Re: [aur-general] TU application -- Santiago Torres-Arias

On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 03:35:52PM -0400, Santiago Torres-Arias wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Formalities first, Christian Rebischke (Shibumi) is sponsoring my application, > although I'd like to thank so many people for their feedback, help, guidance > and counsel in all-things-Arch*. > > My

Re: [aur-general] TU application -- Santiago Torres-Arias

On 07/30/2018 05:34 AM, Christian Rebischke via aur-general wrote: > Hi Eli, > Ehm no? According to our bylaws: > "Following the announcement, standard voting procedure commences with a > discussion period of 5 days, a quorum of 66%, and a voting period of 7 > days."[1] > > Santiago wrote his

Re: [aur-general] TU application -- Santiago Torres-Arias

On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 12:05:56AM -0400, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > On 07/28/2018 11:57 PM, Christian Rebischke via aur-general wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 03:35:52PM -0400, Santiago Torres-Arias wrote: > >> Hello everyone, > >> > >> Formalities first, Christian Rebischke

Re: [aur-general] TU application -- Santiago Torres-Arias

On 07/28/2018 11:57 PM, Christian Rebischke via aur-general wrote: > On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 03:35:52PM -0400, Santiago Torres-Arias wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> >> Formalities first, Christian Rebischke (Shibumi) is sponsoring my >> application, >> although I'd like to thank so many people for

Re: [aur-general] TU application -- Santiago Torres-Arias

On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 03:35:52PM -0400, Santiago Torres-Arias wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Formalities first, Christian Rebischke (Shibumi) is sponsoring my application, > although I'd like to thank so many people for their feedback, help, guidance > and counsel in all-things-Arch*. > > My

[aur-general] TU application -- Santiago Torres-Arias

> > Hello everyone, > > > > Formalities first, Christian Rebischke (Shibumi) is sponsoring my > > application, > > although I'd like to thank so many people for their feedback, help, guidance > > and counsel in all-things-Arch*. > > Apologies for being somewhat late with the ztrawchse review. >

Re: [aur-general] TU application -- Santiago Torres-Arias

On 07/22/2018 03:35 PM, Santiago Torres-Arias via aur-general wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Formalities first, Christian Rebischke (Shibumi) is sponsoring my application, > although I'd like to thank so many people for their feedback, help, guidance > and counsel in all-things-Arch*. Apologies

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Filipe Laíns

On 07/24/2018 04:05 PM, Dan Printzell wrote: > On July 17, 2018 8:50 pm, Dan Printzell wrote: >> On July 12, 2018 7:50 pm, Dan Printzell wrote: >>> I confirm my sponsorship. >>> >>> Let the discussion period begin! :) >> >> The discussion period is now over. Let the voting period begin! >> >> TUs

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Filipe Laíns

On July 17, 2018 8:50 pm, Dan Printzell wrote: On July 12, 2018 7:50 pm, Dan Printzell wrote: I confirm my sponsorship. Let the discussion period begin! :) The discussion period is now over. Let the voting period begin! TUs can cast their vote here: https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=106 --

Re: [aur-general] TU application -- Santiago Torres-Arias

On Sun 22.07.18 - 15:35, Santiago Torres-Arias via aur-general wrote: > - Orphaned packages (I'm a regular user of these): > - netctl (?! currently on core, so I suspect I can't maintain this > one) netctl is maintained by Jouke who maintains the netctl code. We only build and push

Re: [aur-general] TU application -- Santiago Torres-Arias

> I have adopted znc, because I didn't knew it was orphan. I have now > officially made > a calendar entry to look at orphans monthly. I'm glad to have you > co-maintaining, if > you get elected, however. I'm a hardcore user of znc as well. Ok! I'd gladly co-maintain it if I get elected :) >

Re: [aur-general] TU application -- Santiago Torres-Arias

Em julho 22, 2018 16:35 Santiago Torres-Arias via aur-general escreveu: - Orphaned packages (I'm a regular user of these): - giblib (currently on extra) - python-pylint (currently on extra) - uthash - znc - cvf - netctl (?! currently on core,

Re: [aur-general] TU application -- Santiago Torres-Arias

On 07/22/2018 03:35 PM, Christian Rebischke via aur-general wrote: > On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 03:35:52PM -0400, Santiago Torres-Arias wrote: sangy: dude, we know you're cool and all. No need to prove your creds by hacking shibumi so you can send his confirmation half a minute before your your

Re: [aur-general] TU application -- Santiago Torres-Arias

On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 03:35:52PM -0400, Santiago Torres-Arias wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Formalities first, Christian Rebischke (Shibumi) is sponsoring my application, > although I'd like to thank so many people for their feedback, help, guidance > and counsel in all-things-Arch*. > > My

[aur-general] TU application -- Santiago Torres-Arias

Hello everyone, Formalities first, Christian Rebischke (Shibumi) is sponsoring my application, although I'd like to thank so many people for their feedback, help, guidance and counsel in all-things-Arch*. My name is Santiago Torres-Arias[1], and I'm a Mexican PhD candidate from New York

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Filipe Laíns

On July 12, 2018 7:50 pm, Dan Printzell wrote: I confirm my sponsorship. Let the discussion period begin! :) The discussion period is now over. Let the voting period begin! TUs can cast their vote here: https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=106 -- Dan Printzell pgp1VsNDsC8Hz.pgp Description:

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Filipe Laíns

On 12/07/18, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > On to the ztrawhcse review! > > I gave Filipe some advice over IRC prior to his application. As a > result, many packages had their srcdir/pkgdir quoting fixed, or renamed > sources to cooperate with shared $SRCDEST, or fixed style nits with >

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Filipe Laíns

Hey, On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Michael Straube via aur-general wrote: >-DCAMKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR=lib ? Thank you! I will use that. I am more of a meson guy and this kind of isn't usually a problem. Now that I see, the solution is really simple and I feel a bit silly, ahah. >All the best and

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Filipe Laíns

Hey, On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 3:45 PM, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: >Very few people are "good enough" when I really get on a roll... I >generally consider it sufficient that people learn from my critiques, >fix them promptly, and incorporate that feedback into further efforts. > >The only

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Filipe Laíns

On 07/13/2018 10:11 AM, Filipe Laíns via aur-general wrote: > Hey, > > First of all I just want to say that I have 58 packages on AUR and most > of the PKGBUILDs (written by me) were written before I knew some of > this. I tried to update most of them but as it's a really monotonous > task, I

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Filipe Laíns

Am 13.07.2018 um 16:11 schrieb Filipe Laíns via aur-general: cm256cc: - are the mv commands needed or not? - depends on boost but may only need that as makedepends, see if runtime depends could get away with only boost-libs The package installs the 64bit libraries in 'lib64' and 32bit ones

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Filipe Laíns

Hey, First of all I just want to say that I have 58 packages on AUR and most of the PKGBUILDs (written by me) were written before I knew some of this. I tried to update most of them but as it's a really monotonous task, I missed some things. Eli, thanks for pointing them out. Also, most of these

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Filipe Laíns

Hey, First of all I just want to say that I have 58 packages on AUR and most of the PKGBUILDs (written by me) were written before I knew some of this. I tried to update most of them but as it's a really monotonous task, I missed some things. Eli, thanks for pointing them out. Also, most of these

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Filipe Laíns

On 07/12/2018 01:47 PM, Filipe Laíns via aur-general wrote: > Hello, > > My name is Filipe Laíns. > You might also know me by my alias, FFY00. > > I am applying to be a Trusted User with Dan Printzell's (Wild) sponsorship. It's always nice to see people eager to contribute more, good luck! >

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Filipe Laíns

On July 12, 2018 7:47 pm, Filipe Laíns via aur-general wrote: Hello, My name is Filipe Laíns. You might also know me by my alias, FFY00. I am applying to be a Trusted User with Dan Printzell's (Wild) sponsorship. Let's get to the part where you get to know me a bit more I am a Portuguese

[aur-general] TU Application - Filipe Laíns

Hello, My name is Filipe Laíns. You might also know me by my alias, FFY00. I am applying to be a Trusted User with Dan Printzell's (Wild) sponsorship. Let's get to the part where you get to know me a bit more I am a Portuguese student and I use Linux as my main operating system since 2013. I

Re: [aur-general] TU resignation

On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 09:03:02AM +0200, Pierre Neidhardt via aur-general wrote: > > I've stopped using Arch ever since I've switched to GuixSD[1] (a > functional-oriented distribution focusing on reproducible builds and > completely custimizable in Guile Scheme) and it's now quite clear that >

Re: [aur-general] TU resignation

On 05/31/18 at 09:03am, Pierre Neidhardt via aur-general wrote: > > I've stopped using Arch ever since I've switched to GuixSD[1] (a > functional-oriented distribution focusing on reproducible builds and > completely custimizable in Guile Scheme) and it's now quite clear that > there will be no

Re: [aur-general] TU resignation

Em maio 31, 2018 4:03 Pierre Neidhardt via aur-general escreveu: I've stopped using Arch ever since I've switched to GuixSD[1] (a functional-oriented distribution focusing on reproducible builds and completely custimizable in Guile Scheme) and it's now quite clear that there will be no coming

Re: [aur-general] TU resignation

Hi, On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 09:03:02AM +0200, Pierre Neidhardt via aur-general wrote: > - qutebrowser > - pdfjs (optional for qutebrowser) > - python-pypeg2 (require by qutebrowser) As qutebrowser's upstream, I'd be happy to maintain those in the AUR if no TU steps up to continue maintaining

[aur-general] TU resignation

I've stopped using Arch ever since I've switched to GuixSD[1] (a functional-oriented distribution focusing on reproducible builds and completely custimizable in Guile Scheme) and it's now quite clear that there will be no coming back. My involvement in this new project and in others (Emacs, Next

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Robin Broda

On 03/07/2018 04:16 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote: > Discussion period is over, time to cast your votes, everyone! > > https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=105 The voting period is over and the results are in! Yes No Abstain Total Voted Participation 23 8 14 45

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Robin Broda

On 07.03.2018 23:29, Morten Linderud via aur-general wrote: >> Please tell them to email complai...@archlinux.org > > You are mistaken. The mail has been deprecated in favor of > /dev/n...@archlinux.org That has been moved to devn...@archlinux.org because that's easier to write on a phone.

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Robin Broda

On 03/07/2018 05:29 PM, Morten Linderud via aur-general wrote: > On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 05:21:39PM -0500, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: >> On 03/07/2018 05:15 PM, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: Eli Schwartz via aur-general hat am 7. März 2018 um

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Robin Broda

On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 05:21:39PM -0500, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > On 03/07/2018 05:15 PM, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: > >> Eli Schwartz via aur-general hat am 7. März > >> 2018 um 22:16 geschrieben: > >> > >> Discussion period is over, time to cast

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Robin Broda

On 03/07/2018 05:15 PM, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: >> Eli Schwartz via aur-general hat am 7. März 2018 >> um 22:16 geschrieben: >> >> Discussion period is over, time to cast your votes, everyone! >> >> https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=105 >> > I've cast my vote

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Robin Broda

> Eli Schwartz via aur-general hat am 7. März 2018 > um 22:16 geschrieben: > > Discussion period is over, time to cast your votes, everyone! > > https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=105 > I've cast my vote the moment I saw this email. Last time I didn't, I got an angry

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Robin Broda

On 03/02/2018 11:50 AM, Eli Schwartz wrote: > On 03/02/2018 11:34 AM, Robin Broda via aur-general wrote: >> Interestingly enough, the signature went bad after transit. >> This message should verify fine. >> >> Regards, >> Rob >> >> On 03/02/2018 05:16 PM, Robin Broda via aur-general wrote: >>>

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Robin Broda

On 03/05/2018 05:27 PM, Levente Polyak via aur-general wrote: > On 03/05/2018 05:20 PM, Robin Broda via aur-general wrote: >> On 03/05/2018 05:11 PM, Levente Polyak via aur-general wrote: >> >>> On 03/02/2018 08:09 PM, Robin Broda via aur-general wrote: [...] >>> You're welcome. >>> >>> >>>

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Robin Broda

On 03/05/2018 05:20 PM, Robin Broda via aur-general wrote: > On 03/05/2018 05:11 PM, Levente Polyak via aur-general wrote: > >> On 03/02/2018 08:09 PM, Robin Broda via aur-general wrote: >>> On 03/02/2018 06:17 PM, Levente Polyak via aur-general wrote: find some notes related to your

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Robin Broda

On 03/05/2018 05:11 PM, Levente Polyak via aur-general wrote: > On 03/02/2018 08:09 PM, Robin Broda via aur-general wrote: >> On 03/02/2018 06:17 PM, Levente Polyak via aur-general wrote: >>> find some notes related to your packages: >>> >>> [...] >>> >> Thanks for the feedback! >> >> Regards, >>

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Robin Broda

On 03/02/2018 08:09 PM, Robin Broda via aur-general wrote: > On 03/02/2018 06:17 PM, Levente Polyak via aur-general wrote: >> find some notes related to your packages: >> >> [...] >> > Thanks for the feedback! > > Regards, > Rob > You're welcome. BTW: How are you tracking upstream updated so

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Robin Broda

On 03/04/2018 03:02 PM, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > On 03/03/2018 05:50 PM, Nico via aur-general wrote: >>> After becoming a TU, I'd like to look into promoting a couple of >>> packages from the AUR over time, including but not limited to >>> `rutorrent`, `psensor`, `glava` (currently

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Robin Broda

On 03/03/2018 05:50 PM, Nico via aur-general wrote: >> After becoming a TU, I'd like to look into promoting a couple of >> packages from the AUR over time, including but not limited to >> `rutorrent`, `psensor`, `glava` (currently `glava-git`, waiting for >> tagged releases), `gtkhash`, `streem`,

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Robin Broda

On 2018-03-03 23:50, Nico via aur-general wrote: > I might be wrong, but dont we require to have at least 10 votes on AUR > to move a package to [community]? In this case none of your packges has > more than 6 votes at the time of writing this. There is also a rule > about >=1% popularity on

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Robin Broda

On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 05:16:52PM +0100, Robin Broda via aur-general wrote: > Hello, > > I'm Robin 'coderobe' Broda, born in '99, and I'm writing to become a > Trusted User. > > [SNIP] Yo Robin! Super happy to see you applying for TU, and I appreciate the support you have been doing on IRC.

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Robin Broda

On 03/02/2018 05:16 PM, Robin Broda via aur-general wrote: > Hello, > > I'm Robin 'coderobe' Broda, born in '99, and I'm writing to become a > Trusted User. > I've been an Arch user since ~2014, using it on several devices > including most of my servers. I'm more or less active on IRC, very >

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Robin Broda

On 03/02/2018 02:09 PM, Robin Broda via aur-general wrote: >> - /usr/bin/indicator-sysmonitor invokes stuff and imports py files >> provided in usr/lib. This can result in untracked file creations >> if the application is run as root. cache files should be created >> before packaging, but

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Robin Broda

On 03/02/2018 06:17 PM, Levente Polyak via aur-general wrote: > On 03/02/2018 05:16 PM, Robin Broda via aur-general wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm Robin 'coderobe' Broda, born in '99, and I'm writing to become a >> Trusted User. > Hi Robin, > > good luck. Thanks! > You can already start helping with

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Robin Broda

On 03/02/2018 05:16 PM, Robin Broda via aur-general wrote: > Hello, > > I'm Robin 'coderobe' Broda, born in '99, and I'm writing to become a > Trusted User. Hi Robin, good luck. You can already start helping with reproducible build stuff, feel free to ask for advice in #archlinux-reproducible

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Robin Broda

On 03/02/2018 11:34 AM, Robin Broda via aur-general wrote: > Interestingly enough, the signature went bad after transit. > This message should verify fine. > > Regards, > Rob > > On 03/02/2018 05:16 PM, Robin Broda via aur-general wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm Robin 'coderobe' Broda, born in '99,

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Robin Broda

Interestingly enough, the signature went bad after transit. This message should verify fine. Regards, Rob On 03/02/2018 05:16 PM, Robin Broda via aur-general wrote: > Hello, > > I'm Robin 'coderobe' Broda, born in '99, and I'm writing to become a > Trusted User. > I've been an Arch user since

[aur-general] TU Application - Robin Broda

Hello, I'm Robin 'coderobe' Broda, born in '99, and I'm writing to become a Trusted User. I've been an Arch user since ~2014, using it on several devices including most of my servers. I'm more or less active on IRC, very interested in open-source development[0], federated networks, & reproducible

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On Feb 28, 2018 08:40, "Eli Schwartz via aur-general" < aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote: On 02/21/2018 07:06 AM, Eli Schwartz wrote: > Anyway, the voting period has now officially begun, so cast your votes > everyone! https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=104 Voting period is over, and the results

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On 02/21/2018 07:06 AM, Eli Schwartz wrote: > Anyway, the voting period has now officially begun, so cast your votes > everyone! https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=104 Voting period is over, and the results are in! Yes No Abstain Total Voted Participation 23 7 8

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On 02/12/2018 03:30 PM, Brad Fanella via aur-general wrote: > On 02/12/2018 06:52 AM, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: >> Brad, please create a new AUR account, as you will need one to interact >> with the AUR for various TU duties if you are re-elected. (This is >> independent of whether you

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On 02/12/18 at 05:15pm, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > On 02/12/2018 05:04 PM, Brad Fanella via aur-general wrote: > > Turns out that since my application, Antonio Rojas has stepped up to the > > plate and updated MATE to version 1.20.0, so props to him! The whole > > group is still

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On 02/12/2018 04:15 PM, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > I thought the idea here was to see what you are interested in, not what > I'm interested in. :p True, true. The packaging scene right now is both a blessing and a curse: very few packages exist that don't have a maintainer, but at the

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On 02/12/2018 05:04 PM, Brad Fanella via aur-general wrote: > Turns out that since my application, Antonio Rojas has stepped up to the > plate and updated MATE to version 1.20.0, so props to him! The whole > group is still orphaned though, so I would plan on pushing out future > updates when they

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

El Mon, 12 Feb 2018 16:04:24 -0600, Brad Fanella via aur-general escribió: > > Turns out that since my application, Antonio Rojas has stepped up to the > plate and updated MATE to version 1.20.0, so props to him! The whole > group is still orphaned though, so I would plan on pushing out future >

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On 02/12/2018 03:14 PM, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > Not as a general rule, no, but if the forum mods are feeling nice then > the forum software does allow it. :) > > Likewise, Bluewind can edit the bugtracker database. > > Perks of being friendly with the people in charge. :D Heh,

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On 02/12/2018 03:30 PM, Brad Fanella via aur-general wrote: > Per Eli's email, I have gone ahead and created a new AUR account under > the alias "cesura" (my standard nick for the past few years). For > clarity's sake, I've also made my bugtracker account under the same > name. Based on the BBS

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On 02/12/2018 06:52 AM, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > Brad, please create a new AUR account, as you will need one to interact > with the AUR for various TU duties if you are re-elected. (This is > independent of whether you maintain *any* packages in the AUR, which I > hope you will

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On 02/12/2018 04:36 AM, Christian Rebischke via aur-general wrote: > Hello everybody, > I kind of feel uncomfortable with this. I think that somebody who has > resigned, is not able to sign his mails and seems to ignore requests of > doing so, should apply over the normal way like all others do.

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 04:18:45AM -0600, Brad Fanella via aur-general wrote: > I respect that decision and will proceed with the standard application > process, proper signatures and all. :) Thanks, I just wanted to be sure that we atleast vote about your re-application and it's nice btw that

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

chris.rebisc...@archlinux.org> wrote: Well, you could at least starting signing your mails with the next email, even if it is a new GPG key. It's something that we expect from TU-Applicants.. and I see no reason why you should excluded from this expectation. That maybe sounds a little bit harsh,

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

2018. 02. 12, 03.52, Brad Fanella via aur-general ezt írta: > Yes I do. I've just gone ahead and updated my bug tracker account to > reflect this, thank you. Thanks! :) Then I think the next step is to create a new account on AUR, add your PGP fingerprint to your aurweb profile, and post a PGP-

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 03:52:04AM -0600, Brad Fanella via aur-general wrote: > Frankly I'm not quite sure what that would prove. If I don't have a known > signature on record, signing these emails doesn't do anything to verify my > identity. To imply that I'm "ignoring requests" is a bit

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

Do you still have access to your bug tracker account? Can you update your email address here? https://bugs.archlinux.org/user/7923 Yes I do. I've just gone ahead and updated my bug tracker account to reflect this, thank you. wrote: [...] is not able to sign his

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 03:03:32AM -0600, Brad Fanella via aur-general wrote: > > It's been around in some incarnation since 2007, and you have a > > filled-in profile at > > https://www.archlinux.org/people/trusted-user-fellows/#bfanella > > > > So I assumed you must have at one point had access

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

2018. 02. 12, 01.28, Brad Fanella via aur-general: > I'm not sure that would clear up doubts about malicious intent. Do you still have access to your bug tracker account? Can you update your email address here? https://bugs.archlinux.org/user/7923 -- György Balló Trusted User signature.asc

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

> It's been around in some incarnation since 2007, and you have a > filled-in profile at > https://www.archlinux.org/people/trusted-user-fellows/#bfanella > > So I assumed you must have at one point had access to it, even if > it's > been long enough that you have forgotten and/or lost track --

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On 02/12/2018 02:28 AM, Brad Fanella via aur-general wrote: > Do you still have access to your archweb account? If so, you could > update that with your GPG key/new email address and post a confirmation > email signed with that key to this thread. :D > > > I don't believe Archweb was even active

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

Do you still have access to your archweb account? If so, you could update that with your GPG key/new email address and post a confirmation email signed with that key to this thread. :D I don't believe Archweb was even active when I was a TU, sadly. :( I suppose the worst-case scenario would

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On 02/11/2018 02:54 PM, Brad Fanella via aur-general wrote: >> * The originally sent email does not match the email Brad applied >> with >> in 2010. [1] >> * There is no GPG signature, neither on the current application or >> the >> 2010 application, as to remove doubts. >> * The "itsbrad212"

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On 11/02/18 at 01:54pm, Brad Fanella via aur-general wrote: * The originally sent email does not match the email Brad applied with in 2010. [1] * There is no GPG signature, neither on the current application or the 2010 application, as to remove doubts. * The "itsbrad212" account is no

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

> * The originally sent email does not match the email Brad applied > with > in 2010. [1] > * There is no GPG signature, neither on the current application or > the > 2010 application, as to remove doubts. > * The "itsbrad212" account is no longer present on AUR. > * The website on the

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Ivy Foster

On 10 Feb 2018, at 1:02 +0100, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: > the proposal has been accepted. Congratulations! Awesome! Thanks, y'all. Ivy signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Ivy Foster

On 02/09/2018 07:02 PM, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: > On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 12:12:44AM +0100, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 03:53:07PM -0600, Ivy Foster wrote: >>> On 26 Jan 2018, at 10:31 +0100, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: Note: If possible

Re: [aur-general] TU for moving DDNet to community?

On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 11:58:57AM -0200, Rafael Fontenelle wrote: > 2018-02-08 13:45 GMT-02:00 Alad Wenter via aur-general > : > > It has 5 votes on AUR, so it doesn't look very popular on Arch. Typical > > guideline is at least 10 before uploading something to

Re: [aur-general] TU for moving DDNet to community?

2018-02-08 13:45 GMT-02:00 Alad Wenter via aur-general : > It has 5 votes on AUR, so it doesn't look very popular on Arch. Typical > guideline is at least 10 before uploading something to [community]. > > Alad Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought it is a soft

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Ivy Foster

On 10-02-18, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: > On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 12:12:44AM +0100, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 03:53:07PM -0600, Ivy Foster wrote: > > > On 26 Jan 2018, at 10:31 +0100, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: > > > > Note: If possible please

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Ivy Foster

On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 12:12:44AM +0100, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 03:53:07PM -0600, Ivy Foster wrote: > > On 26 Jan 2018, at 10:31 +0100, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: > > > Note: If possible please add a short reply with a GPG signature. > > > > My

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

Alad Wenter via aur-general writes: > * The originally sent email does not match the email Brad applied with > in 2010. [1] > * There is no GPG signature, neither on the current application or the > 2010 application, as to remove doubts. > * The "itsbrad212" account

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 09:50:23PM +0100, Marcin Wieczorek wrote: > Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general writes: > > I'm not sure if, in this case, he would need a sponsor or not. I don't > > think we need to amend the bylaws to add this special case for a returning > >

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general writes: > I'm not sure if, in this case, he would need a sponsor or not. I don't > think we need to amend the bylaws to add this special case for a returning > TU, but I do think the standard procedure should be followed. One of you

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

Em fevereiro 9, 2018 13:29 Alad Wenter via aur-general escreveu: It seems we have no clause in the TU Bylaws [1] on what to do if a Fellow wants to resume his position as TU. That said, I doubt any of us would object when we consider your email as the "application" and simply start the vote

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 01:25:05AM -0500, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > On 02/09/2018 01:00 AM, Brad Fanella via aur-general wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Perhaps this is a bit unorthodox, but in 2011 I resigned from my post > > as a TU for personal and time-related reasons [1]. Coming up on

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On 02/09/2018 01:00 AM, Brad Fanella via aur-general wrote: > Hi all, > > Perhaps this is a bit unorthodox, but in 2011 I resigned from my post > as a TU for personal and time-related reasons [1]. Coming up on almost > 7 years later, I'm still an avid Arch user, and have struck a balance > in my

[aur-general] TU (re-)Application

Hi all, Perhaps this is a bit unorthodox, but in 2011 I resigned from my post as a TU for personal and time-related reasons [1]. Coming up on almost 7 years later, I'm still an avid Arch user, and have struck a balance in my life where I'm much more capable of contributing to open-source projects

Re: [aur-general] TU for moving DDNet to community?

On 02/08/2018 10:45 AM, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: > On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 12:44:27PM -0200, Rafael Fontenelle wrote: >> Hello, >> >> DDNet is a very fun sidescrolling game, similar to Teeworlds (DDNet is >> actually a mod of Teeworlds). Since Teeworlds's development is very >> slow and

Re: [aur-general] TU for moving DDNet to community?

On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 3:44 PM, Rafael Fontenelle wrote: > Is there a TU that would like to adopt it and move it to community repo? archlinuxcn actually carries it. Not sure if that is enough.

Re: [aur-general] TU for moving DDNet to community?

On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 12:44:27PM -0200, Rafael Fontenelle wrote: > Hello, > > DDNet is a very fun sidescrolling game, similar to Teeworlds (DDNet is > actually a mod of Teeworlds). Since Teeworlds's development is very > slow and DDNet's development is very active, a lot of players migrated >

[aur-general] TU for moving DDNet to community?

Hello, DDNet is a very fun sidescrolling game, similar to Teeworlds (DDNet is actually a mod of Teeworlds). Since Teeworlds's development is very slow and DDNet's development is very active, a lot of players migrated to DDNet, which allows to play both gametypes of Teeworlds and many others of

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Ivy Foster

On February 2, 2018 12:40:57 AM GMT+01:00, Ivy Foster wrote: > >For cgo, since upstream pulled in the patches I submitted, LDFLAGS are >properly picked up and we have full relro. > >libbulletml was a bit tougher. I wound up throwing out Debian's >patches to upstream's Makefile

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Ivy Foster

On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 03:53:07PM -0600, Ivy Foster wrote: > On 26 Jan 2018, at 10:31 +0100, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: > > Note: If possible please add a short reply with a GPG signature. > > My mistake! Here's my official, signed reply. > The discussion period is over. Let the votes

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Ivy Foster

On 01 Feb 2018, at 8:29 +0100, Levente Polyak via aur-general wrote: > On January 30, 2018 11:37:42 PM GMT+01:00, Ivy Foster > wrote: > >I'll have some time free tomorrow to get you a proper answer and/or > >fix; for now, I'm just letting you know I got your email! > Hey,

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Ivy Foster

On January 30, 2018 11:37:42 PM GMT+01:00, Ivy Foster wrote: >I'll have some time free tomorrow to get you a proper answer and/or >fix; for now, I'm just letting you know I got your email! Hey, any news from respecting LDFLAGS and if needed just purge parts of it? I'm

Re: [aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH] Clarify the process for Special Removal of an inactive TU

On 01/24/2018 11:18 AM, Eli Schwartz wrote: > On 01/23/2018 12:54 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote: >> On 01/18/2018 06:18 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote: >>> Not everything that is available only to an aurweb account of the >>> Trusted User type, qualifies as a TU "privilege" >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Ivy Foster

On 28 Jan 2018, at 9:33 +0100, Levente Polyak via aur-general wrote: > Hey, good luck and such Thanks! > Just noticed [some interesting points] I'll have some time free tomorrow to get you a proper answer and/or fix; for now, I'm just letting you know I got your email! Thanks, Ivy

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >