Re: got a laptop

I feel most users just want it to work, instead of maintaining it properly. So if you see out of date packages over 2-3 year that still "work" why not try to adopt them, instead of deleting them.

Re: Dealing with unclear upstream licensing and legality

ch project holding a controversial view. No one is accusing Arch of harboring gambling sites, or creating football hooliganism. As such I think the more laissez-faire approach to AUR moderation is in the best interest of the community as it matches closer to the CoC in sections https://terms.archlinu

Re: Dealing with unclear upstream licensing and legality

nder fair use clauses, abandonware is sometimes permitted to be distributed by not the copyright holders. I hope that the policies the AUR moderators and arch linux teams adopt are as permissive as possible without taking on any extra legal risk. In cases such as abgx360, I think we should keep i

AUR git history rewriting

If this is possible, would a TU who knows how to do this reply to me off-list? It is a matter of privacy, so I don't want a permanent record of my username and what I'm trying to remove left in the maling list. "In some cases rewriting the history of an AUR repository is required, for ex

Re: [aur-general] TU rename Bylaws amendment vote

On 04/09/2022 16:34, Konstantin Gizdov wrote: Hi, As per the TU Bylaws following the discussion to rename the Truster Users [1], the Trusted Users themselves must vote to approve the renaming. Hence, please, cast your vote on whether you agree the Bylaws be amended and the "Trusted User"

Re: [aur-general] Why was xenia-git orphaned immeditately?

user made no attempt to contact me about > the issue either by email or in the comments. If they had, I would have > responded as I usually do to issues in my packages. > > I am active on AUR and have been for over 10 years now. I usually can fix > a package issue in a day to a we

[aur-general] Why was xenia-git orphaned immeditately?

no attempt to contact me about the issue either by email or in the comments. If they had, I would have responded as I usually do to issues in my packages. I am active on AUR and have been for over 10 years now. I usually can fix a package issue in a day to a week. According to the arch wiki: > Orp

Re: [aur-general] Compiling with CMake

On 08/09/2022 20:59, Guilhem Saurel via aur-general wrote: Or even better cmake -B build -S . -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr cmake --build build Any opinions ? Should we put that on the wiki² ? Sorry, I jumped too fast. -.- It does look like this is the default recommendation according

Re: [aur-general] Compiling with CMake

On 08/09/2022 20:59, Guilhem Saurel via aur-general wrote: But I think we should let the end user choose if they want make or ninja, by letting them configure their CMAKE_GENERATOR environment variable Why? Isn't it the job of the PKGBUILD maintainer to maintain the PKGBUILD so the software

[aur-general] Compiling with CMake

Hi, In AUR, there are many packages with an old-school > mkdir build && cd build > cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr .. > make Other packages say they require ninja and use > mkdir build && cd build > cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr -G Ninja .. > ninja But

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - blakkheim

On 8/16/22 14:30, T.J. Townsend via aur-general wrote: Hello. I'd like to apply to become a trusted user. ... The voting period has ended. Yes 34 No 4 Abstain 15 Total 53 Participation 86.89% Result: Accepted Congratulations, you are now officially

Re: [aur-general] My package is being flagged as out-of-date falsely by a specific user repeatedly

On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 12:45:57PM +0200, Reza Jahanbakhshi via aur-general wrote: > Hi, hello. > This user https://aur.archlinux.org/account/bittin is flagging > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mesa-git as out-of-date repeatedly. > I asked him not to do so in the package p

[aur-general] My package is being flagged as out-of-date falsely by a specific user repeatedly

Hi, This user https://aur.archlinux.org/account/bittin is flagging https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mesa-git as out-of-date repeatedly. I asked him not to do so in the package page comments section. I also tried to email him directly and explained to him that this is a git package and it's not

[aur-general] TU rename Bylaws amendment vote

Hi, As per the TU Bylaws following the discussion to rename the Truster Users [1], the Trusted Users themselves must vote to approve the renaming. Hence, please, cast your vote on whether you agree the Bylaws be amended and the "Trusted User" role is renamed into "Package Maintainer". Vote

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - blakkheim

@TUs: less than 2 days left, please cast your votes on the new TU application https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/139 cheers, Levente OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Spam in AUR comments

On 31/08/2022 13:41, hawkeye116477--- via aur-general wrote: > Welcome, > I'd like to report spam in AUR comments at > aur.archlinux.org/packages/waterfox-classic-bin#comment-879702, written by > user Shijrat62. > (I haven't previously subscribed, so I'm sending again) Thank

[aur-general] Spam in AUR comments

Welcome, I'd like to report spam in AUR comments at aur.archlinux.org/packages/waterfox-classic-bin#comment-879702, written by user Shijrat62. (I haven't previously subscribed, so I'm sending again)

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - blakkheim

On 2022-08-16 08:30:48 (-0400), T.J. Townsend via aur-general wrote: > Hello. I'd like to apply to become a trusted user. The discussion period is now over. Thanks to all participants! I have started a vote [1] which will end 2022-09-06 17:30 (CEST). Best, David [1] https://aur.archlinux.

Re: [aur-general] package splitting

Mon, 2022-08-29 at 14:34 +0200, Thomas via aur-general wrote: Hi, I have 2 questions: 1) when is it allowed and / or good practice to split multiple packages by 1 PKGBUILD? For example I have created a package which pulls 3 debian packages and creates 3 Arch packages from it. I want to do tha

Re: [aur-general] package splitting

On Mon, 2022-08-29 at 14:34 +0200, Thomas via aur-general wrote: > Hi, > > I have 2 questions: > > 1) when is it allowed and / or good practice to split multiple packages by 1 > PKGBUILD? > For example I have created a package which pulls 3 debian packages and > crea

Re: [aur-general] package splitting

will do so.. Cheers Thomas Am 29.08.22 um 16:27 schrieb Leonidas Spyropoulos via aur-general: Hi Thomas, On 29/08/2022 15:34, Thomas via aur-general wrote: Hi, I have 2 questions: 1) when is it allowed and / or good practice to split multiple packages by 1 PKGBUILD? For example I have

Re: [aur-general] package splitting

Hi Thomas, On 29/08/2022 15:34, Thomas via aur-general wrote: > Hi, > > I have 2 questions: > > 1) when is it allowed and / or good practice to split multiple > packages by 1 PKGBUILD? > For example I have created a package which pulls 3 debian packages and > creates 3 Ar

[aur-general] package splitting

or should this avoided (if so why..)? 2) I found a bug in package splitting regarding the variable "pkgdesc" - when in AUR: it simply gets ignored when used in package_ functions. Example: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/systemd-libs-git -> Line 220: https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - blakkheim

On 8/25/22 17:40, Konstantin Gizdov via aur-general wrote: On 25/08/2022 18:08, T.J. Townsend via aur-general wrote: It can be a little confusing for new users because the tooling will print warnings about this: openiked W: Dependency glibc included but already satisfied openiked W: Dependency

Re: [aur-general] ungoogled-chromium-bin package submission

On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 10:18:23AM +0200, networkException via aur-general wrote: > Hello, > > I maintain / administer the ungoogled-chromium project and its Arch Linux > packaging. > > Last year I asked[1] about the submission rules for an > ungoogled-chromium-bin package

Re: [aur-general] Using the bug tracker to patch outdated packages (was: TU Application - blakkheim)

On 25/08/2022 22:04, Claudia Pellegrino via aur-general wrote: > Hi Leonidas, > >> What stops you from opening bug report and submitting patches for those >> now without being a TU? If these are in core/extras your options would >> be the same as you have now, right? >

Re: [aur-general] Using the bug tracker to patch outdated packages (was: TU Application - blakkheim)

On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 09:04:57PM +0200, Claudia Pellegrino via aur-general wrote: > Hi Leonidas, > > > What stops you from opening bug report and submitting patches for those > > now without being a TU? If these are in core/extras your options would > > be the sam

[aur-general] Using the bug tracker to patch outdated packages (was: TU Application - blakkheim)

g the bug tracker to submit patches for outdated packages is this warning: > Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. > Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List. followed by: > REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packag

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - blakkheim

On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 08:43:38PM +0300, Leonidas Spyropoulos via aur-general wrote: > > I'm the maintainer or co-maintainer for a few OpenBSD-derived packages > > in the AUR: openiked, rpki-client, and openbgpd. I've been involved with > > OpenBSD since 2014 and became a

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - blakkheim

On 16/08/2022 15:30, T.J. Townsend via aur-general wrote: > Hello. I'd like to apply to become a trusted user. Hi T.J. First of all best of luck! > I'm the maintainer or co-maintainer for a few OpenBSD-derived packages > in the AUR: openiked, rpki-client, and openbgpd. I've been

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - blakkheim

On 25/08/2022 18:08, T.J. Townsend via aur-general wrote: > It can be a little confusing for new users because the tooling will print > warnings about this: > > openiked W: Dependency glibc included but already satisfied > openiked W: Dependency openssl included but al

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - blakkheim

> hello T.J. > > you don't have many packages, and it was hard for me to > find something for nitpicking, but I still managed. > > # openiked > depends=('glibc' 'libevent' 'openssl') > it's hard to imagine a system without glibc installed, but I've seen the > same packages in our

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - blakkheim

On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 08:30:48AM -0400, T.J. Townsend via aur-general wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hello. I'd like to apply to become a trusted user. hello T.J. > I started using Arch around 2009 when we still had the curses installer,

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - blakkheim

On 2022-08-16 08:30:48 (-0400), T.J. Townsend via aur-general wrote: > Hello. I'd like to apply to become a trusted user. Hi all, this is a short reminder that more than a week has passed since the application process has started. If you want to ask questions, you still have until the 3

Re: [aur-general] [PRQ#37061] Deletion Request for taskfile-gotask-git

I was not aware of the other two go-task packages. I have created AUR/go-task-git and filed a merge request for AUR/taskfile-git to unify things. I have also changed the binary name to match the other two existing packages (go-task). I am still not 100% convinced that 'go-task' is a good name

Re: [aur-general] [PRQ#37061] Deletion Request for taskfile-gotask-git

r way to deal with those is not creating yet another AUR package, the proper way is to fix the existing one, which I have done, and then noticed you duplicated the package, hence I filed this deletion request. So we should expect deletion requests for all these packages, right? https://aur.archlinu

Re: [aur-general] [PRQ#37061] Deletion Request for taskfile-gotask-git

(resending as I was not subscribed to aur-general before) > It tab-completes very great. And even earlier than in your version. Only if you remember it starts with a 'g', instead of the original 't'. If you're following official documentation and trying to use 'task' and wondering why it's

Re: [aur-general] [PRQ#37061] Deletion Request for taskfile-gotask-git

Hello, forwarding a discussion about package deletion to AUR general list, as our thread didn't reach aur-requests. 22.08.2022 00:23, Stanislav N. aka pztrn пишет: 21.08.2022 23:56, Martin Rys пишет: I believe the request is still valid no matter which naming convention the executable

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - blakkheim

On 8/16/22 14:30, T.J. Townsend via aur-general wrote: Hello. I'd like to apply to become a trusted user. I started using Arch around 2009 when we still had the curses installer, rc.conf, hal... the good old days. I left at some point and came back as a full-time user about three years ago. You

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - blakkheim

On 2022-08-16 08:30, T.J. Townsend via aur-general wrote: I started using Arch around 2009 when we still had the curses installer, rc.conf, hal... the good old days. That was all awful and I much prefer the way things are now. :) signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - blakkheim

On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 09:59:57AM -0400, Santiago Torres-Arias wrote: > Hi! > > I wonder, do you have an AUR account we could peruse? > > Cheers! > -Santiago Here it is: https://aur.archlinux.org/account/blakkheim

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - blakkheim

Hi! I wonder, do you have an AUR account we could peruse? Cheers! -Santiago On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 08:30:48AM -0400, T.J. Townsend via aur-general wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hello. I'd like to apply to become a trusted user. > > I started

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - blakkheim

On 2022-08-16 08:30:48 (-0400), T.J. Townsend via aur-general wrote: > Hello. I'd like to apply to become a trusted user. > > I started using Arch around 2009 when we still had the curses installer, > rc.conf, hal... the good old days. I left at some point and came back as > a

[aur-general] TU Application - blakkheim

find me on IRC under the name blakkheim, usually in #archlinux-security since that's my main area of interest. I'm the maintainer or co-maintainer for a few OpenBSD-derived packages in the AUR: openiked, rpki-client, and openbgpd. I've been involved with OpenBSD since 2014 and became a project

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - serebit

On 2022-08-08 17:23, Jonas Witschel via aur-general wrote: > On 2022-07-25 13:57, Campbell Jones via aur-general wrote: > > My name is Campbell Jones, my online handle is serebit, and this is my > > application to become a Trusted User. [...] > > The discussion period is

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - serebit

On 2022-07-25 13:57, Campbell Jones via aur-general wrote: > My name is Campbell Jones, my online handle is serebit, and this is my > application to become a Trusted User. [...] The discussion period is over now, please cast your votes :) https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/138 Cheers,

[aur-general] Transifex aurweb

Hi Lucas, I'm trying to get some translation updates for aurweb and I believe this is managed from you. Can you please add me to the aurweb team so I can export them and update the repository .po files. Thanks you, -- Leonidas Spyropoulos PGP: 59E43E106B247368 OpenPGP_signature Description:

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - serebit

On 2022-07-25 13:57, Campbell Jones via aur-general wrote: > My name is Campbell Jones, my online handle is serebit, and this is my > application to become a > Trusted User. I've been graciously sponsored by Jonas Witschel (diabonas) and > Leonidas > Spyropoulos (artafinde). Hal

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - serebit

On 26/07/22, Campbell Jones via aur-general wrote: > On Jul 26, 2022, 4:35 PM, Jonas Witschel via aur-general < > aur-general@lists.archlinux.org> wrote: > > Having an active EndeavourOS contributor feels like a great way to bridge > > this perceived gap a bit. &g

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - serebit

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Jul 26, 2022, 4:35 PM, Jonas Witschel via aur-general < aur-general@lists.archlinux.org> wrote: > Having an active EndeavourOS contributor feels like a great way to bridge > this perceived gap a bit. Just to clarify, I am not an

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - serebit

On 2022-07-25 20:09, Jonathon Fernyhough via aur-general wrote: > While EndeavourOS is one of the closest derivatives I'm aware of, they still > have their own repo with some tooling and hooks which might (maybe) affect > things once installed (package building can/should be done in a c

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - serebit

On 25/07/2022 18:57, Campbell Jones via aur-general wrote: I currently have two machines - one desktop, which I use for most of my work, and one significantly less powerful laptop that I'm typing this email from. Both of these machines are currently running EndeavourOS, and not vanilla Arch

[aur-general] Python packaging: weird behaviour

Hello list, I'm currently trying to adapt my AUR packages to the new PEP 517 based build workflow [1]. Some users of the telegram-tg [2] package reported after I changed it to PEP 517, that they are missing the actual python files in the final package. I investigated a bit further and found out

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - serebit

Just to highlight the obvious, On 25/07/2022 14:57, Campbell Jones via aur-general wrote: I elected to install EndeavourOS as a way of getting a somewhat curated experience on Arch. -snip-> Though I haven't been on Arch for long Are you running EndeavourOS, or Arch? ;P OpenPGP_signat

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - serebit

On 2022-07-25 13:57, Campbell Jones via aur-general wrote: > My name is Campbell Jones, my online handle is serebit, and this is my > application to become a Trusted User. I've been graciously sponsored by Jonas > Witschel (diabonas) and Leonidas Spyropoulos (artafinde). [...] I c

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - serebit

On 25/07/2022 14:57, Campbell Jones via aur-general wrote: Hello all, My name is Campbell Jones, my online handle is serebit, and this is my application to become a Trusted User. I've been graciously sponsored by Jonas Witschel (diabonas) and Leonidas Spyropoulos (artafinde). [..] I confirm

[aur-general] TU Application - serebit

ption in its installer - so I elected to install EndeavourOS as a way of getting a somewhat curated experience on Arch. I had already been maintaining a couple AUR packages for Wraith Master for some time, so I had some experience with the PKGBUILD format already, and I decided to take up maintain

Re: [aur-general] Brazillian's mirrors are not found

Em seg., 18 de jul. de 2022 às 10:21, Rafael Fontenelle escreveu: > > Actually, archlinux-br.org was not replaced, it is listed below > archlinux-br.com.br. The tricky issue is that an out-of-sync mirror is > listed before a valid one. > Thanks, the archlinux-br.com.br does not respond to any

Re: [aur-general] Brazillian's mirrors are not found

On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 10:18 AM Leandro Inacio wrote: > Someone change the correct domain archlinux-br.org to archlinux-br.com.br. > > I don't understand why someone change the oldest to a new one created > yesterday. > > Actually, archlinux-br.org was not replaced, it is listed below

Re: [aur-general] Brazillian's mirrors are not found

Someone change the correct domain archlinux-br.org to archlinux-br.com.br. I don't understand why someone change the oldest to a new one created yesterday. Em seg., 18 de jul. de 2022 às 10:13, Rafael Fontenelle via aur-general < aur-general@lists.archlinux.org> escreveu: > archlinux-

Re: [aur-general] Brazillian's mirrors are not found

18, 2022 at 10:07 AM Leandro Inacio via aur-general < aur-general@lists.archlinux.org> wrote: > Em seg., 18 de jul. de 2022 às 00:34, Gabriel Dutra via aur-general < > aur-general@lists.archlinux.org> escreveu: > > > Dear all, > > > > On the download packa

Re: [aur-general] Brazillian's mirrors are not found

Em seg., 18 de jul. de 2022 às 00:34, Gabriel Dutra via aur-general < aur-general@lists.archlinux.org> escreveu: > Dear all, > > On the download package, the following mirrors are not found. > > - archlinux-br.com.br > <https://archlinux-br.com.br/archlinux/iso

Re: [aur-general] Brazillian's mirrors are not found

On 18/07/2022 04:34, Gabriel Dutra via aur-general wrote: Dear all, On the download package, the following mirrors are not found. - archlinux-br.com.br <https://archlinux-br.com.br/archlinux/iso/2022.07.01/> - archlinux-br.com.br <http://archlinux-br.com.br/archlinux/iso/2022.07.01/

[aur-general] Brazillian's mirrors are not found

Dear all, On the download package, the following mirrors are not found. - archlinux-br.com.br - archlinux-br.com.br

[aur-general] ungoogled-chromium-bin package submission

this topic https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2021-September/036581.html 2: The commit updated our release workflow https://github.com/ungoogled-software/ungoogled-chromium-archlinux/commit/88138af15f8231ec0f473e423f28cc29ef76f40f

Re: [aur-general] Python Package Update Review Request

On 30/06/2022 19:43, Sean Snell via aur-general wrote: > I apologize, I forgot to attach the PKGBUILD! Thanks, Sean > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 2:42 PM Sean Snell via aur-general < > aur-general@lists.archlinux.org> wrote: > >> Hello, Hi Sean, >> If I could get

Re: [aur-general] Python Package Update Review Request

I apologize, I forgot to attach the PKGBUILD! Thanks, Sean On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 2:42 PM Sean Snell via aur-general < aur-general@lists.archlinux.org> wrote: > Hello, > I'm fairly new to the PEP 517 workflow for Python Packaging however > python-dephell / setuptools have cr

[aur-general] Python Package Update Review Request

Hello, I'm fairly new to the PEP 517 workflow for Python Packaging however python-dephell / setuptools have created a problem where deprecated components are being invoked which, after further research, I've learned are related to the streamdeck-ui package

Re: [aur-general] Incorrect email at account registration

On 2022-06-27 11:40, JafsZero via aur-general wrote: Hello, Recently I created my account for the AUR but when adding my email I wrote incorrectly the domain as .xom instead of .com and I can't get the verification link to continue with the account registration process. The username

[aur-general] Incorrect email at account registration

Hello, Recently I created my account for the AUR but when adding my email I wrote incorrectly the domain as .xom instead of .com and I can't get the verification link to continue with the account registration process. The username is JafsZero with jafsz...@gmail.com as the correct email

[aur-general] Packaging Python projects without setup.py or PEP 517

What's the recommended way to go about packaging a Python project that doesn't use PEP 517 or setuptools/distutils? Is there a method with pip, is just copying the files to $pkgdir fine, or should a PEP 517/setup.py be implemented through a patch?

Re: [aur-general] Locked out of my account

mardi le 21 juin, 12022 à 07 h 45 +0100, Leonidas Spyropoulos via aur-general a écrit : There's no alternative email or PGP key mentioned on the account, only the SSH key. Do you still have the ssh key used on the AUR site? Leonidas Spyropoulos Thanks for your message. I dug out my old

Re: [aur-general] Locked out of my account

On 20/06/2022 22:24, dan soucy via aur-general wrote: Hi all, Hello, I am hoping to regain access to my aur account. The email used was `da...@archlinux.info`, using the now dead email service once hosted by (forum user) tredaelli. There's no alternative email or PGP key mentioned

[aur-general] Locked out of my account

Hi all, I am hoping to regain access to my aur account. The email used was `da...@archlinux.info`, using the now dead email service once hosted by (forum user) tredaelli. Here is one contribution I made to gcalcli, back in the day: https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/commit/?h=gcalcli

Re: [aur-general] Ask for review for PKGBUILD

Thanks for feedback from both of you, I will update a week later. 2022年6月19日(日) 3:40 Xiretza via aur-general : > > On 19/06/2022 03.47, Dunzhi Zhou via aur-general wrote: > > Dear, > > > > I am new to this mail list, hence please let me know anything if

Re: [aur-general] Ask for review for PKGBUILD

Hi, On Sunday, 19 June 2022 03:47:44 CEST Dunzhi Zhou via aur-general wrote: > I am new to this mail list, hence please let me know anything if I didn't > do properly. Maybe you can also replace the direct calls to setup.py in build() and package() with the PEP 517 workflow.

Re: [aur-general] Ask for review for PKGBUILD

I am new to this mail list, hence please let me know anything if I didn't do properly. There is a GitHub repository (https://github.com/fancompute/ceviche) I want to pack it up as a python library for ez maintenance if there is any future update from the original authors. Last, I attach my

[aur-general] Ask for review for PKGBUILD

Dear, I am new to this mail list, hence please let me know anything if I didn't do properly. There is a GitHub repository (https://github.com/fancompute/ceviche) I want to pack it up as a python library for ez maintenance if there is any future update from the original authors. Last, I attach

Re: [aur-general] Subdirectories: is my workaround acceptable?

On 16/06/2022 17:42, Claudia Pellegrino via aur-general wrote: Hi fellow AUR maintainers, Hello Claudia, [..] I started working around that limitation by including a tarball [2] with my PKGBUILDs instead of a .vscode directory. While aurweb would have rejected that directory, it does accept

Re: [aur-general] Real name leaked to AUR

On Tue, Jun 14, 2022, at 15:16, StarQuake via aur-general wrote: > Hello, > > I just accidentally made a commit with my real name. And I am not allowed > to fix it with a force push. Could someone fix this please? > > I would want it to be starquake. Fixed.

[aur-general] Real name leaked to AUR

Hello, I just accidentally made a commit with my real name. And I am not allowed to fix it with a force push. Could someone fix this please? I would want it to be starquake. https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/log/?h=pacman-backup-hook Hope you can help me. Kind regards, StarQuake --

Re: [aur-general] Undeletion requests and TU role

ly restoring a package. I've sent an email on AUR requests ML one or two weeks ago to talk about the archive.org DMCA exception in one of them but still no reply, maybe I've done it in the wrong way. I was mostly here today for missing dependencies users were complaining about in packages I maintain

Re: [aur-general] Undeletion requests and TU role

Anyone *can* restore a package by just pushing a new commit to the package's git repo. Though usually packages are deleted for a reason, so you might want to ask a TU before blindly restoring a package. On 12/06/2022 18.39, Pellegrino Prevete via aur-general wrote: After an AUR package gets

Re: [aur-general] User MarsSeed spamming perl-* packages requesting maintainers not to do pkgrel bumps

I've forwarded this email to the specified user. -- George Rawlinson signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[aur-general] User MarsSeed spamming perl-* packages requesting maintainers not to do pkgrel bumps

Hi, the user MarsSeed[0] is spamming AUR packages which perform a pkgrel bump for perl version updates with a prewritten comment asking package maintainers not to do that, examples: [1][2][3]. While their reasoning is questionable, I think the AUR/TUs do not have an official stance

[aur-general] keenerd unresponsiveness

Hi All, I've tried to reach out to keenerd a couple of times about dropping some packages of him such as geda-gaf (which lets us drop guile2.0, gtk2 in the future etc.). But I haven't heard back about these mails. David has also tried to contact him about his key expiring and being unable

Re: [aur-general] Possible spam account

On 2022-05-07 15:06, Michael Kogan via aur-general wrote: Hi guys, The user InstallerLegacy [1] just adopted gnome-vfs [2], added himself, including a contact address, to the PKGBUILD head without any further changes, then orphaned the package again two minutes thereafter. Since the account has

[aur-general] Possible spam account

Hi guys, The user InstallerLegacy [1] just adopted gnome-vfs [2], added himself, including a contact address, to the PKGBUILD head without any further changes, then orphaned the package again two minutes thereafter. Since the account has been created just today, maintains no packages and lists

Re: [aur-general] Removal of Andrzej Giniewicz as Trusted User due to prolonged inactivity

On 2022-05-05 16:09:00 (+0200), David Runge via aur-general wrote: > The results are in: > > Yes No Abstain Total Participation > 441 8 53 85.48% > > This means giniu is now no longer a Trusted User. > > I hereby would like to extend my g

Re: [aur-general] Removal of Andrzej Giniewicz as Trusted User due to prolonged inactivity

On 2022-04-28 12:47:07 (+0200), David Runge via aur-general wrote: > On 2022-04-25 12:20:47 (+0200), David Runge via aur-general wrote: > > The discussion period will last for three days, after that I will open > > the vote, which will last for five days. > > The vote has

Re: [aur-general] Renaming AUR Repository

Thanks! May 3, 2022, 11:00 by aur-general@lists.archlinux.org: > On 2022-04-23 14:12, Tuhana GAYRETLİ via aur-general wrote: > >> I'm not pushing to jura-font directly because it maybe conflict with >> ttf-jura, because it already exists. >> > > This is correct, i

Re: [aur-general] Renaming AUR Repository

On 2022-04-23 14:12, Tuhana GAYRETLİ via aur-general wrote: I'm not pushing to jura-font directly because it maybe conflict with ttf-jura, because it already exists. This is correct, it will actually block you from pushing. It sounds like you are on the right track with naming though

Re: [aur-general] Removal of Andrzej Giniewicz as Trusted User due to prolonged inactivity

On 2022-04-25 12:20:47 (+0200), David Runge via aur-general wrote: > The discussion period will last for three days, after that I will open > the vote, which will last for five days. The vote has now started: https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/137 Best, David -- https://sleepmap.de signatu

[aur-general] Removal of Andrzej Giniewicz as Trusted User due to prolonged inactivity

ckager key. However, this never happened and meanwhile Andrzej's last TU vote is 131 (we're at 136) and he has last logged in to the AUR on 2022-02-14. In January I reached out publicly [3] to ask for progress on the matter, but got no reply. Privately I have again attempted to reach out on 2022-04-0

[aur-general] Renaming AUR Repository

Hi. I have an AUR repo named `ttf-jura`[1], which is a font package. After I read AUR Font Publishing wiki, I noticed I need to split TTF, OTF and variable variations, so I split `ttf-jura` as `ttf-jura`, `otf-jura` and `ttf-jura-variable` and changed pkgbase as `jura-font`. But since `ttf

Re: [aur-general] Deletion of vi-vim-symlink and neovim-symlinks

On 22-04-22 10:42, Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote: > I think I'll be re-uploading unless you can show me > where this violates the rules. No need, both packages have been restored. They do not have a maintainer, so feel free to pick them back up. -- George Rawlinson signatu

Re: [aur-general] Deletion of vi-vim-symlink and neovim-symlinks

On 2022-04-22 08:31:27, Brett Cornwall via aur-general wrote: > Secondly, please remember that TUs exist to actually "force" our views onto > everyone via quality control. Is that so? In my understanding the TUs job is to enforce the criteria laid out in the submission rules n

Re: [aur-general] Deletion of vi-vim-symlink and neovim-symlinks

On 2022-04-22 10:42, Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote: > [...] As such, I think I'll be re-uploading unless you can show me > where this violates the rules. Without going into the details of this dispute, I will point out that this is not how the AUR works: the Trusted Users are the mode

Re: [aur-general] Deletion of vi-vim-symlink and neovim-symlinks

On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 08:31:27 -0700 Brett Cornwall wrote: > On 2022-04-22 09:58, Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote: > >Recently vi-vim-symlink and neovim-symlinks were deleted from the AUR. These > >are used by a lot of people to set up their systems, and a lot of people > &g

Re: [aur-general] Deletion of vi-vim-symlink and neovim-symlinks

On 2022-04-22 09:58, Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote: Recently vi-vim-symlink and neovim-symlinks were deleted from the AUR. These are used by a lot of people to set up their systems, and a lot of people want to know why [1]. They do not violate any AUR rules and have been available

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >