Hey,
Can we please wrap this up? I don't care if Tallero gets permanently
suspended or not. We've all seen this discussion before just 2 months ago
and it lasted for over two weeks and 39 emails.[1] Could we either just
ban Tallero for clear violation of the code of conduct or move the
discussion
Ey,
Something you might want to work on is differentiating between the
contexts of emails and chats. I see that you have Telegram configured as
your email client, so you may not realize that. Many people, including
me, try to contain everything we have to say in a single message instead
of tr
On 3/4/24 00:06, gromit wrote:
On 3/3/24 16:27, Carl Smedstad wrote:
Hi everyone,
My name is Carl, or carsme on AUR/IRC, and this is my application to
become a Package Maintainer.
This therefore marks the beginning of the discussion period which will
last for two weeks until 2024-03-17.
@Muflone and other PM's, is this acceptable language against someone in
the Arch/AUR community?
I must stress this was an hyperbole and I don't certainly think you're crazy
and I hope this can be sorted out somehow.
On 17 March 2024 21:38:21 GMT+01:00, Pellegrino Prevete
wrote:
>> Pellegrino continues to post more defamatory than relevant comments
on AUR pages in response to deletion requests instead of replying to the
relevant email thread (e.g. for python2-rpm - PRQ#57945 - which is binary
incompatible
On 17 March 2024 22:08:10 GMT+01:00, Pellegrino Prevete wrote about me:
>
>You are completely insane.
@Muflone and other PM's, is this acceptable language against someone in the
Arch/AUR community?
Pellegrino, please kindly stop this uncivilized behavior and hysteria.
You just sent another ten requests and you routinely send for deletion packages
you made me upgrade hours earlier.
You are completely insane.
Pellegrino, please kindly stop this uncivilized behavior and hysteria.
>Do you have received some insults from anyone? Could you please send me the
>details about that?
Just these huge walls of text on the public mailing list stating vague untruths
about me and assertions without evidence that I attacked him...
On 17 March 2024 21:38:21 GMT+01:00, Pellegrino Prevete
wrote:
>> Pellegrino continues to post more defamatory than relevant comments on AUR
>> pages in response to deletion requests instead of replying to the relevant
>> email thread (e.g. for python2-rpm - PRQ#57945 - which is binary
>> inco
This individual who has even the courage of replying has broken huge dependency
trees in front of me without any shame because of one liners in the main
packages, has ignored my private communications on logistic issues and
kept insulting me, has sent me packets of 10-20 out dates notifications
Il 17/03/24 21:38, Pellegrino Prevete ha scritto:
Pellegrino continues to post more defamatory than relevant comments
on AUR pages in response to deletion requests instead of replying to
the relevant email thread (e.g. for python2-rpm - PRQ#57945 - which
is binary incompatible with current li
Pellegrino continues to post more defamatory than relevant comments on
AUR pages in response to deletion requests instead of replying to the
relevant email thread (e.g. for python2-rpm - PRQ#57945 - which is binary
incompatible with current librpm.so in repo, and also unused on AUR):
[...]
Th
Re: (suspension of Pellegrino Prevete) - was: removal of yuzu from the
official repos – > Dear Muflone,
>
> because of that suspension I can't send code signed with my larger set
of keys to the aur without adding those same keys to my main account,
which I won't do.
> How after finally getting
Dear arch users,
it's months now i keep receiving harrassments from Marcello in requests
and comments.
I have been thinking for quite some months to start livestreaming aur
work sessions so everybody can
witness the issues I am having with Marcello.
I have already published one it which I updat
Pellegrino continues to post more defamatory than relevant comments on
AUR pages in response to deletion requests instead of replying to the
relevant email thread (e.g. for python2-rpm - PRQ#57945 - which is binary
incompatible with current librpm.so in repo, and also unused on AUR):
[...]
De
Dear Muflone,
because of that suspension I can't send code signed with my larger set
of keys to the aur without adding those same keys to my main account,
which I won't do.
How after finally getting in touch directly on the mailing list to
address your statement about an implied difference
Please kindly also remove Pellegrino's defamatory and disrespectful comment
against myself and @Muflone from the following AUR page:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-sound-recorder-git
Pellegrino continues to post more defamatory than relevant comments on AUR
pages in response to deletion requests instead of replying to the relevant
email thread (e.g. for python2-rpm - PRQ#57945 - which is binary incompatible
with current librpm.so in repo, and also unused on AUR):
O
Il 17/03/24 19:10, Pellegrino Prevete ha scritto:
>> Sending again as Gmail SPF policy denied my previous message
>>
>> > Forwarded Message
>> >> tallero [1] added the following comment to libisl25-static [2]:
>> >>
>> >> If Marcello Meszaros were a good maintainer
>> >> he would
Il 17/03/24 19:10, Pellegrino Prevete ha scritto:
Sending again as Gmail SPF policy denied my previous message
> Forwarded Message
>> tallero [1] added the following comment to libisl25-static [2]:
>>
>> If Marcello Meszaros were a good maintainer
>> he wouldn't need me to te
Ey,
> On Mar 17, 2024, at 2:36 AM, 7Ji wrote:
>
> > Maligning other FOSS projects or distributions, or any other operating
> > systems and their users is prohibited.
>
> The FOSS here only limits the scope before the first comma, not after. We
> should show respect towards other projects, FOS
Hi Morten and Torsten!
Replying to both of your emails in one go :)
> I notice you are using `-buildvcs=false` in some Go packages which should
> probably go into the package guidelines, but that is largely on me.
Great point. If I have time, I might sketch out an edit to the
guidelines to inclu
Hi all,
I've felt that it's necessary to summarize up my thoughts towards this
messy WeChat situation on the AUR.
Above all, the "wechat-uos-bwrap" is the first package containing the
new (and originally leaked on a BBS...) so called "Universal" version
on the AUR. And there a clearly eviden
24 matches
Mail list logo
