The answer is:
Expectation
Bias (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Experimenter's_bias)
SuperQ's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2139
View this thread:
SuperQ wrote:
The answer is:
Expectation
Bias (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Experimenter's_bias)
to quote soundcheck - 'everything affects the sound'
fidelizer sets the system timer to 15 ms
fidelizer adjusts non essential processes to low priority
does some other things
so basically it
Phileas wrote:
Can I add AVI ADM40s to the list?
I've just bought a pair and they're extraordinary (I had the ADM9Ts
already).
I'd love to hear what you think of them, I've fancied a pair of the
ADM9T's with a Sub, but now having seen these, I'm really intrested in
them. They are a big
SuperQ wrote:
The answer is:
Expectation
Bias (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Experimenter's_bias)
SuperQ - you're not allowed to say this. The OP has made it clear that
you're only allowed to post conjecture that reinforces his expectations.
I'm surprised he let you get away with this.
chill wrote:
SuperQ - you're not allowed to say this. The OP has made it clear that
you're only allowed to post conjecture that reinforces his expectations.
I'm surprised he let you get away with this.
OP says .
Please note: I am not interested in hearing from the LOL, you cant
possibly
Mnyb wrote:
You can always hear differences , SuperQ just suggested the most
plausible mechanism that makes fidelizer do that for squeezeboxes ( it
may very well work for some issues in pc playback on that I have no
opinion ) , so it actually answered the question ? Without LoL
You make a
ok, sorry in advance, I have not read through this posting, except for
the first few posts. Now comes the real deal of the posting Can
someone post a @who To' to get this working with the current realease of
LMS?
RussellMrgn wrote:
I'd love to hear what you think of them, I've fancied a pair of the
ADM9T's with a Sub, but now having seen these, I'm really intrested in
them. They are a big price hike, so they would have to be a quantum
improvement for me to justify the extra cost. I see that at the
cfraser wrote:
^ Tell me more!! Please. I have never heard of such an xfmr before, but
I should have known they existed...
The AES/EBU sounds better here too. Has an open-ness and a sense of the
music coming out of infinite blackness; very noticeable when other
DACs/inputs *don't* have
Fozzy wrote:
For me, morally as well as legally, one
should obtain music in a way that at least has the potential to provide
the writers and performers of the music with money unless they
specifically choose to give the music away.
In the olden days, before mass copying technology became
HumanMedia wrote:
Here is the exact one I use. I have a hardwired standard Blue Jeans coax
with bnc from the SBT connecting into the BNC at one end of this. The
other xlr end plugs into the AES/EBU Dac input.
chill wrote:
You make a good point. I stand corrected.
So do you think the OP is interested in the THE simple test that will
demonstrate that SuperQ's suggested mechanism is the correct one? You
know, the 'just pull the plug' test.
But that test is not necessarily defintive, it only
JohnSwenson wrote:
But that test is not necessarily defintive, it only tells you if the
processing on the Touch is the issue. There are other possible paths
from server to ears such as EMI radiated from server, noise injected on
power mains etc. Something which is changing the whole
SBGK wrote:
with my large buffer settings I can get several minutes playback of
16/44.1 stored on the touch after the music has loaded via the ethernet.
So I can switch off the laptop and disconnect the ethernet while the
music is still playing - the sound doesn't change when I do this, it
pippin wrote:
Depends.
For studio albums I couldn't care less about lossless since they are all
mixed for mp3 these days anyway, so there's no difference.
Live recordings, however, are a different issue.
As a jazz and classical music fan and listener I beg to differ. You are
referring
magiccarpetride wrote:
Why music industry chose to go with a different model, whereby they
would mass produce and distribute copies of the recorded performance, is
a curious fact that remains kind of difficult to explain.
Actually, it is quite easy to explain. The recorded music industry
mlsstl wrote:
Actually, it is quite easy to explain. The recorded music industry came
directly from the music publishing industry. It wasn't until the 1940s
that records started outselling sheet music.
It's impossible to use the movie model you describe to monetize sheet
music. People
bakker_be wrote:
as a european music lover, i mostly object to the so-called
convenience of itunes or any other service: It's almost impossible for
me to get good music legally + lossless. Quite a lot of the stuff on
hdtracks for instance is interesting to me, but strictly speaking i'm
18 matches
Mail list logo
