Any help is appreciated
MediaCenter's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=32623
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=94592
___
TheOctavist wrote:
I have done this often to bands I record(or to myself). I do a take, and
hit a switch on , say an eq only to hear damn that was good ...but I
hadn't engaged anything at all, but put it from OFF into bypass mode. .
I do this with bands too. ill say im going to change
We are going round in cycles, aren't we?
- You always claim you (and mcr) - yet again - made the sound 100 times
better.
- Yet again you are using tweaks which actually are very unlikely to
change anything at all (like applet loading priority, or triodes Applet
influencing SPDIF) .
- yet
TheOctavist wrote:
I do this with bands too. ill say im going to change this compressor a
bit and without doing anything, I replay the take, they go damn brah,
that sounds much better
Guess I've not been alone when doing recordings in the past.
It's so much easier to talk to bands this way
I can't see any reason why it would -not- work.
I have myself been considering a DEQ2496 for use with my Touch, but then
I'd have to use the DAC in the DEQ2496, and I have no idea how good that
one is.
Soulkeeper's
MediaCenter wrote:
I am running Airplay using Airport Express into Transporter's
digital-in. I wanted to do room correction on Airplay. Currently, room
correction is applied using Inguz. I am thinking of buying DEQ2496 or
something similar to insert it in the digital loop. Will this work?
I
TheOctavist wrote:
I have done this often to bands I record(or to myself). I do a take, and
hit a switch on , say an eq only to hear damn that was good ...but I
hadn't engaged anything at all, but put it from OFF into bypass mode. .
I do this with bands too. ill say im going to change
aubuti wrote:
But I really was looking for some of the purported well documented
cases where sufficiently large population of double blind testers were
reporting significant differences, which I also interpreted (perhaps
foolishly) the 'significant differences' to be the
MediaCenter wrote:
I am running Airplay using Airport Express into Transporter's
digital-in. I wanted to do room correction on Airplay. Currently, room
correction is applied using Inguz. I am thinking of buying DEQ2496 or
something similar to insert it in the digital loop. Will this work?
So
mlsstl wrote:
Classic subjective response featuring the selective use of psychological
issues in audio testing.
Our poor, frightened test subjects are cowed into helpless uselessness
when they find themselves in a situation where their 100 times better,
even my wife could hear it
RonM wrote:
This is really just prime BS. Anyone with anything resembling an
education in science or a capacity for critical thinking can see it for
what it is. It's entirely supposition without so much as a single
remote kernel of truth at its core.
In this context, blind testing is
It would be good to come over again sometime and see/hear the fruits of
your labours re: the garage conversion,and also to hear the Touch with
the Mdac
The only problem with me at the moment is time - I'm rushed off my feet
with work, not that I'm complaining ;)
Chris :)
SB Touch - silver coax - VTL Straight-Line (two-channel, tubed D/A
converter, UltraAnalog DAC D20400 module).
congole's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=40776
View this thread:
SBGK wrote:
so the greatest advancement in sound quality for the Touch, that I have
heard, doesn't raise any intellectual curiosity amongst the denizens of
the premier Squeezebox community forum ?
.
no, because it is rubbish.
if you used room correction or treatment and made those
mikael_b wrote:
This is the opposite of a double blind test, it's an schoolbook example
of expectation bias, one factor you remove with a properly designed
double blind test, and clearly demonstrates why it is necessary with a
double blind test. If I know you are now playing the better
aubuti wrote:
Thanks, and I personally don't find that surprising. But I really was
looking for some of the purported well documented cases where
sufficiently large population of double blind testers were reporting
significant differences, which I also interpreted (perhaps foolishly)
the
16 matches
Mail list logo
