On 04/27/2012 12:34 AM, Massimiliano Torromeo wrote:
> It's odd that with more than 600 packages on AUR I don't use a single
> one of them but that's not an issue of course :P and their quality is
> good.
Be certain that all people involved with audio on ArchLinux use them.
When I see a package fr
On 27.04.2012 14:47, Sergej Pupykin wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> voting is closed. Results:
> Yes - 8
> No - 5
> Abstain - 8
> Total - 21
As already state by Ike, please follow the guidelines [1]. Looking
forward to seeing you on IRC.
Welcome to the team :)
[1]: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/N
Quality of your packages is great. If I need to prove it to someone, I
can show 18 packages maintained before by Speps (15 in [community], 3 in
[extra]) and 657 more in AUR. ;)
It will be pleasure to work with you again, not only on package moving,
so good luck!
--
Bartłomiej Piotrowski
Arch Lin
Op vrijdag 27 april 2012 16:47:19 schreef Sergej Pupykin:
> Hello,
>
> voting is closed. Results:
> Yes - 8
> No - 5
> Abstain - 8
> Total - 21
>
> I don't know who is responsible for next actions.
Well follow: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/New_AUR_TU_guidelines
and contact all the maste
Hello,
voting is closed. Results:
Yes - 8
No - 5
Abstain - 8
Total - 21
I don't know who is responsible for next actions.
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Massimiliano Torromeo
wrote:
> I never had a problem revealing my real-life identity on the internet
> but I also don't think that it actually changes anything since, as
> everyone else already pointed out, I think GPG identities are already
> providing the necessa
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:54 AM, speps wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:46:03 +0200
> Gaetan Bisson wrote:
>
>> [2012-04-26 21:26:19 +0200] speps:
>> > So, from the beginning of my Internet experience, I never referenced to
>> > myself through my real name/life, but using a nickname, a digital ide
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:46:03 +0200
Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> [2012-04-26 21:26:19 +0200] speps:
> > So, from the beginning of my Internet experience, I never referenced to
> > myself through my real name/life, but using a nickname, a digital identity.
>
> Also, your IP address is in the headers.
N
[2012-04-26 21:26:19 +0200] speps:
> So, from the beginning of my Internet experience, I never referenced to
> myself through my real name/life, but using a nickname, a digital identity.
Also, your IP address is in the headers.
Anyhow, there is no anonymity debate: different master key holders
ve
David Adler wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Uli Armbruster wrote:
> ...
> > I use many of speps' packages and they are brilliant! In case there
> > are mistakes, he's very responsive and polite and fixes it very fast.
> > To be honest, I've been waiting for this application for some time
speps wrote:
> I followed the whole discussion on ML, as it is of my interest,
> and I must admit the Xyne presence in the Arch team was always a
> good point for me to assert the possibility of contributing "officially"
> and "anonymously" at the same time, in the hope that is not just an
> excep
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Uli Armbruster wrote:
...
> I use many of speps' packages and they are brilliant! In case there
> are mistakes, he's very responsive and polite and fixes it very fast.
> To be honest, I've been waiting for this application for some time :)
Being another long-time u
On 27 April 2012 03:26, speps wrote:
> Since I'm involved into the Arch Audio project by submitting several build
> scripts and binary packages to its repository, I'd surely add the most
> popular
> in [community] (ex. supercollider, csound, pd, lv2 plugins), and I would
> help Ray Rashif maintai
Thorsthen is your sponsor? That alone is convincing me, ahah!
More seriously, I recognise some nice packages in your list as well as your
username I've seen here and there from the archives. You've done a good job so
far and I'm willing to give you a chance to do even more for this community.
G
* Thorsten Töpper [26.04.2012 21:19]:
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 21:26:19 +0200
> speps wrote:
>
> > I postponed this task too many times in latest months.
> >
> > My application is an extract of the conversations between me and
> > my sponsor, Thorsten Töpper, after his proposal in the end of 2011.
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 21:26:19 +0200
speps wrote:
> I postponed this task too many times in latest months.
>
> My application is an extract of the conversations between me and
> my sponsor, Thorsten Töpper, after his proposal in the end of 2011.
>
I confirm my sponsorship, let the discussion per
I postponed this task too many times in latest months.
My application is an extract of the conversations between me and
my sponsor, Thorsten Töpper, after his proposal in the end of 2011.
-
Introduction
-
I thought a lot of times about applying for becoming a TU before,
and it would be surely a
On 17/04/12 09:18 AM, Sergej Pupykin wrote:
> At Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:54:12 -0700,
> Connor Behan wrote:
>> Hello Archers. This is my application to be a trusted user and my
>> sponsor is Sergej Pupykin. My name on all Arch projects is ConnorBehan.
> Discussion looks finished, I have started voti
At Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:54:12 -0700,
Connor Behan wrote:
>
> Hello Archers. This is my application to be a trusted user and my
> sponsor is Sergej Pupykin. My name on all Arch projects is ConnorBehan.
Discussion looks finished, I have started voting in AUR.
pgpHqVvVqrA37.pgp
Description: PGP
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Connor Behan wrote:
> Yes, I switched all my lists to digest mode awhile ago when I was
> spending more and more time deleting emails. Do you feel strongly that I
> should switch back?
Yes, please switch back for the lists you're going to be participating in.
On 14/04/12 11:02 AM, Florian Pritz wrote:
> On 14.04.2012 10:23, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote:
>> On 04/14/2012 10:19 AM, Florian Pritz wrote:
>>> On 14.04.2012 07:34, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote:
It will be great if you'll start using mail client with threading support.
>>> There are Referenc
On 13.04.2012 04:54, Connor Behan wrote:
> Hello Archers. This is my application to be a trusted user and my
> sponsor is Sergej Pupykin.
Yes, I sponsor him.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 14.04.2012 10:23, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote:
> On 04/14/2012 10:19 AM, Florian Pritz wrote:
>> On 14.04.2012 07:34, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote:
>>> It will be great if you'll start using mail client with threading support.
>>
>> There are References and In-Reply-To headers (in this mail, not
On 04/14/2012 10:19 AM, Florian Pritz wrote:
> On 14.04.2012 07:34, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote:
>> It will be great if you'll start using mail client with threading support.
>
> There are References and In-Reply-To headers (in this mail, not the
> previous), but they point to mail from mailman.
>
On 14.04.2012 07:34, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote:
> It will be great if you'll start using mail client with threading support.
There are References and In-Reply-To headers (in this mail, not the
previous), but they point to mail from mailman.
Do you get digests instead of separate mails?
--
Flo
It will be great if you'll start using mail client with threading support.
--
Bartłomiej Piotrowski
Arch Linux Trusted User
http://archlinux.org/
On 13/04/12 04:16 AM, Ike Devolder wrote:
> Op vrijdag 13 april 2012 18:00:08 schreef Allan McRae:
>> On 13/04/12 17:51, Connor Behan wrote:
>>> How's this? The author of this signed message and the person who
>>> uploaded the key fingerprint to
>>> http://demohack.sourceforge.net/contact.html and
Op vrijdag 13 april 2012 13:30:23 schreef Florian Pritz:
> On 13.04.2012 09:38, Ike Devolder wrote:
> > This would also imply we can remove the eleventh point of:
> > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/New_AUR_TU_guidelines#TODO_list_for_n
> > ew_Trusted_Users
> Don't remove it, but replace it wi
On 13.04.2012 09:38, Ike Devolder wrote:
> This would also imply we can remove the eleventh point of:
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/New_AUR_TU_guidelines#TODO_list_for_new_Trusted_Users
Don't remove it, but replace it with something like "Get your/a GPG key
signed by the master keys".
>
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 3:43 AM, Kaiting Chen wrote:
> Agreed; it's nice to have a single centralized document that delineates
> the procedure. I don't think that we should remove the eleventh point of
>
>
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/New_AUR_TU_guidelines#TODO_list_for_new_Trusted_User
Op vrijdag 13 april 2012 18:00:08 schreef Allan McRae:
> On 13/04/12 17:51, Connor Behan wrote:
> > How's this? The author of this signed message and the person who
> > uploaded the key fingerprint to
> > http://demohack.sourceforge.net/contact.html and
> > http://mebitag.sourceforge.net/contact.ht
On 13/04/12 17:51, Connor Behan wrote:
> How's this? The author of this signed message and the person who
> uploaded the key fingerprint to
> http://demohack.sourceforge.net/contact.html and
> http://mebitag.sourceforge.net/contact.html solemnly swears that he
> wrote the TU application that was ju
How's this? The author of this signed message and the person who
uploaded the key fingerprint to
http://demohack.sourceforge.net/contact.html and
http://mebitag.sourceforge.net/contact.html solemnly swears that he
wrote the TU application that was just sent and hopes that you do not
think less of h
Agreed; it's nice to have a single centralized document that delineates the
procedure. I don't think that we should remove the eleventh point of
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/New_AUR_TU_guidelines#TODO_list_for_new_Trusted_Users
however as it is perfectly conceivable for a TU to use a diff
Hi,
after my own application and seeing it again i would like to propose an update
to the TU Bylaws giving more information that the application should be gpg
signed with the addidional publication of the public key.
This would also imply we can remove the eleventh point of:
https://wiki.archli
Your application should be a PGP-signed email and your key should be
uploaded on your website, github etc to verify that you are who you say
you are :)
--
Ionuț
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
You seem very devoted to opensource and its community; Arch is the most
promising project I've seen in a while. I would gladly want someone like you to
make the user/dev experience worthwhile.
+1 You got my vote here.
On Apr 12, 2012, at 8:54 PM, Connor Behan wrote:
> Hello Archers. This is m
Hello Archers. This is my application to be a trusted user and my
sponsor is Sergej Pupykin. My name on all Arch projects is ConnorBehan.
Some of you may remember me fondly from a conversation or two, others
perhaps not so fondly, and I'm sure some of you don't know me at all!
Anyway, since I
Op 14-03-12 21:46, Laurent Carlier schreef:
> Le 14 mars 2012 14:56, Massimiliano Torromeo <
> massimiliano.torro...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:36 PM, SanskritFritz
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Alexander Rødseth
>> wrote:
The voting period for Györ
Le 14 mars 2012 14:56, Massimiliano Torromeo <
massimiliano.torro...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:36 PM, SanskritFritz
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Alexander Rødseth
> wrote:
> >> The voting period for György Balló (City-busz) has ended and I'm
> >> pleased t
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:36 PM, SanskritFritz wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Alexander Rødseth wrote:
>> The voting period for György Balló (City-busz) has ended and I'm
>> pleased to welcome him as a new TU.
>
> Go hungarians! :)
> ngaba and city-busz, is there any other hungarian in
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Alexander Rødseth wrote:
> The voting period for György Balló (City-busz) has ended and I'm
> pleased to welcome him as a new TU.
Go hungarians! :)
ngaba and city-busz, is there any other hungarian in the team?
Congratulations, György!
On Wednesday 14 March 2012 14:06:01 Alexander Rødseth wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> The voting period for György Balló (City-busz) has ended and I'm
> pleased to welcome him as a new TU.
>
> The results are:
> yes: 18
> no: 1
> abstain: 3
> total: 22 (quorum has been met)
>
> Instructions for new TU
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Alexander Rødseth wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> The voting period for György Balló (City-busz) has ended and I'm
> pleased to welcome him as a new TU.
>
> The results are:
> yes: 18
> no: 1
> abstain: 3
> total: 22 (quorum has been met)
>
> Instructions for new TUs are
Hi everyone,
The voting period for György Balló (City-busz) has ended and I'm
pleased to welcome him as a new TU.
The results are:
yes: 18
no: 1
abstain: 3
total: 22 (quorum has been met)
Instructions for new TUs are available at our wiki and I'll also
provide him with additional info (including
Am 13.03.2012 19:23, schrieb Stéphane Gaudreault:
> Ike, please follow these steps [1].
>
> [...]
>
> [1]
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/New_Trusted_User_Checklist#TODO_list_for_new_Trusted_Users
This list is missing an important (new) step: The PGP key needs to be
verified by at least 3
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 9:38 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> On 13/03/12 19:23, Stéphane Gaudreault wrote:
>>
>> Hi TUs,
>>
>> The voting period for Ike Devolder has ended. Please welcome Ike as a TU
>> :)
>>
>> The results are:
>>
>> Yes : 18
>> No : 1
>> Abstain : 2
>> Total : 21 (Quorum has been
On 13/03/12 19:23, Stéphane Gaudreault wrote:
Hi TUs,
The voting period for Ike Devolder has ended. Please welcome Ike as a TU :)
The results are:
Yes : 18
No : 1
Abstain : 2
Total : 21 (Quorum has been met)
Ike, please follow these steps [1].
Cheers,
Stéphane
[1]
https://wiki.archlinux.or
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 02:23:10PM -0400, Stéphane Gaudreault wrote:
> Hi TUs,
>
> The voting period for Ike Devolder has ended. Please welcome Ike as a TU :)
>
> The results are:
>
> Yes : 18
> No : 1
> Abstain : 2
> Total : 21 (Quorum has been met)
>
> Ike, please follow these steps [1].
>
>
Thomas S Hatch wrote:
> Congratulations Ike! I am excited to see more TUs working on the world best
> Linux Distro!
I didn't even know we were supposed to be working on Hannah Montana Linux.
Someone should probably add that to the top of the TU guidelines. I've only
been focused on Arch the whole
On 03/13/2012 11:23 AM, Stéphane Gaudreault wrote:
> Hi TUs,
>
> The voting period for Ike Devolder has ended. Please welcome Ike as a
> TU :)
>
> The results are:
>
> Yes : 18
> No : 1
> Abstain : 2
> Total : 21 (Quorum has been met)
>
> Ike, please follow these steps [1].
>
> Cheers,
>
> Stéphane
Congrats and welcome!
++
On 13.03.2012 19:23, Stéphane Gaudreault wrote:
> Hi TUs,
>
> The voting period for Ike Devolder has ended. Please welcome Ike as a TU :)
Congrats and hopefully see you soon in IRC.
--
Florian Pritz
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Congratulations!
Don't forget to take a look on our orphan list! :)
--
Bartłomiej Piotrowski
Arch Linux Trusted User
http://archlinux.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Stéphane Gaudreault
wrote:
> Hi TUs,
>
> The voting period for Ike Devolder has ended. Please welcome Ike as a TU :)
>
> The results are:
>
> Yes : 18
> No : 1
> Abstain : 2
> Total : 21 (Quorum has been met)
>
> Ike, please follow these steps [1].
>
Congrats ike !
Congratulations Ike! I am excited to see more TUs working on the world best
Linux Distro!
- Thomas S Hatch
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Stéphane Gaudreault <
steph...@archlinux.org> wrote:
> Hi TUs,
>
> The voting period for Ike Devolder has ended. Please welcome Ike as a TU :)
>
> The resu
Congrats and welcome Ike. :)
--
Cordially,
Alexander Rødseth
Arch Linux Trusted User
(xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)
Stéphane Gaudreault wrote:
> Hi TUs,
>
> The voting period for Ike Devolder has ended. Please welcome Ike as a TU :)
Congrats, Ike!
*hands Ike complementary TU mug and t-shirt*
Hi TUs,
The voting period for Ike Devolder has ended. Please welcome Ike as a TU :)
The results are:
Yes : 18
No : 1
Abstain : 2
Total : 21 (Quorum has been met)
Ike, please follow these steps [1].
Cheers,
Stéphane
[1]
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/New_Trusted_User_Checklist#TODO_li
Hi,
Sorry for the delay, the vote is now open.
--
Cordially,
Alexander Rødseth
Arch Linux Trusted User
(xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)
On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 01:45:11 +0100
Alexander Rødseth wrote:
> Dear TUs,
>
> The discussion period for Balló György is over and the voting period
> starts now.
>
Ohm... Are you sure you opened the vote? I only see the one for Ike...
--
Jabber: atsut...@freethoughts.de Blog: http://atsutane.fre
Dear TUs,
The discussion period for Balló György is over and the voting period starts now.
--
Best regards,
Alexander Rødseth
Arch Linux Trusted User
(xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)
Dear TUs,
Judgement period has come for Ike Devolder. Please vote:
https://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=54
As discussed previously, I will not participate in the vote.
Cheers
Stéphane
Op 05-03-12 20:29, Justin Davis schreef:
> I like how Ike disarmed two potential flame war hijackings in one
> thread! Ike seems pretty cool.
>
thx i like being cool :p
--
Ike
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I like how Ike disarmed two potential flame war hijackings in one
thread! Ike seems pretty cool.
--
-Justin
Ike Devolder wrote:
> I would also like to call for more respect for each others opinions and
> stay away from the "Nobody cares", "it doesnt matter", "hate", ...
> Be constructive, help each other, all these harsh comments are brining a
> community in a downwards spiral of lesser respect, which c
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 07:51:20AM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 05/03/12 04:53, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Xyne wrote:
> >> Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Ike Devo
On 05/03/12 04:53, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Xyne wrote:
>> Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Ike Devolder
wrote:
> Op 03-03-12 16:41, Xyne schreef:
>> Ike Devo
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Xyne wrote:
> Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
>> > On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Ike Devolder
>> > wrote:
>> >> Op 03-03-12 16:41, Xyne schreef:
>> >>> Ike Devolder wrote:
>
>> >> Hi Xyne,
>> >>
>> >> In gen
Op 04-03-12 18:48, Xyne schreef:
> Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Ike Devolder
>>> wrote:
Op 03-03-12 16:41, Xyne schreef:
> Ike Devolder wrote:
>
Hi Xyne,
In general i find it a m
Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Ike Devolder
> > wrote:
> >> Op 03-03-12 16:41, Xyne schreef:
> >>> Ike Devolder wrote:
> >> Hi Xyne,
> >>
> >> In general i find it a mishap building in folders containing spa
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Ike Devolder wrote:
>> Op 03-03-12 16:41, Xyne schreef:
>>> Ike Devolder wrote:
>>>
>>> /snip
>>>
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?SeB=m&L=2&K=BlackIkeEagle
>>>
>>> Hi Ike,
>>>
>>> I too think
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Ike Devolder wrote:
> Op 03-03-12 16:41, Xyne schreef:
>> Ike Devolder wrote:
>>
>> /snip
>>
>>> [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?SeB=m&L=2&K=BlackIkeEagle
>>
>> Hi Ike,
>>
>> I too think that your PKGBUILDs look good. They're clean and well-structured.
>>
Op 03-03-12 16:41, Xyne schreef:
> Ike Devolder wrote:
>
> /snip
>
>> [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?SeB=m&L=2&K=BlackIkeEagle
>
> Hi Ike,
>
> I too think that your PKGBUILDs look good. They're clean and well-structured.
> The only issue I see is the lack of variable quoting, e.g. I'
Hello,
I'm going away for a job interview. I'll be gone from now until March
8.
-- Chris
On 4 March 2012 00:12, Ionut Biru wrote:
> Unity is only a Canonical project, not a project that can be used by anyone.
It's just about accessibility, so as to not deprive anyone and allow
no-one to say "there is no foo in Arch" :D
But I guess if it's that much PITA then it should be forgotten a
On 04/03/12 06:02, Bjoern Lindig wrote:
> Hi Xyne,
>
> this is the noop listening your conversations ...
>>
>> I too think that your PKGBUILDs look good. They're clean and
>> well-structured. The only issue I see is the lack of variable
>> quoting, e.g. I've seen this is many of them:
>>
>> make
On 03.03.2012 21:02, Bjoern Lindig wrote:
> Hi Xyne,
>
> this is the noop listening your conversations ...
>>
>> I too think that your PKGBUILDs look good. They're clean and
>> well-structured. The only issue I see is the lack of variable
>> quoting, e.g. I've seen this is many of them:
>>
>> m
Hi Xyne,
this is the noop listening your conversations ...
>
> I too think that your PKGBUILDs look good. They're clean and
> well-structured. The only issue I see is the lack of variable
> quoting, e.g. I've seen this is many of them:
>
> make DESTDIR=${pkgdir} install
>
> That will not work
luck!
Xiao-long Chen
> Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 17:13:11 +0100
> From: ballog...@gmail.com
> To: aur-general@archlinux.org
> Subject: Re: [aur-general]TU Application - György Balló
>
>
> > Is there a separate repo? Do you intend to start one otherwise? I
> > would
On 03/03/2012 04:15 PM, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
> On 3 March 2012 11:38, Balló György wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> thanks for the question.
>>
>>> I looked at your AUR packages and saw that you are maintaining the
>>> unity desktop. I never used this desktop environment, but as a
>>> curiosity is it somet
> Is there a separate repo? Do you intend to start one otherwise? I
> would really like to see unity accessible for Arch users.
Unity 2D is available in my [ayatana] repo[1] along with indicators. To
provide x86_64 packages, I'll need a build server.
Unity is a more difficult task, because it de
Ike Devolder wrote:
/snip
> [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?SeB=m&L=2&K=BlackIkeEagle
Hi Ike,
I too think that your PKGBUILDs look good. They're clean and well-structured.
The only issue I see is the lack of variable quoting, e.g. I've seen this is
many of them:
make DESTDIR=${pkgdir
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
> Is there a separate repo? Do you intend to start one otherwise? I
> would really like to see unity accessible for Arch users.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Unity ?
2012/3/2 Angel Velásquez :
> Hi Ike!
>
> I didn't get you by your name but by your nickname, oh yeah, as Allan
> said I had a good memory about you, so this is good ;).
I've seen the nickname around as well, but not sure about what really.
But that should be good after looking at a couple PKGBUILD
On 3 March 2012 11:38, Balló György wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for the question.
>
>> I looked at your AUR packages and saw that you are maintaining the
>> unity desktop. I never used this desktop environment, but as a
>> curiosity is it something you want to eventually bring into [community] ?
>
> I
Hi,
thanks for the question.
> I looked at your AUR packages and saw that you are maintaining the
> unity desktop. I never used this desktop environment, but as a
> curiosity is it something you want to eventually bring into [community] ?
I worked a lot on making Unity and indicators usable on A
Hi,
I'm also in favor of György.
He is the best candidate I have seen lately and his presentation is clean.
I would like someone like him around to help the community.
Also, if I pay attention to the other posts, my opinion is... the AUR is a
HELPER tool.
It's only used as a time saver, but it d
Le 2012-03-01 13:00, Balló György a écrit :
Hello everybody,
I'm applying to be a Trusted User.
I'm a 24 years old Hungarian web developer, and I'm using Arch Linux as my main
system since 2010 summer. Before that I used a Debian-based distro for one
year. In my free time I like surfing on th
Thanks for applying and best of luck. :)
--
Sincerely,
Alexander Rødseth
Arch Linux Trusted User
(xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:40:55 +1000
> schrieb Allan McRae :
>
> > Where is it written that you can't do that? PKGBUILDs are bash. Any
> > valid bash is a valid PKGBUILD.
>
> So, what if I would build a package which contains an .install file
>
Am Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:40:55 +1000
schrieb Allan McRae :
> Where is it written that you can't do that? PKGBUILDs are bash. Any
> valid bash is a valid PKGBUILD.
So, what if I would build a package which contains an .install file
with an `rm -Rf /` in its post_install() function and upload it to
Am Fri, 2 Mar 2012 18:49:47 +
schrieb Xyne :
> The choice
> of Bash was myopic and lazy in my opinion, and something that should
> be reversed as far as possible, not glorified.
Don't say that too loud, because Gentoo's ebuilds are principally bash,
too, but Gentoo has its own functions to al
Xyne wrote:
> Allan McRae wrote:
>
> > > Since when it is a good packaging quality to upload packages which
> > > can't be installed?
> >
> > They can be installed. Or do you mean can not be installed by an AUR
> > helper? In which case you are still wrong due to the extra dependency line.
>
Allan McRae wrote:
> > Since when it is a good packaging quality to upload packages which
> > can't be installed?
>
> They can be installed. Or do you mean can not be installed by an AUR
> helper? In which case you are still wrong due to the extra dependency line.
I think this point should b
On 02/03/12 23:40, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 02/03/12 23:16, Heiko Baums wrote:
>> Am Fri, 02 Mar 2012 22:01:59 +1000
>> schrieb Allan McRae :
>>
>>> I see what was done there... makedepends in split packages probably
>>> need to become depends when built as individual packages.
>>>
>>> @György: Le
This thread is kind of fun to read, from a sociological perspective :)
It is however sad when one considers that all the energy put into
writing these emails could have been put into either
- address AUR's shortcomings when it comes to split packages, or
- address the different AUR builders inabi
Am Fri, 02 Mar 2012 10:22:46 -0300
schrieb Angel Velásquez :
> Heiko,
>
> I've always had several discussions with you, now Gaetan, and many
> people seems to have disagree with your opinion.
If they disagree with my opinion, they can happily explain why. I
explained my concerns. But I only got
Le 2012-03-02 09:00, Peter Lewis a écrit :
On Friday 02 Mar 2012 13:03:47 Thomas Bächler wrote:
I always highlight that the Arch core developers usually don't interfere
with the affairs of the TU group. In that sense, the bylaws make sense
by saying you need to TU to sponsor him. However, the im
On Friday 02 Mar 2012 13:03:47 Thomas Bächler wrote:
> I always highlight that the Arch core developers usually don't interfere
> with the affairs of the TU group. In that sense, the bylaws make sense
> by saying you need to TU to sponsor him. However, the important part
> (voting) is done by TUs o
1201 - 1300 of 2660 matches
Mail list logo
