Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Fidelizer & SBT.. Why should it work?

2012-06-30 Thread lake_eleven
Soundcheck, in his thread, suggests using TCPOptimizer's 'optimal' settings. Even this does not affect SBT playback? lake_eleven's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48979 View this thread: http://foru

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] RC (Inguz etc.)

2012-06-30 Thread Wirrunna
RussellMrgn wrote: > ok, sorry in advance, I have not read through this posting, except for > the first few posts. Now comes the real deal of the posting Can > someone post a 'how to', to get this working with the current realease > of LMS? Start with this thread - http://forums.slimdevices.

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Fidelizer & SBT.. Why should it work?

2012-06-30 Thread garym
And he referred you to jplay forums for more info. That's like asking Bernie Madoff for investment advice. Search hydrogenaudio.org on jplay. garym's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17325 View this

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Fidelizer & SBT.. Why should it work?

2012-06-30 Thread garym
chill wrote: > what have I missed in my summary? For one, you're talking to SBGK, a poster who has demonstrated time and again a complete misunderstanding of how squeezeboxes work. garym's Profile: http://forums.slimdevic

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Fidelizer & SBT.. Why should it work?

2012-06-30 Thread chill
SBGK wrote: > lol, this really is the tar pit of audiophile forums. > > OP, I would try somewhere else for an answer. The author of fidelizer > posts in a few eg jplay forums, you can ask him directly there. SBGK The fact is that there aren't many places that an explanation of Fidelizer's eff

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Fidelizer & SBT.. Why should it work?

2012-06-30 Thread Apesbrain
darrell wrote: > As far as asking the developer of Fidelizer for the answer to this, it > would be like relying on Bob Diamond to tell you whether Barclays Bank > was an upright and moral organisation! Translation for our members in the USA: "...it would be like relying on Jaime Dimon to tell y

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Fidelizer & SBT.. Why should it work?

2012-06-30 Thread darrell
SBGK wrote: > > > chill wrote: > > John > > > > I can't tell if you're just being mischievous, but if not, are you > > seriously suggesting that the mere presence of a powered-up computer in > > the same house as the hifi will have an audible effect? That's a bit of > > a blow for the whole c

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter as server (digital outs)- a few basic questions

2012-06-30 Thread garym
jh901 wrote: > Quick question: > > My outboard DAC accepts 24/192 via AES or Coax digital inputs. The > Transporter downconverts (right word?) 24/192 to 24/96 as I understand > it in order to play 24/192, but will it pass native 24/192 to an > outboard DAC via digital outs? > > Much appreciate

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter as server (digital outs)- a few basic questions

2012-06-30 Thread jh901
BUMP Anyone?? jh901's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=18175 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=95476 ___ audiophiles maili

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] The Master List of HD and Lossless Download Sites..

2012-06-30 Thread Mycenius
Mycenius wrote: > Well I'm still waiting for the Warners' Customer Service Team to respond > on what happened to my Nonesuch files?! :( Well I might have to apologise to Warners over that one, seems I apparantly mistyped my email address, and because it didn't have a second validation field at c

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Fidelizer & SBT.. Why should it work?

2012-06-30 Thread SBGK
chill wrote: > John > > I can't tell if you're just being mischievous, but if not, are you > seriously suggesting that the mere presence of a powered-up computer in > the same house as the hifi will have an audible effect? That's a bit of > a blow for the whole computer-based audio industry. B

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Fidelizer & SBT.. Why should it work?

2012-06-30 Thread chill
JohnSwenson wrote: > But that test is not necessarily defintive, it only tells you if the > processing on the Touch is the issue. There are other possible paths > from server to ears such as EMI radiated from server, noise injected on > power mains etc. Something which is changing the whole opera