mlsstl
so, how would you compare the rip played through Transporter to
original LP record?
I also have few rips of my friends, and there is some loss in
resolution, separation and clarity (given that the rip is done using
24/96). It is very close, though.
--
michael123
---
pfarrell;530005 Wrote:
>
> Audiophiles often claim "accuracy" when they like something. And most
> audiophiles love the added even harmonic distortions that tubes/valves
> and vinyl have in spades.
>
This is a caricature, as you know.
My tube amplifiers have no more distortion than the ss ones.
garym;528215 Wrote:
> Parasound - Halo P3 Balanced Preamplifier
> http://www.audioadvisor.com/prodinfo.asp?number=PAHP3
This Preamplifier is not very good. I had it some years ago. There is a
lot of functions in it, but sound is not very good, and there is a small
noise.
It would be better for yo
michael123;529998 Wrote:
> That's not exact.
> The market of vinyl is booming. Records go for 30$, 50$, 100$, ...
> I see more audiophiles that switched to CD 10-15 years ago and now go
> back to turntable. Because of a sound. If there will be more material
> to buy, these guys will.
>
> There i
snarlydwarf;530013 Wrote:
> Then your citations to those articles was meaningless?
>
> I must not understand how you could be "not talking about graphs" when
> you cited them as proof of the "limits" of digital reproduction.
Measurements might be the proof to the listening experience.
Listening
michael123;530007 Wrote:
> I was not talking about graphs, that was my pure listening experience.
>
Then your citations to those articles was meaningless?
I must not understand how you could be "not talking about graphs" when
you cited them as proof of the "limits" of digital reproduction.
-
Wombat wrote:
> Sadly i have the feeling the Transporter is seeing EOL soon and no one
> from the devs want to change anything on the Transporter anymore.
Well, its been documented that the diplays are EOL. And Logitech has
moved to a new fundamental platform for the internals. I would expect
that
I asked that already in another thread but none of the developers
answered.
In theory it should be set in the same way the Transporter chooses
polarity.
Only one flag in a register.
Sadly i have the feeling the Transporter is seeing EOL soon and no one
from the devs want to change anything on the
snarlydwarf;530004 Wrote:
> The catch is those graphs are not comparing "digital to analog" ...
> there is no analog source depicted for comparison: you are left to fill
> out the ideal curves in your head. Believing those ideal curves are
> representative of how an analog source would display,
Themis wrote:
> Phil Leigh;52 Wrote:
>> This is just silly. Analogue has some lovely added distortion that a
>> lot of people like. Accurate it simply isn't.
> Well, not quite true. A lot of quality recordings are made on analogue
> gear, and, having them on CD doesn't make them "more accurate
michael123;530001 Wrote:
>
> Many digital recordings have that 'edginess', vinyl sounds more
> 'smooth'
>
>
The catch is those graphs are not comparing "digital to analog" ...
there is no analog source depicted for comparison: you are left to fill
out the ideal curves in your head. Believing
Phil Leigh;52 Wrote:
>
> This is just silly. Analogue has some lovely added distortion that a
> lot of people like. Accurate it simply isn't.
Well, not quite true. A lot of quality recordings are made on analogue
gear, and, having them on CD doesn't make them "more accurate"... ;)
As for th
Phil
1) Did you listen to quality analog rig?
2) If you did not read the article, please do. That's not black &
white.
I am not a "vinyl lover", but I do listen frequently to quality gear.
Many digital recordings have that 'edginess', vinyl sounds more
'smooth'
There are some measurements in
michael123;529986 Wrote:
> Thanks, wireless200.
>
> mlsstl,
>
> Then why is the need to work with 192KHz at all? Why the industry
> adopts DXD, which is 384Hz, I think..? I saw few labels going this way,
> and there is hardware available of course..
>
>
> There is one interesting article, com
That's not exact.
The market of vinyl is booming. Records go for 30$, 50$, 100$, ...
I see more audiophiles that switched to CD 10-15 years ago and now go
back to turntable. Because of a sound. If there will be more material
to buy, these guys will.
There is no point to own 100,000$ stereo system
michael123;529986 Wrote:
> Thanks, wireless200.
>
> mlsstl,
>
> Then why is the need to work with 192KHz at all? Why the industry
> adopts DXD, which is 384Hz, I think..? I saw few labels going this way,
> and there is hardware available of course..
>
>
> There is one interesting article, com
michael123;529986 Wrote:
> Thanks, wireless200.
>
> mlsstl,
>
> Then why is the need to work with 192KHz at all? Why the industry
> adopts DXD, which is 384Hz, I think..? I saw few labels going this way,
> and there is hardware available of course..
>
>
> There is one interesting article, com
Thanks, wireless200.
mlsstl,
> If one is not mixing and editing multi-track files, what purpose is
> being served at 192K sample rates? Then why is the need to work with 192KHz
> at all? Why the industry
adopts DXD, which is 384Hz, I think..? I saw few labels going this way,
and there is hardw
Thanks for the post. These streams are an excellent example of how
satisfying 256-320kbs content can be when recorded properly.
--
esbrewer
Server: 2.4GHz Intel iMac running Mac OS 10.6.2, SBS 7.4.2, Inguz DRC
Sources: SB3 (2), SB Boom, NAD C542, NAD T515
Amplification: NAD C720BEE
Loudspeak
michael123;529507 Wrote:
>
> Transporter is a killer product, i think it deserves more attention.
Michael, I appreciate you dogged pursuit of answers in this thread.
That's really the only way good things ever get done. You ran into a
bit of a "no can do" attitude but it resulted in one of t
Hi,
Would it be possible to make the choice between slow and sharp rolloff
filter in the AK4396 (transporter) user selectable? Personally I would
be very interested to compare (subjectively) the difference.
Ronald.
--
tingtong5
-
21 matches
Mail list logo
