magiccarpetride;623231 Wrote:
A counter-counter anecdote is that an acquaintance of mine claims that
he can't hear the difference between the Touch and his alarm clock.
Sort of similar how I can't hear the difference between my refrigerator
and the sound the furnace makes when it's pushing
The differences between SOX (VHQ) and Weiss are clearly measurable but
inaudible in practice and there is NO consensus on which is even
theroretically better.
Weiss can handle DSD and that is why it is used in pro circles.
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a
JohnSwenson;623284 Wrote:
My theory is that with a large buffer you have lots of processing
happening all at once at fairly infrequent intervals. With a small
buffer you have much less processing but closer together, the
processing is more spread out.
John. Very interesting. Great to see
Phil Leigh;622886 Wrote:
I completely agree - all this talk of multiples is nonsense in the
context of SOX...
Thanks for that Phil Wombat, I'd previously made the same assumption
as Gaz R.E. the multiples of...
My SB setup is still redbook, as my main DAC is an Audiolab 8000DAX and
won't go
soundcheck;623349 Wrote:
John. Very interesting. Great to see that you measured some kind of
impact.
Less processing for smaller buffers!?!? Hmmh.
You got a lot more interrupts in the system to refill a smaller
buffer.
Theoretically the total amount of data you process should be the
Still can´t get the menu options to work in the Touch (nor iPeng) but
got it working with filters from Audiolense and the difference is quite
large! :)
Realized I had some nasty dips (-24dB!) around 80 Hz, so I will
experiment a bit with speaker placement to even that out a bit.
Not sure why I
Phil Leigh;623372 Wrote:
That's a totally different concept - RME are talking about latency - the
delay between an input stimulus (such as an incoming midi note-on event
from a keyboard or other controller) and the generation of the desired
corresponding sound from a software or hardware
'Here'
(http://www.stereophile.com/content/linn-majik-ds-i-da-integrated-amplifier-manufacturers-comment-2)
are some measurements from right inside a Linn Majik DS-I network DAC
showing the effects of the processor loading the powersupply every 5ms
as an ethernet packet is received. So, such
soundcheck;623388 Wrote:
It is about midi. You figured it out . I knew you're a pretty bright
fellow. Great.
You missed bridging what's being said over to our discussion. It's
about the principle how a buffer gets managed. And that this might not
be as linear as some people might think it
JezA;623391 Wrote:
'Here'
(http://www.stereophile.com/content/linn-majik-ds-i-da-integrated-amplifier-manufacturers-comment-2)
are some measurements from right inside a Linn Majik DS-I network DAC
showing the effects of the processor loading the powersupply every 5ms
as an ethernet packet
johann;623377 Wrote:
Still can´t get the menu options to work in the Touch (nor iPeng) but
got it working with filters from Audiolense and the difference is quite
large! :)
Realized I had some nasty dips (-24dB!) around 80 Hz, so I will
experiment a bit with speaker placement to even that
adamdea - I think the Linn measurements are in response to Stereophile's
measurements, so it's probably worth reading those as well to get the
context.
--
JezA
JezA's Profile:
My Rega DAC is scheduled to arrive tomorrow. I've come down with a bad
allergy attack yesterday, so my sinuses are all plugged and my ears are
definitely not in condition to do any critical listening. So, I'll have
no choice but to wait until the unit has had some burn-in time before
giving it a
adamdea;623427 Wrote:
Sorry to hear you don't get it to work in Inguz. It didn;t work for me
at first but then suddenly did. Do you get EQ in extras, or does Inguz
not appear at all?
I can only access Inguz from the SBS web interface (e,g, not server
settings but the left frame in
Is inguzdsp.exe definitely running? I remember havibng Inguz appearig in
the web browser but not in Ipeng at one point. I had not installed the
second part of Inguz ie th actual engine. I am sure you are much more
competent than i am though so I sure you wouldn't have done that. If
you ask Phil
adamdea;623436 Wrote:
Is inguzdsp.exe definitely running? I remember havibng Inguz appearig in
the web browser but not in Ipeng at one point. I had not installed the
second part of Inguz ie th actual engine. I am sure you are much more
competent than i am though so I sure you wouldn't have
adamdea;623436 Wrote:
Is inguzdsp.exe definitely running? I remember havibng Inguz appearig in
the web browser but not in Ipeng at one point. I had not installed the
second part of Inguz ie th actual engine. I am sure you are much more
competent than i am though so I sure you wouldn't have
What ever became of the folks who wrote the inguz plugin? I wonder if
they could be persuaded to come out of retirement?
--
adamdea
adamdea's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=37603
View this
Phil Leigh;623438 Wrote:
I cannot get the sweep/measurement menus to appear on the Touch. They
appear fine on my Boom (not very helpful!).
This appears to be a Squeezeplay issue - the plugin simply isn't
compatible and needs to be re-written to work fully on SP devices like
the Touch.
Hi guys I have good and bad news. The good one is that on my Touch all
the menus are working, filter selection, test tones, EQ name it;
everything is accessible from the screen and the remote. The bad one is
I don't know why mine is working ;-((
The only thing I can make to help you is to
krzys;623450 Wrote:
Hi guys I have good and bad news. The good one is that on my Touch all
the menus are working, filter selection, test tones, EQ name it;
everything is accessible from the screen and the remote. The bad one is
I don't know why mine is working ;-((
The only thing I can
I tried my best last night to discern differernces between the various
filter settings. Using 24/96 tracks, the only differnces that I can
even possibly claim to have heard was that filter #4 (linear phase
apodising) was a bit over-boomy in the bass. Listening to classical
music, #5 (minimum
krzys;623450 Wrote:
Hi guys I have good and bad news. The good one is that on my Touch all
the menus are working, filter selection, test tones, EQ name it;
everything is accessible from the screen and the remote. The bad one is
I don't know why mine is working ;-((
The only thing I can
I'm conservative I'm running 7.5.3, on XP . The Inguz menus appear as EQ
in the Touch Extras menu ans on SBS.
--
krzys
krzys's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2256
View this thread:
I'm struggling to figure out this whole digital filtering
business...linear, minimum, apodizing, soft knee, etc...I've read some
of the technical explanations and discussions, but quite honestly 98%
of it goes right over my head. This is more intellectual curiousity
than anything else as I have
ralphpnj;623275 Wrote:
Whatever drug you're on, I want some - please!
Wait what am I saying! This is the Audiophiles section so I guess
that rumor, hearsay, magic and general BS are all fair game. Kind of
like the climate change deniers - science just gets tossed out the
window and one
ralphpnj;623275 Wrote:
Whatever drug you're on, I want some - please!
Wait what am I saying! This is the Audiophiles section so I guess
that rumor, hearsay, magic and general BS are all fair game. Kind of
like the climate change deniers - science just gets tossed out the
window and one
magiccarpetride;623495 Wrote:
It was a belated April Fool's joke! Lighten up, people;)
MOST of us knew that Alex... :)
--
Gazjam
Gazjam's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=18604
View this thread:
On 05/04/11 18:28, magiccarpetride wrote:
It was a belated April Fool's joke! Lighten up, people;)
Ah... a joke...
Funny, it sounded just like the rest of the drivel you post. Is that all
a joke too?
R.
--
Feed that ego and you starve the soul - Colonel J.D. Wilkes
You ask to much to explain. The pro peole will grub out all kinds of
audiophile vovabulary to describe all types of filters. Most likely the
same vocabulary will be valid for parts of other filters.
From a technical view there of cause can be audible differences because
some filters simply affect
magiccarpetride;623495 Wrote:
It was a belated April Fool's joke! Lighten up, people;)
Since you're not the op I can only assume that
a) you are completely full of sh*t (but I already know that :))
b) that you and the op are in cohoots, to which I say boy are we in
trouble.
Robin Bowes;623502 Wrote:
On 05/04/11 18:28, magiccarpetride wrote:
It was a belated April Fool's joke! Lighten up, people;)
Ah... a joke...
Funny, it sounded just like the rest of the drivel you post. Is that
all
a joke too?
R.
--
Feed that ego and you starve the soul -
krzys;623473 Wrote:
I'm conservative I'm running 7.5.3, on XP . The Inguz menus appear as EQ
in the Touch Extras menu ans on SBS.
Would you mind uploading your Plugin.pm, please?
--
johann
johann's Profile:
magiccarpetride;623509 Wrote:
Thank you for your kind compliment.
No problem!
On a slightly different note, which drugs make:
a) The Transporter sound best?
b) The Touch sound best?
c) The SB3 sound best?
My answers:
Transporter - drugs which provide one with a heightened awareness and
johann;623511 Wrote:
Would you mind uploading your Plugin.pm, please?
Yes of course in the evening estern american time = late in Europe
--
krzys
krzys's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2256
ralphpnj;623513 Wrote:
No problem!
On a slightly different note, which drugs make:
a) The Transporter sound best?
b) The Touch sound best?
c) The SB3 sound best?
My answers:
Transporter - drugs which provide one with a heightened awareness and
sharper focus.
Touch - drugs
magiccarpetride;623518 Wrote:
Thanks for the insight. Also, don't forget to take your meds every
morning.
Why limit oneself to just the morning?
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2 (oops) - Touch
'Last.fm'
Thanks, hopefully I don´t need it since I think I found the problem.
I was using a Plugin.pm posted in this thread and found that I had
errors in the server logfile pointing to line 391.
In the file I was using, I had
my @rootdirs = Slim::Utils::PluginManager::pluginRootDirs();
This caused an
ralphpnj;623534 Wrote:
Why limit oneself to just the morning?
That's the question you should ask your psychiatrist.
--
magiccarpetride
magiccarpetride's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=37863
magiccarpetride;623547 Wrote:
That's the question you should ask your psychiatrist.
Psychiatrist?!?!?
Don't you mean dealer?
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2 (oops) - Touch
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/)
working fine with XP SP3. If that can help someone
Chris
+---+
|Filename: Plugin.zip |
|Download: http://forums.slimdevices.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=11651|
This thread gives me a headache...
--
RadioClash
RadioClash's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2839
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84742
My Transporter sits on the floor. If it was on a rack I might use the
nob.
--
earwaxer9
System: modified Winsome Labs Mouse, modified Maggie MMG's, Transporter,
HSU sub 12, MSB DAC to 500 watt sub slave amp, JPS labs power cords,
Silver audio interconnect, Audioquest Granite speaker cable.
43 matches
Mail list logo
