Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-04-01 Thread mlsstl
Curt962;529674 Wrote: > > It seems the music industry itself isn't concerned with providing the > highest resolution possible.They could, but without a viable market > (read: BIG market) it simply isn't on their radar screen. > A sole focus on maximum quality has never been true in the

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-04-01 Thread Curt962
Perhaps someone could award me an honorary PhD in "Miscommunications" For me, it's really not a matter of music appreciation.There's not many genres of music in which I can't find something to like. Thoughts to the contrary wasn't my point at all. My point is, and I'm sure others may qu

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter volume-control digital input

2010-04-01 Thread DCtoDaylight
DaveWr;529519 Wrote: > Agreed, that's why most real digital volume controls use 32 bits + and a > dither algorithm. Also why some of us prefer a digitally controlled, analog solution, post DAC. The sad fact is that many "24bit" dacs aren't very linear in their lsb's, and can't provide sufficien

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] More nonsense from Hi-Fi World...

2010-04-01 Thread Themis
Phil Leigh;529610 Wrote: > OK, well how about this: > ..."FLAC has become a become a sort of default standard for > Audiophiles(it doesn't sound as good as .WAV but it's close, especially > when encoded on a good ripper such as EAC)" :) I wouldn't be amazed to read something like this in a magazi

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] More nonsense from Hi-Fi World...

2010-04-01 Thread slate
well the words are correct, but badly out of order -- slate Main: Duet -> Beresford Caiman -> Carver A-500x -> B&W 704 Office: Duet -> Technics SU-V50 -> Stax SR84 Pro Server: Zotac IONITX-A, 4 GB, 1 TB WD EADS, Win7 w. 7.5e -

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why do some sources sound quiet on Transporter

2010-04-01 Thread Phil Leigh
Squeezed_Rotel;529608 Wrote: > Curt, how did you do it? I've used dBpoweramp to rip all of my cds, but > I left everything to default settings. Where would I find the menu item > you said would add some fixed gain? > TIA > John Don't do this, John. Use Replaygain to add variable (track and album

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why do some sources sound quiet on Transporter

2010-04-01 Thread Phil Leigh
Squeezed_Rotel;529608 Wrote: > Curt, how did you do it? I've used dBpoweramp to rip all of my cds, but > I left everything to default settings. Where would I find the menu item > you said would add some fixed gain? > TIA > John Don't do this, John. Use Replaygain to add variable (track and album

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] More nonsense from Hi-Fi World...

2010-04-01 Thread Phil Leigh
OK, well how about this: ..."FLAC has become a become a sort of default standard for Audiophiles(it doesn't sound as good as .WAV but it's close, especially when encoded on a good ripper such as EAC)" -- Phil Leigh You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it ain't what

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] More nonsense from Hi-Fi World...

2010-04-01 Thread Phil Leigh
Siduhe;529604 Wrote: > Oh go on, don't leave the rest of us hanging... > > Any chance it was an (belated) April Fool? > > Missed the old SD 1 April news announcements btw. Closest that came to > making me smile today was: > > http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/hadron-collider-ii-planne

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why do some sources sound quiet on Transporter

2010-04-01 Thread Squeezed_Rotel
Curt962;529488 Wrote: > Good Post! > > I've found a number of Hi-Res downloads (24-88, 24-96) that are at > ridiculously low levels.The VU meters barely move, and the music > actually sounds a bit "lost".The effect is not unlike using a > low-output MC cartridge into a phono stage with i

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] More nonsense from Hi-Fi World...

2010-04-01 Thread Siduhe
Oh go on, don't leave the rest of us hanging... Any chance it was an (belated) April Fool? Missed the old SD 1 April news announcements btw. Closest that came to making me smile today was: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/hadron-collider-ii-planned-for-circle-line-1932744.html -- S

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] More nonsense from Hi-Fi World...

2010-04-01 Thread Siduhe
Oh go on, don't leave the rest of us hanging... Any chance it was an (belated) April Fool? Missed the old SD 1 April news announcements btw. Closest that came to making me smile today was: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/hadron-collider-ii-planned-for-circle-line-1932744.html -- S

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Tranporter Volume Concrol cant be deafeated?

2010-04-01 Thread SuperQ
Sounds like a bug to me, I would check the bugs database. If you don't find anything about fixed volume when using digital inputs I would file a new bug. http://bugs.slimdevices.com -- SuperQ SuperQ's Profile: http://for

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] More nonsense from Hi-Fi World...

2010-04-01 Thread Phil Leigh
If anyone has the May issue, I urge you to read page 67. I nearly spilled my Burgandy... -- Phil Leigh You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it ain't what you'd call minimal... SB Touch Beta (wired) - TACT 2.2X (Linear PSU) + Good Vibrations S/W - MF Triplethreat(Aud

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] transporter balanced output?

2010-04-01 Thread chill
I make no audiophile claims, but I made myself what sounds, to me, a superb Class D dual mono amplifier out of two Hypex UcD180 modules (www.hypex.nl). The Hypex modules have balanced inputs, and also come in higher powered versions than my 180W units (they do 400W and 700W versions). If you're

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Tranporter Volume Concrol cant be deafeated?

2010-04-01 Thread peterw
It's a hacked workaround, but you might try installing my VolumeLock plugin and locking the Transporter volume at 100%. I don't know if that will work, and don't have a Transporter to test with. Good luck. -- peterw http://www.tux.org/~peterw/ Free plugins: 'AllQuiet' (http://www.tux.org/~pe

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Tranporter Volume Concrol cant be deafeated?

2010-04-01 Thread ntang
Hi I just got a Transporter and besides hooking it up to the SqueezeBox server running ALAC, I also hook up my CD player as a transport so that it can use the Transporter's DAC. I am having trouble defeating the Transporter's volume control when the RCA Coax Digital inputs is active. That's desp

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter volume-control digital input

2010-04-01 Thread cliveb
Fxdwg123;529528 Wrote: > Great, thanks. So I started to look on the internet for stepped > attenuators and see a lot of offerings. However, too much choices! 10, > 50 or 100 kilo ohm?? 12, 24, 36 or 48 steps? etc. etc. Can somebody > gives me a direction? I see some positive feedback on Endler st

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter volume-control digital input

2010-04-01 Thread cliveb
Fxdwg123;529421 Wrote: > Responding on the volume degradation issue: I currently listen to a > -48dB volume level (Transporter) and I have read somewehere that at > this level there are still 16bits left so degradation not noticable. > And to be honest, at this level the music sounds great, bette

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter volume-control digital input

2010-04-01 Thread Fxdwg123
Phil Leigh;529444 Wrote: > Yes. Also, don't use AES/EBU, use spdif coax instead. It works better. Great, thanks. So I started to look on the internet for stepped attenuators and see a lot of offerings. However, too much choices! 10, 50 or 100 kilo ohm?? 12, 24, 36 or 48 steps? etc. etc. Can some

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter volume-control digital input

2010-04-01 Thread DaveWr
DCtoDaylight;529472 Wrote: > Minor nit: this only works for original 16 bit data sources ->played by > 24 bit DAC's<- Agreed, that's why most real digital volume controls use 32 bits + and a dither algorithm. This is a history feature only. Dave -- DaveWr ---

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-04-01 Thread DaveWr
michael123;529507 Wrote: > > > Transporter is a killer product, i think it deserves more attention. It may be a killer product, but not for a Logitech like company, they want the MP3 crowd, volume is where it's at. Dave -- DaveWr --