rbl;604044 Wrote:
Hmm - big thanks for looking into this and creating the 2 new files,
which I installed and then rebooted the PC. Sadly InguzDSP.exe never
ran again! The EQ user interface seems to work normally but no EQ sound
processing. I reinstalled the original plugin.pm and
Griffin;604002 Wrote:
If you think that really does matter, than use toslink.
Yes it really matters and Toslink (which I do use for certain things)
has its own issues, so as always one has to try both and see which
actually sounds best...
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path
darrenyeats;604000 Wrote:
It seems the length which every camp might find acceptable is 1.5m.
What about optical cables - is length significant and why? I hear glass
is better than plastic...any comments?
So, coax versus optical on the SB Touch - does anyone have any
comments?
magiccarpetride;603946 Wrote:
There are 'experts' who claim that any and all perceived differences in
the picture clarity between blu ray (a high definition format) and DVD
(a mid definition format) are based merely on the expectation bias.
I can quite confidently say that the percieved
I did that and it now works. Yiha! A few notes and q's though
- why on earth did it work for several days in the first place (with
the incorrect MAC addresses)?
- I dind't update the Inguz version number as kryzs suggested (I have
the latest Inguz from Inguz's website installed)
- like youself
stop-spinning;604102 Wrote:
I can quite confidently say that the percieved difference between DVD
and Blu-Ray is 'easily' discernable, so I can only assume that people
that cannot tell the difference between these two have sight problem do
not have a large screen TV. I however agree when it
Can it not be dependent on the gear you are using some tos transmitter
and recievers are not fantastic they say ?
making the the optical interface having less bandwidth than the
electrical interface that's a pity it has potential to be significantly
faster.
But this info was absorbed trough
rbl;604105 Wrote:
- I dind't update the Inguz version number as kryzs suggested (I have
the latest Inguz from Inguz's website installed)
I edited my post and dropped this recommendation, forget it. It isn't
necessary since the only change between the 30 and 32 versions is the
plugin
rbl;604105 Wrote:
I did that and it now works. Yiha! A few notes and q's though
- why on earth did it work for several days in the first place (with
the incorrect MAC addresses)?
- I dind't update the Inguz version number as kryzs suggested (I have
the latest Inguz from Inguz's website
Thanks for that Phil.
I've been surfin' the net (probably a dangerous thing to do) about the
SB and notice various reviews and such like relating to better sounding
'modded' versions.. (there's even a highly modded SqueezeBox PLUS!); now
after all I am in the Audiophile section of the forum here
On 21/01/11 16:23, stop-spinning wrote:
Thanks for that Phil.
I've been surfin' the net (probably a dangerous thing to do) about the
SB and notice various reviews and such like relating to better sounding
'modded' versions.. (there's even a highly modded SqueezeBox PLUS!); now
after all I
I think you will get much better sound **within your budget** if you
stick to headphones..
--
michael123
Big 'thank you' to AndyG for fixing #15209, #15693, #16442, #16760
:)
michael123's Profile:
There's not much you can do within that budget, certainly not in the
Audiophiles forum. One option would be to forget about the T-amp for
now, and instead combine those funds with the speaker budget to buy a
pair of self-powered speakers such as the Audioengine 2 (A2, see
Hi to one and all,
I purchased a SB (Duet) a couple of years ago and it's now sitting in
the box as I wasn't happy with the sound. I used the coaxial in the SB
to pump a signal to an external DAC (Beresford), thence to pre amp
(audio synthesis) amp (audio note) and speakers (audio note).
Of
I'm probably not understanding something here, but if you want to avoid
the wireless on the SB Receiver why not just configure it to use the
ethernet port instead?
--
aubuti
aubuti's Profile:
jameswilcox;604223 Wrote:
Hi to one and all,
I purchased a SB (Duet) a couple of years ago and it's now sitting in
the box as I wasn't happy with the sound. I used the coaxial in the SB
to pump a signal to an external DAC (Beresford), thence to pre amp
(audio synthesis) amp (audio note)
garym;604233 Wrote:
WIFI under virtually all circumstances has nothing to do with sound
quality. Bad wifi can cause dropouts, pauses, etc. but bits are bits,
and whether it arrives via wifi or ethernet, the audio quality is not
affected. So I suspect your initial problem with sound quality
My plan is to the speakers 2nd hand, and I have seen some good offers on
for example Wharfedale Diamond 9.
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Wharfedale-Diamond-9-1-Main-Stereo-Speakers-/150548282834?pt=UK_AudioVideoElectronics_HomeAudioHiFi_HiFiSpeakershash=item230d607dd2#ht_500wt_1156
(even cheaper than
zoqi;604239 Wrote:
My plan is to the speakers 2nd hand, and I have seen some good offers on
for example Wharfedale Diamond 9.
Thanks guys. I take your point on wifi not being different to wired,
but the sound at least appears different in blind tests of me and
subjects. I do however think that the weak link in my system is my DAC,
which is no fault of the DAC as it's proportionally cheap vis a vis the
other components.
There are various NAS (network attached storage) devices that can run
SBS. Check in the 3rd Party Hardware forum. Or you could look at a
low-cost, low-energy server, such as a SheevaPlug or a small dedicated
server. Either would be more likely to give you more oomph for your
buck than a NAS.
--
Thanks for the replies.
The audioengine A5 seems really interesting, though it does defeat my
purpose of getting speakers now which later can be turned into my
surround system.
I'm gonna look more into some good 2nd hand deals of older, but still
good speakers.
--
zoqi
22 matches
Mail list logo
