Don't know how many tugs would conform either
-Cath
On 20/05/2010, at 3:49 PM, Tim Shirley wrote:
And by the way, a rule requiring a glider to be established on final at 500
ft could be used as an example in a dictionary definition of the word
"silly".
_
All this seems to be the sensible advice - make the proper radio
calls and you can continue to use the low finish permission in CAO
95.4 (of which the straight-in is the most efficient use of airspace
and time), so long as you are not stuffing up other traffic by doing so.
If you know you have
At 06:14 PM 20/05/2010, you wrote:
No, provided you broadcast your intentions and give way to all / any circuit
traffic, who have right of way.
John H
Well, do they really when one aircraft is a glider and it is low and
trying to land?
Mike
Borgelt Instruments - manufacturers of quality s
)
Sent: Thursday, 20 May 2010 1:27 PM
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] New Non Controlled Aerodrome ops
Does this change in any way our exemption to perform low level finishes
?
-Original Message-
From: aus-soaring-boun
At 03:50 PM 20/05/2010, you wrote:
Also I think all glider pilots should be aware the correct
procedure in the event of a radio failure at a certified or
registered airport (they now all require radio)
So what are the correct procedures? I haven't seen any in writing?
I It is not the norm
...@lists.internode.on.net] On Behalf Of Texler,
Michael
Sent: Thursday, 20 May 2010 14:20
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] New Non Controlled Aerodrome ops
>Does this change in any way our exemption to perform low level finishes
?
Good
I went CASA seminar 3 or 4 weeks ago and I got the impression arrival with
base and final only circuit or just a straight in (and give calls
as appropriate) are approved arrival methods for all airports. Also I think
all glider pilots should be aware the correct procedure in the event of a
radio fa
ode.on.net
[mailto:aus-soaring-boun...@lists.internode.on.net] On Behalf Of Texler,
Michael
Sent: Thursday, 20 May 2010 12:20 PM
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] New Non Controlled Aerodrome ops
>Does this change in any way our exemption to perf
>Does this change in any way our exemption to perform low level finishes
?
Good question.
I haven't heard an official GFA statement yet WRT new regs and low level
finishes.
I am referring to (OPERATIONS DIRECTIVE 1/06 - Low Level Finish Pilot
Endorsements): http://2009.gfa.org.au/Docs/ops/OD%201
Maybe a dud pilot!
Dave
From: "Texler, Michael"
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
Sent: Thu, 20 May, 2010 1:32:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] New Non Controlled Aerodrome ops (hopefully useful
rant)
>If a pilot s
relating to Soaring in Australia.
Subject: [Aus-soaring] New Non Controlled Aerodrome ops
Hi All,
I attended to CASA Class D and non-towered aerodrome ops seminar.
The chnages to radio procedures anp ops seem sensible, more onus on the
pilot doing what is safe and sensible.
The anecdote was recalled
>If a pilot says something on the radio, and nobody hears him, is he
still there?
According to the CASA dudes that spoke on Tuesday, they don't really
care if you are in Class G airspace! The CASA police aren't listening to
every transmission on 126.7 MHz live. Not even CENSAR uses your
transmis
, 20 May 2010 12:06
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
Subject: [Aus-soaring] New Non Controlled Aerodrome ops
Hi All,
I attended to CASA Class D and non-towered aerodrome ops seminar.
The chnages to radio procedures anp ops seem sensible, more onus on the
pilot doing what is
Hi All,
I attended to CASA Class D and non-towered aerodrome ops seminar.
The chnages to radio procedures anp ops seem sensible, more onus on the
pilot doing what is safe and sensible.
The anecdote was recalled that around Caboolture and adjacent
aerodromes, the CTAF was so congested with calls t
14 matches
Mail list logo
