On 2022-08-16 08:30, T.J. Townsend via aur-general wrote:
I started using Arch around 2009 when we still had the curses installer,
rc.conf, hal... the good old days.
That was all awful and I much prefer the way things are now. :)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 2022-06-27 11:40, JafsZero via aur-general wrote:
Hello,
Recently I created my account for the AUR but when adding my email I
wrote incorrectly the domain as .xom instead of .com and I can't get
the verification link to continue with the account registration
process.
The username is
On 2022-05-07 15:06, Michael Kogan via aur-general wrote:
Hi guys,
The user InstallerLegacy [1] just adopted gnome-vfs [2], added himself,
including a contact address, to the PKGBUILD head without any further
changes, then orphaned the package again two minutes thereafter. Since the
account has
On 2022-04-22 09:58, Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote:
Recently vi-vim-symlink and neovim-symlinks were deleted from the AUR. These
are used by a lot of people to set up their systems, and a lot of people
want to know why [1]. They do not violate any AUR rules and have been available
in the
On 2022-03-31 10:06, Ben Denhartog via aur-general wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022, at 00:06, RobinCandau via aur-general wrote:
Can I adopt it or do you guys think that I should
leave that to someone else ?
There is absolutely no reason you would be unable to adopt it. Go wild.
Yeah, man, you
On 2022-02-19 01:20, kestraly via aur-general wrote:
Hi. I accidentally used my real name in astronciaiptv AUR commits (
https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/log/?h=astronciaiptv ), is it
possible to change it to Astroncia? Thanks.
Hi,
This is done.
signature.asc
Description: PGP
On 2022-02-07 16:07, Brett Cornwall via aur-general wrote:
On 2022-02-07 13:33, Ben Denhartog via aur-general wrote:
- buildozer
This seems to not use the AUR bazelisk package for building, but a
release from github? Why doesn't it use the AUR package?
I like to keep things simple for users
On 2021-12-17 01:05, silentnoodle via aur-general wrote:
hey all,
Today a package i co maintain (telegram-desktop-bin) was deleted
because "Package exists in official community repo", but since we used
prebuilt binary as source I did not think that would have applied.
So guess I'd just like
On 2022-01-01 05:33, Xyne via aur-general wrote:
On 2021-12-28 19:52 -0800
Brett Cornwall via aur-general wrote:
On 2021-12-29 03:27, eNV25 via aur-general wrote:
So in this case the package would be fine if it had a different name,
with a suffix like -upstream-bin, -official-bin or -static
On 2021-12-29 03:27, eNV25 via aur-general wrote:
So in this case the package would be fine if it had a different name,
with a suffix like -upstream-bin, -official-bin or -static-bin?
I am working with the others to see what we want to establish going
forward. Thanks for the patience.
On 2021-12-28 13:17, Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote:
On Tue, 28 Dec 2021 10:34:58 -0800
Brett Cornwall via aur-general wrote:
On 2021-12-28 12:08, Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote:
>On Tue, 28 Dec 2021 09:21:01 -0800
>Brett Cornwall via aur-general wrote:
>
>> Feel free
On 2021-12-28 19:07, Aleksandar Trifunovic via aur-general wrote:
On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 6:21 PM Brett Cornwall via aur-general
wrote:
On 2021-12-28 15:35, alad wrote:
>> And how am I supposed to have known that?
>>
>By looking at how the packages differ before simply accept
On 2021-12-28 12:08, Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote:
On Tue, 28 Dec 2021 09:21:01 -0800
Brett Cornwall via aur-general wrote:
Feel free to post an RFC. In the meantime, I'll continue to follow
the rules that have been established.
Established where? Upstream builds as -bin packages were
On 2021-12-28 15:35, alad wrote:
And how am I supposed to have known that?
By looking at how the packages differ before simply accepting the request?
I'm not going to compare binaries for each -bin request in the hopes
that there's some difference that makes it worthwhile to keep. It's the
On 2021-12-27 23:26, alad via aur-general wrote:
On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 07:01:08 -0800
Brett Cornwall via aur-general wrote:
On 2021-12-17 09:54, Filipe Laíns via aur-general wrote:
>On Fri, 2021-12-17 at 00:17 +0100, Justin Kromlinger via aur-general wrote:
>> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 01:05
On 2021-12-20 02:26, kiasoc5--- via aur-general wrote:
Please ignore my deletion request for linux-slim [1]. I thought the package
would be too niche but there are some users of it per the package comments.
Perhaps now is a good time to clarify what the wiki means by an "extremely
On 2021-12-17 09:54, Filipe Laíns via aur-general wrote:
On Fri, 2021-12-17 at 00:17 +0100, Justin Kromlinger via aur-general wrote:
On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 01:05:19 +0200
silentnoodle via aur-general wrote:
> hey all,
>
> Today a package i co maintain (telegram-desktop-bin) was deleted because
>
On 2021-12-16 16:58, Hunter Wittenborn via aur-general wrote:
I just received some emails about an hour ago that my 'makedeb-beta'
and 'makedeb-alpha' packages were deleted off of the AUR because they
were duplicates of 'makedeb' [1] [2]. I'm a bit confused on how exactly
they're "duplicates" of
On 2021-12-14 06:45, George Rawlinson via aur-general wrote:
On 21-12-14 00:07, Jan Kohnert via aur-general wrote:
Hi,
I'm maintaining the eccodes aur package and would like to enable some extra
tests in PKGBUILD. This can be done by downloading extra testdata and put that
into the main build
On 2021-11-30 15:55, zoorat via aur-general wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have been hunting for broken packages and filing deletion requests against
them for a while now...
Thanks for all of your help on that!
1. to TU's, how do you guys are checking if a package should be deleted or not
??
I want
On 2021-11-07 18:26, George Rawlinson via aur-general wrote:
What is the issue with handling one's own requests, specifcally?
I guess I don't see anything on the Wiki. I was under the impression
that we didn't service our own requests so that there were sanity
checks to keep us all in check.
On 2021-11-06 18:47, B via aur-general wrote:
Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I did not realize that it
was an issue to have a duplicate package in the AUR, and clearly see
now that I should not. I guess the action of deleting the package
makes more sense so I apologize for any
On 2021-11-06 16:05, B via aur-general wrote:
grawlinson made a deletion request on this package after I updated it
to v0.89.1, and they immediately approved their own request. The
community package is flagged out-of-date and is at v0.88.1.
First, this violates the AUR community guidelines that
On 2021-11-03 10:38, 山田ハヤオ wrote:
If the difference isn't important, what's important? This can lead to
the removal of all *-bin packages.
I have a screenshot that proves a clear difference, but it probably
has no effect.
Please review the submission guidelines:
On 2021-11-03 10:04, 山田ハヤオ via aur-general wrote:
Grawlinson, You should look at this mailing list. The filezilla-bin
package is completely different from the community one.
And that's easy to see by looking at the PKGBUILD source code.
The differences are not substantial, and this package
On 2021-10-30 18:49, Kr1ss via aur-general wrote:
Hi TUs,
could somebody pls take care of this new spam account and their
comment(s):
https://aur.archlinux.org/account/EngineeringQ
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/freetube-bin/#comment-833607
Thanks, cheers !
Kriss
Done. Thanks for
On 2021-09-12 20:54, David C. Rankin via aur-general wrote:
All,
Who authorized the removal of my packages gtkwrite, gtwrite-git and gtkate
from AUR? I check my dashboard regularly and there was nothing flagged and
there was no notice that the packages were going to be removed.
Why were they
On 2021-09-10 20:37, Jason Kercher via aur-general wrote:
Thank you Jonathan. I see a lot of the orphans are for arm64, but I don't
own an arm board. I assume makepkg can be configured for cross-compiling...
Is it okay to maintain packages that way?
You can safely ignore those. There are many,
On 2021-06-18 14:35, Morgan Adamiec via aur-general wrote:
Hey there!
I'm Morgan, Morganamilo in most places and I'd like to apply to become a
Trusted User with dvzrv and kpcyrd's sponsorship.
Hello, Morgan! Nice to meet you. :)
I've been an avid Arch user for the past 5 or so years. I
On 2021-05-21 11:54, Manhong Dai via aur-general wrote:
I know I will be the minority in this list. However, this statement
doesn't sound right to me if the patch file is applied to the original
source code.
Unlike the file PKGBUILD, a patch file constitutes a modified source
code because it
On 2021-05-17 21:16, Carsten Haitzler via aur-general wrote:
On Mon, 17 May 2021 13:32:26 + lawl via aur-general
said:
Hello
I'm the developer of NoiseTorch (https://github.com/lawl/NoiseTorch/).
I faithfully believe that the package "noisetorch" in the ArchLinux User
Repository ("AUR")
On 2021-04-11 03:21, George Rawlinson via aur-general wrote:
Hello everyone!
My name is George Rawlinson (grawlinson), and I am applying to be a
Trusted User. My sponsors are Morten Linderud (Foxboron) and
Sven-Hendrik Haase (svenstaro). They have evaluated my PKGBUILDs and
quickly come to the
On 2021-03-30 17:00, Fabius via aur-general wrote:
I'd like to ask, if possible, to delete the last commit (only last one)
from the following two packages, which i maintain:
1) ruby-pg-query (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-pg-query/)
2) ruby-sqlint
On 2021-02-18 07:12, Brett Cornwall wrote:
On 2021-02-18 09:53, Uwe Koloska via aur-general wrote:
Am 18.02.21 um 06:12 schrieb Jeff Hubbard via aur-general:
You make the correction and bump pkgrel, then push the changes. You can
bump pkgrel whenever you make changes to PKGBUILD, but there
On 2021-02-18 09:53, Uwe Koloska via aur-general wrote:
Am 18.02.21 um 06:12 schrieb Jeff Hubbard via aur-general:
You make the correction and bump pkgrel, then push the changes. You can
bump pkgrel whenever you make changes to PKGBUILD, but there aren't changes
to the software.
But this
35 matches
Mail list logo
