using intel graphics 4000, and several apple computers, and gave up nvidia. For day to day work it is more than enough for me. I only have one 8500 card at work. Therefore, it is difficu

Re: [ATrpms-users] Nvidia Upgrade Agony

Would you have this version already packaged and available somewhere, or at least, the source rpm? Thanks. On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 10:33 PM, Stephen Collier wrote: > On 5/01/2015 6:52 pm, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: > >Hi, > > I need a set of nvidia rpms for an old rhel6 dell

Re: [ATrpms-users] Nvidia Upgrade Agony

Hi, I need a set of nvidia rpms for an old rhel6 dell notebook with a nvidia 8400. Since I upgrades to rhel 6.6, the ones I used stopped to work. Does anyone know what is the appropriate version now? Also, I have a new le novo notebook running f21. Anyone has experience with bumblebee and nvidi

Re: [ATrpms-users] fedora 20 - scrpms

The easiest way is rebuilding mplayer against the newer lib: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/myrpms-f20-x86_64/lcgrpms/mplayer-1.2-93_snap20140413.fc20.x86_64.rpm On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Nick Campbell wrote: > yes, this is what is hanging up. Its trying to install libdirectfb1.6 as > a

Re: [ATrpms-users] libavfilter4

There are some packages unsigned in Epel, and a lot of broken dependencies ... You can just install then using in mock, even without signature, and rebuild your packages. I have rebuilt quite some packages myself, but I gave up myth a long time ago... I use xbmc... My packages are here: http:/

[ATrpms-users] Rhel7 packages

There are so many packages missing on all rhel7 repos, that I really do not know if the effort is worth ... Anyway, my basic survival environment is here: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/myrpms-el7-x86_64/repoview/ Epel has been extensively used in my builds ... Some packages from F20 have also be

Re: [ATrpms-users] ATrpms repo status?

I really cannot answer this question. I had to build myself most of the packages for F20, either x86_64 or i686. Some of the dependencies were also too old and had to be upgraded first. A lot of work, but I have a usable and very stable installation now... I do not know what are Axel's plans. Only

Re: [ATrpms-users] nvidia-graphics-long-lived

I have the latest driver for F20 x86_64, here: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/myrpms-f20-x86_64/repoview/ On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 3:34 AM, Duncan Brown wrote: > Hi Axel > > Just a minor issue - the nvidia-graphics-long-lived package on el6 is > currently pointing to nvidia-graphics319.32, not

[ATrpms-users] Packages for F20

I put the missing packages from ATrpms, here: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/myrpms-f20-x86_64/lcgrpms/ Have fun ... -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-users mailing list atrpms-users@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/at

Re: [ATrpms-users] Fwd: kmdl Nvidia packages for fc20

I put the latest nvidia kmdl here: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/rpms/rmps20-x86_64/ On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: > I think Axel, is on vacations, and F20 is missing the majority of its > multimedia packages. Maybe next week we have the packages ava

Re: [ATrpms-users] Fwd: kmdl Nvidia packages for fc20

I think Axel, is on vacations, and F20 is missing the majority of its multimedia packages. Maybe next week we have the packages available ... On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 8:28 AM, O&M Ugarcina wrote: > On 02/01/14 21:02, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> th

Re: [ATrpms-users] Fwd: kmdl Nvidia packages for fc20

Hi, this is the one I am using now: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/rpms/rmps20-x86_64/nvidia-graphics331.20-kmdl-3.12.5-302.fc20-331.20-162.fc20.x86_64.rpm It is working just fine for me. On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 7:40 AM, O&M Ugarcina wrote: > > Hello Guys, > > Would it be possible t

Re: [ATrpms-users] New nvidia long lived 331.20

http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/nvidia-graphics331.20-331.20-159.fc18.src.rpm On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 7:35 AM, O&M Ugarcina wrote: > Hello Paulo and Axel, > > Can you please package up a src rpm or rpm of the new nvidia drivers rev > 331.20 . Much appreciate your hard work . > > Bes

Re: [ATrpms-users] Nvidia long lived 319.49

I had some fun upgrading from F17 to F18... One of the problems was that nvidia 319 does not compile any more with the latest 3.10 kernel. Axel compiled the newest nvidia 325.15, which works, despite of a message complaining about a missing libGL during installation. There seems to be some patches

Re: [ATrpms-users] Nvidia long lived 319.32

http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/nvidia-graphics319.32-319.32-157.fc17.src.rpm On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 8:45 AM, O&M Ugarcina wrote: > Hello Paulo, > > Looks like we have a new NVIDIA driver out . Seems to have some new > features , would like to try it out . Can you please package up

Re: [ATrpms-users] Installing mplayer FC18 64bit

s repo so 'yum install mplayer' can work. I'm particularly > interested on the el6 repo. > > I glanced around orion.lcg but couldn't find the src.rpm. Hope it's not > lost! > > Thanks, > Chris > > > On 05/22/2013 09:31 AM, O&M Ugarcin

Re: [ATrpms-users] nvidia drivers - 319.23

I tried and vdpau did not change for me. Something is not being initialized, because if I try several times then suddenly it works (maybe one in five tries). I have two monitors, and I do not know if this fact has anything to do with the problem. The 310 series worked much better for me ... On

Re: [ATrpms-users] nvidia drivers

vdpau is crashing in nvidia 319.17 drivers when playing most divx compressed avi's. I am using vo=gl with mplayer to bypass this problem. I do not remember of seeing this happen with previous nvidia drivers, thought. My card is a GT 640, that is, a relatively new card. We have to wait for a fix b

Re: [ATrpms-users] Installing mplayer FC18 64bit

I still have it here: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/myrpms-f12-x86_64/atrpms/mplayer-skins-1.0-16.noarch.rpm On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 9:47 AM, O&M Ugarcina wrote: > Hello Guys, > > I have been trying to install mplayer , but am getting a strange > dependency : > > Error: Package: 4:mplayer-1.2

Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 319.17 drivers

] > /root/redhat/BUILDROOT/nvidia-graphics319.17-319.17-155.el6.x86_64 >> error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: >>/usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-mps-control >>/usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-mps-server >>/usr/bin/nvidia-persistenced >> >> >> RPM build errors: >> I

Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 319.17 drivers

This is easy. There are three new files not listed in the package yet. I will try to fix the spec ... On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 9:09 AM, O&M Ugarcina wrote: > On 06/05/13 23:20, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: > >> This is a renaming Axel created for avoiding conflicts with previous >

Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 319.17 drivers

This is a renaming Axel created for avoiding conflicts with previous versions (the files were originally un-versioned). Maybe nvidia fixed this issue and the renaming is no longer necessary. Try commenting these two lines and see what happens... On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 8:41 AM, O&M Ugarcina wr

Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 319.17 drivers

http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/nvidia-graphics319.17-319.17-155.fc17.src.rpm On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 4:20 AM, O&M Ugarcina wrote: > Hello Paulo, > > Looks like we have a new NVIDIA driver out . Seems to have some new > features , would like to try it out . Can you please package up

Re: [ATrpms-users] Compiling error vlc 2.0.6

It is a linking problem. It is not finding the opengl libraries. I compile using mock, and this avoids conflicts between mesa and nvidia files. I have vlc for rhel6 here: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/myrpms-el6-x86_64/lcgrpms/vlc-2.0.6-6.el6.x86_64.rpm http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/myrpms-el6-

Re: [ATrpms-users] Nvidia srcrpm for long lived 310.44

Not tested yet: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/nvidia-graphics310.44-310.44-155.fc17.src.rpm On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 2:04 AM, O&M Ugarcina wrote: > Hello Paulo, > > When you can please make us one of your world famous src rpm for the new > Nvidia long lived drivers rev 310.44 . I

Re: [ATrpms-users] New longlived nvidia rev 310.40

On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 7:42 AM, O&M Ugarcina wrote: > Hello Paulo, > > When time permits could you please package up a srpm for this new nvidia > long lived release . Much appreciate your help . > > Not tested, but should work ... http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/nvidia-graphics310.4

Re: [ATrpms-users] Building and running MythTV -0.26

On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 9:52 AM, John Pilkington wrote: > After running Myth 0.26 for a few weeks on my SL6 laptop I thought I would > like to experiment with patches and have tried rebuilding using Stephen's > specfile (posted 2 December) and a new git download. That worked fine, but > afterwar

Re: [ATrpms-users] f16 nvidia-graphics304.64 problem

On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 12:04 PM, John Pilkington wrote: > I saw new packages for nvidia-graphics 304.51-149 and 304.64-150 for > kernel 3.6.10-2, which is in Fedora-testing, and gave them a try. I had > 304.51 running under 3.6.2-1, but had a file conflict and had to remove it > to install 304.

Re: [ATrpms-users] [ATrpms-devel] Building nvidia 310 driver for Fedora 16 x86_64

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 8:42 AM, O&M Ugarcina wrote: > On 06/12/12 19:39, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: > > >> >> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 11:08 PM, George Galt > george.g...@gmail.com>**> wrote: >> >> Paulo: >> >> I get a conflict wi

Re: [ATrpms-users] [ATrpms-devel] Building nvidia 310 driver for Fedora 16 x86_64

On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 11:08 PM, George Galt wrote: > Paulo: > > I get a conflict with: > Transaction Check Error: > file /usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-proxy-control from install of > nvidia-graphics310.19-310.19-151.fc16.x86_64 conflicts with file from > package nvidia-graphics304.51-304.51-149.fc16.x8

Re: [ATrpms-users] [ATrpms-devel] Building nvidia 310 driver for Fedora 16 x86_64

On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 8:14 PM, George Galt wrote: > Ouch! Thanks. I'll wait and give it a try a little later. > > It is already there now... -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-users mailing list atrpms-users@atrpms.net http://lists.atr

Re: [ATrpms-users] [ATrpms-devel] Building nvidia 310 driver for Fedora 16 x86_64

On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 7:44 PM, George Galt wrote: > Really? I must have messed up building the src.rpm from the .spec file. > Oh, well. I'm just glad something worked. Please upload the src.rpm and > I'll build it too. > > Thanks!! > > I am re-uploading it now (same version, same file). It sh

Re: [ATrpms-users] [ATrpms-devel] Building nvidia 310 driver for Fedora 16 x86_64

On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 6:15 PM, George Galt wrote: > Well, I've tried to follow the instructions on the Packaging Guidelines, > but it doesn't seem to have worked for me. I'm reasonable new to RPM > packaging, so I might be missing something. > > I've added > %filter_from_requires '/libnvcuvid.s

Re: [ATrpms-users] Building nvidia 310 driver for Fedora 16 x86_64

On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 2:45 PM, George Galt wrote: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 5:24 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 2:13 AM, O&M Ugarcina wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>> In each case, the path differs by the

Re: [ATrpms-users] Building nvidia 310 driver for Fedora 16 x86_64

On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 2:13 AM, O&M Ugarcina wrote: > > >> In each case, the path differs by the addition of >> "nvidia-graphics-310.14" before the file being looked for. Does anyone >> have any idea how to either adjust the spec file or alter the way it looks >> for these files? >> >> Thanks,

Re: [ATrpms-users] Nvidia 304 series

> Sorry, I meant: > > rpmbuild -bs --rmsource nvidia-graphics304.51.spec > > Furthermore, one has to adapt the spec file to adjust > the version. Axel also names the spec file using the version of the > driver. > > > http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/nvidia-graphics304.60-304.60-149.fc12

Re: [ATrpms-users] Nvidia 304 series

On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: > > > > >> One thing I was going to ask you . I am interested how do you create the >> srpm from the binary package that Nvidia makes . I would like to have a go >> at making the new 304.60 drivers into a srpm

Re: [ATrpms-users] Nvidia 304 series

> One thing I was going to ask you . I am interested how do you create the > srpm from the binary package that Nvidia makes . I would like to have a go > at making the new 304.60 drivers into a srpm , and then into a set of rpms > for el6 . Any information appreciated greatly . > > > Basically, you

Re: [ATrpms-users] Nvidia 304 series

On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 10:48 PM, O&M Ugarcina wrote: > > The old nvidia packages do not build for kernel 3.6.1 (F17) any more. >> >> I built the latest 304: >> >> http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/**myrpms-f17-x86_64/nvidia/** >> nvidia-graphics304.51/

Re: [ATrpms-users] Nvidia 304 series

On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 11:31 PM, O&M Ugarcina wrote: > Hello Axel and Guys > > Are there any plans to package the 304 series of drivers ? The reason I am > asking is that I would like to buy the new GTX650 graphic card for my front > end , and would need this driver . The card is new and the supp

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV F17 request systemd scripts

> %pre backend > # Add the "mythtv" user > /usr/sbin/useradd -c "mythtvbackend User" \ > -s /sbin/nologin -r -d %{_varlibdir}/mythtv mythtv 2> /dev/null || : > > %post backend > /sbin/chkconfig --add mythbackend > > %preun backend > if [ $1 = 0 ]; then > /sbin/service mythbackend stop > /dev/nu

[ATrpms-users] Mythtv fedora 17 - is it working at all?

Hi, has anyone successfully configured mythtv 0.25.2 on F17? The installation went fine, but ... My problems are: 1) Mythweb just shows me a blank page. I see some error 500 in http log. 27.0.0.1 - - [27/Aug/2012:09:22:06 -0300] "GET /mythweb/ HTTP/1.1" 401 401 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_

Re: [ATrpms-users] LIRC on CentOS 6

On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Kirk Bocek wrote: > > > On 8/25/2012 8:28 AM, James B. Huber wrote: > >> Can't speak to anyone else, I use the atrpms kernel modules for 0.8.7-88 >> on both my RHEL and CentOS machines that have both the IR from Hauppauge >> IR hardware & remotes and a MCE USB co

Re: [ATrpms-users] Errors Building kmdls Myself

Paulo: > > Thanks for all of the help! You are correct that KDE was the culprit. > Building under Gnome (Cinnamon, to be precise), it worked just fine. > I also experimented with upgrading back to fakeroot 1.12, but found > that didn't work. > > I'm curious about these 2 issues. I notice that fa

Re: [ATrpms-users] Errors Building kmdls Myself

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:07 PM, George Galt wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Paulo Cavalcanti > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:41 PM, George Galt > wrote: > >> > >> Paulo: > >> > >> Thanks. I added 0 1 to

Re: [ATrpms-users] Errors Building kmdls Myself

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:41 PM, George Galt wrote: > Paulo: > > Thanks. I added 0 1 to the end and got a little further, but I've had > a bunch of other issues. I had to create a directory /etc/OpenCL and > chmod 777, but I still get a bunch of errors. It seems like it is > trying to uninsta

Re: [ATrpms-users] Errors Building kmdls Myself

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:58 AM, George Galt wrote: > Thanks, I've grabbed the src.rpm from Axel's site (here: > http://dl.atrpms.net/all/fakeroot-1.11-19.src.rpm) and built it > myself, but I am still getting an error that says: ERROR: No NVIDIA > driver is currently installed; the '--kernel-m

Re: [ATrpms-users] Errors Building kmdls Myself

On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:08 PM, George Galt wrote: > Paulo: > > Yes, I've checked and I have fakeroot 1.12. What is the difference > and is there any way to use 1.12? > None that I am aware of. I always downgrade to 1.11. I should have a pre-build version if you want. -- Paulo Roma Cavalca

Re: [ATrpms-users] Kernel modules for EL6

On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 9:02 AM, James B. Huber wrote: > Did we stop building/providing updated kernel modules for EL6 ? > > Been a few weeks and haven't seen kqemu, lirc or video4linux for last > 2.6.32.279.2.1 kernel ??? > > Regards, > Jim > > > Our rhel6 license has expired some time ago. The

Re: [ATrpms-users] rpmbuild and mock failing for missing requires

On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Bob Lightfoot wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > I'm trying to build an rpm from an atrpms src.rpm and it keeps failing > for > error: line 13: Dependency tokens must begin with alpha-numeric, '_' > or '/': BuildRequires: %{_x_module_path

Re: [ATrpms-users] Fwd: kmdl Build Question

On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Bob Lightfoot wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > This may have been discussed in the past so pardon the repeat if it > has. I know Axel is a wonderful one man show and will eventually have > time to build and release the video4linux-kmdl

Re: [ATrpms-users] Mythtv at 0.25.2

On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > Ok, SRPM is ready! > > https://dl.dropbox.com/u/34775202/mythtv/mythtv-0.25.2-1.fc16.src.rpm > > Richard > > Actually, I think I can build the Atrpms package, but I am just finishing my F17 tweaks on my new computer, and had to fix my own pa

Re: [ATrpms-users] mythtv problem with kernel 3.4.2-1.fc16.x86_64

On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 8:57 AM, John Pilkington wrote: > On 01/07/12 23:26, Scott Harris wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 2:15 PM, John Pilkington > > wrote: >> >> I've mentioned this in the 'ATrpms Status Update' thread and on the >> MythTV lists, but an

Re: [ATrpms-users] ATrpms Status Update?

On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:03 AM, John Pilkington wrote: > On 27/06/12 12:30, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:59 PM, John Pilkington > <mailto:j.p...@tesco.net>> wrote: >> > > > >> >>It might be easi

Re: [ATrpms-users] ATrpms Status Update?

On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:59 PM, John Pilkington wrote: > On 26/06/12 20:32, George Galt wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:21 PM, George Galt >> wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Paulo Cavalcanti >>> wrote: >>> >>>&g

Re: [ATrpms-users] ATrpms Status Update?

On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 9:06 AM, O&M Ugarcina wrote: > >> On 23/06/12 06:26, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 4:41 PM, John Welch wrote: >> >>

Re: [ATrpms-users] ATrpms Status Update?

On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 4:41 PM, John Welch wrote: > Thanks Brian. I guess the only unanswered question then is does anyone > know Axel's current status? Is he on vacation or is he otherwise engaged > (new / different job, etc.)? If it's the latter then we can probably > expect little to no up

Re: [ATrpms-users] kmdl questions (Paulo Cavalcanti)

On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Bob Lightfoot wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Paulo - when you say building them is easy are you refering to using > yum to download the source rpm and then rebuild the rpm on the new > kernel running in runlevel 3 mode without the kmd

Re: [ATrpms-users] kmdl questions

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Bob Lightfoot wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Dear Atrpms: >This may be a basic "newb" question but here goes. I use several > kdml packages from atrpms on my mythtv pc and every time a new kernel > is released I end up patiently

Re: [ATrpms-users] vlc segfault after today's (non-vlc) upgrades

On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 4:44 AM, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 12:07:03PM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: > > These new nvidia drivers should always go to testing, > > because they cause a lot of headaches ... > > I got fooled by them being tagged as long lived

Re: [ATrpms-users] How to resolve the libvpx problem

On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Matt Lewandowsky wrote: > > Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 09:48:17 -0400 From: george.g...@gmail.com > > > Are these instructions for a particular architecture? I'm on Fedora > > 16 and Fedora 15 at home and these issues were resolved weeks ago. If > > you are only tal

Re: [ATrpms-users] Update Failure el6

On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 08:44:31PM +0100, Tom G. Christensen wrote: > > On 03/11/2012 04:28 PM, Axel Thimm wrote: > > >Hi, > > > > > >On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 08:32:35AM -0500, Ed Hurst wrote: > > >>Recent updates won't go through because of con

Re: [ATrpms-users] problem updating ffmpeg

The problem is that the new ffmpeg packages were linked against libvpx 1.0 from testing. Probably, Axel will rebuild them ... -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-users mailing list atrpms-users@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/lis

Re: [ATrpms-users] vlc segfault after today's (non-vlc) upgrades

On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 8:22 AM, John Pilkington wrote: > >> I upgraded a few packages this morning, including the new >> nvidia-long-lived and IIRC some ssh-related ones, but not the new >> F15-64-

Re: [ATrpms-users] vlc segfault after today's (non-vlc) upgrades

On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 8:22 AM, John Pilkington wrote: > I upgraded a few packages this morning, including the new > nvidia-long-lived and IIRC some ssh-related ones, but not the new > F15-64-bit kernel, and rebooted. Now vlc segfaults when asked to play a > file; I haven't seen any other probl

Re: [ATrpms-users] vlc output distorted

On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Bob Tennent wrote: > >|Most probaby the relevant files are under ~/.config, ~/.local and > >|~/.cache. Paulos suggestion is very good, creating a new user with a > >|default config takes only half a minute, so testing whether the issue > >|is in the user confi

Re: [ATrpms-users] vlc output distorted

On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 08:43:39AM -0500, Bob Tennent wrote: > > >|> Has anybody else had this problem on EL6 systems? It started in > > >|> vlc-1.1.12-73 and is still there in vlc-1.1.13-74. The preceding > > >|> version, vlc-1.1.11-72 is

Re: [ATrpms-users] lirc-0.8.7 Kernel Module for latest RHEL 6.2 kernel

On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 12:18 PM, James B. Huber wrote: > Thanks Axel, > So... Redhat made changes between 2.6.32.220.2.1 and 2.6.32.220.4.1 > that has broken the ability to get lirc-0.8.7 to compile. > > I'd be happy to work this, when I pull the src rpm I get the following: > Executing "rp

Re: [ATrpms-users] wicd on SL6

On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 6:49 PM, John Pilkington wrote: > On 12/18/2011 01:24 PM, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 5:18 PM, John Pilkington > <mailto:j.p...@tesco.net>> wrote: >> >>On 12/14/2011 06:18 PM, John Robins

Re: [ATrpms-users] wicd on SL6

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 5:18 PM, John Pilkington wrote: > On 12/14/2011 06:18 PM, John Robinson wrote: > >> On 14/12/2011 17:42, John Pilkington wrote: >> >>> My laptop has an iwl3945 , which it appears Intel no longer supports, >>> >> >> I think they do, though http://intellinuxwireless.org/ doe

Re: [ATrpms-users] Drivers or kmdls for dvb-t2

On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 12:27 PM, John Pilkington wrote: > On 02/12/11 22:21, David Watkins wrote: > >> http://git.linuxtv.org/media_**build.git >>> >>> >>> I just ran this and apparently have 473 modules built. Interesting. >>> That's >>> on f14, 64bit

Re: [ATrpms-users] nvidia 290.10 and Centos6 install

On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Bob Lightfoot wrote: > I just did a fresh install of Centos 6 and after yum update and adding > the atrpms I decided to switch from nouveau to the nvidia-graphics driver. > > Problem 1 - atrpms had no package for 2.6.32-71.29.1 kernel it wanted > 2.6.2.6.32-71.7

Re: [ATrpms-users] Long term Nvidia

My card is a nvidia gt 240. vdpau wotks, but not gl. I am sticking with 285 because of that ... -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-users mailing list atrpms-users@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

Re: [ATrpms-users] Long term Nvidia

On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Axel Thimm wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 12:06:14PM +1100, O&M Ugarcina wrote: > > I would like to ask for a favour please . Myself and probably many > > others have migrated over to RHEL / Centos /SL to escape the fedora > > rat race , which was forcin

Re: [ATrpms-users] Alsa kmdl for 2.6.18-274.7.1.el5PAE not available

On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 6:13 PM, Mark Goldberg wrote: > It seems these are not built, but the video4linux-kmdl-2.6.18-274.7.1.el5 > and > video4linux-kmdl-2.6.18-274.7.1.el5PAE are built. Could you build the > Alsa kmdls for kernel 2.6.18-274.7.1.el5 if possible? > > There is a missing symbol: div

Re: [ATrpms-users] MPD segfault

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 6:26 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:10 AM, James Szinger wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm trying to run mpd from atrppms on CentOS 6.0. When I first ran it, >> I got a segfault in /usr/lib64/libavform

Re: [ATrpms-users] MPD segfault

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:10 AM, James Szinger wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to run mpd from atrppms on CentOS 6.0. When I first ran it, > I got a segfault in /usr/lib64/libavformat.so.52. I then did a 'yum > downgrade libavformat52' from 0.7.1-46.el6 to 0.6.3-43.el6 and now it > works well. Is

Re: [ATrpms-users] Fedora 15 x86_64 libva conflict

On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:42 AM, George Galt wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Paulo Cavalcanti > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 5:14 PM, George Galt > wrote: > >> > >> Axel: > >> > >> There seems to be a conf

Re: [ATrpms-users] Fedora 15 x86_64 libva conflict

On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 5:14 PM, George Galt wrote: > Axel: > > There seems to be a conflict between your libva1 package and the > latest libva from Fedora updates. Any advice? > > I would wait until we update ours: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/libva-1.0.13-6.fc14.src.rpm --

Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia drivers ver 275

On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Christopher X. Candreva wrote: > On Fri, 24 Jun 2011, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 7:10 PM, The Walters > > wrote: > > It was the nvidia.conf.backup file. For some reason that was > > bei

Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia drivers ver 275

On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 7:10 PM, The Walters wrote: > It was the nvidia.conf.backup file. For some reason that was being read > (kept getting the boot warnings about it). Once I removed that and left the > nvidia.conf only it came up fine. Thanks for your help, looking at the > nvidia-graphics-

Re: [ATrpms-users] VLC and qt47 problem

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Marco Scano wrote: > Hi, > > I have installed VLC 1.1.10 by repository. When I type the comman vlc -vvv > I obtained the following error > > *main interface error: option qt-volume-complete does not exist > [0x9be776c] skins2 interface debug: cannot open directory

Re: [ATrpms-users] Error locate lirc_I2c package lirc-kmdl-2.6.32-131.2.1.el6.x86_64-0.9.0-89.el6.x86_64

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 22:59 -0400, James B. Huber wrote: > > Getting a compliant when trying to load the lirc_i2c module on RHEL-6.1 > > > > Executing "modprobe lirc_i2c" as root. > > FATAL: Error inserting lirc_i2c > > > (/lib/modules/2.6.32-1

Re: [ATrpms-users] FLAC to MP3?

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 6:40 AM, John Robinson < john.robin...@anonymous.org.uk> wrote: > I just know there must be something in the repo that will convert my tree > of FLACs to a tree of MP3s and retain the tagging and perhaps even artwork > but I'm scoobied[1] if I know what it is. Please could

Re: [ATrpms-users] Need upgraded Video4Linux-KMDL's Please

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 5:28 AM, John Pilkington wrote: > On 10/06/11 00:55, Larry Roberts wrote: > >> I just upgraded to the latest and greatest mythtv (and all the other >> bits) and all is well except I can no longer record programs. A little >> digging reveals that it is most likely due to no

Re: [ATrpms-users] audacious-plugins dependency error

On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:15 PM, mladen kr wrote: > Hi, > > I'm getting dependency error when trying to install > audacious-plugins-2.4.4-3.el6.x86_64 > > Error: Package: audacious-plugins-2.4.4-3.el6.x86_64 (atrpms-testing) >Requires: libavcore.so.0()(64bit) > Error: Package: audacio

Re: [ATrpms-users] Problems compiling nVidia SRPM

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 15:54 -0400, Speice, Bradlee wrote: > > > > I'm having some problems packaging the nVidia source rpm as given by > > atrpms. Specifically, when I try to install the package it complains > > that I don't have the correct ker

Re: [ATrpms-users] EL5: mythtv vs. lirc

On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Marcel Telka wrote: > On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 05:50:42AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Marcel Telka wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > After update of the lirc packages (to version

Re: [ATrpms-users] EL5: mythtv vs. lirc

On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Marcel Telka wrote: > Hi, > > After update of the lirc packages (to version 0.8.7) on my CentOS 5.5 > frontend the MythTV stopped to accept my remotes. I noticed the irw works > correctly, so I assume the lirc API (in liblirc_client.so) somehow > changed and mythtv

Re: [ATrpms-users] New directfb in Fedora requires rebuilds or mplayer and xine-lib (at least).

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Kevin J. Cummings < cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net> wrote: > The new, just released, directfb-1.4.11-3.fc14 in Fedora fails to > install because both mplayer-1.0-80_snap20110221.fc14.x86_64 and > xine-lib-1.1.19-22.fc14.x86_64 have an = dependency on > libdirectfb-1.4

Re: [ATrpms-users] New libva Package has Conflict on F14

also occurring on F13 > > eg > > -> Running transaction check > ---> Package libva.i686 0:1.0.10-1.fc13 set to be updated > --> Processing Dependency: libva-x11.so.1 for package: > libva-1.0.10-1.fc13.i686 > --> Running transaction check > ---> Package libva-x11_1.i686 0:1.0.10-1.fc13 set to be ins

Re: [ATrpms-users] New libva Package has Conflict on F14

On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Kevin J. Cummings < cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net> wrote: > On 03/12/2011 03:27 PM, Brian Long wrote: > > Kevin, > > It's very "iffy" mixing RPMs from rpmfusion and ATrpms. As Paulo said, > > you should choose which of the above you want and remove the other. > > A

Re: [ATrpms-users] New libva Package has Conflict on F14

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 12:02 PM, John Welch wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti > wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:54 AM, John Welch wrote: > >> > >> Just tried doing a 'yum update' on one of my Fedor

Re: [ATrpms-users] New libva Package has Conflict on F14

On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Kevin J. Cummings < cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net> wrote: > On 03/11/2011 09:25 PM, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: > > I am having a similar, but different conflict with the new > > gnome-mplayer-1.0.2 package having conflicts with the older

Re: [ATrpms-users] New libva Package has Conflict on F14

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Kevin J. Cummings < cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net> wrote: > On 03/11/2011 09:59 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: > > It needs a newer libdrm (2.4.24), which did not land in the repo yet... > > I can't find the updated libdrm, even in updates-

Re: [ATrpms-users] New libva Package has Conflict on F14

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:54 AM, John Welch wrote: > Just tried doing a 'yum update' on one of my Fedora 14 workstations > and got the following message: > > 'Processing Conflict: libva-1.0.10-1.fc14.i686 conflicts libdrm < 2.4.23' > > As a test I tried running 'yum remove libdrm' to see what th

Re: [ATrpms-users] Multiple versions of libva installed

On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote: > Paulo Cavalcanti wrote at about 18:40:33 -0300 on Wednesday, March 9, 2011: > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky < > atr...@kosowsky.org>wrote: > > > > > After an rpm upgraded,

Re: [ATrpms-users] Multiple versions of libva installed

On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote: > After an rpm upgraded, I have the following versions of libva all > installed: > > libva-0.31.1.1_1-0.31.1-2_sds5.fc12.i686.rpm > libva-0.32.0-3_sds1.fc12.i686.rpm > libva-0.32.0.1_1-0.32.0-3_sds1.fc12.i686.rpm > > libva-x11-0.31.1.1_1-0

Re: [ATrpms-users] Installing MythTV on SL 6.0

On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Tony Seward wrote: > I'm trying to install MythTV from atrpms on a newly installed Scientific > Linux 6.0 machine. Initially there was a missing dependency on > perl-Date-Manip that I resolved by temporarily enabling atrpms-testing > and getting it from there. > >

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >