SBGK wrote:
> ralph, hope your health isn't affected by the constant stream of bile
> you spout forth. It's only hifi. Perhaps you need another hobby.
Quite right: it is only hifi but then again it is very representative of
the overall level of complete and utter dishonesty that exists at all
le
ralphpnj wrote:
> Julf - you are banned from Computer Audiophile - good work and
> congratulations!
>
> There is one thing about Computer Audiophile that I admire - the site's
> founder (whose name escapes me) started out as just another audiophile
> but thanks to the unrelenting kowtowing to th
darrenyeats wrote:
> Mynb, agreed, I didn't mean to imply it was universally true, it's just
> my modus operandi.
Ok :) no problem .
Meridian and Linn uses them for example .
I have a feeling that they might actually be defacto standard very soon
( if not already )
-
Mnyb wrote:
>
> IMHO it's a myth that it is always smps power supplies that dirties the
> network , linear supplies can do this too and some smps supplies are
> decently filtered and do not pose a problem .
> A bad power supply can polute the mains .
>
Mynb, agreed, I didn't mean to imply it wa
SBGK wrote:
> It wasn't my fault you got banned from computer audiophile and tirna
> hifi, but thanks for the shout out.
Julf - you are banned from Computer Audiophile - good work and
congratulations!
There is one thing about Computer Audiophile that I admire - the site's
founder (whose name e
ralphpnj wrote:
> Just to clarify: by "ring layout" you mean circuit. ie. the outlets and
> switches that are grouped together on one circuit which runs back to the
> fuse or circuit breaker back at the main electrical panel.
>
Yeah, for example it's not worth filtering 3 three items if the ring
Julf wrote:
> SBGK's 'MQN Player'
> (http://www.computeraudiophile.com/f11-software/visual-studio-2012-c-and-wasapi-minimalist-player-15401/),
> where minor differences in the player software make night and day
> differences to the sound.
>
> 'Audiophile solder'
> (http://www.soniccraft.com/prod
darrenyeats wrote:
> Yes Ralph, it's fair to describe these as my perceptions and experience
> and not as a statement of fact to be taken as gospel. Also, when it
> comes to power-related stuff, I know there are many different opinions,
> experiences - and even technical views. The good thing is,
darrenyeats wrote:
> Yes Ralph, it's fair to describe these as my perceptions and experience
> and not as a statement of fact to be taken as gospel. Also, when it
> comes to power-related stuff, I know there are many different opinions,
> experiences - and even technical views. The good thing is,
Yes Ralph, it's fair to describe these as my perceptions and experience
and not as a statement of fact to be taken as gospel. Also, when it
comes to power-related stuff, I know there are many different opinions
and experiences. The good thing is, filters and lampless/switchless
extensions are pret
darrenyeats wrote:
> Hi Ralph,
> 1. The cumulative effect of all the steps I described is significant,
> and I would be surprised if I couldn't hear it blind (even though I've
> to proved myself to have been fooled on past occasions, so I am wary). I
> have been distinctly unsatisfied with the so
Hi Ralph,
1. The cumulative effect of all the steps I described is significant,
and I would be surprised if I couldn't hear it blind (even though I've
to proved myself to have been fooled on past occasions, so I am wary). I
have been distinctly unsatisfied with the sound on two occasions since
the
darrenyeats wrote:
> I agree. The issue is somewhat dependent on your supply and your
> components, so I would expect experiences to differ.
>
> More of my present thinking here:
> http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?101270-Need-a-little-help-from-the-experts&p=775845&viewfull=1#post775
get.amped wrote:
>
> There is some basis for power conditioning.
I agree. The issue is somewhat dependent on your supply and your
components, so I would expect experiences to differ.
Check it, add to it! http://www.dr.loudness-war.info/
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/richpub/listmania/byauthor/
jimmypowder wrote:
> Based on your responses to the Marantz and Auralic streamers , I doubt
> your judgment is worth a plug nickel . Remote control would be the
> last item on the list that I would consider pivotal in buying an
> audiophile music streamer . I can move my fat ass up off the co
15 matches
Mail list logo
