Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] MEASUREMENTS: Some Squeezebox numbers to consider...

2014-02-20 Thread tpaxadpom
you need to remember when you run a loop back you are using both DAC and ADC. One can be better than the other. Years ago when I discovered RMAA I started to do measurements at home with M-Audio Transit sound card. My DAC always produced better numbers then what I was getting with loop back.

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] MEASUREMENTS: Some Squeezebox numbers to consider...

2013-03-21 Thread tpaxadpom
A few screenshots using AP2722 and looking at analog output (XLR). J-test 16bit 44.1kHz played in all cases. http://imageshack.us/f/838/transporteranalogjitter.jpg/ Streaming wave file http://imageshack.us/f/28/transporteranalogjitter.jpg/ RCA input AP2722 source

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] MEASUREMENTS: Some Squeezebox numbers to consider...

2013-02-27 Thread tpaxadpom
Archimago wrote: Thanks! Very nice... Looks like I should see an improvement switching over from TosLink -- AES/EBU for the digital loop! That's a huge variability in the TosLink cables - wow! Was this related to length? Brand name cables? Do you mind if I add your data to my blog

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] MEASUREMENTS: Some Squeezebox numbers to consider...

2013-02-27 Thread tpaxadpom
I corrected my post with measurements for toslink connections. Measured values are in ns not ps as stated before. 50Hz - 100kHz bandwidth. I wouldn't rely on peak or average jitter measurements to make any conclusions. Looking at the spectrum would be more instresting, but even then I don't know

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] MEASUREMENTS: Some Squeezebox numbers to consider...

2013-02-27 Thread tpaxadpom
Archimago wrote: Thanks tpaxadpom! Will update the blog with your data tonight. Yeah, I've seen some roundish TosLink plugs which are symmetrical so you can plug them in without a specific up or down orientation. Here's the million dollar question - can you hear the degradation in music

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] MEASUREMENTS: Some Squeezebox numbers to consider...

2013-02-27 Thread tpaxadpom
Archimago wrote: Thanks for the note tpaxadpom! Hey, good luck with Monster Cables; make sure you pay us a visit when you've made megabux on that patent and installed kilobuck cables all the way through! :-) Thank but I may want to hang out here for a little while, I have my doubts :o. BTW

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] MEASUREMENTS: Some Squeezebox numbers to consider...

2013-02-26 Thread tpaxadpom
Ok I have measured transporter and touch on AP2722. I've only looked at digital out as promised. Here is the run down: Transporter: AES/EBU 377.3-424.5 ps SPDIF RCA 566 ps SPDIF BNC 283-330.2 ps (rca cable with 2 bnc adapters yielded the same results) Toslink 1.462 - 4.103 ps depending on the

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] MEASUREMENTS: Some Squeezebox numbers to consider...

2013-02-19 Thread tpaxadpom
Archimago wrote: Hi Mnyb. Yeah, it's hard to get a sense of what the limit of the ADC is but I agree that the Transporter XLR is hitting the limits already... In comparison to Stereophile's AP measurements, I suspect I'm maybe missing the bottom most 3-4dB of what the Transporter is capable

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] MEASUREMENTS: Some Squeezebox numbers to consider...

2013-02-19 Thread tpaxadpom
You know I am the wrong guy to ask. I never processed this kind of PO. I would imagine they are $35k+. BTW built-in signal generator isn't the last word by any means. I've measured around 1ns of jitter using toslink.