bartman wrote:
> I don't think there are any work-arounds to allow 192 khz files to play
> on the Transporter ( if someone knows this is possible -- p-lease
> respond - as I'd like to get that working ! )
AFAIK the Transporter is limited to 96k, but that really isn't an issue.
I did try the EDO
Transporter have very low noise and thd a bit better than Touch , so it
has better DAC performance . And if you use the unbalanced output you
can tune the output level with built in attenuators .
The age of the design is not such a disadvantage as some might believe ,
the development of digital
bartman wrote:
> The biggest difference between the Touch and the Transporter (apart from
> the size, look and the cost ) is the built in DAC on the transporter
> (which is rated quite highly by several reviewers) and the multitude of
> input and output connections on the transporter -- Analogue
Julf wrote:
> Was your comparison a level-matched, double-blind ABX? If not, I
> question your use of the word "unquestionably" :)
The biggest difference between the Touch and the Transporter (apart from
the size, look and the cost ) is the built in DAC on the transporter
(which is rated quite h
netchord wrote:
> i have both a transporter (with knob) and a touch. it's been some time
> since i listened to them in the same system (they're in different rooms
> now), but i'd say the transporter is unquestionably a better sounding
> device, at least via its analog outputs.
Was your comparis
RonM wrote:
> Just curious, actually, as to what exactly is the advantage of a
> Transporter (any model) over a Touch. I don't see anyone saying the
> Touch's DAC is inferior, and it has outs usable for most purposes. It's
> a newer design.
>
> I use a TP every day, and have two Touches in rese
Hi
I may have lost my (dearly loved and expensive !) UE in-ear headphones.
If so I will need suitable replacements, but these are not made
anymore.
Any suggestions ? They've got to be good at sub-bass (and bass in
general) but also good in other respects. Round-the-ear wires pretty
essential as
Balanced outputs. Which you need if you want to drive good active
speakers (unless you live in an anechoic chamber) which in turn is what
you want to do these days, at least when you buy new ones.
You'd ned an external DAC for the Touch for that.
Apart from that it's really primarily the looks,
But they look cool and HiFi.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
jimbobvfr400's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=56857
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=101924
___
Just curious, actually, as to what exactly is the advantage of a
Transporter (any model) over a Touch. I don't see anyone saying the
Touch's DAC is inferior, and it has outs usable for most purposes. It's
a newer design.
I use a TP every day, and have two Touches in reserve. Just not at all
sur
10 matches
Mail list logo
